To access the remainder of this piece of premium content, you must be registered with Firehouse. Already have an account? Login
Register in seconds by connecting with your preferred Social Network.
Complete the registration form.
After reviewing and correcting a 256-page deposition transcript, I just have to shout out for the forgotten "victims" in the legal process. When I raised my right hand and took the oath of office as fire and EMS chief, I knew that a tremendous amount of responsibility would follow. I was aware and prepared for long days, short nights and a lot physical and mental stress. However, I didn't realize the overwhelming impact that frivolous lawsuits would have on me, the organization and the city government.
The related legal work effort is tremendous, from finding and gathering documents to depositions to a rare trial, there has to be a better way for the American fire-rescue service to do a better job in this out-of-control process. This brief column will outline one powerful way that relief could be provided or at the very least greatly reduce this incredible waste of time, energy and money.
Let me open by saying that I firmly believe in the American justice system. Further, there are many cases where a government or a supervisor has illegally, immorally and improperly treated subordinate employees. In fact, there are cases where employees were treated so wrongly that the court system offered significant relief to those harmed. However, a growing number of frivolous, unwarranted and needless lawsuits are being filed in the fire-rescue service. Let me start by discussing a case in point that I am personally aware of and can address.
A portion of the above-mentioned transcript review was a line of questioning about why a battalion chief was demoted to the rank of captain. The interrogatory question that proceeded the deposition hearing demanded a detailed explanation and rationale as to how and why such punitive action was taken against the officer (in this column, people and departments will remain nameless for obvious reasons). When I read demands like this one, I must admit my stomach tends to do a flip flop or two. However, after reading the demand and reflecting back to the facts of the situation, my anxiety turns to disappointment.
The real story reveals that after completing four years of the National Fire Academy's Executive Fire Officer program and completing a three-week Harvard University summer course (perhaps the greatest amount of money and time the city had invested in an employee to prepare for an administrative position within the fire-rescue department), a battalion chief was reassigned to manage a support-services function; specifically, the job duties and responsibilities required the command officer to oversee all of the real property (fire stations) to include fire-rescue apparatus management.
Without question, this is one of the most important and mission-critical positions in the department and one that this person was using tens of thousands of city training dollars to prepare to handle. As you might have guessed, this highly important position required the incumbent to be assigned to day work, typically working five eight-hour days per week. The much-sought-after shift of eight to nine 24-hour shifts per month would become a thing of the past for this very well administratively trained command officer.
My guess is that everyone reading this knows what happened next. The former chief officer requested, in writing, a reduction in rank to captain that included a plea to stay on the most-valued shift schedule. One would think that the city attorneys could resolve this miscarriage of justice (a boldfaced lie), but that would not to be the case. This fabricated complaint required a detailed written response; followed up with being "prepared" to answer verbal questions about this "mandated action" (actually voluntarily requested) demotion in rank.