Some departments call them job ratings; others may refer to them as “annual evals.” Regardless of the local nomenclature, properly evaluating the performance of an employee is not easy. Even when done correctly, it is a time-consuming and sometimes awkward task. This prompts many departments...
To access the remainder of this piece of premium content, you must be registered with Firehouse. Already have an account? Login
Register in seconds by connecting with your preferred Social Network.
Complete the registration form.
Some departments call them job ratings; others may refer to them as “annual evals.” Regardless of the local nomenclature, properly evaluating the performance of an employee is not easy. Even when done correctly, it is a time-consuming and sometimes awkward task. This prompts many departments to degrade the evaluations process into a ticket-punching, hoop-jumping, obligatory paperwork exercise that is nothing short of meaningless. By bastardizing this very legitimate process, these departments rob themselves of a tremendous opportunity to help develop their people.
Personnel may think their performance is being evaluated for these four reasons:
1. To lay the groundwork so an employee can be fired.
2. To get a merit pay increase. Personnel may well get a step increase in pay for satisfactory performance. However, pencil whipping a performance form each year in order to help out a brother or sister get some extra money does not bring about the desired outcome.
3. To get some extra points added to an overall promotional examination score. If your department still practices the aforementioned, you are asking for trouble. This creates a situation where firefighters want to work for the more liberal officers who know how to play the “flower it up” game. Why do you think assessment centers use anywhere from three to five different evaluators? It is to eliminate this kind of bias that can be injected by a single evaluator process.
4. To create busy work. It may very well seem like busy work if nothing is ever done with the evaluations to indicate that they serve any legitimate purpose. Regardless of what happens with the paperwork, don’t miss the opportunity to sit down with your personnel to advise them of how they are doing.
Why Evaluate Personnel?
The following are my top six legitimate reasons for evaluating personnel
1. So employees will know how they are doing.
2. To shore up areas of weakness. Everyone has weaknesses or blind spots. Providing constructive, diplomatic remedies to better the employee is a vital component within the job of the supervisor. If left unchecked, these deficiencies will become magnified, cause hard feelings within the work group and possibly disenfranchise the worker who has yet to receive word from his or her boss that a problem even exists.
3. To keep competencies honed. Don’t assume that because an employee is proficient in an area that he or she will always be proficient. New equipment or technologies, and em-ployee apathy or overconfidence all must keep the supervisor constantly alert as to the skill levels of his or her people.
4. To increase employee productivity and satisfaction. Despite what some would lead us to believe, productive workforces are the most satisfied workforces. When employees know that they are making an impact in their community, and for their organization, they will go above and beyond the call of duty to have an even greater impact. While it is true that lackadaisical workforces don’t have to do as much work, they are also the most miserable personally and professionally.
5. To prepare personnel for promotions. The objective is not to give an employee a high rating to beat the other candidates with bonus points. The objective is to develop the individual so that he or she can assume the role of the rank they are seeking without a learning curve once they find themselves in the new position. Proper performance evaluations help pave the way for employee success as they move up within the organization.
6. To enhance or create dialogue. Supervisors must have a relationship and level of trust and with their crewmembers that allows them to sit down and work out problems. This can be very awkward, particularly for those with more introverted personalities. However, it is a skill that can be mastered through practice and development. Keeping lines of communication open may sound cliche, but it is a key component to problem solving.