To access the remainder of this piece of premium content, you must be registered with Firehouse. Already have an account? Login
Register in seconds by connecting with your preferred Social Network.
Complete the registration form.
Once upon a time, 16 years ago, there was a member of Congress who promised to support legislation that concerned the fire-rescue service. But when it came time to pass an important bill, he switched sides and voted against the firefighters. A few months later, on Election Day, they voted against him - as did many others - and he was booted out of office. (Apparently, firefighters weren't the only people he double crossed.) Better yet, the candidate who beat him became a strong supporter of the fire service and was re-elected to seven more terms.
We're now in the midst of another political campaign and it's time to remember that on Election Day you have a chance to punish your enemies and reward your friends. Between now and Nov. 5, we will be bombarded by promises from candidates who are running for local, state and federal offices. This year, many will attempt to identify with firefighters, who have become America's favorite heroes. The trick is to figure out who really is your friend and who merely wants to exploit your image for a "photo op" or a television ad.
In the aftermath of 9/11, it's difficult to find a politician who hasn't declared his or her unwavering support for the nation's first responders. It's like being in favor of motherhood. But how deep does it go and who really means it? Who has a record that shows support for the fire service? Who has the integrity and the skill to deliver on their campaign promises? Who can be trusted? It all comes down to character and that's not an easy thing to judge.
For example, in one campaign, a few of us who were concerned about fire issues met privately with several candidates for local offices. If elected, they would control the fire-rescue budget. In response to our questions, each one looked us in the eye and promised they would never cut the fire budget and would maintain a minimum staffing of four career firefighters on every company. All were elected and within their first year in office made drastic cuts in the fire budget that reduced staffing to three on most companies. When I reminded them of their broken campaign promises, one complained that I didn't understand "fiscal reality."
The truth is I understood perfectly. "Reality" was that they didn't have the guts to cut the school or police budgets and the fire department was an easy target because no one would challenge it. The public and the news media didn't understand and didn't care. There were no editorials opposing the fire-rescue cuts and no outraged reaction from any citizens' groups. However, the politicians did make good on their promise to the voters that they would cut taxes, which is why there wasn't enough money to maintain four-man fire companies.
Aside from showing that I'm a poor judge of character, there are other lessons to be learned from this experience. Beware of any candidates who promise to cut taxes; it's usually a warning sign the fire department will suffer if they are elected. Also, fight as hard as you can against any ballot measure that calls for tax and spending limitations; that is like a flashing red light and almost guaranteed to cripple the fire service.
This is the first major election since the 9/11 terrorist attacks and it will be interesting to see how much political change has actually occurred. It's gratifying that the public and elected officials have developed this great admiration for firefighters, but will it result in fire departments finally getting the resources that are desperately needed, not only for the defense against terrorism, but to do their everyday job of responding to fires, accidents and emergency medical calls? The prime responsibility for this lies with local government, which is why "fire politics" - like all politics - begins and ends at the local level.