Sand Creek Lynn
03-21-2000, 12:46 PM
I'm putting together a tanker filling system using a 1500 gpm pump that I'm about to buy.
Pump is high volume [obviously] but quite low pressure. According to the performance curve it goes to 0 gpm at about 80 psi. So I'm interested in keeping the pressure extremely low. Will draft with 6 in. and fill with 5 in. ldh. Through 4 in. storz fittings. 4 in. because all our mutual aid uses 4 in. I'll be ok on my pressure using 50 feet of 5 in. through a 5 in. gate valve and the 4in. storz.
So anyway I called Akron and an engineer there said when going through a restriction there is no noticible pressure loss if the length of the restriction is less than 2.5 times the diameter of the restriction.
Example: 2.5 in. valve. If less than 6.25 in. long [2.5 X 2.5] I will have no noticible loss.
So.... theoretically I could hook my 5in. line to a 2.5 in. fill valve on the back of my tanker and flow 1500 gpm though it without excess pressure loss. I'm not going to but the theory presents an interesting thing to contemplate.
My question: in theory this would work.
Has anyone played with something like this to see if theory and reality are similar?
Thanks, Lynn.
Pump is high volume [obviously] but quite low pressure. According to the performance curve it goes to 0 gpm at about 80 psi. So I'm interested in keeping the pressure extremely low. Will draft with 6 in. and fill with 5 in. ldh. Through 4 in. storz fittings. 4 in. because all our mutual aid uses 4 in. I'll be ok on my pressure using 50 feet of 5 in. through a 5 in. gate valve and the 4in. storz.
So anyway I called Akron and an engineer there said when going through a restriction there is no noticible pressure loss if the length of the restriction is less than 2.5 times the diameter of the restriction.
Example: 2.5 in. valve. If less than 6.25 in. long [2.5 X 2.5] I will have no noticible loss.
So.... theoretically I could hook my 5in. line to a 2.5 in. fill valve on the back of my tanker and flow 1500 gpm though it without excess pressure loss. I'm not going to but the theory presents an interesting thing to contemplate.
My question: in theory this would work.
Has anyone played with something like this to see if theory and reality are similar?
Thanks, Lynn.