PDA

View Full Version : Two veteran fire managers speak out about the Thirtymile Fire


smketer
09-02-2002, 08:16 PM
Two veteran fire managers speak out about the Thirtymile Fire

After hearing the news and reading the paper about the Thirtymile Fire incident and the unprecedented punishment of local firefighters, we can no longer keep quiet and watch our fellow firefighters take the blame for a tragic accident.

We have fought fire and managed fire for over 30 years. Between us we have 60 years of experience in a very high-risk occupation, which taught us that from time to time a series of events occur that result in a tragedy such as the one last summer. The Forest Service and other wildland fire management agencies do not need policy changes or reforms designed by Congress or other laypersons and non-fire personnel. The policy and safety procedures have been in place for many years, and have been hard-proven over time. Any improvements would require highly experienced wildland firefighters, not grieving, political, or monetarily motivated laypersons.

We two highly experienced wildfire firefighters are wondering just what those improvements might be. Today, they are not teaching the crew boss that your people are your ultimate responsibility. All crew bosses and squad bosses are trained that if you can't meet the 10 standard orders and the 18 situations that shout "watch out," you don't go. We're sorry, but the bottom line is: It's the crew leadership that is responsible.

If congressman Hastings and congresswoman Cantwell want to point fingers and look for scapegoats, they should look in their own backyard. They took away the budget and made professional firefighters into generalists who take on all jobs that have no financing or jobs that are considered beneath all the other so-called, "specialists/professionals," and still had to maintain their fire expertise. Whatever happened to the National Fire Plan? We know our national forests ramped up their firefighting organization because of the National Fire Plan and folks from Washington, D.C. promised the budget to fund the effort. Because of budget cut backs, fire managers now have to figure out ways of cutting costs and still maintain a safe and efficient workforce. If we look at it that way, then Congress is responsible for all firefighter deaths!

Wildland firefighting is a highly dangerous occupation and does not need amateurs like Congress and OSHA interfering. Leave it to the professionals! Many top-level fire managers have very little fire experience. In fact, currently a person could become a crew boss or higher based on two or three fires and some training. In our day, we had to prove our skill by fire. It took about 50 fires to upgrade to the next level.

Another problem is that other parts of the agency have not been taught the part of the book that has always taken precedence over the other "manual" procedures and restrictions: wildfire takes precedence over any other resource needs in a time of emergency.

To have our local fire personnel blamed for the unfortunate deaths is wrong. To have our local fire personnel punished by a "stand down" and reassigned to non-supervisory positions is appalling. They have not even been told what they did wrong.

We are ashamed of today's Forest Service, which is not backing its firefighters under adverse conditions. There was a time when it would.

We have worked with the local people in question and support each and every one of them. We would follow them on any fire in any region; they have been there. We know they would not and did not violate any safety policy or procedure that would involve the unfortunate deaths of the young firepersons.

Another problem: There has been too much emphasis put on teaching the fire shelter as a safety net. It is not and never has been. Our current day firefighters need to spend more time on avoiding these types of circumstances, not how to deploy a fire shelter. It is not rocket science. Once you have learned how to deploy a fire shelter, you should know how they work for the rest of one's career. We look at it this way: if you pop a shelter then you have made an extremely dangerous mistake. If a firefighter uses a shelter they are in the wrong place. We have never used them in our 30 years of fire experience and neither have the managers and crew bosses implicated of wrong doing at Thirtymile.

We do not want to come across as uncaring. As fellow firefighters and parents of firefighters, we also grieve for the young firefighters who died and for their families. However, the fact is—and has always been—that the final responsibility for each and every crewmember lies within the crew itself. We have taught that for the last 30 years, and it remains true today. It cannot be any other way.

Do not turn our remaining firefighters into political scapegoats. For that matter, do not allow the current agency administrators to hide behind our firefighters and use them as political scapegoats. We need them.

Do you know there are very few qualified fire leaders left in the Methow! The qualified are on stand down. Who wants to fight fire now?



Thought you all might like to read this,
Stay Safe,

RxFire
09-04-2002, 03:15 AM
Smketer - was this in a local paper or something... this is the first I've heard of this? you can email me if you'd prefer with the info.

Thanks...

NJFFSA16
09-05-2002, 06:02 PM
Did these two veterans do this anonymously...or are their names attached to the document?

I, for one, will not take any credence in an unsigned document. Sure, it raises some good points, but without knowing the sources and their involvement with this fire...I can not accept their evaluations or comments. If they weren't there...well, they have no way of knowing.

smketer
09-07-2002, 12:11 PM
Hello Sorry it took me so long to get back with everyone.

The guys who wrote the story is Roy E. Skelton and Terence L. McCabe, who are both retired fire management officers from the Twisp/Winthrop ranger districts.

Everyone can also find more infomation on www.smokejumpers.com


I am sure that we will also be reading about the story in more papers here soon as well.

Stay Safe,

RxFire
09-07-2002, 02:15 PM
Smketer, thanks for the info on the authors and where this was published.

Hope things are winding down there and you are able to catch a good break before going into burning season hard and heavy.

TC/SS

Celt
09-08-2002, 12:29 PM
I have read this post several times and am in agreement on some issues and view some others from a different perspective. I certainly agree we have entered a politically motivated period. The unfortunate part is that policy drives our actions as an agency, and policy comes from some of the most dishonest and self effacing people in the country, our politicians. I don't think they are totally to blame. I see "us", that is the wildland fire service agencys guilty of convincing them what is correct. NWCG is a political organization that certainly has to defend their positions, after all that is what we teach our young firefighters. If you look at the NWCG sanctioned material over the past decade or so, it is a mass of tactical cheers that actually do not provide any direction to making good decisions. The statement made by the retirees comes from a generation that developed the original 10/13. What you have to understand here is, they developed and learned the original 10 orders as a decision process, not a mash of 10 items that do not show an interrelationship. It works like this, (Situational Awareness) the first few orders direct you to know your target, what is the fire doing right now, what is the weather, and what is the predicted weather (identify the tactical hazards and risks). Next based on your tactics you will want to know what the fire is doing, that you have ways to exit the fire area safely, and you can communicate the needs to everyone. Last you need to be assured of the human factors side, that is good clear command and control, leadership demonstrated through logical behaviors. Then, and only then do we commit to supprsion activities. NWCG does not profess process. The recently initiated Risk Management Process is good, it works, and takes us away from the LCES trap we have built for ourselves. The only problem is, it is only included in one NWCG course, and is not that well explained, and never used, and never tested. We would rather give the LCES cheer, lay all the responsibiltiy on the firefighters, and in retrospect of the accident, say to the investigators, "I don't know what they were thinking, I told them to be safe and remember LCES." We have lost our relationship to the land. We no longer spend time in the mountains, it's all done on the virtual reality machine. Congress knows the numbers because that's what we provide them. A point here is the urban interface situation. It's a crock. People buy the land, own their own house, live a non-compatible and un-sustainable life style, refuse to accept their own responsibiltiy, and we promote the problem as a forest fuels issue. Why? To go to Congress and get fuels management funding, justified on houses, not on what we as resource management agencies were charted to do, and that is manage resources based on resource management objectives (commdities, forest health). That is where our managers are, that is where our focus on firefighter safety is, and on where management decisions come from. The focus is to find out who is to blame, and in this case it is the firefighters. Just like we cannot tell homeowners it's their responsibility, we blame the forests. We don't blame our educational and organizational system, we blame firefighters. It's easy to say they did not adhere to LCES and that is why they died; but understand that LCES is only the mitigation part, it's not the whole process. You have to recognize the hazard, assess the risks, measure opportunities for success, mitigate the risks, communicate those to everyone, provide opportunity for questions and clarification, recognize what to monitor and how that will be done, and know how often you will get updated information (and what that will be) and how you will use it to reassess your situation. This long sentence does not spell LCES, or 10/18, or the downhill guides, or any other acronym or politically directed foo faw raw. Why do we teach the use of fire shelters? Because they work, and as long as we refuse to help firefighters and fire managers to make good logical decisions, we are going to use them. If you are threatened, and pop a shelter, you have not failed at anything. You are merely trying to save your life. No shame, and certainly there should be no ridicule. With the lack of proaction in our agencies to change the current trends, wouldn't you want to protect yourself? What a stupid way to build experience. We are capable of better, and we deserve better, and need to question how to use the material we are taught, and learn from the successful how they are successful. Base our actions on the process, not the cheers. jim steele