View Full Version : OH FF Certification Levels
WTFD10
11-30-2002, 09:59 AM
Does anyone else think it's time Ohio updated the training and certification level for Volunteer Firefighters?
Michigan requires their vollies to complete 240 hour Firefighter II. Why can't we? Or at least FF I.
IMHO, the current 1-A training gives us just enough knowledge to get into trouble.
Anyone else have an opinion on this?
(And before anyone jumps on me, I am a Volunteer)
Lieutenant07
12-14-2002, 06:11 PM
I do believe that Ohio should update the training requirements.
The 36 hour class is a joke. It does not prepare people as firefighters. I feel sorry for the folks that only get their 1-A and nothing else.
Firedan38
12-19-2002, 02:14 PM
what are we going to do about those who were "grandfathered in" when the state decided to organize the firefighter training, and what about those who were trained to vff before the current 1-A,1-B,1-C, came about. are they going to require them to obtain the new training?, It would be beneficial for them but if most dept. are like mine....."It aint gonna happen". I for one am all for changing the current system. most of the 36 hour ff's I have seen just know enough to get thesmselves or somebody else killed. I beleive there should be a continuing education requirement for all FF, if they dont meet the hours they get their FF certs. pulled. just like EMT's, and I also feel that there should be an age limit for being consdered an active firefighter.(that should start something :0), i just dont feel comfortable arriving on scene with a crew of 4, and of them 3 being over 60. i have ranted enough.
MJFire
12-26-2002, 10:03 PM
while it would benefit all departments to move to higher cert levels ,until the state puts funding into departments with the training as prerequisite ,little is going to happen .If your dept is like many those 36 hr greenhorns will need much guidance from the experienced members,whether they have that ff1 level
And about the age limits ,a group must be very careful not to restrict participation without cause for any reason ,let alone age . Aparently ,firedan ,you are prepared to fight fire by yourself if you dont allow older ff to respond
ProFfrL474
12-30-2002, 12:10 PM
My feelings are that there should be an obvious and apparent differentiation among levels of firefighters. I am personally a career full time paid firefighter and am as proud of my profession as are other people that call themselves "firefighters" I don't see those in the medical field who don't complete the medical programs afforded the name of doctor or pysician, they are known as a physicians assistant, those that are not surgeons are surgical assistants. The list goes on and on such as journeyman, technician, auxilary, etc,etc. I am offended that my profession allows people who have little and sometimes no training to be known as firefighters. How about we call those who want to be "firefighters", but don't have the proper certifications or training "Firefighter assistants" or something other than firefighters???Would you go to someone for a cardiac condition and accept them as a physician and call them doctor if they only 1/8 of the training as those who complete the medical program???What do you think???
PFink19
01-04-2003, 09:47 AM
It seems to me what needs to be remembered is that the 1a class should only be used as a structured orientation to the fire service. 1a certification should not be the destination but instead a step in the right direction, whether the Firefighter goes on to be a level 1 or 2 or instead learns the job through training at his dept. is what is important. I am a career firefighter but have also spent a large portion of my service (T&I cert. in 1976) as a volunteer. If your department does not have a comprehensive on-going training program for its members then we have met the enemy at it is you. Also I am proud to serve with and share the title of Firefighter with any member that is willing to get up on those cold february mornings at 0200 hrs. and go and do their best to help. It is way to easy to look at a member who works 40+ hrs a week to support their family and say you need to be level 1 or 2. Remeber we are all brothers and sisters just doing what we can, it would be great if all of us could commit to training to level 2 but we have to be realistic. Be safe and watch out for each other.
WTFD10
01-04-2003, 11:29 AM
1a certification should not be the destination but instead a step in the right direction, whether the Firefighter goes on to be a level 1 or 2 or instead learns the job through training at his dept. is what is important.
PFink you are correct, however, how many Firefighters go beyond it? My experience is not many. If the state required it, they'd have no choice. My department has one two hour drill per week but how much can you get done in two hours?
It is way to easy to look at a member who works 40+ hrs a week to support their family and say you need to be level 1 or 2.
They do it in Michigan. They attend one or two nights a week and an occasional 8 hour session on Saturdays.
Also I am proud to serve with and share the title of Firefighter with any member that is willing to get up on those cold february mornings at 0200 hrs. and go and do their best to help. Remember we are all brothers and sisters just doing what we can
I share your opinion on this and chose not to reply to the post by someone who obviously has some strong anti-volunteer opinions.
My point in this thread is that Ohio should mandate further training for all firefighters just like neighboring states do. This would provide two great benefits:
1) ALL Firefighters would be safer, more competent and better trained.
2) "Full Time Professional Fire Fighters" would have to find another reason to look down on those of us who are "always on call" ;)
Stay safe!
ProFfrL474
01-07-2003, 11:24 AM
My response to your post must be a problem for you, I apologize for any interpretation on your part. I am a proud IAFF Firefighter and am not ANTI-Volunteer. I was just raising another question on your topic and expressing my opinion. I just do not feel that as inherently dangerous as the job of a firefighter is that all who receive a certification of ANY level from the state should be performing the same job & duties & call themself by the same name of "firefighter". I agree that there should be more training, maybe right now there are too many certification levels????Maybe there could be mini courses or continuing education to achieve the next level of certification and duty performance. My point is the job is dangerous and safety should be priority #1, and how can it be if all levels of certification are performing the same duties and functions daily in the real world in the communities that we live in.
Maybe those who are in charge for each community, if they really care about the community and those who will respond to fire related emergencies will do the right thing and train people to the level I&II, and won't allow those with levle 1-A or B perform duties and functions that they have not been certified for.
I know that there is a need for firefighters other than full time paid career firefighters. Not all communities can afford to have career and/or paid personnel,I have no problem with those communities or those firefighters.
For those who want a better understanding of the Ohio certification levels see the Ohio Dept of Commerce web site they state that "Certified Firefighters" are those issued a certificate of completion by the division of EMS. the levels are 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, Level 1, & Level I&II. There is an in-depth explanation of these levels.
The levles of firefighters that are recognized by the Ohio Revised Code are "Permanent full-time paid", "Volunteer", & "Part-time firefighter". These are recognized as levels of employment, not certification
MetalMedic
01-09-2003, 05:20 PM
I am going to stand on the other side of the fence on this one and offer a different option. It is hard enough now for many volunteer departments to recruit and maintain members. By increasing the number of hours of "basic" training, you will futher deter potential membership. However, I do agree that the 36 hour course certainly does not prepare one to go into burning buildings with enough experience to do so safely.
What I would propose is to change the laws so that you accomplish what the 36 hour class was intended for. That would be to require additional training on a regular basis in order to maintain certification, just like the EMT certification requirements are in Ohio. As I am led to belive, technically a person can join a fire department, complete 36 hours of basic training, and never have to submit to any further training for the rest of their career. Your FF 1A certificate has no expiration date on it and the Department of Public Safety does not require you to re-certify every three years.
So, with that in mind, I would prefer to see firefighter certifications go the route that EMT certification has gone. Have three levels (1A, 1B and 1C/2) and then require refresher or on-going training every 3 years.
firenresq77
01-09-2003, 06:04 PM
ProFfrL474-
Just a bit of clarification.....
Ther are levels I-A, I-B, I-C, I, and II, but once you go from the I-A to the I-B, you are a FF-I. Then if you go and take the I-C, you become a FF-II. You still get the same amount of hours you would as if you went through the whole academy (240 hrs), but it's just split up.
As for the levels per the Ohio Revised Code, that basically says that (I believe)
In order to be a "Volunteer" FF, you must have at theast the I-A. To be a "part-time" FF, you must have at least obtained the FF-I (or I-A + I-B), and to be a "full-time" FF, you must have at the FF-II (or I-A, + I-B + I-C)
shenry32
01-21-2003, 06:21 PM
I do believe that yes the State does need to modify the way things are done. The FF level 1-a is slowly being phased out, and it should be, this was never a good idea. I believe that everyone (PT or volly) should get at least a level 1 card. I would then love to see the state say that you cant take the level 2 class (1-c) for at least a year or two. The experience that you gain running calls will enable you to get more out of the level 2 class.
This is very similar to the person who takes EMT-B and then jumps right into EMT-P. They are not (my opinion) as ready as the person who worked as an EMT-B for a while.
And just for the record, I'm a vollunteer firefighter, hold a civilian staff position at another department and am also a certified Fire Instructor.
Scott
betheljen
01-25-2003, 11:09 PM
Thank you, Scott...you hit the nail on the head. The 36 hour is being phased out, and eventually will be done away with. I recently certified Level 1 and right away, a Captain at my new department told me if I wanted to hurry and sign up for Level II, one was starting...I knew immediatly, I was not ready for that just yet. Let me get my Level I skills nailed first. Give me that year...
I also understand a possible yearly recertification is in the works...what do you guys think about that?
The only thing that bothers me are the comments about the old-timers. Yes, they were grandfathered but they come from a time when volunteering meant exactly that. Most I know now will still not except any type of compensation for their time. And they have something a lot of us do not: years of experience. I'm more comfortable in a situation with these guys than most of the younger ones. I have a great deal of respect for the old guys, even they can't get that experience proved on a 125 question test...
ff7134
02-03-2003, 11:44 AM
On the subject of levels of training, Yes i do agree that
thier needs to be an increase!!! I believe that wholeheartedly.
But the requirement for CE's, I know that it is enough of a pain to get CE's done for EMT's much less having to worry about a FF CE.
And yes I am a part-time Firefighter(am I allowed to say that since I only have my FFI)and I am currently in class for my FFII. I believe that part of the problem is the individual departments. My department
pushs more education and further training. If the department only cares that you have a FF1A then thats all most people will get.
And i believe that the "Pro-Union" people need to remember that we all do the same job, just some of us get paid for it and some do it
because the feel a need to derve the community and help others.
Thanks,
Jeff
FireSarge
02-27-2003, 10:37 AM
i am taking my 120 may 28
i was offered to take the 36hour
the thing is the 36 hour is a joke as was said before and most departments that are volunteeer in my area make their firefighters go through a 120 course becasue of how bad the 36 hour certification is
MJFD10
03-03-2003, 11:55 PM
just why does everyone scowl at the 36 hr class? isn't it just like military basic training
where recruits are started on the way . nowhere in the course outline can you say that the person is ready to fight fire -just that the basics of safety and self preservation are taught along with some understanding of fire attack ,mostly the mechanics of it. it is the responsibilty of the local FD to see that the higher skill levels are taught to these new ff.
should this be done -certainly ,should it be forced on each and every volunteer -maybe not .
what situation would you want - a pumper being controlled by an operator skilled in water supply and operation but but not in hoseline tactics or a 120 hr cert person with few supply skills -to automatically require these extra hours for all members may not really increase the departments on scene abilities -yes it would be great for a volunteer unit to have multiple skilled people available at every position on the fireground -nozzlemen that are great at ventilation and water movement and search and overhaul but i think most departments would be happy with a crew of capable people at each needed position -a good pump operator ,good hosemen ,etc
coladam
03-16-2003, 05:44 AM
The 36 is just enough to get you killed....120 should be the minimum for structural firefighting....as far as CE each department should have SOP'S that cover them. For example,40 hrs of training a year or you don't get to put the wet stuff on the red stuff!!!!
tdfahrney
03-22-2003, 05:58 PM
I am a career firefighter and have been for almost 15 years. I have also been on the volunteer side as well. I served the community that I now work for 6.5 years part-time/volunteer.
As far as the training question I've never experienced the question you ask, I didn't wait for an orginzation to tell me what level I needed to be to be called a firefighter.
Anyone in this business for any length of time will tell you that it really does not matter how much education we have "it's never enough". If you think that even achieving level 2 in Ohio will prepare you for what is ahead you're dead wrong. Let's face it OJT comes into play no matter where you chose to work.
If you strive to be a fireman you will ALWAYS be in some type of school learning more stuff. If you wait on someone to mandate it you may be a hazard to yourself or others.
IF you really want to do this job you will be getting the education on your own and not waiting on burecrats who have never been on a fire scene to decide how much you need.
Almost every training class I attended I did so at my expense, I worked a full-time job and then went to school in the evenings for several years to educate myself and others.
I say all this because there are people out there looking at the situatuion saying what's in this for me. IF you're a fireman there is only one thing in this for you and that's the feeling of doing the job the right way the first time and seeing it work.
I try not to subscribe to the Vollunteer vs full-time debate. I do see merit in several previous post's reguarding experience but to say we're on duty more than you and just because we are that makes us better is just plain wrong. The only measure of a job well done is the fact that we come home the next morning and are not any worse than when we went in. Also that we saved a few along the way. Sometimes we can't.
Try to put differences behind and ALWAYS WORK ON EDUCATIONG YOURSELF AND OTHERS AROUND YOU. You never know it may be that person who pulls you out of the hands of the fire tonight.
WORK TOGETHER, BE SAFE,
Dale Fahrney :cool:
valley09
04-29-2003, 07:27 AM
OK ProFfrL474 and others its time someone tells you how it is in reality "Or at least in Volunteer Land" since you being a "Paid Firefigher" dont seem to understand.. Yeah the FF-1A class is a joke a BIG JOKE, But you learn the basics thats why its a "Basic Fire Class". The Volleys "Like Myself" that work 40+ hrs a week and are not going to Fire School and being paid like most Paid Fire Departments, I would be fired if i took enough time off to take my 240. However I do agree more training should be done and there are some things that are not in the FF-1A that should be added. But as I was told from Retired Firefighters and also "Paid Firefighters" you dont learn how to fight fire in a class room or watching a video or anything you learn it by Doing it. You take your Rookies in with you and show them just what it does and how to properly attack the fire. My Fire Dept. is all volunteer and I would like you or any of you other Apparent Volley Haters :D to see some of the stops and saves we 36hr guys have made and i have seen my guys "and gals" go in a kick some ***** and knock the fire down, and I have seen them save lives and do repeling and various other things that the stupid 240hr Class teaches. And they were tought how to do this NOT by sitting in a class room in Reynoldsburg or any other training location but by Learning from doing it and Vet Firemen. But anyways I hope that this didnt offend any Paid Firemen cause we are lucky enough to have 2 Full Time Firefighters that work on our Dept as Volleys as well.. I Guess the Paid life just isnt exciting enought for them they had to come into Volleyland. :D . Ohh and by the way about 98% of our Department is FF-1A and thats it. Thank you
allamericankid
05-15-2003, 09:09 PM
Hey brothers,
I feel that the 36hr class is a great class for volunteer departments, as long as the firefighters progress after their thiry six hours. For example, I joined in May 2002, and began my 36hr. class within 3 weeks. Approx. 2 months after I had passed the 36hr t I began and finished my level one trans. and am now taking my level two.
The 36hr. gives the motivated volunteers a chance to get in the field a little bit quicker. I do agree strongly though, that firefighters should have their level 1 within their first year.
jcasey
06-07-2003, 10:58 PM
To valley09, I too am a vol in a community that gives 30 members with 2 pumpers, one tanker, a squad and a brush somewhere around 20k a year to pay for EVERYTHING. We all work 40+ a week as well as farm in most cases. But, I too have a solid, foul distaste for the 1-A. It is true that most vollies get that, maybe an EVOC and Haz awarness and call themselves "firefighter". They are not. They are a FireFighters in training. It took me 4 years, but I have my level 2, haz tech, and EMT B. As I grew and learned in this field of practice, I became more and more aware that technical competance is the key. If you ever get the chance to see (or host a seminar from) Bt Cheif Chase Sargent in his "Buddy to Boss" seminar, the light will dawn. If you can't do the business of the busniness, don't leave the house. This is a seriouse line of work, paycheck or not. You can not learn the skills as the house burns and the people jump. It is all good that you have helped your community out, and are willing to sacrifice your time. All good people help out their communities. We are good people. But when you do this stuff, it's for keeps. Go visit a burn unit for a day. Could be you, or a vic that got steamed from a vollie who didn't know vent or stream placement or.... well you get the point.The training NEVER ENDS here. If you are too busy to put in the time, or stop because the state (trust the gov?) says "that's good" then you are a statistic in waiting for NIOSH. Please, keep traing so you are safe. The 1-A is a death trap. Jason
Ohiovolffemtp
06-12-2003, 06:15 PM
Valley09,
I've been a volunteer for over 20 years now. I started off before there was even a FF1-A course. It was the 36 hour "T&I" - Trade & Industrial course then. I thought I knew alot once I finished it - couldn't have been more wrong. Fortunately, the dept. I was on had lots of experienced personnel and we had twice a month mandatory training for fire and 1/month for EMS. It was those trainings and actual calls where I learned alot.
However, that only happened because there were experienced folks to train us. If the whole department has only minimal training and minimal experience, there's no one to learn from.
That's why education MUST continue. If you can get it from experienced members - that's good. But you're seriously wrong if you think that that's the only way to learn. The classes at Reynoldsburg and other schools have lots of hands on. If you'd been through my last FF1 class you would have pulled hose, raised, climbed, & lowered ladders, taken victims up & down stairs & ladders, and burned a house down.
Bottom line - you need both the classes and the in-house training to be competent. Then, you need continual practice to stay proficient. This isn't anti-vollie at all. Vollies need scheduling flexibility and accessible training - NOT lower requirements.
Weruj1
04-01-2005, 12:07 AM
bump..........
WTFD10
04-01-2005, 01:11 AM
As I stated in a thread almost as old as this one (that Josh has not bumped... yet):
I'm a big advocate for higher certifications for volunteers (even though I haven't made it to I-B or I-C yet) and I started a thread on this very subject back when these state forums were first put up. Since then, I have changed my opinion slightly:
The Michigan county just to the north of me requires ALL of their firefighters to complete FF II (240) within 2 years of being hired (paid) or joining (volunteers).
That being said, my department (most of us only have 36 hours) can run circles around some of their departments on the fireground. And I don't mean to sound arrogant when I say that.
I feel the reason is we have required weekly 3 hour drills that build on what we were taught in the 36 hour class and much of the info taught in FF II is learned that way.
Yes, the 240 looks great on paper and inititally you will be much better trained than a 36 hour firefighter but you must have continuing education throughout your career.
FF I or even II would be great for volunteers but I now feel that a continuing education requirement similar to EMS would be even better.
firenresq77
04-01-2005, 05:33 PM
Well put, Moe....... Actually I have heard that sometime after we are done with the FF-II class (go figure) there is a strong possibility of the state awarding certifications to people based on their amount and type of training done in-house. This would have to be signed off by an official "school" (can't think of the word I'm looking for!!), but we would most likely go to Oregon to sign off for us......
Sorry if the post is screwed up and isn't clear what I was trying to say.......
Had a HUGE brain-fart......
WTFD10
04-01-2005, 06:32 PM
They would need to be signed off by certified instructors from a chartered training facility.
Is that what you were trying to say? ;)
First I heard of this...
firenresq77
04-01-2005, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by WTFD10
They would need to be signed off by certified instructors from a chartered training facility.
Is that what you were trying to say? ;)
First I heard of this... Yeah....... That's it.....
I think it's still in the discussion phases right now........ Not sure if/when it will actually take place......
fireguy919
04-04-2005, 12:46 PM
36 is the BASIC class. on top of that you have to get hazmat,nims and what ever else the state or fed gov wants. most of these poeple work 40 hours plus. if we need more trainign then why does the state not require more ce than it does. look at all the state requires for ce. each dept should train there guys past that. sounds like alot of people are not wanting to take the rest of the time to train them according. each area has differant things that need more attention that another. it would do me no good to learn about aerial truck ops when the biggest building we have is 2 floors. by the time we need on would remember enough to safely work with it anyway. does the 240 or ff1 cover anything about farm equipment or silo's. we do not have any of these in our area either. thats why the 36 hour class is in place. step up to the plate and train your guys for what they need not something they dont.
firenresq77
04-04-2005, 06:19 PM
Originally posted by fireguy919
36 is the BASIC class. on top of that you have to get hazmat,nims and what ever else the state or fed gov wants. most of these poeple work 40 hours plus. if we need more trainign then why does the state not require more ce than it does. look at all the state requires for ce. each dept should train there guys past that. sounds like alot of people are not wanting to take the rest of the time to train them according. each area has differant things that need more attention that another. it would do me no good to learn about aerial truck ops when the biggest building we have is 2 floors. by the time we need on would remember enough to safely work with it anyway. does the 240 or ff1 cover anything about farm equipment or silo's. we do not have any of these in our area either. thats why the 36 hour class is in place. step up to the plate and train your guys for what they need not something they dont. First off, Yes, the Volunteer FF (36 hour) is just the basics required by the State of OH. To my knowledge, there are no FF CE's required by the state at this time. Everyone should be held to a minimum standard of training, which is what the 36 hr is. It is just the basics that EVERYONE should know, regardless of the area you are in. If you need additional training in certain areas, like farm machinery and silo emergencies, it should be provided by your FD or arranged by them.
fireguy919
04-05-2005, 03:02 PM
FIRENRESQ77 i agree with what your saaying and my department does cover things in our area. ce's should be looked in to i think. just all in how the state would do it.
Weruj1
09-02-2006, 12:01 AM
bump..............
mkamann
09-04-2006, 11:46 AM
What i have heard that come Jan 1 the state is mandating ce's for FF's. I do not know all the details, but I feel that this is a good thing. I personally do not like the 36 cert, but for dept's that are limited on funds than this is a good thing. With training than you can make anyone good at the job. It doesn't matter where you work or how long you have been a FF you still go to training to better yourself and learn new things. You maybe a full time ff, but you don't know it all because you fight fire every shift. The certification you have doesn't make you better than the other guy or gal. I have heard of full time ff's that are in it for the money and have no love for the job. They get on scenes and do as little as they can or can't even do some of the tasks. There are also full time FD's that use Vol. FD's as mutual aid to either help fight fire or cover their district. We are hear to fight fire, save lives and property, help those in distress, and make the community safer. Every ff should be trying to get as much training as he/she can possibly get to make themself better. If you are a 36 than go to school and get your ff1 and than get your ff2. If it take you 10 years so be it, but you are trying to better yourself and your fd.
Firedan38
09-04-2006, 07:13 PM
You have some good points....however what do you do about the members who have the attitude that and I'm quoting here "I dont need any more training...36 hours is enough for me". theindividual that stated that was the Volunteer Safety captain of a Vollie/Part time Department in Marion county, I have since moved on so I dont know if he is even still there or affiliated....we tried to change his attitude but itwas like talking to a wall...and the Fire Chief was no better....he did not even show up to "training" nights.
I agree that CE are the way to go...I also think that 36 should be a starting point....and that you shpould be mandated to certify as FF1 after the first year and after 3 years be FF2, Florida soes the CE for FF's but Im not sure how it is done. Im still struggling with the EMS crap down here!!!! I wish all Ohio FF's well and good luck!!!!
Stay Safe
dday05
09-04-2006, 07:44 PM
[QUOTE=Firedan38]You have some good points....however what do you do about the members who have the attitude that and I'm quoting here "I dont need any more training...36 hours is enough for me". theindividual that stated that was the Volunteer Safety captain of a Vollie/Part time Department in Marion county, I have since moved on so I dont know if he is even still there or affiliated....we tried to change his attitude but itwas like talking to a wall...and the Fire Chief was no better....he did not even show up to "training" nights.
I'd have a serious talk with that member,a attitude like that as far as I'm concerned is'nt welcomed in the fire service and this kind of comment came from a safety capt? WTF is he/she thinking,either get your head out of your *** or show he/she the door.The membership of the dept looks up to the officers and what would that tell a new recruit? That could turn a good ff into a bad ff with that kind of attitude.This is all I will say for the time being.BE SAFE!!!!
jethro2636
09-05-2006, 12:17 PM
There has been a lot of good points made here, but as for now the state only requires 36 hours to make you ready to fight fire. Let's be serious, there is no way anyone could possibly learn enough about the world of old man fire in a week long class with no live fire training. The requirements from the state are only minimums, and should be looked upon by everyone in the fire service as just that. I agree the state should increase the hours of training for basic firefighters, and they should have some sort of ce program also because lets face it , if you don't use your skills you lose them. The most important part of this business is the safety of ourselves and the citizens we protect. The best way to accomplish this is through training. Wether mandated by the state or not, we should all be taking the initiative to better ourselves.
Weruj1
09-05-2006, 12:58 PM
Dear Jethro,
While I agree with your posts, there is one thing that EVERYONE needs to know. For the Vol FF 36 hour cert, 36 hours is the MAXIMUM you can teach per the State of Ohio, not an hour more. However, after that .............the other classes are just that the minimums.
RFRDxplorer
09-05-2006, 04:15 PM
Dear Jethro,
While I agree with your posts, there is one thing that EVERYONE needs to know. For the Vol FF 36 hour cert, 36 hours is the MAXIMUM you can teach per the State of Ohio, not an hour more. However, after that .............the other classes are just that the minimums.
Now I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but why would you set a MAXIMUM number of hours to be trained? Maybe that's just me, but I think that is stupid. That kind of hinders people or might shun them away from getting more training because.."the state says that I can only have 36 hours of class"
Weruj1
09-05-2006, 04:23 PM
seems mighty odd huh ? I think that winds of change are coming, CE's arent a bad thing for the most part.
BFire31
09-06-2006, 10:04 AM
Weruj1,
I also once heard that you must have "card-in-hand" to participate in a live burn. Is this true? Some "Vol. FF" classes have been run in our area where the live burn is scheduled a few weeks after the completion of the class because of this. With many state exams being graded on the spot and temporary cert. papers being issued that day, I suppose it opens the door to catch a fire without ever having the chance to operate a line in "realistic" conditions, and have the all-important fire behavior "campfire talk" in the burn room.
Obviously I'm not advocating live-fire before you are in training, but it seems that toward the end of class, BEFORE you're let loose in the real world, would be the time. Even with close supervision from a good officer, new firefighters should feel a little heat in a controlled envirionment before potentially needing to feel it for real.
Any clarification or thoughts??
On a side note, I've worked as a volunteer, part-time, and full-time firefighter in Ohio. I've seen both sides of the ballgame. I understand very well the idea of time constraints on volunteers, and all that stuff. HOWEVER, I absolutely agree with those who say that the 36 hour cert. should be a thing of the past. It's quite simply not enough to be safe interior firefighters. I understand that many out there get their 36 hr. and then train all the time and get very competent. But those first few months/years after you get your "1-A" and before you get enough additonal training to get "comfortable and competent" could prove to be a deadly time.
And the whole CE thing for FFs required by the state.... GREAT idea.
Just my personal opinion. Stay safe.
Brad French
Dayton Fire Dept.
R1SAlum
09-06-2006, 11:00 AM
I took the old T&I 36 hour course in 1977. The first thing the instructor told us was that he was going way beyond those 36 hours. He did 6 hour Saturdays and 4 hour Sundays for 3 months. I didn't learn anything about sprinkler systems, haz-mat, technical rescue or high-rise tactics. I WAS taught hours and hours of hose lines, forcible entry, ladders, mask confidence, search, ventilation, ropes, salvage and overhaul and more basic techniques while using three acquired structures. Three years later, our department did it again. In close to 30 years in the service and being through F/F I, II, and II in Virginia, MFRI in Maryland ,and our rookie school, I never replicated that initial impression and just good old fashioned bread and butter fire instruction with actual fire on a regular basis. Maybe it is too short of a course for today's new firefighter but there are other options.
mkamann
09-06-2006, 12:05 PM
You are right in that you need your 36 cert before you can see live fire. This is a big reason why they need to get rid of the 36. In my Dept we dont let newbee's run until they get more training and experience. If they do get to go on a call there are select FF's and Officers that they can go with. If one of those persons isn't there than they stay behind. The bottom line is TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING.
enginegirl
10-04-2006, 11:19 AM
Hi, this summer I completed the 36-hr and then had a live burn day at the school's burn tower. This was in Butler County.
Our instructors were very straight up with us: "This class you are taking is just enough to get you killed. You must continue your education."
I really liked that frankness.
I interviewed with my rural all-volley township fire & rescue and they have a lot of people who just have the 36 hr but have learned on the job. That being said, they are encouraging everyone to take FF1 and FF2 as they can. Most everyone works a 40 hr job and also farms, so time is a factor.
A lot of the dept is older. This is a tight community and people tend to stay on as volunteers as long as they are physically able. I will be very proud if they take me on and know I will learn a lot from these experienced people.
And I will also take FF1 and FF2. Experience and training go hand in hand for the best education, I think.
Stay safe everyone.
jethro2636
10-17-2006, 04:38 PM
Sounds like you've got the right attitude enginegirl. Training and live fireground experience will teach you volumes beyond the calssroom but the classroom gives you the credentials. Also pay attention to the experienced firefighters you can learn alot. Often times they will pick up something from you too. Keep on training and stay safe.
enginegirl1
10-25-2006, 01:04 PM
Thanks Jethro. My husband applied also and they took us both on. After our probie period the township is putting us both through FF1 and EMT-B. They have been fantastic with us, very welcoming and happy to show us everything. We are PUMPED and honored to work here, great dept.
OHIO KEEP SAFE,
Amy
pfd3501
11-08-2006, 03:14 PM
I think the fire fighter I level is a good start
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.