St Paul, MN does this, but with 4 people. We have 11 medic rigs that are dual staffed with a minimum of 2 medics. All but 2 are housed with another engine or truck. The 2 that don't have 2 units are supported by a house with an engine and truck. As it stands now, this has been a very sucessful combination. If the medic rig is out, there is another asset in the district to first respond with a defib, trauma bag, O2, airway stuff, and ect. When there is a fire in your district, you get on the engine and go have fun. All firefighters are trained to the the EMT B level. With this system, we are averaging about 26% cardiac survivability.
BUT in the buget crunch times we are in, the administration wants to decommission 3 rigs and make "supermedic" companies. A medic and a truck or engine staffed with 6 people, 2 medic, 4 other. This with out a doubt is the dumbest idea possible, with any ALS call, not only have you taken the medic rig out of service, but when you provide a couple of people off the other rig to assist, you have removed that also, effectively eliminating a first responder for that district.
To top it off, it appears that a card carrying member of the union, who is a district chief, proposed this BS plan. I can understand when the administration sells you out, but when one of our own does it, it's all the worse. -steps down from soap box-
So to answer your question Yardbird, it does work well, if you maintain a first responer in the district.
__________________
My posts reflect my views and opinions, not the organization I work for or my IAFF local. Some of which they may not agree. I.A.C.O.J. member
Elevator Rescue Information
|