1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tennessee
    Posts
    3

    Default A Question about Charleston and ISO!

    So much is in the headlines about Charleston and the tragic events that occurred to the Charleston Fire Department. I am not placing blame and am not trying to belittle the memory of the firefighters lost. However, I want to know how the Charleston FD. was able to secure an ISO class 1 rating and what ramifications ISO will have if this rating was not justified. Here the citizens of Charleston thought they were being protected by a class 1 fire dept. and I just cannot understand how that rating could have been obtained. Makes me wonder how many more departments in the country are prouding displaying ISO class 1 when really under the covers they are less prepared than we think! Will the rating be scrutunized by anyone? will they have to retest?
    Things to consider:
    1.Multiple high rise buildings and no LDH
    2. Multiple high rise buildings and 16 engine companies and three ladder companies
    3. No Mutual aid agreements
    4. No unified dispatch
    * I mean no disrespect Charleston FD i just had to ask!

    Charleston you are the most beautiful city on the east coast! We love you! It broke our hearts to hear of your loss and we want to see you overcome this tragic disaster.

  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ullrichk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Deleted by the forum gremlins
    Posts
    1,663

    Default

    ISO's PPC is all about what assets a community has available for fire protection and says nothing about its ability to use it.
    ullrichk
    a.k.a.
    perfesser

    a ship in a harbor is safe. . . but that's not what ships are for

  3. #3
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    1,312

    Default There's a difference between Class 1, and First Class.

    ullrichk hits the nail on the head.

    To answer these questions, you would need to see the complete Fire Suppression Rating Schedule results of Charleston's last PPC rating.

    Take a look here for the Relative Value of Pumper Equipment and Hose (Table 512.A). It says nothing about LDH hose does it? ISO's requirements for Apparatus are remarkably low. If you get a perfect score for Fire Engines, it constitutes only 10% of the overall score, Ladders just 5%.

    All things considered, the Fire Dept only accounts for 50% of the points. Hydrants account for 40%, and Receiving and handling of fire alarms 10%.

    There's a difference between Class 1 and First Class. I know, I work for a Class 1 Dept.
    Last edited by txgp17; 05-26-2008 at 05:06 PM.
    The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened. --Norman Mattoon Thomas, 6 time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America

  4. #4
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Here, There, Everywhere
    Posts
    4,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rescueme456 View Post
    So much is in the headlines about Charleston and the tragic events that occurred to the Charleston Fire Department. I am not placing blame and am not trying to belittle the memory of the firefighters lost. However, I want to know how the Charleston FD. was able to secure an ISO class 1 rating and what ramifications ISO will have if this rating was not justified. Here the citizens of Charleston thought they were being protected by a class 1 fire dept. and I just cannot understand how that rating could have been obtained. Makes me wonder how many more departments in the country are prouding displaying ISO class 1 when really under the covers they are less prepared than we think! Will the rating be scrutunized by anyone? will they have to retest?

    Things to consider:
    1.Multiple high rise buildings and no LDH
    2. Multiple high rise buildings and 16 engine companies and three ladder companies
    3. No Mutual aid agreements
    4. No unified dispatch
    * I mean no disrespect Charleston FD i just had to ask!

    Charleston you are the most beautiful city on the east coast! We love you! It broke our hearts to hear of your loss and we want to see you overcome this tragic disaster.
    Have you ever read the rating requirements of ISO?

    1.What do high-rise buildings have to do with LDH?
    Note: NYC only carries LDH on 7 appratus (6 satellites and 1 JFK hosewagon) And they aren't even staffed by dedicated personell.

    2. I know a few college towns with multiple highrises with as little as 3 Engines and a partially staffed Ladder. If the distances are within the requirements of ISO then 3 Ladders are sufficent for them.

    3. Mutual aid is only a small fraction of the ISO grading schedule.
    4. I don't recall any points being awarded for unified dispatch...not sure what you exactly mean by this. My ISO schedule is in storage so I don't have access to it currently.

    Re-read the ISO rules and one can see it is very easy to bend the rules to achive a high rating...even a 1.

    FTM-PTB

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    Walk down the streets of your area. Ask the homeowners if they know what their ISO rating is.

    My bet....most would not know.

    Insurance companies know...and are the only ones that really care.


    ISO ratings are a joke. It's a rating on how well you "document" stuff (cuz they don't verify the documentation). It's a rating on your water supply and/or water shuttle abilities (again, rarely verified). It's a rating on your dispatch center.


    Remember, ISO considers a Thermal Imaging Camera a substitute item for an Oxy-Acetyline torch. ISO removes points (albeit few) if your company phone number is not listed in the white pages.


    ISO ratings are a joke.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    sfd1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Wa
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bones42 View Post
    ISO ratings are a joke. It's a rating on how well you "document" stuff (cuz they don't verify the documentation). It's a rating on your water supply and/or water shuttle abilities (again, rarely verified). It's a rating on your dispatch center.


    ISO ratings are a joke.

    I couldn't agree more.

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tennessee
    Posts
    3

    Talking wow!

    you all slaughtered this question!

    first, i am well versed on the scoring system of ISO and realize that the fire dept only is responsible for 50 % of the recieved points. however, if a dept cannot deliever the required waterflow for the average commerical occupancy in the area they serve then the higher the rating will be. right? RIGHT!!!! This not only tests the abilities of the hydrants but of the pumpers and aerials if we are talking multi story occupancy, hose, manpower, and other resources.

    two, smaller diameter hydrant hose is adequate if hydrant lays don't extend beyond there limits. When flowing maximum capacity water out of your pumper would you rather have a smaller line and risk cavitation or go with the bigger line where theres room to grow? In Charleston did the 3 inch line work? or did the fire overwelm and overgrow the limits of the water output? would 5 inch line on the same hydrant made a different? i am talking about for water supply now not for the outcome of the fire.

    third, i mention the mutual aid because if we have standing mutual aid agreements with outside agencies we can add the equipment they bring as assests. Even if we just use the outside agencies as RIT or in my case a ladder truck. i achieved needed ladder points by having mutual aid aggreements with an agency for a ladder truck cause my department could not afford one at the time. Mutual aid is worth the time and allows for cross boarder trainer.

    Lastly, everyone seemed to agree that ISO was just useless. the public didn,t know what it meant or understood who they were etc. but we are the very ones that display the numbers proudly on the sides of our apparatus when we achieve the rank. We should work to change the way people think about ISO and the way ISO grades depts! it can work for the community to save the homeowners in your area lots of money on insurance and be used as a marketing tool for fire departments for fundraising or advertising. thats what we should be doing with it. however, we don't need to talk the talk unless we can walk the walk. don't cheat on the ISO tests because the only people that gets hurt is the firefighters and fire departments in the end. i am not saying Charleston was not a deserving ISO class 1 fire dept so please don't misread that.

    Thanks for the replys!

    Again, i mean no disrespect toward Charleston or the memory of the Charleston Firefighters. You are always in my thoughts!

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,682

    Default

    a dept cannot deliever the required waterflow for the average commerical occupancy in the area they serve then the higher the rating will be.
    True, but first, you need to know what the calculated fire flow is, which is calculated by ISO. Then they look at your engines and supply hose and do more calculations on whether it's possible to flow that amount. They don't test to see if you can actually do it, they only do the calculations.

    Mutual aid agreements CAN help....if you are lacking in an area. If you already max out points with your own equipment, mutual aid adds 0.

    We should work to change the way people think about ISO and the way ISO grades depts!
    ISO is run by a company that makes money off of selling their information to Insurance companies. There is not 1 single thing we, the fire service, can do about that.

    but we are the very ones that display the numbers proudly on the sides of our apparatus when we achieve the rank
    Usually done more for political reasons than department pride.

    it can work for the community to save the homeowners in your area lots of money on insurance
    I can only speak for NJ, but unless your ISO rating is changing from a 9 to a 4, you are not saving any homeowner a lot on insurance. And ISO's headquarters is in NJ.


    Better your Department with actual training and realistic equipment needs. Don't fall for the ISO baloney.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  9. #9
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24

    Thumbs down Chief makes all sorts of wonderful quotes.....

    Chief Routley (Charleston fire department) stated:

    "the ISO rating is an "antiquated system for looking at fire departments," based mainly on accessibility to water. He said the rating system's usefulness as a measure of a fire department's expertise and capabilities went out of style with disco"


    You can see a bunch of horrible quotes from Routley at:

    http://www.firefighterhourly.com/fir...on-routle.html

    They should fire his sorry but.

  10. #10
    Forum Member
    gunnyv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    SE MI
    Posts
    1,430

    Default

    Routley was the leader of the investigative team, not the Charleston Chief. He exposed how ridiculous the claims are that ISO class means something. As far as that goes, I'm with him 100%.

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber
    jack61sgfd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Baton Rouge,La.
    Posts
    141

    Lightbulb

    I believe it was said best that ISO is a joke, I couldn’t agree more. What has surprised me more is that departments have not used ISO to their advantage. Our department took our ISO rating form a class 5 in 1998 to a class 2 in 2003. We have hired almost 200 firefighters with the selling point of lowering our citizens’ insurance premiums. We passed a fire tax in 1998 after several public meetings and a media campaign telling our residents how if they agree to pay approximately $90 a year in taxes (for a home assesed at $150,000) their insurance premiums would reduce $135 (the commercial savings was even greater) thus giving them a net saving of $45, plus the added benefit of having the staff 24 hours a day if they ever needed it. The bottom line is most citizens could not care how many firefighters are on an engine or a truck till they need help. What a great selling point to use, “we can save you MONEY!!” Many departments in our area have been very successful with this plan. I would be the first to say I will not lose any sleep if ISO went by the wayside tomorrow, but its here, we just need to find more ways to use it to our advantage.
    Last edited by jack61sgfd; 06-10-2008 at 07:16 PM.
    Shut the nozzle stupid, thats' smoke not fire!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Charleston 9 t-shirts
    By 2dresq in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 09-04-2009, 04:25 PM
  2. Charleston, SC
    By arowett in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 11:21 PM
  3. WTH that Charleston thread go?
    By dave29 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06-20-2007, 07:48 PM
  4. Charleston, S.C.
    By brack22 in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 01:46 AM
  5. charleston f.d
    By robbie in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-05-2001, 10:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register