Too bad this will never work/come to pass. But then most good ideas never do.
Warner: National Speed Limit Would Save Gas
POSTED: 6:58 am EDT July 4, 2008
UPDATED: 8:58 am EDT July 4, 2008
WASHINGTON -- An influential Republican senator suggested Thursday that Congress might want to consider reimposing a national speed limit to save gasoline and possibly ease fuel prices.
Sen. John Warner, R-Va., asked Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman to look into what speed limit would provide optimum gasoline efficiency given current technology. He said he wants to know if the administration might support efforts in Congress to require a lower speed limit.
Congress in 1974 set a national 55 mph speed limit because of energy shortages caused by the Arab oil embargo. The speed limit was repealed in 1995 when crude oil dipped to $17 a barrel and gasoline cost $1.10 a gallon.
As motorists headed on trips for this Fourth of July weekend, gasoline averaged $4.10 a gallon nationwide with oil hovering around $145 a barrel.
Warner cited studies that showed the 55 mph speed limit saved 167,000 barrels of oil a day, or 2 percent of the country's highway fuel consumption, while avoiding up to 4,000 traffic deaths a year.
"Given the significant increase in the number of vehicles on America's highway system from 1974 to 2008, one could assume that the amount of fuel that could be conserved today is far greater," Warner wrote Bodman.
Warner asked the department to determine at what speeds vehicles would be most fuel efficient, how much fuel savings would be achieved, and whether it would be reasonable to assume there would be a reduction in prices at the pump if the speed limit were lowered.
Energy Department spokeswoman Angela Hill said the department will review Warner's letter but added, "If Congress is serious about addressing gasoline prices, they must take action on expanding domestic oil and natural gas production."
The department's Web site says that fuel efficiency decreases rapidly when traveling faster than 60 mph. Every additional 5 mph over that threshold is estimated to cost motorists "essentially an additional 30 cents per gallon in fuel costs," Warner said in his letter, citing the DOE data.
Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press.
However, I do know from the personal experience of a week ago, that essentially what the Energy Dept says is basically true. Between 50 and 60mph I had relatively decent fuel milage; above 60 it went down hill real fast. It wasn't great to start with, but it got worse at the higher speeds. Unfortunately eastern TN's minimum interstate speed is 65; it was kinda nice once I got back into southern Virginia.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Wishful Thinking, I Think
07-07-2008, 08:41 AM #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Loco madidus effercio in rutilus effercio.
Wishful Thinking, I Think
07-08-2008, 04:05 PM #2
The last time I went on vacation in my pickup, running with traffic at the miserly flow of 75 mph, I averaged around 18-19 mpg. On a recent trip to Memphis, with very little city driving, I averaged 16.5 mpg with a speed of 65-70mph. Thanks to ethanol, a very dependable 16 mpg for normal driving between 55-65 around the house has dropped to 14 mpg.I fish for a living, but I have to work for money...
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)