1. #1
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    111

    Default Can someone explain IML and there pension policy

    in english for a dumb fireman.

    Our department is against it, and against the constitutional convention

  2. #2
    Forum Member
    Not2L84U2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Catlin, IL, USA
    Posts
    960

    Default

    I'm not the most educated guy so if I get this wrong then I'm sorry but here's what I understand. They want to open up the IL constitution so they can get rid of police and fire pensions because the gist is that the pensions are the largest drains on the cities. Of course they don't relize all the issues they will have from doing this. I know there is more information that should be coming but I would hope that everyone will vote not to hvae a convention. If you haven't done so already, you should recieve a flyer in the mail and it says right in it that it will cost 70+ million dollars just to have a convention when they can already change most major issues by passing a bill. Hope this helps. Maybe someone else can give a better reply.

  3. #3
    MembersZone Subscriber
    DjInferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mt. Vernon, IL, USA
    Posts
    219

    Default

    They legally have to ask for a constitutional convention. They aren't officially wanting to open it up for any specific reason, but they gotta ask the voters. Now, opening up the constitution could result in drastic changes to our pensions, including the pensions of teachers and others. This is probably not a good thing to anyone involved, including the taxpayers who would have to front the bill for said convention. They can however, AMMEND the constitution through referendum, not just through a standard bill. There's far more to it than that, if need more info, check our website below.
    Last edited by DjInferno; 09-29-2008 at 11:09 PM.
    DJ

    IAFF L738
    www.iafflocal738.org

    IACOJ

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default

    The IML has been spreading a ton of half-truths and flat out lies regarding firefighters pensions. It is not true that they want to scrap our pensions but they want to blame us, the members for the neglect that many Illinois cities have heaped upon their public pension funds. Underfunding is a mjor problem for some funds. There has been some great strides made in the legislature in protecting our pensions, especially in the case where these cities cannot get their grubby paws on the payment made by the counties. The funds go straight to the fund, which is a great thing. The IML hates this. They hate the political power that the AFFI has. One more thing to note is that IMRF (Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund) is 100% funded. City Managers arent dummies. Con-con is a loser. It will cost 100 million dollars to convene one and wholesale changes are not necessary to the state constitution. This will be a nightmare. I suggest www.affi-iaff.org for some in depth articles about these subjects .
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Not2L84U2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Catlin, IL, USA
    Posts
    960

    Default

    I knew there was better information out there than what I could provide. Here is some info I found on a flyer in our union office last work day.

    It is estimated that the Convention would cost tax payers as much as $100 million. That cost is unacceptable at a time when our state is in a budget crisis, our pension systems are grossly underfunded and our road and schools are crumbling.

    The Convention would most likely be administered by the current politicians that have created a virtual stalemate in Springfield. So, it is unlikely that a State Constitutional Convention would be very efficient or effective.

    All issues could be considered and changed including; Right To Work, defined benefit pension plans, education funding and tax rates for state and local governments. Changes to any of thes current state policies could potentially be damaging for union workers in both the private and public sector.

    A CON CON could take years to complete and negatively affect the state's economy. A Convention would further delay legislative action on important issues like education funding, creating a Capital program and balancing the state budget.

    The state constitution can already be changed by the ammendment process. In fact, Illinois voters have amended the current constitution ten times since 1970.

    Again, I can't take credit for this information. I just copied it from a flyer I found. It does make some valid points.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Can someone explain this...
    By FireR0ck in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2008, 11:52 AM
  2. Explain this...
    By masterFF in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 11-01-2007, 09:28 AM
  3. Can someone please explain this...
    By FTMPTB15 in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-26-2006, 11:56 AM
  4. Please explain this
    By GeorgeWendtCFI in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-29-2004, 12:53 AM
  5. PA - Can someone explain how this happens?
    By Bones42 in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-18-2003, 10:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register