I know this should probably go in the EMS forum, but I figured it applies here, and will get more play in this forum. Effective this month, the Pennsylvania BLS protocols are changing. Some things make sense, but two seem a little odd to me. EMT-Bs are now have Endotracheal tubing as a protocol, this seems to be a little intense, seeing as how much of a risk there is with so little training. The other seems really odd. Now, If I find a loaded gun on scene, I am supposed to pick it up and deal with it and my patient. I was always told that my safety was first, then my partner, then everyone else, and picking up a gun in an unsecured environment just seems crazy. Thoughts?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 26
Thread: New Protocol In PA
-
11-02-2008, 12:06 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 301
New Protocol In PA
-
11-02-2008, 01:26 PM #2MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
First of all, endotracheal intubation isn't that hard. Most competent EMTs shouldn't have a problem performing the skill.
As far as your gun thing, I'm a little lost. I've been on my share of calls with guns present. Unless LE is on scene, I've been more than willing to secure the gun (lock the chamber open, ensure safety is on, whatever) to further ensure my safety. In most cases, you likely won't have to deal with it, as you'll be staging for LE to arrive.
-
11-02-2008, 07:29 PM #3
1. If the tube is the same one that was introduced at a training class I took in Maryland about 5 years ago is the same one, it is just about idiot-proof and a competent EMT will be able to use it.
2. Sorry, I have to call bullschit on this one. Aside from the fact that I read the updates for both ALS and BLS, nothing is mentioned about EMS personnely dealing with weapons; besides, it is NOT our job. How much training would it take to show ALL EMS personnel how to safely pick up, handle, and safety a loaded weapon?
Thats what the cops are for."Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
-
11-02-2008, 09:44 PM #4Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Central IL
- Posts
- 47
Is it a true ET tube or one of the dual-lumen devices such as a CombiTube?
-
11-02-2008, 09:50 PM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 301
FWDBuff:
E. Lethal weapons:
1. Do not move firearms (loaded or unloaded) unless it poses a potential immediate threat.
2. Secure any weapon that can be used against you or the crew out of the reach of the patient
and bystanders
a. Guns should be handed over to a law enforcement officer if possible or placed in a locked
space, when available.
1) If necessary for scene security, safely move firearm keeping finger off of the trigger
and hammer and keeping barrel pointed in a safe direction away from self and
others.
2) Do not unload a gun.
b. Knives should be placed in a locked place, when available.
Direct from PA DOH
-
11-02-2008, 09:52 PM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 301
-
11-03-2008, 01:30 AM #7MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Avonmore, PA
- Posts
- 25
Funny I'm in EMT school right now and none of this has been taught to us yet. Yes it is in PA for those that sometimes do not read the location information for the poster.
-
11-03-2008, 12:48 PM #8
Do a little dance, make a little rum, Italian Ice! Italian Ice!
Actual lyric: Do a little dance, make a little love, get down tonight, get down tonight.
(KC & The Sunshine Band "Do A Little Dance")
My thoughts are mine alone and do not represent the thoughts of any Organization to which I am affiliated.
-
11-03-2008, 01:08 PM #9MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Irwin, PA
- Posts
- 224
That is not what either of those protocols say.
Protocol 222 addresses ventilation via an ET tube or similar device, and assisting the ALS provider in securing the tube (tube lock). It also talks about proper ventilation methods.
Protocol 919 addresses scene safety. It specifically states that firearms should only be moved if they pose a "potential immediate threat" and that if you move it, keep your finger off the trigger. I would have never thought of that last one if they didn't write it.
Thomas Anthony, PE
Structures Specialist PA-TF1 & PA-ST1
Paramedic / Rescue Tech North Huntington Twp EMS
The artist formerly known as Captain 10-2
No, I am not a water rescue technician, but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night.
-
11-03-2008, 01:34 PM #10Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Southeast PA
- Posts
- 110
Thanks PATF, you beat me to it. I was wondering where the O.P. got this mis-information. It certainly wasn't from the PA DOH's protocol book.
To the OP, go to
http://www.dsf.health.state.pa.us/he...ocols_2004.pdf
Thats the protocols and they highlight changes in yellow.
-
11-03-2008, 04:35 PM #11
In Ohio, EMT-B's have been intubating pulseless and apneic patients for over 12 years.....
And if no LEO is on scene, I would rather secure the weapon myself instead of taking the chance of it getting in the wrong hands.......The comments made by me are my opinions only. They DO NOT reflect the opinions of my employer(s). If you have an issue with something I may say, take it up with me, either by posting in the forums, emailing me through my profile, or PMing me through my profile.
We are all adults so there is no need to act like a child........
IACOJ
-
11-09-2008, 11:48 PM #12MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Avonmore, PA
- Posts
- 25
I could swear at one point my location information was under my name. Freaking weird. I only said that because in the past on many forums including this one I have run across many people that for one reason or another just do not look at the locations.
I'll get my info posted under there since it has gone missing.
-
11-10-2008, 03:10 AM #13Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 474
Paramedics are barely intubating competently, and there are plenty of studies to prove it. Now somebody thinks EMTs should be doing it because "it isn't hard"?
What makes you think the public is safe with endotracheal intubation ("the ER tubes," good lord), which is a high-risk, low-frequency, invasive treatment, being given to someone who spent less time (much less time actually) learning the skills they already have than their barber spent learning how to cut hair?Last edited by emt161; 11-10-2008 at 03:14 AM.
-
11-10-2008, 10:33 AM #14Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Central IL
- Posts
- 47
Intubating is a skill that needs practice. Thats it. Having a certain license or having had a certain class doesn't make you better. Just practice. Just because you are a Paramedic doesn't mean you are going to be better. All you need is proper instruction and practice.
-
11-10-2008, 04:32 PM #15The comments made by me are my opinions only. They DO NOT reflect the opinions of my employer(s). If you have an issue with something I may say, take it up with me, either by posting in the forums, emailing me through my profile, or PMing me through my profile.
We are all adults so there is no need to act like a child........
IACOJ
-
11-12-2008, 02:02 AM #16Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 474
And how are they supposed to maintain their skills and GET practice when Basics can do it too?
Btw, the intubation statistics just HAPPEN to be coming out of jurisdictions where fire departments have their local governments convinced that every ambulance, engine, ladder, and garbage truck needs a half-dozen paramedics on it. Coincidence? I think not.
Giving ETI to Basics will make an already deadly problem a hundred times worse.Last edited by emt161; 11-12-2008 at 02:05 AM.
-
11-12-2008, 10:05 AM #17
Wow...What county are you from? With that attitude, you must have some of the worst EMT's in the state! We welcome the opportunity to be able to vent a patient more efficiently in the absence of ALS, and will train regularly on this, just as we do the rest of our skills!
Oh, and BTW, "it isn't hard.""Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
-
11-14-2008, 02:22 AM #18
You sound like a bitter para-god. It takes training and skill not a license level.
-
11-14-2008, 11:02 AM #19Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Southeast PA
- Posts
- 110
The protocols don't give the EMT-B ETI in thier scope of practice. This is mis-understood by the O.P.
I don't think it can't be learned and practiced by an EMT-B, but I don't think you'll convince the state of that. We just got CPAP!
-
11-14-2008, 08:28 PM #20
I have been in an EMS conference this past week, and have seen a whole bunch of studies. Medics are messing up at tubes, and the survival rates of tubed vs BLS airway cardiac arrest saves (walk out of hospital) are virtually identical. An agency north of us has even rewritten protocols to make ONE attempt at intubation, and then drop a King IT airway. Also, ONE attempt at peri or EJ IV, and then go for EZ-IO. very neat stuff. For peds, the docs are even more adamant to not waste time with a tube, BLS airways with short transport times. Long transports, yes, go for the tube. I have study references if anyone is interested.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Man Down Protocol
By grasstrimmer in forum Fireground TacticsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-26-2007, 10:00 AM -
Response Protocol
By hrtrescue10 in forum University of ExtricationReplies: 4Last Post: 11-03-2006, 07:21 PM -
Your EMS Protocol
By TDFDCaptain#5 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 04-29-2001, 09:16 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




