Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: MSA vs Bullard

  1. #21
    Protective Economist Jonathan Bastian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    966

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by neiowa View Post
    Get ahold of local Scott rep for a demo unit. I can't understand why Scott is the only mfg with a camera that is configured for a crawling FF.
    There are a few reasons:
    1. It encourages the firefighter to stare down at the imager, relying on the imager solely as his means of entering and exiting the building. This is a very bad practice.
    2. Scanning in a non-fire environment is counter-intuitive. Pointing straight ahead makes the imager aim up at the sky or ceiling.
    3. An imager with a display facing skyward is almost impossible to use outside in daylight...the reflection from the sun is overwhelming on the display.

    The rotating handle addresses some of that, but as firefighters should know, hinges are generally weak points and more prone to breaking. The single-body imagers are far more popular for that reason.
    Last edited by firemanjb; 05-23-2009 at 05:42 PM.
    My comments are sometimes educated, sometimes informed and sometimes just blowing smoke...but they are always mine and mine alone and do not reflect upon anyone else (especially my employer).


  2. #22
    Forum Member Rescue101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Bridgton,Me USA
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Beat to the punch. Out of all the cameras I've used for day to day ops, the T3/T4 series are hard to beat.I DON'T crawl looking at the camera.I take a "snapshot"of the room at three levels,pick a reference point,move to it and do it again.And again.And again. Maintaining reference to the wall so if the camera fails,I still know where I am and where the exits are. T.C.
    Last edited by Rescue101; 05-28-2009 at 11:06 AM.

  3. #23
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7

    Default

    "The rotating handle addresses some of that, but as firefighters should know, hinges are generally weak pionts and more prone to breaking. The single-body imagers are far more popular for that reason."

    That is the reason we chose Scott SCBA because of the non swivel back frame plus it is T-69 aluminum and not plastic.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bullard T4
    By LtSuperG in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2006, 10:57 AM
  2. Bullard T3 Max
    By FF0104 in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-11-2006, 10:34 PM
  3. msa vs. bullard
    By mic409 in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-11-2005, 03:27 PM
  4. Bullard T3 Max TI
    By UPFireFighter in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2004, 01:42 PM
  5. Bullard T3 max
    By UPFireFighter in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-07-2004, 08:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts