Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: New Trends

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default New Trends

    Hello gents, This is my first post, I'll save all that for the meet and greet forum, but in the mean time i have a question for all of you. I am taking some classes for fire science technology and i have an assignment to browse some websites and identify a trend in the fire service. I have looked at a few and have an idea of what i'm looking for but i wanted to hear from the front lines about any trends that are appearing in the fire service and where they seem to be headed. Any input would be appreciated, as well as websites i can check out. Already got Fire Engineering.com and Fire Tactics.com. Thanks.


  2. #2
    Forum Member ziggy171's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    98

    Default ems

    I would say that one major one would be the integration of EMS into the fire service.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by firefuss View Post
    layoffs, demotions, and company closings


    what a pessimist, those are layoffs those are forced indefinite furloughs, and it isn't called a demotion its called a reassignment, and companies don't get closed its called a new allocation of resources. Nothing bad is happening we're just using a different service delivery model.



    so one new trend is euphemisms for sacrificing fire protection.

  4. #4
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    1,214

    Default

    Another new trend is to not go inside burning buildings because its too dangerous.

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MG3610 View Post
    Another new trend is to not go inside burning buildings because its too dangerous.
    I think the technical term is cowardice.

  6. #6
    Forum Member BKDRAFT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,146

    Default

    PPV induced flashovers.

  7. #7
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Stamford, CT
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MG3610 View Post
    Another new trend is to not go inside burning buildings because its too dangerous.

    Took the words right out of my mouth.

    The trend is to regulate operations on the fireground to the point where we aren't doing what we're there to do. Seems the most basic tenet of the fire service, which is.... put the fire out and the problem goes away...is slowly being trended right off the fireground.


    Cogs

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    Getting back to the basics and sending EMS back to it's own entity where it belongs. Fire Fighters will be fire fighters, and EMS people will do EMS work, and Police Officers will do police work.

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,567

    Default

    The professionalization of the fire service leadership by more and more departments requiring college degrees for chief officers and college credit for promotion to Captain and Lieutenant.

    More departments realizing the dangers of interior operations in structures where the is nothing or very little to gain.

    EMS becoming even more embedded into the fire service.

  10. #10
    Forum Member FWDbuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pee-Ayy!
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Whocares View Post
    I think the technical term is cowardice.
    Quite possibly even "criminal."
    "Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    St. Louis City Mo
    Posts
    382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    Getting back to the basics and sending EMS back to it's own entity where it belongs. Fire Fighters will be fire fighters, and EMS people will do EMS work, and Police Officers will do police work.
    If we do that there will be even more firefighter layoffs. EMS is over 70% of the calls the American fire service runs these days. Sorry but we better get use to it because it is here to stay.

  12. #12
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    what we need is for FD's to be only first response EMS, so that we can go to calls where extra hands/being their quicker can make the difference, but we are also able to clear if needed for Fire/Rescue situations that are our primary concern.

  13. #13
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,567

    Default

    Nameless ...

    The problem there is tthat hundreds if not thousands of departments have come to depend on the billing revenue generated by transports.

    If they shut down the ambos, they will fire those firefighters assigned to those rigs as the transports are paying their salaries. Without the transport, they will not have the funds to pay them and they will not be reassigned to suppression, as there will be no incoming funds to pay them.

    So just running first response will cost thousands of positions.

    That's the financial reality.

    And the reality is, in many, many places, EMS has become our primary mission and fire response is now secondary. That, as a service, we need to accept.

    So are you really sure you want to go back to the "old days"?
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 02-17-2009 at 08:37 AM.

  14. #14
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    1,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post

    And the reality is, in many, many places, EMS has become our primary mission and fire response is now secondary. That, as a service, we need to accept.
    It really shows in some places too....just watch some fireground videos on youtube some day.

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    224

    Default

    In the volunteer departments I have observed, less fires, coupled with less training, resulting in much less effective leadership and service to the community.

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber jfTL41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    573

    Default

    Gotta go with the cowardice, the Pussification process is going strong.

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Nameless ...

    The problem there is tthat hundreds if not thousands of departments have come to depend on the billing revenue generated by transports.

    If they shut down the ambos, they will fire those firefighters assigned to those rigs as the transports are paying their salaries. Without the transport, they will not have the funds to pay them and they will not be reassigned to suppression, as there will be no incoming funds to pay them.

    So just running first response will cost thousands of positions.

    That's the financial reality.

    And the reality is, in many, many places, EMS has become our primary mission and fire response is now secondary. That, as a service, we need to accept.

    So are you really sure you want to go back to the "old days"?


    in that case don't waste the money on the fire apparatus, don't waste the money on the fire training, and don't trick people into thinking they have a "fire department", when its an EMS dept. that'll go to a fire and maybe shoot water at it from outside.

    The U.S. has one of the highest fire death rates of industrialized countries, do you really think we should put fire suppression skills on the back burner?

  18. #18
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canuck Expat May be anywhere
    Posts
    2,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nameless View Post
    in that case don't waste the money on the fire apparatus, don't waste the money on the fire training, and don't trick people into thinking they have a "fire department", when its an EMS dept. that'll go to a fire and maybe shoot water at it from outside

    The U.S. has one of the highest fire death rates of industrialized countries, do you really think we should put fire suppression skills on the back burner?
    nameless, thats an interesting point you bring up. Definitely fire supression has got to remain important due to the statistics, but maybe the entire system needs some overhaul. Building codes, building materials, public education, inspections, the entire gamut. I've spent quite alot of time in Europe and I know most places spend far less resources on firefighting than North America.

  19. #19
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,567

    Default

    The U.S. has one of the highest fire death rates of industrialized countries, do you really think we should put fire suppression skills on the back burner?

    Never said we should. But the reality is that many small departments are as EMS may be 75-85% of their runs.

    Because of that, the department may choose to focus their training time on EMS. The EMS volume may limit their available training time, and as a result, some basic suppression skills are not drilled on as often.

    I never said it was right, but I have no doubt in some departments it's happening.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 02-19-2009 at 08:38 AM.

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Nameless it may be different in your part of the country but i work for a department who ran over 70,000 calls last year covers 437 square miles with a population of over 800,000 people with the largest fire service district in the state of georgia. And yes 80% of our call volume is EMS. We do transport and thats what keeps us funded for our apparatus and staffing. We have not had a line of duty firefighter death in over 10 years with close to 800 firefighters. So you do the math. That constant fire train that we do pays off and we still fight fires aggressively and rescue is our number one priority. We are successful because of the gear we have and the training that we receive and none of those things would be possible without the revenue that transports bring us. The fire service has always been dedicated to meeting our customers needs and to provide the best customer service that we possibly can. Its true that it will never be like the war years when the fire service could survive without EMS but they must coexist now. There is no way around it. That is why my department is still hiring and building new stations and adding more trucks because our leaders get it. Without EMS we would be dead in the water like our neighbors in Atlanta.


    THINK ABOUT IT, better code inforcement and better public education means less fire...thats just how its gonna be. Thats why ill be going to Medic school and thats why ill promote and we will continue to grow.


    LEATHER FOREVER
    FTM-PTB

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Current Trends
    By dbutcher in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 01:41 PM
  2. trends in the fire service, new hires
    By nbrk911 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-28-2005, 03:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts