Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 54
  1. #1
    Forum Member trizahler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    46

    Default A Forward Thinking City. Well Done!

    http://www.officer.com/web/online/Top-News-Stories/Minnesota-Police-Department-Cross-Trains-Officers-as-Firefighters/1$41199


  2. #2
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Default

    Your kidding.....right?
    RK
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    that's good, under staff your fire dept, then make up for it by having cops supplement manpower. Now you have a poorly staffed FD and PD, very progressive.

  4. #4
    Permanently Removed CALFFBOU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    6,520

    Default

    A very, very poor idea and in no way is it prgressive. The only reason the Cops are supporting it is because they get the extra pay.

  5. #5
    MembersZone Subscriber npfd801's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Illinois
    Posts
    2,220

    Default

    The only thing I personally can see being decent along the same lines is giving police officer's the training and equipment to do early cardiac and EMS tasks. The nature of their patrols and being on the street could make a difference in rapid treatment, drug interventions and so forth, but not at the expense of reducing staffing on the fire and EMS side.
    "Share your knowledge - it's a way to achieve immortality." - Stolen from Chase Sargent's Buddy to Boss program

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by npfd801 View Post
    The only thing I personally can see being decent along the same lines is giving police officer's the training and equipment to do early cardiac and EMS tasks. The nature of their patrols and being on the street could make a difference in rapid treatment, drug interventions and so forth, but not at the expense of reducing staffing on the fire and EMS side.
    this is true. the same reason why fire based first response EMS is a good idea, is the same reason police officers should respond if available.

  7. #7
    Forum Member FWDbuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pee-Ayy!
    Posts
    7,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trizahler26 View Post
    http://www.officer.com/web/online/Top-News-Stories/Minnesota-Police-Department-Cross-Trains-Officers-as-Firefighters/1$41199
    Son.....Fat, drunk, and stupid are no way to go through life.
    Last edited by FWDbuff; 08-15-2009 at 03:49 AM.
    "Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."

  8. #8
    Forum Member DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,583

    Default re: a "forward looking city"

    One step forward... ten steps back.
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    I have to remain consistent here. Just as I don't believe EMS should be in the fire service I don't think the PD should be involved in EMS or Fire Suppression.

    However, on the flip side. I can see this as being a viable solution for many cities. Rather than have Firefighters, EMTs, and Police Officers you would have public safety officers trained in all three disciplines. This gives a larger labor pool allowing for more efficient staffing decsions. For instance, There are 7 fire fighters, 4 EMTs, and 6 Police officers slots to fill each shift. 2 of the fire fighters call out. Rather than a 7 man duty crew being reduced to 5 men, you simply take two of the Police guys and move them over.

  10. #10
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    I have to remain consistent here. Just as I don't believe EMS should be in the fire service I don't think the PD should be involved in EMS or Fire Suppression.

    However, on the flip side. I can see this as being a viable solution for many cities. Rather than have Firefighters, EMTs, and Police Officers you would have public safety officers trained in all three disciplines. This gives a larger labor pool allowing for more efficient staffing decsions. For instance, There are 7 fire fighters, 4 EMTs, and 6 Police officers slots to fill each shift. 2 of the fire fighters call out. Rather than a 7 man duty crew being reduced to 5 men, you simply take two of the Police guys and move them over.
    Well, the first part was consistent. However, it's debatable whether or not this is a "viable solution".

    Let's assume, based on these numbers that as seperate agencies, unit staffing on a daily basis is 2 fire apparatus, 2 ambulances and 6 patrol cars. In order maintain the same "apparatus" response times, at least 4 people will have to be assigned to the fire & ems apparatus. Now you're already on record as opposed to sending a 40,000 pound vehicle to medical calls, so I guess these units would be in station between calls and not "on patrol".

    If 2 ambulances were staffed in the past, then there's a high likelihood that the community has a decent EMS call volume, so it's likely that 2 more people will not be available for "patrol" a good bit of the day. So from an EMS/patient care perspective, we haven't gained much of anything that couldn't be achieved by simply having a PD first responder program.

    We'll further assume that the remaining 5 "fireman" are now on "patrol" duties between calls instead of being at the station because otherwise, what's the point of cross training them as PD if they're just going to sit in the fire station. So we've potentially increased the "police function", but likely lost a lot of the "between call function" of the FD. We could easily pull a patrol unit or two to do fire inspections, fire safety programs, etc, but if this component of your FD is fairly active, then you've lost part of that increased "police function".

    You've also potentially created a logistical nightmare, particularly on the PD side. Each unit generally has a zone to patrol. What do you do as these units move from PD function to Fire/EMS functions? Who patrols the now uncovered zones?

    What about the public? Will this new arrangement "confuse" then in some respects? If everyone is a PD officer too, then it would reason that they'd have the authourity to make a traffic stop while driving one of the engines or ambulances. Will getting them to pull over and stop be as effective as if it were a patrol car? Would an engine be able to participate in any sort of pursuit?

    I see a whole lot of reasons why this wouldn't be a better deployment of personnel and we haven't even talked about whether or not all of these people will be able to perform adequately enough in all 3 roles.

  11. #11
    Forum Member firehick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Eastern Kentucky University
    Posts
    124

    Default

    That idea aint worth a velvet painting of a whale and dolphin getting it on.

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ocala, FL
    Posts
    216

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by firehick View Post
    That idea aint worth a velvet painting of a whale and dolphin getting it on.
    Very few things are.

    It was tried in a couple communites down here and it failed. The logistics are a bear as stated above. You've doubled your training budget. Instead of say 100 people keeping thier cop certs up and 50 firefighters keeping up wiht their FF traing you now have 150 people to be kept up with everything.

    From a performance standpoint you can only be good at so many things before you aren't good at any of them. How much specialization is their in each respective service?
    I may speak gibberish, but I don't talk s***! -- Dropkick Murphys

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireMedic049 View Post
    Well, the first part was consistent. However, it's debatable whether or not this is a "viable solution".

    Let's assume, based on these numbers that as seperate agencies, unit staffing on a daily basis is 2 fire apparatus, 2 ambulances and 6 patrol cars. In order maintain the same "apparatus" response times, at least 4 people will have to be assigned to the fire & ems apparatus. Now you're already on record as opposed to sending a 40,000 pound vehicle to medical calls, so I guess these units would be in station between calls and not "on patrol".

    If 2 ambulances were staffed in the past, then there's a high likelihood that the community has a decent EMS call volume, so it's likely that 2 more people will not be available for "patrol" a good bit of the day. So from an EMS/patient care perspective, we haven't gained much of anything that couldn't be achieved by simply having a PD first responder program.

    We'll further assume that the remaining 5 "fireman" are now on "patrol" duties between calls instead of being at the station because otherwise, what's the point of cross training them as PD if they're just going to sit in the fire station. So we've potentially increased the "police function", but likely lost a lot of the "between call function" of the FD. We could easily pull a patrol unit or two to do fire inspections, fire safety programs, etc, but if this component of your FD is fairly active, then you've lost part of that increased "police function".

    You've also potentially created a logistical nightmare, particularly on the PD side. Each unit generally has a zone to patrol. What do you do as these units move from PD function to Fire/EMS functions? Who patrols the now uncovered zones?

    What about the public? Will this new arrangement "confuse" then in some respects? If everyone is a PD officer too, then it would reason that they'd have the authourity to make a traffic stop while driving one of the engines or ambulances. Will getting them to pull over and stop be as effective as if it were a patrol car? Would an engine be able to participate in any sort of pursuit?

    I see a whole lot of reasons why this wouldn't be a better deployment of personnel and we haven't even talked about whether or not all of these people will be able to perform adequately enough in all 3 roles.
    Here is the thing with patrol. Most of the time these guys are simply riding around looking for speeders and traffic infractions. So rather than giving out tickets, they save a life or put out a fire. In essence, the idea would give you a bigger more effective team.

  14. #14
    Forum Member Rescue101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Bridgton,Me USA
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Scarecrow,You DON'T REALLY relieve that s**t DO YOU? Every place that I know that's tried it(mixing police/fire)as PSO's has had, at best, a less than mediocre outcome. It's just a p**s poor idea,PERIOD! Blue stays on the Blue line,Red stays on the RED line. Pure and simple. Or let the bean counters try our jobs,they'll give 'em back quick enough. They'd rather set on their uneducated a**es and do what they do best.Screw up a working deal. T.C.

  15. #15
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Default

    Progressive would be cutting back on the police and giving all the fireman guns.

    Okay, progressive is not the right word, but the right word escapes me.
    RK
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rescue101 View Post
    Scarecrow,You DON'T REALLY relieve that s**t DO YOU? Every place that I know that's tried it(mixing police/fire)as PSO's has had, at best, a less than mediocre outcome. It's just a p**s poor idea,PERIOD! Blue stays on the Blue line,Red stays on the RED line. Pure and simple. Or let the bean counters try our jobs,they'll give 'em back quick enough. They'd rather set on their uneducated a**es and do what they do best.Screw up a working deal. T.C.
    There are 3 public safety groups, fire fighting, EMS, and Law Enforcement. If you can mix two why not three? How can you mix Fire and EMS but not Fire and Law Enforcement?

  17. #17
    Forum Member Rescue101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Bridgton,Me USA
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Guess you haven't been paying attention. We DO NOT mix them. Occasional first responder but no EMS here. That you can count. And as a solution to staffing? See above. T.C.

  18. #18
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    Here is the thing with patrol. Most of the time these guys are simply riding around looking for speeders and traffic infractions. So rather than giving out tickets, they save a life or put out a fire. In essence, the idea would give you a bigger more effective team.
    I guess my post went right over your head.

    Yes, there are aspects of the overall operation that could be "enhanced" in this type of set up, but there's also aspects of the individual and overall operations that will be sacrificed in return.

    You can pretty much achieve the same "life saving" benefit by having the current PD respond to EMS calls. I agree that saving a life and putting out fires are good things, but so is traffic enforcement and other "routine" police activity.

  19. #19
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    300

    Default

    The only thing PD should be mixed with is EMS. The township next to me has adequate EMS staffing provided by a service that runs all over the county. The PD has made one of the suburbans into a QRS so they can be there for rapid aid. That works well without decreasing staffing.

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    There are 3 public safety groups, fire fighting, EMS, and Law Enforcement. If you can mix two why not three? How can you mix Fire and EMS but not Fire and Law Enforcement?
    Just a few reasons off the top of my head while it's easy to mix Fire and EMS, but not PD:

    1. PD is generally much busier than Fire & EMS.
    2. There is much clearer overlap in function between Fire & EMS than there is with PD. Any "rescue" situation involves pt care (EMS) AND skills/equipment usually found in the FD. To appropriately perform that rescue requires an integration of pt care while performing the technical parts of the rescue.
    3. At least in my experience, many, many more people working in Fire or EMS, are also involved with the other and very few are also involved with PD work.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Here's what we have to look forward to
    By GeorgeWendtCFI in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 236
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 02:50 PM
  2. Pay It Forward Opportunity
    By BC79er_OLDDELETE in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 03:32 PM
  3. Pressing Forward in CA
    By Blueracer in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 11:15 AM
  4. looking forward to seeing you guys
    By firemanbeak in forum Washington DC
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-12-2005, 07:46 PM
  5. What we have to look forward to!
    By AXMAN620 in forum Line of Duty: In Memory Of
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2000, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts