In some cases, it has had some rather nasty property losses and deadly results...PS to Gonzo: sending a QRV or a sedan to an activated fire alarm is already done in some communities.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 41 to 60 of 74
Thread: Quick Response Vehicles (QRV's)
-
08-14-2010, 07:08 PM #41
"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
-
08-15-2010, 03:09 PM #42Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 101
I dont know about you guys. But, not speaking about money, or anything else for that matter, I would HATE to be that Bamma in a Bandaid Pickup truck, returning from a stubbed toe and drive by a house, smoke showing, people in the streets waving you down cause, remember YOU ARE the Fire Department, and have NO Ladders, Minimum to NO hose or Water. Last time I checked, that ALS monitor never put a fire out.
Just saying, i like running fires, and id be one p'ed off Mofo. ; )-Ron Stanton
Avondale Fire Company
Chester County Station 23
visit our page @ http://www.avondalefirecompany.org
DCFD
Engine Co. 11
www.houseofflame.com
-
08-15-2010, 03:40 PM #43FossilMedic
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- metro Washingon DC
- Posts
- 526
-
08-15-2010, 03:58 PM #44
-
08-15-2010, 04:37 PM #45
I have yet to see anyone mention the Ladder Tender concept that Pheonix employs. If it is a non fire call, they run a medium duty rescue to the call and leave the ladder in the station. The LT has all the equipment of a ladder company besides the pump, tank and aerial ladder. Saves wear and tear on the ladders.
I agree that this concept may work in some places and not in others. My career department runs an engine to everything. With my volly department, we run a light rescue to medical calls.
I would say it depends directly on your tactics and the way you run things. It works for some, for others maybe not.
-
08-15-2010, 05:24 PM #46
Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.
Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.
-
08-16-2010, 04:44 AM #47Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 5
Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...PS to Gonzo: sending a QRV or a sedan to an activated fire alarm is already done in some communities.
Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue....
-
08-16-2010, 08:38 AM #48
-
08-16-2010, 08:43 AM #49
Nope,referring to MAJOR property losses that have occured from sending a Buggy or a Mini me to an incident that SHOULD have been 2 and 1 or HIGHER. Seen it and it WON'T happen here.The only thing a QRV would be useful for here is Brush or haul the airboat. Anything else gets a REAL Engine. GT this is for Joeff NOT you. T.C.
-
08-16-2010, 08:52 AM #50MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
I would like to see published facts on those statistics. I know of no department in our state that has adopted this response. Where did you come up with "a majority of departments"?
Perceived fears? Can you link any publish reports that indicate QRV are more efficient? You call it fear, but why change something that works for something that has not been proved to save money or lives? Where are your study or reports?
-
08-16-2010, 10:56 AM #51
-
08-16-2010, 02:20 PM #52MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Pheonix run a tiered EMS system? In their case the ambulance is a BLS unit and the medic will swap with one of the EMT's if it's an ALS call.
We're running aerials on medical (and every other type of call) right now. Part of the reason we're considering a quick response vehicle is to reduce the number of times that aerial (in particular the 100-footer) has to run on medical or other calls where we don't need 100' worth of ladder.
-
08-16-2010, 03:41 PM #53Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 5
[/QUOTE]Perceived fears? Can you link any publish reports that indicate QRV are more efficient? You call it fear, but why change something that works for something that has not been proved to save money or lives? Where are your study or reports?
No I can not find any link that indicates a QRV will save money.. That's why I asked---Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue.... You only assumed I was for the QRV concept when in fact I have an open mind and would just like to see some type of case study regarding the "notion" - The QRV will save money or the percieved fears of QRV causing dept to drop staff to 2 man, Depts will stop buying Fire Engines etc etc .. I do not want to see Crew integrity compromised by having 2 men on a QRV and 2 men on an Engine back at the station but like a lot of other Dept's mine is facing some serious budget concerns and Crew integrity may compromised by way of lay off's rather than mixed staffing!
-
08-16-2010, 04:14 PM #54Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 5
Originally Posted by joeff1974
Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...
I would like to see published facts on those statistics. I know of no department in our state that has adopted this response. Where did you come up with "a majority of departments"?
My point is that responding to and from calls has been responsible for more firefighter deaths than actual "fire alarm activations" (NFPA.org)- I could possibly be wrong that "majority of Depts" made adjustments. It is only my assumption that it is the "majority" my apology... So your Departments respond a full assignment- 3 engines 1 ladder 2 battalions all lights and sirens to an alarm indication? (or whatever your intitial response is to structure fire )You have not made any adjustment for "Alarm Activation only" - like first due code 3 all others code 2 or engine and ladder only or single engine investigative mode.. etc etc..?
-
08-16-2010, 06:16 PM #55Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 16
Kramer, would this be a QRV response or an Engine Co. response?
-
08-16-2010, 06:38 PM #56MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
Once again you stated that a "majority of departments", but you have yet to cite where you get your information from. I know of no department in the past 35 years that has adopted such a practice. I am not saying there are not departments that have, but I would like to know where you get your data from proving these statements.
It depends on the alarm. Or a standard residential or business we dispatched 2 engines, 1 ladder, 1 district chief, 1 rescue, 1 service, and safety. On a high life hazard we dispatched, 4 engines, 2 ladder, 2 district chiefs, 2 rescues, 1 service, and safety. By state law when responding to an emergency we must run with audible and visual warning devices. Actually over the last ten years we start with the high life hazard response, for high rises, nursing homes, schools that are in session,...
In the last 10 years, on my shift, at this station I have made 9 working fire, first in, from fire alarm activations. 5 residential and 4 commercial business.
-
08-16-2010, 07:12 PM #57Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Orygun
- Posts
- 167
To adress the issue of always sending an engine or truck co. to non-critical calls, the deptment I retired from recently started using "CARS" as QRV's. They respond to medicals, unknown if injury MVA's, and fire alarms. They have dedicated staffing so crew integrity is not an issue.
You can read more about it by following this link. The You Tube video explains the program too.
http://tvfr.com/news/index.aspx
-
08-16-2010, 08:00 PM #58
I've heard of fire departments reducing the response on known nuisance alarms. Usually the response was cut back from a full first alarm to a single engine or something along that line - never just a staff vehicle. Sorry - no source, just years of reading fire service publications.
That said - how many of those nine automatic alarms were "regulars?" Places that you could count on running to several times a week?Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.
Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.
-
08-16-2010, 08:03 PM #59
That's because it is even more retarded than the concept being discussed. Phoenix is basically paying for a pumper to send on medical calls that they don't want to send the truck on. Why not just send the engine company, not the engine that the truck guys take on medicals? I guarnatee you they are not saving any money!!!
Robert Kramer
cell #901-494-9437
Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.
"Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.
Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.
-
08-16-2010, 08:04 PM #60
Robert Kramer
cell #901-494-9437
Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.
"Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.
Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Prep For Quick Response
By hero762 in forum Volunteer ForumReplies: 60Last Post: 03-31-2005, 03:43 PM -
Are we stressing quick response to much??
By fireman4life in forum Emergency Vehicle OperationsReplies: 42Last Post: 01-26-2002, 10:44 AM -
paramedic response vehicles
By Chief 801 in forum Emergency Services AdministrationReplies: 0Last Post: 03-19-2000, 09:45 PM -
Quick Response Unit
By Chief51 in forum Meet and GreetReplies: 7Last Post: 03-07-1999, 11:11 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




