Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 74
  1. #41
    Forum Member DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,288

    Default

    PS to Gonzo: sending a QRV or a sedan to an activated fire alarm is already done in some communities.
    In some cases, it has had some rather nasty property losses and deadly results...
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY


  2. #42
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    101

    Default

    I dont know about you guys. But, not speaking about money, or anything else for that matter, I would HATE to be that Bamma in a Bandaid Pickup truck, returning from a stubbed toe and drive by a house, smoke showing, people in the streets waving you down cause, remember YOU ARE the Fire Department, and have NO Ladders, Minimum to NO hose or Water. Last time I checked, that ALS monitor never put a fire out.

    Just saying, i like running fires, and id be one p'ed off Mofo. ; )
    -Ron Stanton

    Avondale Fire Company
    Chester County Station 23

    visit our page @ http://www.avondalefirecompany.org

    DCFD
    Engine Co. 11
    www.houseofflame.com

  3. #43
    FossilMedic
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    metro Washingon DC
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeputyChiefGonzo View Post
    In some cases, it has had some rather nasty property losses and deadly results...
    Yep!

    Which is why I ALWAYS proceed to the scene in my Big Red Truck and contacted the caller when they wanted to cancel a response to an activated fire alarm.

    Caught two structure fires that way.

  4. #44
    Let's talk fire trucks! BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BackStepNBackWards View Post
    I dont know about you guys. But, not speaking about money, or anything else for that matter, I would HATE to be that Bamma in a Bandaid Pickup truck, returning from a stubbed toe and drive by a house, smoke showing, people in the streets waving you down cause, remember YOU ARE the Fire Department, and have NO Ladders, Minimum to NO hose or Water. Last time I checked, that ALS monitor never put a fire out.

    Just saying, i like running fires, and id be one p'ed off Mofo. ; )
    I've never beat a fire into submission with a 35' ladder off a dry ladder truck either.
    Career Fire Captain
    Volunteer Chief Officer


    Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

  5. #45
    Forum Member GTRider245's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Augusta,GA
    Posts
    2,987

    Default

    I have yet to see anyone mention the Ladder Tender concept that Pheonix employs. If it is a non fire call, they run a medium duty rescue to the call and leave the ladder in the station. The LT has all the equipment of a ladder company besides the pump, tank and aerial ladder. Saves wear and tear on the ladders.

    I agree that this concept may work in some places and not in others. My career department runs an engine to everything. With my volly department, we run a light rescue to medical calls.

    I would say it depends directly on your tactics and the way you run things. It works for some, for others maybe not.
    Career Firefighter
    Volunteer Captain

    -Professional in Either Role-

    Quote Originally Posted by Rescue101 View Post
    I don't mind fire rolling over my head. I just don't like it rolling UNDER my a**.

  6. #46
    MembersZone Subscriber tree68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Jefferson County, NY USA
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTRider245 View Post
    I have yet to see anyone mention the Ladder Tender concept that Phoenix employs.
    IIRC, when Phoenix started running paramedics they didn't have enough to staff the ambulances (rescues in their jargon) or engines, so they put them on the trucks. Not feeling well? There will be an aerial at your front door shortly.
    Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.

    Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.

  7. #47
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default

    PS to Gonzo: sending a QRV or a sedan to an activated fire alarm is already done in some communities.
    Quote Originally Posted by DeputyChiefGonzo View Post
    In some cases, it has had some rather nasty property losses and deadly results...
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...

    Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue....

  8. #48
    Forum Member GTRider245's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Augusta,GA
    Posts
    2,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...

    Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue....
    Pretty sure he was referring to civilian loss of life and property.
    Career Firefighter
    Volunteer Captain

    -Professional in Either Role-

    Quote Originally Posted by Rescue101 View Post
    I don't mind fire rolling over my head. I just don't like it rolling UNDER my a**.

  9. #49
    Forum Member Rescue101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Bridgton,Me USA
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Nope,referring to MAJOR property losses that have occured from sending a Buggy or a Mini me to an incident that SHOULD have been 2 and 1 or HIGHER. Seen it and it WON'T happen here.The only thing a QRV would be useful for here is Brush or haul the airboat. Anything else gets a REAL Engine. GT this is for Joeff NOT you. T.C.

  10. #50
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...
    I would like to see published facts on those statistics. I know of no department in our state that has adopted this response. Where did you come up with "a majority of departments"?

    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue....
    Perceived fears? Can you link any publish reports that indicate QRV are more efficient? You call it fear, but why change something that works for something that has not been proved to save money or lives? Where are your study or reports?

  11. #51
    MembersZone Subscriber LVFD301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...

    .

    Majority of departments? I toss the flag on this one, what is your source for such a statement?

  12. #52
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    SW MO
    Posts
    4,244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tree68 View Post
    IIRC, when Phoenix started running paramedics they didn't have enough to staff the ambulances (rescues in their jargon) or engines, so they put them on the trucks. Not feeling well? There will be an aerial at your front door shortly.
    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Pheonix run a tiered EMS system? In their case the ambulance is a BLS unit and the medic will swap with one of the EMT's if it's an ALS call.

    We're running aerials on medical (and every other type of call) right now. Part of the reason we're considering a quick response vehicle is to reduce the number of times that aerial (in particular the 100-footer) has to run on medical or other calls where we don't need 100' worth of ladder.

  13. #53
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Perceived fears? Can you link any publish reports that indicate QRV are more efficient? You call it fear, but why change something that works for something that has not been proved to save money or lives? Where are your study or reports?
    [/QUOTE]

    No I can not find any link that indicates a QRV will save money.. That's why I asked---Can someone please post some actual data, statistics, financial reports anything that is FACT or TRIAL BASED information to support their view (opinion) rather than continue to speculate "perceived" fears or notions. Otherwise this post will continue and continue and continue.... You only assumed I was for the QRV concept when in fact I have an open mind and would just like to see some type of case study regarding the "notion" - The QRV will save money or the percieved fears of QRV causing dept to drop staff to 2 man, Depts will stop buying Fire Engines etc etc .. I do not want to see Crew integrity compromised by having 2 men on a QRV and 2 men on an Engine back at the station but like a lot of other Dept's mine is facing some serious budget concerns and Crew integrity may compromised by way of lay off's rather than mixed staffing!

  14. #54
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Originally Posted by joeff1974
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...

    I would like to see published facts on those statistics. I know of no department in our state that has adopted this response. Where did you come up with "a majority of departments"?

    Quote Originally Posted by LVFD301 View Post
    Majority of departments? I toss the flag on this one, what is your source for such a statement?
    My point is that responding to and from calls has been responsible for more firefighter deaths than actual "fire alarm activations" (NFPA.org)- I could possibly be wrong that "majority of Depts" made adjustments. It is only my assumption that it is the "majority" my apology... So your Departments respond a full assignment- 3 engines 1 ladder 2 battalions all lights and sirens to an alarm indication? (or whatever your intitial response is to structure fire )You have not made any adjustment for "Alarm Activation only" - like first due code 3 all others code 2 or engine and ladder only or single engine investigative mode.. etc etc..?

  15. #55
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Kramer, would this be a QRV response or an Engine Co. response?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Lt. Dan Harris
    Rescue Co. 3
    Memphis Fire Dept.
    danharris@iaff1784.org

  16. #56
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    Originally Posted by joeff1974
    Are you referring to the number of firefighters killed responding to and from calls...? Because I promise you that is a much higher danger to Firefighters than using a QRV to initially investigate a fire alarm indication. That’s why the majority of Depts. have dropped fire alarm activations to a single engine response, code 2 (no lights or siren)...
    Once again you stated that a "majority of departments", but you have yet to cite where you get your information from. I know of no department in the past 35 years that has adopted such a practice. I am not saying there are not departments that have, but I would like to know where you get your data from proving these statements.



    Quote Originally Posted by joeff1974 View Post
    My point is that responding to and from calls has been responsible for more firefighter deaths than actual "fire alarm activations" (NFPA.org)- I could possibly be wrong that "majority of Depts" made adjustments. It is only my assumption that it is the "majority" my apology... So your Departments respond a full assignment- 3 engines 1 ladder 2 battalions all lights and sirens to an alarm indication? (or whatever your intitial response is to structure fire )You have not made any adjustment for "Alarm Activation only" - like first due code 3 all others code 2 or engine and ladder only or single engine investigative mode.. etc etc..?


    It depends on the alarm. Or a standard residential or business we dispatched 2 engines, 1 ladder, 1 district chief, 1 rescue, 1 service, and safety. On a high life hazard we dispatched, 4 engines, 2 ladder, 2 district chiefs, 2 rescues, 1 service, and safety. By state law when responding to an emergency we must run with audible and visual warning devices. Actually over the last ten years we start with the high life hazard response, for high rises, nursing homes, schools that are in session,...
    In the last 10 years, on my shift, at this station I have made 9 working fire, first in, from fire alarm activations. 5 residential and 4 commercial business.

  17. #57
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Orygun
    Posts
    167

    Default

    To adress the issue of always sending an engine or truck co. to non-critical calls, the deptment I retired from recently started using "CARS" as QRV's. They respond to medicals, unknown if injury MVA's, and fire alarms. They have dedicated staffing so crew integrity is not an issue.

    You can read more about it by following this link. The You Tube video explains the program too.

    http://tvfr.com/news/index.aspx

  18. #58
    MembersZone Subscriber tree68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Jefferson County, NY USA
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Acklan View Post
    In the last 10 years, on my shift, at this station I have made 9 working fire, first in, from fire alarm activations. 5 residential and 4 commercial business.
    I've heard of fire departments reducing the response on known nuisance alarms. Usually the response was cut back from a full first alarm to a single engine or something along that line - never just a staff vehicle. Sorry - no source, just years of reading fire service publications.

    That said - how many of those nine automatic alarms were "regulars?" Places that you could count on running to several times a week?
    Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.

    Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.

  19. #59
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTRider245 View Post
    I have yet to see anyone mention the Ladder Tender concept that Pheonix employs.
    That's because it is even more retarded than the concept being discussed. Phoenix is basically paying for a pumper to send on medical calls that they don't want to send the truck on. Why not just send the engine company, not the engine that the truck guys take on medicals? I guarnatee you they are not saving any money!!!
    Robert Kramer
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  20. #60
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danomfd View Post
    Kramer, would this be a QRV response or an Engine Co. response?
    Oh......my pal Dano.

    That was no response. It was picked the bike up and rode another 6 hours to Tulsa. I was just hurting to bad to make the remaining 5500+ miles after that.

    Bastard.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Robert Kramer
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Prep For Quick Response
    By hero762 in forum Volunteer Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 03-31-2005, 03:43 PM
  2. Are we stressing quick response to much??
    By fireman4life in forum Emergency Vehicle Operations
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 01-26-2002, 10:44 AM
  3. paramedic response vehicles
    By Chief 801 in forum Emergency Services Administration
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-19-2000, 09:45 PM
  4. Quick Response Unit
    By Chief51 in forum Meet and Greet
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-07-1999, 11:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts