Thread: The cost of fire apparatus...
06-04-2009, 06:50 PM #51
06-04-2009, 07:44 PM #52
It's a two-piece heavy rescue company. That's the "utility", the smaller of the two units."Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
06-04-2009, 10:10 PM #53
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- PG Co. Md
343 Rescue, I thought the same thing, but being on the apparatus committee I have some "inside knowledge". We had many long meetings trying to come up with a way to get the Seagrave but to no avail. Pierce was the next best option and after driving and inspecting a few neighboring units we went with Pierce. 72 is gonna get a much needed break and then we will most likely alternate the Pierce and Seagrave as front line wagon. Hopefully we'll see her backing in the firehouse sometime in August.
06-04-2009, 11:37 PM #54
Well, it's good to see that 7's getting a new wagon. Congrats.
72's a beast, and one badass mo-fo of a wagon.
-VermontOriginally Posted by ThNozzleMan
I A C O J
Honorary Disclaimer: While I am a manufacturer representative, I am not here to sell my product. Any advice or knowledge shared is for informational purposes only. I do not use Firehouse.Com for promotional purposes.
06-04-2009, 11:55 PM #55
So as I understand the reasoning , if this had the second drive axel under it ,would it be a heavy?? We decided against a tandem due to road limitations.
Chuck & his crew built a cafs engine for us in in 2001 in addition to U-2, in 2003 and the same folks that built them now sevice them under another business venture.
Buff check your e-mail , lots of photos there.
06-05-2009, 07:12 AM #56
If you got this piece for less than $300K equipped, all the power to you. I am sure it suits you fine and works well for you. Just don't call it a Heavy Rescue. Don't even call it a light rescue. "Utility" is a perfectly suitable name for it. In our own house we have an FL80 Freightliner with a box just a bit larger than yours, (including the crew cab running behind the main cab with SCBA seats for three.) We also have a tower, a cascade and lots of tools. It is also designated utility (although for purposes of our County system it is officially designated "Special Service 11.""Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
06-05-2009, 04:30 PM #57
I think it could be classified as a medium rescue because it is on a medium duty chassis. I delivered many units that could be considered heavy rescues and were on commercial chassis. The units I can think of as great examples are Port Penn De., Conneaut Oh., Pikesville, Md., Camden NJ., Hollywood Md.
Again I am sure someone who knows nothing about firefighting from the federal groernment will be able to classify these units in NIMS and ICS. It will only cost the $300,000. That was spend on IslandFires' rescue to do so.Fyrtrks
06-06-2009, 08:25 PM #58
Oh,Nims will classify it as a heavy toolbox or some other term you never heard of before.Want something frig*ed up? Just get the Federal government involved in it.God knows they've done such a banner job of managing their own affairs. T.C.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By GeorgeWendtCFI in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 51Last Post: 04-16-2009, 11:31 PM
By arff42 in forum Federal & Military Firehouse ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 07-03-2008, 03:58 PM
By Consultant in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 0Last Post: 03-25-2008, 11:17 AM
By UTFFEMT in forum Fire WireReplies: 1Last Post: 10-02-2004, 09:55 AM
By fireflymedic in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 04-28-2004, 07:18 AM