+ Reply to Thread
Results 61 to 80 of 406
-
09-23-2009, 08:05 AM #61Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 642
-
09-23-2009, 08:07 AM #62Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
Exactly. When you get dispatched the information comes in from a dispatch center. Doesn't really matter where that dispatch center is as long as you get good information. If I understand it correctly, used to be the call came into a central dispatch and was then sent to FD Dispatch. The time wasted getting the basic information and then having to repeat that information is where the savings come from. I suspect the Unions real issue is they will loose positions.
-
09-23-2009, 08:10 AM #63Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
- Posts
- 9,566
Just a question ..
When you say "verify the address" are you referring to asking the caller what the address is a 2nd time or comparing it to the electronic information which should come up on the screen?
Or are you referring to verifying the address information
on the screen?
In other words, is the verbal address or screen address the primary source of location information?
The reason I ask is that our dispatchers take calls for the entire parish, including the city, with several common street names and route numbers, and rarely seem to have an issue.Last edited by LaFireEducator; 09-23-2009 at 08:23 AM.
-
09-23-2009, 08:10 AM #64Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
09-23-2009, 08:12 AM #65Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
09-23-2009, 08:17 AM #66Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
And how often does this happen? How often did it happen before?
This is a quality improvement initiative. The problem is with most government agencies they really don't do quality right. In order to be done right you need to :
- Define
- Measure
- Analyze
- Improve
- Control
I guarantee that there has been no measurements of the numbers of wrong addresses before and after. And if getting bad info is the issue then fix that problem. I'm all in favor of doing anything to get equipment dispatched quicker. That way we can stop at green lights
-
09-23-2009, 08:50 AM #67Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- PA
- Posts
- 2,862
First of all, would you even be able to take in that other call? You're already assigned to a call, so responding to the second call may not even be an option.
Second, if you think sending multiple units out on snip hunts because the correct location and problem wasn't determined up front (while possibly not sending units to that location also) is a good idea, you're a lot dumber than we give you credit for.
-
09-23-2009, 08:51 AM #68Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- PA
- Posts
- 2,862
-
09-23-2009, 09:14 AM #69
I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
09-23-2009, 09:17 AM #70
Maybe, if he spent the time to actually understand how the process in NYC works, instead of comparing it to his town, he might start to understand the situation.
Maybe."This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
-
09-23-2009, 10:08 AM #71
Scardeycrow,Take Five and find the KEY! ONCE you get you Cranial-rectal inversion UNLOCKED,walk outside and take a DEEP breath.You don't know Jack Schit about NYC or any of it's inner workings.You have NO idea of the emergency call volume NOR would you be qualified to shine the boots of a FAD or DD in the FD Comm system.Trust fred and ray when they tell you the system is screwed.Hell,even I can see this and I only visit once or twice a year. Your Podunk training doesn't qualify you as an expert on this subject,in fact you're so far WRONG on this it might be wise to take a probies stance: Shut up and listen! T.C.
-
09-23-2009, 11:40 AM #72Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
09-23-2009, 11:42 AM #73Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
09-23-2009, 11:50 AM #74
I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
09-23-2009, 11:56 AM #75
-
09-23-2009, 11:58 AM #76
-
09-23-2009, 12:09 PM #77
ScareCrow57, you . . . .YOU, you!
NO IT IS NOT A NON-ISSUE! If you are far away from a legitimate call because you were sent somewhere in error, IT IS A PROBLEM!
You truly don't get the point do you, there is a problem with the way the dispatch system is working and the muckity mucks are bragging about a parlor trick they pulled to falsely improve response numbers.
I learn alot from reading this and other boards about firefighting and one of the things I have learned is that most people and or politicians truly don't understand how their decisions effect how we do our jobs; you sir are one of the reasons why you just don't want to see anything but your own narrow viewpoint. I honestly wonder about how much you care about and for your fellow firefighters.Mark Zanghetti
FF-EMT
Goshen Fire Dept.
Waterford, CT
-
09-23-2009, 12:11 PM #78
Ah NO. You need to understand RUDEMENTARY Firefighting for that process to begin.Don't see that happening with our resident Dodo(expert). If the guys working in the system are saying it isn't working,I think I'll believe them instead of our quality control expert.I've got some issues in OUR dispatch but they're Waaay easier to fix than this. Short companies,brownouts,gear shortages/issues........What's next? Time for the uprising,I think. T.C.
-
09-23-2009, 12:33 PM #79MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Canuck Expat May be anywhere
- Posts
- 2,906
I can't really understand the hostility here. The problem seems to be the dispatch system in NYC. Seems to me that the problems need to be addressed between FDNY and City of New York management. I have no idea why people want to rant at me or others in regard to this. Our system worked, is working, and I'm sure will work in the future. We don't have big issues between FD, LE, Medics and the city. I'm sorry if you do.
-
09-23-2009, 12:49 PM #80Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
It was explained here
If you eliminate the transfer then you improve response times.
Sounds like there is a problem with the 911 system. I would think there would be a dispatch center in each of the 5 boroughs. So when you dial 911 you go directly to the appropriate dispatch center.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
FDNY Response Times
By NJFFSA16 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 52Last Post: 06-09-2006, 03:17 PM -
Response Times
By donethat in forum Emergency Services AdministrationReplies: 1Last Post: 05-16-2006, 01:31 PM -
Response Times.............
By hwoods in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 21Last Post: 12-10-2004, 04:00 PM -
FDNY Response Times
By NJFFSA16 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 04-11-2004, 07:40 PM -
Vol response times
By shenry32 in forum Volunteer ForumReplies: 29Last Post: 11-19-2000, 01:02 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





