Quote:
The downside could be you getting called into court for driving past an accident/fire and someone getting the plate and sticker information. It probably would be dropped real fast but it could happen. It falls under the duty to act clause. For an EMT that gets even worse.
Are you sure about this?
This sounds like one of those wive's tales that get's repeated over and over.
In most places, you only have a duty to act if you are "on duty".
How do you define "On Duty"? As a volunteer I am on duty 24/7/365.
If you are a volunteer, you are a volunteer... it's your choice. Sticker or not.
Check your state laws.
I think you are In NY:
Quote:
NYS statutes do not obligate an individual citizen, regardless of training, to respond to a situation or provide care unless there is a formal duty by job description or role expectation. Such a duty to act arises from participation with an agency having jurisdiction.
http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/ems/pdf/98-05.pdf
Read that REAL close and you will note it says UNLESS there is a formal duty by job description OR role expectation.
That last sentence is the problem that none of the courts have decided on. If your a NYS certified EMT your are certified to operate in all of NY State. As an EMT your role is to provide aid to those in need.
And I have seen this used to drag a couple folks into court. One was driving in another part of the state, drove past a car accident (no medical gear in the vehicle) a woman saw his EMT decal and called it in. Case was dropped but it did happen.
Not a big problem but I don't like having those headlines " Firefighter sued for passing scene" isn't a good read, especially when the end result never gets in print.