Has anyone considered using a ARFF vehicle, such as the Oshkosh T1500 or 3000 as a tender in regular structure fire protection?
Thoughts? Seems I always see some in surplus.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 52
Thread: ARFF Vehicle as tender
-
10-06-2009, 01:31 AM #1
ARFF Vehicle as tender
-
10-06-2009, 09:39 AM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 301
While I know little about tender operations I will provide this input. Does the ARFF vehicle meet DOT standards? Does it allow for quick dumping? Will it meet NFPA standards (I know some people could care less, but you might)?
-
10-06-2009, 10:14 AM #3MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Rural Iowa
- Posts
- 3,107
Took a look at fielding an Oshkosh P15 as tanker/wildland when DOD was getting rid of them a few years ago. Pretty capable off road (8x8) Huge tank (5000gal) REALLY REALLY big though would have made getting moved to FD very very expensive. So did not proceed.
http://www.olive-drab.com/idphoto/id...s_fire_p15.php
Isn't a tender that thing that follows a steam locomotive around?
-
10-06-2009, 10:28 AM #4
I would love to put more stock in NFPA standards, and I do strive to meet them, but realize I have to do what is needed to operate first.
DOT to my understanding is met.
Your quick dump question is one I had, but if you had one of the larger ones you could use them for a nurse tanker, while smaller tankers with quick dumps ran a shuttle.
I was hoping others had already gone this route.
-
10-06-2009, 10:35 AM #5
Last edited by Frmboybuck; 10-06-2009 at 10:37 AM.
Buck
Assistant Chief/EMT-B
-
10-06-2009, 10:36 AM #6
-
10-06-2009, 10:38 AM #7
-
10-06-2009, 10:50 AM #8
One important thing to think about is low weight roads and bridges....not many bridges will carry that weight
Buck
Assistant Chief/EMT-B
-
10-06-2009, 11:04 AM #9MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
The width would be one of my biggest concerns. 10' is getting pretty wide for a lot of the two-lane highways and country roads.
-
10-06-2009, 11:38 AM #10
The weight we are used to dealing with - we presently have a 5k gallon
tanker. The width is an issue, even the T3000 is close to 9 feet - but 9 feet
is less than a foot wider than many box trucks.
-
10-06-2009, 12:06 PM #11
-
10-06-2009, 12:46 PM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- TEXAS GULF COAST
- Posts
- 111
There is a department a couple of counties over that has two of them. They had dump valves installed and they use them as tenders. They also use them as brush trucks and say they work really well for putting brush fires out in hard to reach places.(they can shoot the water farther with them)
Puttin the wet stuff on the red stuff!
-
10-06-2009, 12:55 PM #13
-
10-06-2009, 02:06 PM #14
Even so, you can not haul that much weight on 2 axles(T1500) or 3 axles(T3000). The legal limit on 1 drive axle is 17000 lbs...Steer is 12000lbs. You can not legally drive one on the roadway with out exemption and I highly doubt the state of MO is going to give that much weight the OK......
Buck
Assistant Chief/EMT-B
-
10-06-2009, 02:13 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 420
I've seen ARFF converted to tankers and wildland vehicles.
Here is one:
http://www.indianafiretrucks.com/pag...in_county.html
-
10-06-2009, 02:28 PM #16
-
10-06-2009, 02:45 PM #17
It is that simple....you are not going to gain enough on a ARFF vehicle to matter. Yes, in MO, secondary roads can carry 36K on tandems. You can not on interstate highways which probably does not pertain to you. However, on the T1500, you have 2 axles...No tandems without modifications. T3000 has 3 axles so max u could have is 48000 gross. I'd have to check the specs again but I believe the T3000 exceeds that by a long shot
Buck
Assistant Chief/EMT-B
-
10-06-2009, 05:17 PM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
-
10-06-2009, 05:38 PM #19
P-15 has 6K of water on board, plus you never would have gotten the permits to run one around your local roads. I forget the exact specs but fully loaded, they weigh in excess of 100,000....Plus they are 11'4" wide if I remember the width correctly. Not to mention I suspect the cost of maintenance would have driven your department to bankruptcy....lol
Here's a partial picture of one (and my boys.) Part of the Andy Leider collection. Too freaking big to get a picture!!!"Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
-
10-06-2009, 05:55 PM #20
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Broken tanker/tender
By timm1960 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 8Last Post: 05-25-2006, 06:57 PM -
How big of a tank for a tender?
By Wolf8552 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 11Last Post: 02-26-2006, 10:20 AM -
RE: Filling a tender
By Sleuth in forum The EngineerReplies: 20Last Post: 01-28-2006, 12:40 AM -
Tender hookup
By Sleuth in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 2Last Post: 09-26-2002, 02:01 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




........I don't think the Iowa DOT would be too crazy about a truck on 4 axles, weighing 131,000lbs, beating up and down their roads.
