Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 139

Thread: SAFER is out.

  1. #1
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,543

    Default SAFER is out.

    Looks like Obama is paying back the unions.

    Don't see too many little grants for the smaller departments that really need it.

    Why am I not surprised.


  2. #2
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Where did you see the list of departments who received them?

    EDIT: Found them.
    Last edited by FFRock; 03-31-2010 at 09:59 AM.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Looks like Obama is paying back the unions.

    Don't see too many little grants for the smaller departments that really need it.
    First of all, this is only one round of awards, so you really can't draw much of a conclusion from that.

    Second, SAFER was in place long before he took office, so the distribution of first round funding isn't exactly the "pay back" you're asserting. Yes, I know that there was shift in funding on his watch. Call it payback if that makes you feel better, but it's really just the fruits of being politically active as an organization. We may not like it, but it's the way things are these days. It's kind of like that old saying for the lottery, "you have to be in it, to win it." So, if you choose to sit on the sidelines of the political process, then you may not reap any reward.

    Third, maybe the smaller departments didn't apply. I know mine didn't.


    Why am I not surprised.
    Because that's who you are.

  4. #4
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,439

    Default

    Maybe if you hired people instead of forcing "volunteer unpaid overtime because that is what we expect of our guys" on others, and had a union to look out for the firefighters to prevent that kind of abuse, you wouldn't have such a bitter taste in your mouth against unions.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

  5. #5
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,866

    Default

    Frankly, why do you care? You are always on here spouting off about how your FD could go back to all volunteer, well, except for your position since it can no longer be done by volunteers. Which is amazing in itself since before you had it you always bragged about doing it as a volunteer.

    If you were to put on a SAFER grant the duties you would be assigning, and the fact that your paid guys are most often NOT first due, I wouldn't fund your grant request, if you made one, anyways. SAFER grants are for firefighters, not janitors and maintenance men.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,543

    Default

    Frankly, why do you care? You are always on here spouting off about how your FD could go back to all volunteer, well, except for your position since it can no longer be done by volunteers. Which is amazing in itself since before you had it you always bragged about doing it as a volunteer.

    You really have an issue with this. I was perfectly happy accomplishing about 50% of my public education goals doing it as a volunteer. the department decided that they wanted me to accomplish more, and realized that this would not happen with me as a volunteer. They also decided that the Deputy Chief needed a chunk of the training burden taken off his shoulders. They asked me if I was interested. It was really that simple.

    I was and still am proud of the pub ed programs that i ran as a volunteer here and back in VT. In fact, it was more comprehensive than many career departments.

    If you were to put on a SAFER grant the duties you would be assigning, and the fact that your paid guys are most often NOT first due, I wouldn't fund your grant request, if you made one, anyways. SAFER grants are for firefighters, not janitors and maintenance men.


    In fact, we did submit a SAFER request. I was tasked, along with the Asst. Chief to write it. I hope we don't get it as we really don't need it, and I know there are departments with much greater needs than ours.

    And just so we set things right, all paid staff, including myself when not committed to a public education program or task, are first due for all structure fires, brush fires on high-hazard days, technical rescues, selected EMS calls and significant MVAs. Other EMS calls, car fires and other emergencies depend on the number of volunteers available and the possible severity of the incident. It's amazing how well the system works as it allows our volunteers to do what they signed up for - make runs and manage scenes. It really bothers you that our volunteers are as capable, if not more in some cases, of handling most of our runs as our paid staff? I think it bothers you more that the paid staff's function is to support the volunteers. I really don't understand why that is such as issue, but so be it.

    Maybe if you hired people instead of forcing "volunteer unpaid overtime because that is what we expect of our guys" on others, and had a union to look out for the firefighters to prevent that kind of abuse, you wouldn't have such a bitter taste in your mouth against unions.

    Actually I have always had a bitter taste against unions. Each worker should be evaluated and compensated on his/her own performance and should be available to do whatever the employer needs done at that time. I simply do not beleive that they are needed, and do more harm than good.

    I have never had an issue with compensation or being dealt unreasonable work requests, and I have worked in several different fields.

    Our full-time staff respond off-duty because they want to. I guess it's because we have always hired from our volunteer pool and they understand why they should. I guess it's that whole brotherhood thing.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 03-31-2010 at 03:38 PM.

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I have never had an issue with compensation or being dealt unreasonable work requests, and I have worked in several different fields.

    Our full-time staff respond off-duty because they want to. I guess it's because we have always hired from our volunteer pool and they understand why they should.
    If you don't see how these two sentences contradict each other, then you are delusional.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusKspn View Post
    If you don't see how these two sentences contradict each other, then you are delusional.
    Let's see. They live in the community and are often the closest or one of the closest members to an emergency or a station. They are available days when we are shorthanded. They often possess the most experience and specialized skills.

    Your right. The community doesn't deserve them on-scene.

    I guess we just feel it's the right thing to do in our circumstances.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 03-31-2010 at 04:42 PM.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    Maybe if Washington didn't take so much money from the locals they would have more to fund what they really need. Sad part is Washington only returns 80 cents on the dollar to the people. The other 20% goes into overhead and is lost on administrative BS. The whole practice of Washington taking in more money that it needs and then giving it back is stupid and wasteful. Just another example of Government gone bad and trying to play Robin Hood. Something else they don't do very well. The departments with the most resources get the best grant writers and hence get the most money. This is one reason schools have far too many administrators as well. God Bless the Charter Schools. Now privatize all education.

  10. #10
    Forum Member DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Let's see. They live in the community and are often the closest or one of the closest members to an emergency or a station. They are available days when we are shorthanded. They often possess the most experience and specialized skills.

    Your right. The community doesn't deserve them on-scene.

    I guess we just feel it's the right thing to do in our circumstances.
    The irony is... the paid staff possesses the most experience and specialized skills, which you do not capitalize on for "routine responses".

    The community deserves their response.. and the paid staff deserve to be compensated for their fof duty response.
    Last edited by CaptainGonzo; 03-31-2010 at 05:36 PM.
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  11. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    135

    Question Question for LaFireEducator

    If your paid personnel do infact volunteer on their off time do you realize that is a violation of FLSA? Do you also realize if caught, your department, parrish or whatever is your governing body will be subject to paying these individuals for that volunteer time?

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txchf1 View Post
    If your paid personnel do infact volunteer on their off time do you realize that is a violation of FLSA? Do you also realize if caught, your department, parrish or whatever is your governing body will be subject to paying these individuals for that volunteer time?
    If you do a quick search you fill find a complete disregard for any rules that may apply. FLSA, DEQ, Workmans Comp.....

    They work in their own little world
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

  13. #13
    Forum Member ThNozzleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Jefferson City, TN
    Posts
    4,334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Looks like Obama is paying back the unions.

    Don't see too many little grants for the smaller departments that really need it.

    Why am I not surprised.
    Cry us a river...then float far, far away.

  14. #14
    Forum Member medic190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Stuyvesant Falls, NY
    Posts
    328

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by txchf1 View Post
    If your paid personnel do infact volunteer on their off time do you realize that is a violation of FLSA? Do you also realize if caught, your department, parrish or whatever is your governing body will be subject to paying these individuals for that volunteer time?
    A previous EMS employer found out about that one the hard way... Paying us the back time wasn't as much the problem as the huge fine for it occurring! And, they were on the radar for quite a long time afterward....

    And, another issue they found out: They were paying staff, they fell under federal OSHA instead of NYS PESH. As much as people complain about PESH, they are really puppy dogs when compared to OSHA: they want to help you conform to the rules by helping, OSHA helps you conform to the rules by fines (yet another whack they received - all told, it was a bad year for the employer financially (a non-profit EMS agency) and even bad for us with a lot of training and re-training...

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,543

    Default

    I have asked about it and the department has stated it is not an issue.

    They have no issue with us responding as a volunteer when off-duty. In fact, it's the way we do business.

    It's also the way most, it not all of the fire districts do business around here as well.

    I have no issue with it personally. I see it as no different than volunteering for my other all-volunteer department next door. I guess in my mind it is hurting absolutely nobody and it's helping out the citizens by providing them additional staffing at no cost. To me, and to all the other paid staff, it's simply a part of the job. I guess that makes us all anti-worker rights then.

    No different than when we teach fire/EMS classes on our off time evenings and weekends, or go to classes on our off-time. We're not compensated for that either. Part of the job.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 03-31-2010 at 06:43 PM.

  16. #16
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Yea, Obama is really paying back the unions for support, ok. Disregard the fact that career or mostly career departments (NFA's definition not mine) protect 61% of the population of the U.S., whereas volunteers or mostly volunteer departments protect 39%. So I guess the "big" departments are getting it because of the unions, not because of the 22% difference in population coverage.


    This isn't even touching on the fact that the "big" departments you complain about are by no means rich and need the money just as much as many of the smaller departments.

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,543

    Default

    Fair is fair.

    And I have no issue with urban departments getting a fair share, but in excess of $6M for a single department.

    Sorry, that's not fair.

  18. #18
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Ok lets examine the facts. I'm assuming its Cincinnati award that upsets you. $6,904,000.00 to a city with a population of 331,285 and a daytime pop. of 434,005. Which works out to $20.84 per resident and $15.91 for the day time pop.

    That doesn't seem unfair at all.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nameless View Post
    Yea, Obama is really paying back the unions for support, ok. Disregard the fact that career or mostly career departments (NFA's definition not mine) protect 61% of the population of the U.S., whereas volunteers or mostly volunteer departments protect 39%. So I guess the "big" departments are getting it because of the unions, not because of the 22% difference in population coverage.


    This isn't even touching on the fact that the "big" departments you complain about are by no means rich and need the money just as much as many of the smaller departments.
    Of course we protect people and property, so population is only half of the equation. Volunteers protect 80% of the land, if not more.

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    Of course we protect people and property, so population is only half of the equation. Volunteers protect 80% of the land, if not more.
    The value of property varies. Empty land does not have the same value as developed land. So to say you protect 80% of the land can be misleading. The value of the buildings and their contents is important if you want to play the who covers more area game. Also of importance, insurance can replace property, nothing will replace a person.

    Not that wildland and farmland doesn't deserve money or protection, but just throwing out covering 80% of the land is highly misleading and idiotic.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question On Safer Grant Stipulations On Adding Manpower
    By crankshaft in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 01:34 PM
  2. SAFER open 7-30-07
    By AsstChief11 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 04:14 PM
  3. SAFER Funding Up/AFG Down
    By onebugle in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-07-2005, 06:20 PM
  4. SAFER, who is actually going to use it?
    By neiowa in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-28-2004, 02:26 PM
  5. SAFER ACT a reality?
    By DaSharkie in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 11-13-2003, 10:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts