That is just proof of a major flaw in the denial process.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 41 to 60 of 76
Thread: Equipment DJs are out
-
04-16-2010, 08:58 PM #41
-
04-16-2010, 09:09 PM #42MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- Out and About
- Posts
- 948
I had the same thing for a department that I helped with a tender. Your application was generally good but its was determined, etc. etc.
My operations grant for hose for my vol department said "This notice is to inform you that your 2009 application scored well at the peer review panels, but it was not processed because your request was satisfied via your 2008 AFG award."
However, we were denied in 2008 for our hose operations application! Somethings not right.
-
04-16-2010, 09:09 PM #43MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 306
It is quite obvious there is some type of problem with the way these where processed. Also why would they have their very limited staff complete tech reviews and reductions right up to the very end on applications that they never intended on funding. The amount of applicants that had reductions and then received DJs is astounding.
-
04-16-2010, 09:29 PM #44Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 9
I was having a crazy week anyway and now a DJ on equipment.
Not the way I wanted to start the weekend.
-
04-16-2010, 10:18 PM #45
I was thinking the same thing so I looked and the congressional districts in red have their share of the grants. It is almost like they are dumping this year’s grants and going to start fresh with the 010 grants. Maybe they have had enough of all the screw ups. If I am not wrong they have to spend what was appropriated for 09. But they could award a large amount of funds to some originations that really don’t have anything to do with firefighting. Like all of you it seems to be something screwy about this. Getting any kind of useful info from them is like pulling you wisdom teeth.
-
04-16-2010, 11:38 PM #46
-
04-16-2010, 11:56 PM #47
-
04-17-2010, 08:29 AM #48
-
04-17-2010, 08:51 AM #49Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Long time no Sea
- Posts
- 2,253
-
04-17-2010, 09:45 AM #50Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Monroe, MI
- Posts
- 286
Could it be that the computer has screwed up so bad that it is giving the awards to the dj's, and the awarded projects are getting the dj's? With such short man power that they have, maybe nobody has caught it, or doesn't want to fix it? Just a thought.
-
04-17-2010, 06:30 PM #51
-
04-17-2010, 08:30 PM #52
DJ after 1199 in December
Well we lost the battle yesterday for a rehab trailer that we applied for. We had a 1199 post in December and now we got the DJ letter yesterday. What a disappointment after seeing the 1199 post and wait to hear more and now we find out that it is a DJ letter. O well I guess time to move on and hope 2010 AFG goes well.
-
04-17-2010, 10:21 PM #53MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 222
My turnout gear made it to peer review but not enough money, diesel exhaust removal computer rejected. Oh well. Now I know what I'm going to work on.
-
04-18-2010, 12:48 AM #54
-
04-18-2010, 07:25 AM #55Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 75
Someone else alluded to it, but is there any chance that the DJ's were a screw up with comedy of errors which has taken place this year? I find it difficult to believe they would consume the time to go in and do all of the manual reductions in the system and then turn around to DJ the application? The only thing that I could think of was they wanted the budgets corrected on those applications that made it through computer before they were peer reviewed? Seems rather time consuming though!
I guess I am grasping at straws, but I wonder in their haste to get the DJ's released, others were mistakenly pulled into the mix? Let's at least hope people!
-
04-18-2010, 08:29 AM #56
Thats my question. Too much work was done on many applications then they were turned down?
I realize it may be grasping at straws, but geesh.
-
04-18-2010, 09:00 AM #57
Ths is only the second time I have EVER heard of that happening. This has been the screwiest year I have ever seen in AFG since 2004. I am quite ure that AFG's phone willbe ringing off the hook fomr departments and Congressional reps onext week... I wonder what the repsonses will range from?
Kurt Bradley
Public Safety Grants Consultant
"Never Trade Skill for Luck"
-
04-18-2010, 09:23 AM #58MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 179
Definitely calling my Congressman...my DJ says I didn't provide enough cost-benefit information and I didn't explain how my project would benefit the daily operations of my department........
My project was a live-burn trailer for over 1,000 FF in a seven county area, with 150,000 citizens in that area. I even included the cost per person/ per use formulas, etc., in the app, had all my financial info, etc........I don't mind getting turned down. But I DO MIND being told I didn't do something that I DID do.
-
04-18-2010, 10:41 AM #59
-
04-18-2010, 02:12 PM #60Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 69
Got ours to damn it
oh well Kurt might need your assistance brother.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
ISO Company Personnel
By FIRE549 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 20Last Post: 05-16-2007, 06:15 PM -
Investigations Equipment
By Not2L84U2 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 0Last Post: 11-14-2005, 10:05 AM -
Lockout/Tagout SOG's
By Maness in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 10-28-2005, 02:41 PM -
Is your equipment ready for the next terrorist attack?
By PAVolunteer in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 09-24-2002, 04:40 PM -
Extrication equipment
By BFD101 in forum Departments Helping DepartmentsReplies: 0Last Post: 09-06-2002, 07:34 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




