Some of you may have heard of the 5-fatality apartment fire in Seattle's Fremont neighborhood last Saturday, and that the first-in engine couldn't pump water.
It was reported that the engine wouldn't transfer from road to pump gear.
Now the department is investigating what went wrong with that apparatus (a mid-90's E-One).
Turns out that this rig--and all of Seattle's engines--don't have a manual pump shift override lever.
Now, the victims in this fire didn't stand a chance anyways--not matter if the rig had pump correctly, because when this first engine arrived on-location, smoke and flames were pouring from every opening of this structure.
However the mention that this engine wouldn't go into pump gear, and that their (the SFD's) entire fleet of engines don't have manual pump shift override features, really astonished me.
In another forum, I was told by a couple of firefighters that these features are UNCOMMON in most fire engines. With that, I call major BS on this.
Almost every rig I've pumped on/operated had this feature. Every E-One, KME and Pierce had this feature. The only two rigs that didn't--were Darley's.
So, I ask all of you: Do you have manual pump shift overrides on your apparatus?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 103
-
06-16-2010, 01:51 AM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 23
Manual Pump Shift Override mechanism
-
06-16-2010, 02:10 AM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- virginia
- Posts
- 490
Only on the trucks that were pre-quint concept. All the quints and FRVs do not have manual pump shift overrides. Hopefully the next batch will. Funny thing we had talked about this less then a month ago in the station. one of those what if things.
FYI we are running 2000 GPM Hale pump
-
06-16-2010, 02:56 AM #3
All I am going to say is this:
I can't believe that the NFPA has NOT made it mandatory for all engines to have a secondary means of engaging the pump. As well, the builders to make it an option. This should be mandatory for the reasons such as this. Sh^t happens, and you need to have a back up plan. (if I'm wrong concerning the NFPA, please post it)
I find it really disgusting that they request a secondary braking system, but not a secondary means of putting an engine into pump gear. Hopefully this incident will make changes to that effect.
As for my rigs, all of them have a manual bypass to engage the pump. Not having it, is retarded.
FM1I'm the one Fire and Rescue calls, when they need to be Rescued.
Originally Posted by EastKyFF
-
06-16-2010, 07:31 AM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Northeast Coast
- Posts
- 3,527
As I noted in the other thread, every engine I've worked on had the manual override somewhere. Like FIREMECH1 said, they're usually a T-handled pull lever that moves in and out upon actualtion, manually or when the air switch works. Only one was under the pumphouse requiring laying under the pump. The newest engine with it's rearmount pump has the lever mounted right off the pump along the pumphouse wall. I too am very surprised this is not as common as I assumed. I'm willing to bet many have them but just don't know it, while some may not have them at all, but I'd think this would be a simple redundancy that makes too much sense to skip.
-
06-16-2010, 09:06 AM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 23
Man, I never thought of that way. NFPA requiring us to have two braking systems, but not a secondary system to engage the pump?!?!
I'm going to do some research to see how to get this NFPA standard changed. I too am amazed that this is not required.
Thanks for the responses guys. Glad to know I wasn't in La-la land when I was told they (manual pump shift) were uncommon, as I knew they actually were.
-
06-16-2010, 11:11 AM #6
pump shifts overrides
Pump shift override is an option that should be standardized by all of the manufacturers,
so truck committees all over the country dont have to remember to ask for one ; but should be put there anyways. Otherwise you have a $400,000 toolbox carrying water that you cant use.
-
06-16-2010, 12:04 PM #7
Agreed.
With all the push for safety, it is rather concerning that this is not a mandated item to have on a pumper. If the switch fails, before pump engagement or during, not being able to move the water to the fire puts so much in jeopardy. I'd be willing to help get NFPA to push this through, for what it's worth. Let me know if I can help.
-
06-16-2010, 05:04 PM #8Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 20
Other than the 1938 Seagrave, our 2002 E-One CAFS pumper has it. No other trucks in our dept have it and I was adamant when I spec'd this truck. This truck is first in and I would have not have had it any other way.
-
06-16-2010, 05:46 PM #9Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 156
where does this one end???? do you have a back up for the electronic throttle/pressure governor? (more prone to fail than the pump shift) a back up for warning light activations? a back up for the back up? back up system for the electric o2 valves on ambulances? an extra defibrillator in case your fails? as far as the secondary braking systems mentioned above, its not in case you lose your brakes, its to give added braking/stopping ability.
In the Washington instance, was it really a failure of the pump shift or some other issue?
By the way, who knows how to properly use your manual pump over ride?
-
06-16-2010, 06:26 PM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- SW Missouri
- Posts
- 1,081
Only two of our engines have an override, both of them have Waterous pumps in them. The trucks with Hales do not have overrides. New 2010 engine with a Waterous does not have an override. Have had the override freeze up in 0 degree weather. Tried to break the override loose on scene and could not get it to break loose. Had to get it inside to get it to thaw the cable out.
-
06-17-2010, 01:14 AM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 23
What kind of imperical data do you have to support the statement "...do you have a back up for the electronic throttle/pressure governor? (more prone to fail that the pump shift)..."?
I've never had a throttle or governer fail, however I've had the pump not go into gear on a couple of occassion. Now this is usually because of " butt gears" situation, whereas the splines don't line up (a known issue with residual torque in Allison Trannies), but is easily resolved by placing the transmission in reverse momentarilly, and then re-trying the pump shift procedure.
I think you're missing the point here thought. No one is suggesting that you go hog wild, and have a back up for everything, however having a manaul pump shift for you pumper seems pretty reasonable to me.
Any yes, I know precisely how to manually shift every rig in our fleet into pump gear.
-
06-17-2010, 02:40 AM #12
Right now I have a batch of 50/50 engines with either the D60's, or ISM's. I have had the hand throttle fail on D60's several times, and only once on the ISM. Either way, I keep one of each on my service truck.
Originally Posted by sirhcdeer1
And just to let you know, you made my night. Someone posted about a problem with having a "torque" problem going into pump gear. My response was operator error, by doing it too fast. As well, I recommended that they should put it in reverse, and try again. I'm glad there are operators (as you) that actually have a clue.
FM1I'm the one Fire and Rescue calls, when they need to be Rescued.
Originally Posted by EastKyFF
-
06-17-2010, 03:02 AM #13
The electronic throttle/pressure governor does have a backup/default mode, so you can still flow water. If you didn't know that, then the rest of your post is what it is. EPIC FAIL.
Originally Posted by ffp20
I never said the secondary braking requirement was put into place in case of brake failure. It was said to show the priority of what the NFPA has required. To not mandate a back up of the pump gear operation, is freaking stupid.
Carry on, some where else.
FM1I'm the one Fire and Rescue calls, when they need to be Rescued.
Originally Posted by EastKyFF
-
06-17-2010, 01:40 PM #14Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Nova Scotia, Canada
- Posts
- 62
It is in our specs
It's in our specs that every new truck comes with a manual override. I can't say all the trucks in the fleet have it but I would hazard to guess 90% of them do. And I know that at least some of that other 10% are manual shifts anyway.
And I too know how to shift all the overrides and maunal shifts.
I have had my Governor control fail onsite during a major call. It autmoaticly kicked into RPM and I was able to continue my flow without interuption.....Funny it was about 5 minutes after the salt water I started being fed hit the pump....LOL Damn salt water. On top of that so long as the pump didn't come out of gear I could still flow water even if the whole governor control "dissaperad" since I can control the rpms of the truck with the throtal in the cab. ( Hard to do but it is possible)
-
06-17-2010, 03:09 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- virginia
- Posts
- 490
-
06-17-2010, 06:24 PM #16
We just had a situation where our first in pump would not engage. All of our pumps have a manual lever, so I crawled under to give it a tug, but it turned out to be a broken shifting collar, so I couldn't move it even with the manual pull rod.
It should be a pretty easy retro fit...depending on space. Our manual pull rods is a simple rod bolted on to the triangular metal plate that the air switch normal activates.
Having said that, it shows the beauty of a centrifical pump. Next truck in hooked up and we pumped right through the broken engine, since all the lines were already deployed and ready to go.
p.s. Every member who go through our pump classes learns where that rod is and how to use it.Last edited by Saltspringfire; 06-17-2010 at 06:28 PM.
"We accept great personal risk to save another person's life; We accept moderate personal risk to save another persons property; We accept no personal risk to save what is already lost"
Visit us on the web @ www.saltspringfire.com
-
06-17-2010, 07:07 PM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Westchester County NY
- Posts
- 20
Be careful what you wish for because you might get it. My 1997 Pumper was delivered with a manual override for the pump shift. Since it was not part of the specifications I questioned it and was told that it was an NFPA requirement. To be honest about it I never researched it to find out if it was or was not mandated I accepted the statement at face value and lived with the override. It lasted four years until I finally removed it.
It was as others have stated a “T” handle attached to a cable which is clevis pinned to the rear of sliding transfer gear shaft on the pump transmission. The “T” handle moves in and out when the pump shift is cycled and here lies the problem. If the solid shaft section becomes bent when the handle is ion the out position the apparatus won’t shift out of pump gear. This as it turns out is a fairly common occurrence. If the handle becomes bent when the apparatus is in “road” gear then it won’t shift into pump, much harder to do but not impossible.
If your preventative maintenance isn’t up to par and the cable section becomes corroded you will never move the thing either in or out. Those of you who can remember the old veneer cables on pre 1991 throttles or on ladder PTOs will recall some of the corrosion related freeze problems especially in areas with heavy road salt use.
The pump shift override had created more problems with that vehicle going in and out of pump than the override ever would have corrected. These problems were responsible for the truck being out of service.
This entire discussion operates under the assumption that the pump didn’t shift because of an air shift problem, may be the pump shift mechanism is working perfectly and the air pressure was low when they tried to engage the pump. Low air pressure = no pump shift. Catastrophic failure of air driven pump shifts happen but aren’t common, there is almost always warning signs that something needs service or repair.
Those of you who think that you can control the throttle from the cab are driving apparatus built before 1991, or you already have electronic/maintenance/service issues telling you there is something wrong with your apparatus and it needs to be diagnosed and corrected. 1991 was when the last of the cable actuated throttles with direct connect linkages were replaced with electronics. Yes I know the knob on the pump panel looks the same, turns the same but if you look behind the pump you will see that the back of the throttle control does not have a cable attached to it, but a rheostat with two wires. When you shift into pump the foot throttle in the cab is disabled and engine speed control switches to the pump panel throttle.
Training and in particular comprehensive operator training remains the key to making sure your apparatus will work when and how you need it. If the operator doesn’t understand every aspect of what the apparatus is doing when you shift into pump he cannot troubleshoot it to make sure it is not human error instead of mechanical or electronic failure. If it is mechanical or electrical failure in the field with today’s apparatus you’re put of service at the scene period.
The NFPA apparatus standard is not written to make sure that no civilians die in a fire or accidents, it is done to make sure that the vehicles safer for firefighters and firefighting operations. Hence things like secondary braking and minimum ladder strength and performance requirements.
-
06-17-2010, 08:37 PM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- SW Missouri
- Posts
- 1,081
That would be incorrect. It may be correct for your trucks but it is not correct for everyone. We have 2-1998, 2000, and 2002 engines that all can be controled from the foot throttle in the cab. I am unsure if the 2009 or 2010 engines can. I can also bet you money that there is no E/M/S issues with those trucks.
-
06-17-2010, 10:28 PM #19
SpecCapt, I see your point. What about having the manual pump-shift handle recessed into a "pocket" in the side of the pump panel? A door over it would help to keep road debris out of it, but it would still have room to move in and out without worrying about getting accidentally bent.
Just a thought.
-
06-17-2010, 11:38 PM #20MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Rural Iowa
- Posts
- 3,107
I've never had a need for a backup/manual pump shift. Use the Jake brake on EVERY drive.
I can't think of a new pumper I've inspected that had anything obvious that looked like a manual pump shift. Pierce, E-One, Central. I've never seen such listed in a spec. Certainly unlike on a "program" truck which covers most of those sold in the US.
Our new 2007 M2-112 operates using the driver's accelerator quite nicely when pump is in gear.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
2000 GPM Pump overkill ?
By Fire304 in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 45Last Post: 06-05-2011, 10:56 PM -
Pressure Correction
By jt4a in forum The EngineerReplies: 5Last Post: 10-12-2001, 08:52 PM -
Pumper run away
By *LHS in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 12Last Post: 07-17-2001, 03:10 PM -
RPM's & GPM's
By Daron in forum The EngineerReplies: 9Last Post: 07-03-2001, 01:33 AM -
RFP's
By D Littrell in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 1Last Post: 09-08-2000, 06:36 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




