checked my 2010 AFG OPS today. Realized that under # of firefighters trained to FF1 I accidentally put 1. Not 44 out of 50 like I noted in my narative. All my other info was correct and almost identical to the info provided for my 2009 AFG OPS that I was awarded in like the 3rd round. How much of an effect do you think it had? Is it worth calling the help desk for any reason?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: Fatal flaw in my 2010 AFG?
-
10-04-2010, 05:11 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Saugerties, NY
- Posts
- 62
Fatal flaw in my 2010 AFG?
-
10-04-2010, 05:42 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 308
They cannot change your application after submission.
-
10-04-2010, 05:59 PM #3
It doesn't ask you how many in the data entry portion, it asks the percentage. So if you entered 1, you have 1% certified.
As CCC said, nothing can be changed anyway, however I will say that I have seen awards with 0; although it is certainly possible that the number is factored into your overall score.
-
10-04-2010, 09:24 PM #4Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Northwest PA
- Posts
- 319
IMHO that should not affect your chances. Some peer reviewers would catch that as an entry error particurally if your narrative stated the facts concerning the number of FFI trained firefighters you have. I wouldn't sweat it.
-
10-05-2010, 02:33 PM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Saugerties, NY
- Posts
- 62
I knew they couldn't change it. And yeah I just noticed its a percentage not the number of firefighters. Just wasn't sure if there was anything worth trying. I'd hate to lose out on the grant over 1 typo.
-
10-06-2010, 09:13 AM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Long time no Sea
- Posts
- 2,253
I have made errors before. Although it cannot be changed and AFG states it will not, you can follow up with an email to explain the mistake. but it should be done right away and before peer.
Frankly, I am not sure if what you described will have that much effect.
-
10-06-2010, 11:01 PM #7
I would probably agree with Jam here. Depending upon what your request was for, I would think that error would not have a large bearing on your results.
-
10-08-2010, 05:22 PM #8Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Saugerties, NY
- Posts
- 62
I asked for $9000 for a TIC. we've never had one before. hoped this was gonna be a no brainer grant. now i'm just a little concerned.
-
10-10-2010, 08:03 AM #9
-
10-10-2010, 06:15 PM #10Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Saugerties, NY
- Posts
- 62
-
10-10-2010, 08:28 PM #11MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
I had what I thought was a fatal error on our 2010 app (somehow it got checked we were a federal FD), yet we still have an 1199a update, if that makes you feel better.
-
10-11-2010, 09:29 AM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 790
I think there was some kind of a glitch in their system, as I also had a check beside the federal fire department question, and have spoke with a few others who have said the same thing. I always do a final read through just before I submit to ensure everything has transferred over without a glitch, and was about 100% positive it was not there when I did the read through, but when I looked back it was was checked.
-
10-11-2010, 09:54 AM #13MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- NW Indiana
- Posts
- 1,419
Leeds--i think that is still a "survey" question, not a "points" question, if that's right it doesn't affect scoring at all. The smart people will correct me if i'm wrong on that.
Shoot--just checked our apps and my departments haven't shown up as "federal". With some of our best writers getting the federal click it makes me concerned!!
-
10-11-2010, 10:06 AM #14MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
-
10-11-2010, 04:43 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Saugerties, NY
- Posts
- 62
see thats part of the reason a called it a stupid mistake. i looked the app over before sumbition and i remember having to do the calculation to figure out the %. maybe it was right and is glitched
-
10-11-2010, 04:59 PM #16
Yea.... those of us in NJ are aware of that problem.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/ny.../26njrace.htmlI am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
10-17-2010, 07:37 PM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Catlettsburg, KY
- Posts
- 378
I made a similar mistake with mine, I had paid instead of volunteer. A very helpful AFG agent contacted me and told me no worries. I was really relieved. Also, did you ask for some funds for training on the TIC? If so the 1% may help. I am not sure. I try not to worry about the scoring once it is submitted because there is nothing that can be done at that point as I abruptly found out.
Also it is best to use IE when filling out the app, as I found out and have been told by the same AFG agent.
-
10-17-2010, 10:16 PM #18
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Cleveland Fire Dept., Fire exam, July 31st, 2010
By dmfireschool in forum Hiring & Employment DiscussionReplies: 706Last Post: 04-22-2013, 10:22 PM -
Your Ideal Fleet
By viperfire1 in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 103Last Post: 01-16-2011, 09:37 PM -
Stven Hawking SAYS SO!
By MalahatTwo7 in forum The Off Duty ForumsReplies: 89Last Post: 09-10-2010, 12:53 PM -
2010 san antonio, texas fire exam
By dmfireschool in forum Hiring & Employment DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 04-16-2010, 07:27 AM -
2010 afg
By MoneyMan29 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 32Last Post: 02-01-2010, 08:23 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




