Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    811

    Cool Our Policy.....

    We primarily protect light/medium framed rotary aircraft, but we use primarily Structure Gear. At Station 3, which protects Military and Civilian Aircraft we do have the Proximity Suits issued to us but they stay in a closet unless some Heavy Cargo Planes come-in then we pull them out and set them by the ARFF and Water Tender. Our Crash Stations provide both services so the Structure Gear works best for our Operations.

    I do agree, once the get the ARFF Boots on, it's like walking on pillows. Have fun getting them off though. When I first got hired at my current Career Department, I wore ARFF Boots with Structure Gear. I almost cried when they had me switch back to Turnout Boots. LOL.

    Gunny V, you do make some very valid points especially with the Manpower issue. I never understood how an ARFF with either (1) or (2) personnel is expected to be able to perform everything needed for an Aircraft Rescue. I know that we cover multiple Units, but (1) person (to bring the number up to 3) more per Unit would make more sense to me. It will be interesting to see if anybody challenges the manpower using the "2 In, 2 Out" Regulation. Just a thought.....

    Here's another thought, ever notice how the DOD training disks show ARFF/AF FFs wearing Proximity Gear while responding to a simulated FS which would require an Interior Attack, yet the Manufacturer says the gear is not intended for that use?
    Last edited by mikeyboy; 12-31-2010 at 05:12 PM.
    "Be LOUD, Be PROUD..... It just might save your can someday when goin' through an intersection!!!!!"

    Life on the Truck (Quint) is good.....

    Eat til you're sleepy..... Sleep til you're hungry..... And repeat.....


  2. #22
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    L-Town, SC
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firemedic070 View Post
    I agree the boots are the most uncomfortable boots I've ever worn. Globe has come out with an ARFF boot made of Leather that has all the protection of the rubber but 10xs more comfortable. Cost alot. I'm hoping that Globe at FDIC this year will have an set to try on.
    I am going to have to investigate that because I hate wearing my ARFF boots. Running the tapes after a barrier engagement really sucks in them.

  3. #23
    MembersZone Subscriber fyrman1977's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Mpls area
    Posts
    15

    Default

    As an index E dept we switched to all structual gear about 6 years ago. As has already been stated the need for prox gear is pretty nill these days. If you have a large fuel fire, you should be in the crash truck.

    And after reading the current studies out there we are now switching over to leather boots as well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Turnout gear narratives
    By firefighterford in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 12:08 AM
  2. World Of Fire Report: 03-02-06
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2006, 10:11 PM
  3. World Of Fire Report: 12-09-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-15-2005, 09:15 PM
  4. World Of Fire Report: 12-05-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-10-2005, 01:28 PM
  5. World Of Fire Report: 06-06-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 09:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts