We are in the process of developing specifications for a new engine/tanker.
Tentatively, it will be a custom cab, 2,000 gallon water tank, dual-rear axle. Think of it as an attack(scene) truck with a bigger than average water tank for a rural department.
In speaking with many vendors, we get a different answer from each of them for the following items:
Brakes - All disc, disc in front and drum in the back, or drum all around?
Rear Suspension - Air-ride, conventional leaf spring, or rubber block?
Pump - Hale, Waterous, or Darley?
Scene lighting - LED vs quartz/halogen?
Brand of hydraulic generator - Onan, Harrison, or Smartpower etc?
Please chime in and let us know your experience on any of the above items.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: New Truck Options?
-
04-08-2011, 09:55 AM #1MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Feb 2000
- Location
- Willington F.D., CT
- Posts
- 139
New Truck Options?
-
04-08-2011, 10:39 AM #2
-
04-08-2011, 10:40 AM #3MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- So of Can. / N. of Mexico
- Posts
- 859
-
04-08-2011, 10:55 AM #4
We've been using all-wheel disc brakes since 1990, and have had exceptional success with it. Now that you can get a 17" rotor on a non-IFS suspension, your braking power has increased that much more.
We switched to a Hendrickson rear in our tower ladders and tankers a couple of years ago, and we're getting a much better ride quality out of these than we had previously.Rear Suspension - Air-ride, conventional leaf spring, or rubber block?
Ford, Chevrolet, or Dodge? Although Darley pumps aren't nearly as popular here as they are overseas, they still appear to be quality pumps (the Pierce PUC pump is manufactured by Darley). As for the Waterous vs Hale arguement, they're both fine pumps. Many departments will stick with one brand over the other because of parts interchangability. Both of my departments have run Waterous for decades, and unless presented with a reason to switch, we'll stick with them.Pump - Hale, Waterous, or Darley?
LED's draw far, far less power and still give some excellent lighting options. FRC just introduced a 20,000 lumen LED brow light at FDIC, and they have a new surface mount 15,000 lumen LED side scene light with only 1.25" of protrusion. The Whelen Pioneer Plus is also an excellent option for LED floods.Scene lighting - LED vs quartz/halogen?
One advantage to the LED's is that they're 12V systems, and eliminate the need for a generator. Their light is a bit more "harsh" than the more yellowish tint of standard quartz lights, however.
All good brands. We've had excellent luck with our Harrison units and plan on sticking with those.Brand of hydraulic generator - Onan, Harrison, or Smartpower etc?
Many of these things are going to be based on your need and budget. If you don't have a need for a generator for anything but scene lighting, perhaps you can go all LED scene lights and save yourself $20,000 on a generator. Other things, such as your pump choice, would have quite an impact on the price of the unit.
I know many others will chime in on this thread, let us know what other questions you have.Career Fire Lieutenant
Volunteer Chief Officer
Never taking for granted that I'm privilged enough to have the greatest job in the world!
-
04-08-2011, 12:27 PM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 109
Brakes - I do not think that you are able to get disc's all around at the weight level. The disc in front, drum in back is just fine for performance. Maintenance may be another issue.
Rear Suspension - Air ride from Ridewell or Firemax is pretty good.
Pump - Waterous and Hale are good pumps... slight differences regarding gear teeth shapes, and how they supply water to the various discharges.
Scene Lighting - LED is great, but is pricey. Quartz lights are OK, and have their place depending on what you are doing.
Hydraulic Generator - I would use Smartpower... they have awesome customer service if you have issues.
Here is a great example of a large tanker working as an engine:
Dagsboro Fire Department Delaware
(1) Custom Pumper/Tanker
Sutphen East is proud to announce the delivery of Dagsboro, DE Pumper / Tanker. This unit features a Sutphen Tandem axle custom chassis with 500HP ISM Cummins, 15” raised roof and seating for 6. The Apparatus also has a HALE 2000 GPM QTWO pump, Foam Pro 2001 system, 3 speed lays, front and rear suctions and deck gun. The generator is a Smart Power 15KW. The tank holds 2500 gallons of water and 30 gallons of Foam. Aluminum extruded body, ROM roll up doors and Zico ladder rack complete this vehicle. This apparatus was sold by Emergency Equipment Sales of NJ.Last edited by 93Cobra; 04-08-2011 at 04:49 PM.
-
04-08-2011, 12:38 PM #6
most trucks have the option of 50, 55, 60, 63, 65, 75, 77, 85, 90, 95, 100, 102, 105, 125, and i think of a 127 feet aerial device. this is of course dependent on the mfg of the TRUCK.
Originally Posted by madden01
"and everyone is encouraged to use Plain, Spelled Out English. I thought this was covered in NIMS training."
-
04-08-2011, 12:51 PM #7Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 1999
- Location
- Swanton Fire Dept. Swanton, Vermont
- Posts
- 454
I would strongly suggest for what you are building MIV valves on the intakes and a primer selector valve to choose what intake you want to prime up to the MIV. It does add cost but you will have less issues with priming at rural situations.
We did it on our last engine and it works much better than our older rigs. You are pumping away on tank water or another supply and prime the intake you want up to the outside of the MIV and then open it up and you never miss a beat.
-
04-08-2011, 01:16 PM #8
Stuart, I have to tell you my department does not operate a Pumper Tanker such as your dept is looking to acquire, but on the whole I agree with much of what has been said above, see my specific comments below and I'll try not to be repetitive of above replies.
I hope this all helps!~ Doc
- Happy Public Servant working in the Public Safety Field since 1998
“Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst of Evils.” ~ General John Stark
-
04-08-2011, 02:27 PM #9
yes, on some drafting units they have installed priming systems on the outsides of the miv's. this allows priming from the drop tanks while using the pump to nurse to the attack engine. in my opinion you can essentially get the same benefit by using the low-profile strainers with 1.5" connection for jet siphoning.
Originally Posted by madden01
"and everyone is encouraged to use Plain, Spelled Out English. I thought this was covered in NIMS training."
-
04-08-2011, 02:43 PM #10
-
04-08-2011, 02:44 PM #11
-
04-08-2011, 02:47 PM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 113
Akron Brass just released a new LED Scene Light too. I bet it will likely be less expensive compared to the FRC and Whelen products.
http://www.akronbrass.com/uploadedFi..._SceneStar.pdf
-
04-08-2011, 03:21 PM #13MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 104
Took delivery about 6 weeks ago of this Pumper/Tanker, 1500gpm w/2500 gallon tank. Truck is equipped with disc brakes all the way around.
*(2) 1000watt FRC lights on all four sides
*10kw Harrison Hydraulic Generator
*Dual Racks (1) Ladder and 10' Hard Suction (1) 3000 tank and 10' Hard Suction
*(2) Coffin storage with 15' suction
*Waterous 1500gpm single stage pump
*Leafs on the rearLast edited by todd3603; 04-08-2011 at 03:32 PM.
-
04-09-2011, 04:15 PM #14Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 710
Sorry. Dual post. See below
Last edited by Command6; 04-09-2011 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Dual posting
-
04-09-2011, 04:17 PM #15
-
04-11-2011, 12:16 PM #16Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 1999
- Location
- Swanton Fire Dept. Swanton, Vermont
- Posts
- 454
-
04-11-2011, 06:21 PM #17
Since time is not on my side I'll just throw something in about the suspension. Knowing Connecticut pretty well (I came from thar) I know its roads can be crappy, to put it mildly. Very similar to our roads up here in Vermont. An air ride suspension will make SUCH a difference in your ride quality.
At my place of work all of our new trucks (Both single rear and tandem axel rigs) are being equiped with the Hendrixson air ride suspension systems. Going from a truck with springs in the back, to one with air ride is like night and day. The load isn't tossed and bumped around nearly as much, and it saves the frame and body from being beaten on constantly.
For fire apparatus, I'm sure they would have the same effect. I wish our tanker had an air ride suspension, it would make my spine hurt less once I get back to the station.Opinions expressed by myself here are just that, mine. And not that of ANY organization or service I am affiliated with.
-
04-17-2011, 04:36 PM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Penny Lane
- Posts
- 390
Stuart:
Since a lot of people have already commented on your specific questions, I would just offer this word of advice:
We bought our first "attack" engine-tanker ten years ago, and our second one four years ago. It was fantastic rolling up on the first piece with 2,000-2,500 gallons of water, with another 2,000-2,500 gallons coming in second-due. It was very convenient, and brought a lot of confidence with it.
About two years ago, we finally realized that these beasts just couldn't go enough places as a primary attack engine. Sure, there are places that they work just fine, but we have a ton of narrow driveways where the big rigs either need to stay on the road, or it takes a lot longer to maneuver them into place (in several cases causing damage to the vehicle, as well). I cannot imagine how the department with that Sutphen pumper-tanker pictured above manages to get into tight spaces.
We've now switched back to running our 1993 1,000 gallon engine out first, with the stipulation that the second engine must follow within four minutes (thereby sustaining a 250gpm fire flow). The pumper-tankers make very versatile 2nd or 3rd/4th due pieces, and can also stand in for our 1,000 gallon piece when it's out for repair.
If you're looking for a primary, first-out piece and really want more than 1,000 gallons, I would strongly consider something like this 1,500 gallon piece, albeit with the caveat that your hosebed height will shoot up.
If 2,000 gallons is really your goal, I would strive for something like this, aiming to minimize all dimensions (rear overhang, front overhang, cab length/pump house/forward compartment dimension). They manage with a 6" bumper, a SMFD cab, a 44" pump house, and 31" front and rear compartment lengths. It should also be noted that they have ladders, suction hose, and dump tank on the outside, so as to provide the most compact rig possible (internal ladders & suction or full-height+full-depth compartments take so much real estate). In this case, I would opt to drop 500 gallons from the tank size (down to 2,000) in order to lower the hosebed floor. Note: I would contact this department first and ask how it rides. Our 192" wheelbase turns like a miracle but gives a ride from hell. Although the Chepachet rig has a 187.5" WB, it may ride a lot better because it has so little weight overhanging the rear axle (and the front axle).Last edited by BlitzfireSolo; 04-17-2011 at 05:17 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Mobile, Alabama ladder truck crash
By EFD840 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 27Last Post: 04-27-2011, 11:16 AM -
Cedar Fort gets new Fire Truck
By UTFFEMT in forum UtahReplies: 1Last Post: 02-15-2011, 11:30 PM -
World Of Fire Report: 12-20-04
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 12-31-2004, 09:39 PM -
World Of Fire Report: 04-29-04
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 05-02-2004, 11:52 AM -
World Of Fire Report: 02-03-04
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 02-04-2004, 07:41 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Hmmmm, I think you went the same route I was going to go with this, only I was going to be more of a smart ***. I could be wrong though, haha.
