My Agency was recently advised by "CAL-OSHA" that our large breathing air cylinders we carry on our Aerial, (for tip air) and the ones on our breathing support are not compliant because they are D.O.T bottles, and not A.S.M.E.? We were promptly given a compliance letter. However D.O.T states our bottles carried on the roadways must meet D.O.T. regulations which A.S.M.E are not? It was our understanding A.S.M.E bottles were for Permanent installations such as for compressor units at the stations. Has anyone ever run into this issue with two regulatory agencies not agreeing? Who must we follow? Every fire agency around us has D.O.T bottles on their aerials as well.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: D.O.T vs CAL OSHA?
-
05-31-2011, 11:54 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 2
D.O.T vs CAL OSHA?
-
06-01-2011, 03:46 AM #2MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 808
Huh, Cali not playing well with others? Say it ain't so... Haven't had that issue before, but that is an interesting issue. I would ask what the difference is.....
"Be LOUD, Be PROUD..... It just might save your can someday when goin' through an intersection!!!!!"
Life on the Truck (Quint) is good.....
Eat til you're sleepy..... Sleep til you're hungry..... And repeat.....
-
06-01-2011, 10:24 PM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 2
HA! Yeah shocking huh?? All we have been told is the ASME bottles are much thicker and much heavier, (not very conducive for aerials or any vehicles for that matter), and the testing requirements are different.. DOT-5 year hydro, ASME, no hydro, but some sort of external ultrasonic testing to check for cracks.
-
06-01-2011, 10:30 PM #4
You are correct, ASME cylinders are for fixed installation.
Tell Cal-OSHA you want a citation for the regulation."Nemo Plus Voluptatis Quam Nos Habant"
The Code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Safety From A Viewpoint We Don't Like To Look At
By MalahatTwo7 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 08-09-2005, 04:11 PM -
HAZWOPER & Emergency Action Plans
By MalahatTwo7 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 08-01-2005, 08:18 AM -
And We Thought OSHA Was "SAFE"
By MalahatTwo7 in forum The Off Duty ForumsReplies: 0Last Post: 02-21-2005, 01:37 PM -
FYI in CA
By hootman in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 17Last Post: 09-28-2004, 12:04 AM -
Propane Co. cited by OSHA in explosion
By GeorgeWendtCFI in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 02-23-2004, 08:10 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



