My department is currently looking into upgrading a brush truck to a brush truck/quick access truck for structure fires in our tight lakeshore roads. This truck would have between 300 and 400 gallons of water (foam), hose and misc tools.
I was wondering what are some pros and cons for the Ford Super Duty F-550 4x4 (Power Stroke Diesel) Extended Cab and the same for the Chevrolet 3500 Heavy Duty 4x4 (Duramax Diesel) Extended Cab.
Any info you can provide I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 36
Thread: Ford F-550 vs Chevy 3500
-
11-21-2011, 04:16 AM #1
Ford F-550 vs Chevy 3500
Last edited by rschultzjr; 11-21-2011 at 04:24 AM. Reason: More info added
-
11-21-2011, 08:52 AM #2
We have a 2008 F-550 light rescue. I have no complaints. It is well-balanced, runs great, handles great, and has had no mechanical issues.
I can't give you any comparison to a Chevy since I haven't driven a 3500, but we're happy with our Ford."Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”
--General James Mattis, USMC
-
11-21-2011, 10:47 AM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 72
Ford F-550 has a GVWR of 19k
Chevy 3500 has a GVWR of 15K
I have used plenty of Fords 450-550s for said purposes, and never had an issue.
-
11-21-2011, 12:31 PM #4Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 1999
- Location
- Swanton Fire Dept. Swanton, Vermont
- Posts
- 454
I would get someone that knows spreadsheets and make a list of the items, number to be carried and weights of each item.
You can get chassis weights probably off websites, water is 8.33 #/gallon and some educated estimate on the body. You will probably find that the GVWR is approached rather quickly on either chassis.
Do your homework now or
later....
-
11-21-2011, 01:15 PM #5
I don't know the two chasis very well, as far as personal operating experiance.
However, if it were my project I would be interested in expected loaded weight versus GVWR of the proposed chasis (as mentioned above) first and foremost. Then I'd look at wheel base, approach and exit angles, turning radius/cramp angle, as well.
Expect to go heavy, if your dept is anything like mine, you'll end up adding, this and that in the future. So unless your figures show that you have some good "wiggle room" with the GVWR on the Chevy 3500 HD, I think you're going to lean toward the F-550.~ Doc
- Happy Public Servant working in the Public Safety Field since 1998
“Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst of Evils.” ~ General John Stark
-
11-21-2011, 03:30 PM #6
If you're gonna be carrying 300-400 gallons, you better be looking bigger than 550. My old vollie dept had a 2008 F-550 4wd single cab with skid pump/tank that was only 200 gallons, galvaneal body, hand tools and Hurst tools. It was overweight by about 1500 lbs.
Better to be safe than sorry. I'd think about going with a MD chassis (650, International, etc), or reducing your load/water.
-
11-22-2011, 12:57 AM #7
Scooby, your F-550 had 19,834 lbs of persons, equipment and body weight on it? How much stuff were you carrying (rhetorical question)?
I have to admit that my dept currently has only two trucks built on Pick-up style chassis, both of the 3500 (aka 1 ton) range. One is simply a brush truck with 350 gal water and 25 gal class A foam. The other has a walk-in body and is socked with rehab supplies. So not the best comparison.
I guess I have to rethink my understanding of using a F-550 for a fast attack pumper/brush truck as is becoming common in the rural departments around my area.~ Doc
- Happy Public Servant working in the Public Safety Field since 1998
“Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst of Evils.” ~ General John Stark
-
11-22-2011, 01:53 AM #8Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 54
A third option
Have you looked at the IH Terra Star?
Stronger frame, no DEF, bigger cab, allison, multiplex wiring.
Just a thought
-
11-22-2011, 01:55 AM #9Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 54
-
11-22-2011, 06:57 PM #10Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Colorado
- Posts
- 83
I have experience with both the 3500 and the F-550. We had an old Marion body brush truck (250 gpm/250 gals) re-mounted onto the 3500 in 2001 (4x4 extended cab) and it was a little over weight (not by very much though). I personally loved that truck and it served us very well. We recently sold the body and had a flatbed put on and we are planning on installing a skid unit with 300 gals. We also have a F-550 (2-door) with a Darley poly body on the back that has 400 gallons and a CAFS system. The Ford is great too, however we did have some mechanical issues that were fixed with no troubles by our local Ford dealer. My suggestion would be this: the Chevy may be cheaper to buy upfront (or at least it was in our case) and it will serve you well if you have luck like we did, but be careful because it is easier to go over the GVWR on the Chevy vs the Ford, so with that said, with the water you want to carry, I would go with the Ford. From my experience, either one would suit you well, and like everything else it just depends on what you put on it and use it for.
-
11-22-2011, 09:56 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Greensboro, NC USA
- Posts
- 1,265
If you're gonna carry that much water, you'd better consider jumping to a Class 6 chassis or higher.
The number one selling point for the GM 3500 chassis is the Allison 1000. The Duramax diesel engine is not the best, but it's darn good.
If step right up to the Class 6 chassis, it opens the doors to Allison 3000/3500 series transmissions for everyone, which levels the playing field.
Also, with a F-650/750, you can get the proven Cummins ISB engine too.
But if you're forced to only choose between a F-550 or 3500, I'd go with the F-550. It's got higher GVWR, and solid front axle, and a great body/chassis.The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened. --Norman Mattoon Thomas, 6 time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America
-
11-25-2011, 06:32 PM #12
Do you still want off road capability with this truck? Anything over a 3500 (1 ton) isnt going to be to have much.
Are you using it as a "brush" unit, or a "first attack" truck for structures? There is a difference.
-
12-01-2011, 08:10 PM #13
Here's your main difference in the two:
GM (Chevy) had the nerve to ask for a government bail out and then turned right around and declared bankruptcy. Pretty ****** bag move if you ask me. Thanks for wasting my damn money GM.
Ford didn't ask for a bail out nor did they need to declare bankruptcy.
I don't know about you but that tells me who has the better product, there's a reason Ford made enough to not declare bankruptcy.
After owning two GM vehicles, both Pontiacs, I can honestly say I'm not in the very least impressed. Too many little issues. The first Pontiac the transmission fell out just after 50,000 miles (was wife's car) and the second has just had too many little electrical issue.
Both Fords I owned had no problems. The '89 F-150 I owned had 327,000+ miles on it when I traded it in on a 2001 F-250. The F-250 had just over 100,000 miles on it before I sold it (big mistake) when I entered the military. I can't wait to get another F-250.
-
12-01-2011, 11:15 PM #14Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 221
We have this exact set up for our brush truck, and for the same reasons. We have a single cab, F-550, with 500 gallons of water, foam, and a high capacity pump to be able to get to structure fires on those tight lakeshore roads in our district. We have never had a problem with the truck or the weight, other than the "pizza cutter" tires it current has do not work so well on soft terrain.
-
12-02-2011, 12:18 AM #15MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Posts
- 129
We have the same setup with no problems. Trucks do everything and go just about everywhere we ask them to.
They were built on a short bed chassis to give them a better turning radius. They turn on a dime, but we have to make sure we don't get stuck going through a ditch or other similar feature.
-
12-02-2011, 11:08 AM #16Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 221
He is a link to photos of our fleet. Scroll down to 3357 to see the squad.
http://www.clearlakefire.com/apparatus.html
-
12-02-2011, 12:44 PM #17
-
12-02-2011, 01:18 PM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- So of Can. / N. of Mexico
- Posts
- 857
-
12-02-2011, 02:22 PM #19Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 221
-
12-02-2011, 08:58 PM #20
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Ford to slash up to 30,000 jobs
By nozzelvfd in forum The Off Duty ForumsReplies: 5Last Post: 01-24-2006, 01:08 PM -
Brush Truck
By onebugle in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 8Last Post: 03-09-2005, 08:43 PM -
Trucks ----- Chevy vs. Ford
By eagleedmark in forum The Off Duty ForumsReplies: 66Last Post: 09-30-2004, 11:23 AM -
Ford vs. Chevy chassis
By nwadler in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 11Last Post: 08-04-2004, 10:16 PM -
Your Vol. Department
By Rescue678250 in forum Volunteer ForumReplies: 92Last Post: 03-05-2001, 11:15 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




