Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Which Chassis -International w/DPF or Freightliner w/DEF

  1. #21
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    252

    Default

    [QUOTE=FF715MRFD;1324006]Just wanted to update one last time. Our BOD has finally agreed to buy us a new truck and it was ordered today.

    It will be a 1250/1250 Pumper/Tanker on an International chassis. This will be the first new piece apparatus in our station in 22 years so we are extremely excited about it.

    Thank You to everyone that posted here, we really tried to take all the information in and look at the chassis from every angle. We feel like the International will serve us great for the 30+ years it will be in service.[/QUOTEWill you be getting the 330hp Maxxforce motor in your new pumper?


  2. #22
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodbridge View Post
    Will you be getting the 330hp Maxxforce motor in your new pumper?
    Yessir, 330hp MAXXForce 9 mated to an Allison 3000EVS 5-Speed Transmission. It will be the first truck we've ever had with an auto.

  3. #23
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FF715MRFD View Post
    Yessir, 330hp MAXXForce 9 mated to an Allison 3000EVS 5-Speed Transmission. It will be the first truck we've ever had with an auto.
    The smell of burnt clutches has become a lot less prevalent in the last twenty some years. I actually kind of miss it.

  4. #24
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by firepundit View Post
    The smell of burnt clutches has become a lot less prevalent in the last twenty some years. I actually kind of miss it.
    We've never really had that problem, our current rigs are so underpowered that they'll stall before the clutch slips. All of our members are very good with a standard transmission, I guess that come from living in a place where you grow up driving everything from cars to tractors to trucks.

  5. #25
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    So of Can. / N. of Mexico
    Posts
    869

    Default

    Cornbinders forever! Learned to double clutch when I was 14 and driving the Cornbinder, hauling corn and hay from the fields to the silo and hay loft.

  6. #26
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    252

    Thumbs up EVS 3000 Automatic Trans

    You will be happy with your new apparatus with the Auto tranny, we had two Mack CF fire apparatus with standard trans, with about 8-10 feet of linkage between the gear shifter and the trans. which made it diffacult to find the right gear at times you would hear a lot of grinding from some drivers. And also what builder got the contract to build your new pumper ?
    Last edited by Woodbridge; 04-07-2012 at 02:17 PM.

  7. #27
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodbridge View Post
    And also want builder got the contract to build your new pumper ?
    Well it came down to two, Forstner and E-ONE. They speced out virtually the same truck and the bids were $150 apart. We took a vote and E-ONE was the winner. I voted for the Forstner, but I'm happy with the E-ONE.

    It will be a Tradition series with a top-mount pump panel. Nothing fancy at all, swing-style doors, no foam, no overhead ladders, no bells and whistles at all; but that's exactly what we wanted and it will serve us very well. E-ONE's spec said delivery in 200 days but their rep thought that they'd be able to do better than that. I'll try and put some pictures up when we do get it.

  8. #28
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Nice! It's always exciting to buy a new rig- even more so when you haven't had one in a loooonnnng time. Congrats!!

    To add to what Rescue101 said, the vast majority of big rigs out there (in North America)are conventionals- and they can put engines in them to pull however much weight you need moved. 600+ hp is not a problem. You'll not be able to get by with the cheaper, lower end chassis- those simply aren't made for that- but you can get a conventional (commercial) chassis with all the balls you need. As a bonus, Freightshaker and corn binder dealers/shops are EVERYWHERE.

    Also, for those with SCR engines- see if you have a truckstop nearby. Many, like Pilot, Loves, and Flying J now sell DEF fluid right from the pump. Beats the hell out of pouring jugs into the tank! These companies are used to negotiating discounted prices with trucking companies- you may be able to work out a nice contract price for your diesel and def fluid.

  9. #29
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

  10. #30
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FF715MRFD View Post
    Well it came down to two, Forstner and E-ONE. They speced out virtually the same truck and the bids were $150 apart. We took a vote and E-ONE was the winner. I voted for the Forstner, but I'm happy with the E-ONE.

    It will be a Tradition series with a top-mount pump panel. Nothing fancy at all, swing-style doors, no foam, no overhead ladders, no bells and whistles at all; but that's exactly what we wanted and it will serve us very well. E-ONE's spec said delivery in 200 days but their rep thought that they'd be able to do better than that. I'll try and put some pictures up when we do get it.
    gotta ask -for $150 you went with a large builder as opposed to a small "local" builder? I just wonder if any of the guys that voted for eone complain about walmart?
    ?

  11. #31
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slackjawedyokel View Post
    gotta ask -for $150 you went with a large builder as opposed to a small "local" builder? I just wonder if any of the guys that voted for eone complain about walmart?
    Well like I said, I wanted the Forstner and the Chief also wanted it. The last engine we got (21 years ago) was what our BOD wanted and they gave very little say to the FD, needless to say that caused some bad blood so this time around they left it up to the Chief as long as he stayed in budget and the Chief let the FF's decide what they wanted and that is about all I can say there.

    The E-ONE did have a better warranty and a shorter delivery time, and there was some discussion as to whether or not Forstner would still be around in 25 years to support its product and I think that affected the way some guys voted.

  12. #32
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,967

    Default

    I wasnt being critical, I am just a big fan of the small builders.
    ?

  13. #33
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FF715MRFD View Post
    Well like I said, I wanted the Forstner and the Chief also wanted it. The last engine we got (21 years ago) was what our BOD wanted and they gave very little say to the FD, needless to say that caused some bad blood so this time around they left it up to the Chief as long as he stayed in budget and the Chief let the FF's decide what they wanted and that is about all I can say there.

    The E-ONE did have a better warranty and a shorter delivery time, and there was some discussion as to whether or not Forstner would still be around in 25 years to support its product and I think that affected the way some guys voted.
    As far as being around 25 years from now, why would one think E-one would be here and forstner wouldnt? Anyone with even minimal knowledge of the industry would realize size doesnt matter in that regard.

  14. #34
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default

    You made a good choice with the International chassis but I'd say if you were to choose the Freightliner chassis I think you'd be just as happy. Both make a great product!

    Who did you choose to build the body?

    Best of luck with your new apparatus! :-)

  15. #35
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Marble Rock, Iowa
    Posts
    214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZMastr28 View Post
    You made a good choice with the International chassis but I'd say if you were to choose the Freightliner chassis I think you'd be just as happy. Both make a great product!

    Who did you choose to build the body?

    Best of luck with your new apparatus! :-)
    Thank you! The apparatus is an E-One. There is a link a few posts up to the thread I started with the details and pictures of it.

  16. #36
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bryn Athyn, Pa.
    Posts
    1,618

    Default

    I agree with ZMastr, they're both good chassis. I've driven several apparatus several thousand miles on both, and enjoyed the ride on each. One thing to take note of if this hasn't been built yet: Navistar was not able to get the Enhanced EGR system perfected, so they made the decision to go to SCR like everyone else. Beginning in about April or so of 2013 they will start producing SCR engines. I understand that they will begin with the MaxxForce 13 and bring the other engines on after that. They have a deal with Cummins to provide their technology and components. So I would have to guess that it depends on when your engine gets built as to what system you will have. Good luck with it, whatever it is!

  17. #37
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    55

    Default

    I agree both good builders, also with Hebe gone Navistar can only get better. They are calling it a retirement

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Freightliner VS International
    By ... in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 03:58 PM
  2. (2003) 4D INT vs 4D FREIGHTLINER M2 CHASSIS
    By Firedog64 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-10-2004, 08:27 AM
  3. International vs. Freightliner???????
    By FF E5 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-31-2000, 03:12 PM
  4. Freightliner Business Class Commercial Chassis Apparatus
    By firecadet613 in forum Fire Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2000, 05:05 PM
  5. Freightliner Business Class Commercial Chassis Apparatus
    By firecadet613 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2000, 10:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts