+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 81
Thread: Good call on the deck gun
-
01-25-2012, 11:21 PM #1
-
01-26-2012, 07:15 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
Two thumbs up for sure..that was a pretty quick knock considering the amount of fire they had when they arrived. Glad to see someone utilizing the deck gun, depts around where I live often forget about it, and go to pulling multiple ground lines and simply **** away the water they have available. Great video thanks for sharing!
-
01-26-2012, 11:22 PM #3
Imagine if they charged that 2 1/2" off the back instead....
then they could have gotten to the fire under the roof that the deck gun couldn't get at and you see still burning once the deck gun stops."This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
-
01-27-2012, 09:16 AM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- West Point, VA
- Posts
- 431
I gotta go with Bones on that one. Would have gotten into service quicker as well. Not to take away from them hitting it hard, but if we are nit-picking.
-
01-27-2012, 10:06 AM #5
The fire clearly was confined to the exterior, so I would have been concerned that the deck gun might have pushed heat inside. A little nonsurgical for this application.
Kinda looks like the engineer got impatient with the guys stretching hose and said, "Screw it, I'm knocking it down myself.""Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”
--General James Mattis, USMC
-
01-27-2012, 12:53 PM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 31
Pretty much textbook to me. Knock down the exterior with the deckgun until your lines are in place and water supply is set. Good work all around. I know there are other ways to attack this that I would agree with, but I like the idea that they recoginzed the fire spread potenial on the exterior of the structure and got water on it as fast as possible. Again good sound tactics.
Last edited by Capt-nj; 01-27-2012 at 01:01 PM.
-
01-27-2012, 04:30 PM #7Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
I agree..I dont really think that hand line off the back would have done very much at all...and I really dont feel like the deck gun or the hand line would have made much difference on the "pushing it back" concept..either way you're attacking the fire from the exterior so it will naturally push the fire where ever it wants to go...
-
01-27-2012, 05:09 PM #8MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 69
Overall not a bad job... The main goal was accomplished of getting the wet stuff on the red stuff, but for of the video, almost everyone one that company was standing around and looked kind of lost...
Also, I don't know who it was, but it looked like 2 civilians were the ones charging the hydrant... At least that is what it looked like.
-
01-27-2012, 05:12 PM #9Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
-
01-27-2012, 06:34 PM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- West Point, VA
- Posts
- 431
Why does this push the fire? If you are using a straight stream, how do you push it? Or are you talking about spreading steam everywhere. If so, that will happen when you have that much fire and you add water. Might be what you were referring to. Just looking to clarify.
-
01-27-2012, 06:37 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
oh I was referring to EastKyFF's post about pushing heat inside the structure when attacking from outside...I just mean..that regardless what stream you attack with you do run the risk of "pushing" the fire to any unburned areas...when we flow water from a nozzle there is some..not much but some forward wind associated with it..in turn, "pushing" fire/heat in the direction you flow..thats my basic idea behind the post anyway..
-
01-27-2012, 07:03 PM #12
How did the conditions in the interior change when that fire was attacked via the deck gun?
Looked like there might have been more smoke and steam coming from the interior during and after.
It knocked the fire down, but what else happened? Hard to say from a video, just food for thought, I guess.I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
01-27-2012, 07:20 PM #13MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- West Point, VA
- Posts
- 431
C'mon Chief, you know that there was definitely more steam (which makes it look like more smoke) after hitting it!
-
01-27-2012, 08:21 PM #14
It didn't push it anywhere any worse that a 2.5 would have, and the fire was knocked down much quicker.
As far as hand lines go, an 1.75 @150-200 would have knocked that down in less than a minute.Bring enough hose.
-
01-27-2012, 08:27 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
-
01-27-2012, 10:10 PM #16
-
01-27-2012, 10:13 PM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 34
-
01-27-2012, 11:35 PM #18
The 2 1/2" was in place. It wasn't charged for an unknown to us reason (possibly due to operator worrying about deck gun instead). And the same water that went out the deck gun would have hit more of the fire via the 2 1/2".
Is what they did bad/wrong? Nope. Just not, in my opinion, the best option."This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
-
01-28-2012, 12:27 AM #19
I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
01-28-2012, 10:16 AM #20
I'm with Bones on this one.
The deuce and a half was in place.Is what they did bad/wrong? Nope. Just not, in my opinion, the best option.FTM-PTB-EGH-RFB-KTF
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Deck Fires
By FIREINST in forum The Off Duty ForumsReplies: 12Last Post: 04-29-2009, 09:07 AM -
on deck
By HFDINSTR in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 03-23-2009, 03:55 PM -
Good call - exterior ops with truss roof involved
By Firescueguy in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 03-18-2004, 04:08 PM -
Deck gun nozzles
By FIRE549 in forum Fireground TacticsReplies: 22Last Post: 06-25-2001, 07:11 PM -
Pay-Per-Call... good? bad? suggestions?
By Eng522ine in forum Volunteer ForumReplies: 15Last Post: 05-02-2001, 07:29 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




