Thread: Fail Temp. for Scott Face Masks?
03-06-2012, 03:48 AM #1
Fail Temp. for Scott Face Masks?
Does anyone know the fail temp. on scott's face masks? I'm sure regaurdless of the model, there all the same fail point for the fire service geard face masks they make. I contacted scott, but with no avail, I have not recieved any information.
Thanks guys!Firefighter 1/ PA EMT-B
03-06-2012, 09:08 AM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Lusby, MD
03-06-2012, 05:48 PM #3
Thank you Eng34FF, That was a short, but good article. Clearly, our masks cannot withstand over 530 degrees. Which is right along track with what I thought. My guess was failing at around 450* F.Firefighter 1/ PA EMT-B
03-06-2012, 10:20 PM #4
FWIW, this is a big research issue right now. The material used in SCBA masks in much of Europe has a higher failure temperature but doesn't meet the clarity requirements of the US standard.
Last edited by DeputyMarshal; 03-16-2012 at 11:00 AM. Reason: typo"Nemo Plus Voluptatis Quam Nos Habant"
The Code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.
03-16-2012, 03:29 AM #5
I've been doing allot of searching over the past week or so, and haven't found a damn number! UghFirefighter 1/ PA EMT-B
03-16-2012, 08:33 AM #6
03-16-2012, 10:54 AM #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
The answer is in KW per minute according to the NFPA (I'll have to confirm), fail temps are one of the concerns for the new accepted standard and that's why there has been no new revision so far this year, it will be pushed to end of year and fully adopted mid next year.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By USMA36 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 01-04-2008, 05:56 PM
By Fighting41NY in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 1Last Post: 03-02-2007, 12:44 PM
By FFEMT263 in forum TerrorismReplies: 0Last Post: 02-04-2003, 04:50 PM
By pylonchief in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 08-08-2002, 11:28 PM
By postal79 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 03-12-2001, 02:09 PM