Like Tree2Likes

Thread: 2012 AFG submission number

  1. #51
    MembersZone Subscriber
    LVFD301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,995

    Default

    EMW-2012-FO-07201 at 1700 eastern. ok, maybe 16:59:59. When It reloaded it said 0 seconds remaining.


    EMW-2012-FV-03802 was about 45 minutes earlier.
    Last edited by LVFD301; 07-06-2012 at 05:28 PM.

  2. #52
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Monroe, MI
    Posts
    292

    Default

    r-00434 with 12 minutes left. regional mdt/cad grant

  3. #53
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    20

    Default

    So it appears around 7300ish ops and 4000 vehicles? Im curious to see the numbers, seems like a slower year.

  4. #54
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default

    I guess submission numbers are down this year. Good luck all!

  5. #55
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Monroe, MI
    Posts
    292

    Default

    what do you think, maybe 12 to 14,000 apps this year? I know that alot are with out power, but it still seems like alot fewer apps. Better chance to get funded with such fewer applications.

  6. #56
    MembersZone Subscriber
    LVFD301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,995

    Default

    Unless you are adding regional to your ops amount, I bet it was very few over 7200 ops grants. 7201 with 0 seconds remaining does not leave a lot of room.

    4000 vehicles may be about right. Probably 500 or less on regionals.

  7. #57
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rayville, Louisiana, USA
    Posts
    70

    Default

    4000 vehicles ive been told that they will award 350 to 400 vehicles this year so thats a 8 to 10% chance of getting funded. Good luck everybody. I havent been funded since 2009 so I hope my luck changes this year.

  8. #58
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dist8229 View Post
    4000 vehicles ive been told that they will award 350 to 400 vehicles this year so thats a 8 to 10% chance of getting funded. Good luck everybody. I havent been funded since 2009 so I hope my luck changes this year.
    Same money as last year and only 25% of total;l can go to vehicles so you probably going to see only closer to 300. This year there were 304 vehicle awards only.
    Kurt Bradley
    Fire/EMS/EMA Grant Consultant
    " Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  9. #59
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pottstown, PA
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Submitted an Ops grant for multi band radios around 4-430PM EST and our number was EMW-2012-FO-06772

  10. #60
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    28

    Default

    So 300 vehicles? How many regional grant might be awarded?

  11. #61
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Onalaska, WI
    Posts
    104

    Default

    EMW-2012-FO-02615 July 5th around 1100.

  12. #62
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golden City 1 hour south of fort smith
    Posts
    545

    Default

    County wide regional communications grant EMW-2012-FR-00044 Submitted 7/2/2012
    4 fire department regional PPE and SCBA grant EMW-FR-00192 Submitted 7/6/2012 at about 0025 hrs

  13. #63
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    Just under 12,000 apps total not including paper submissions, about 5,000 off from last year. Looks like either a lot of people didn't need anything or folks got caught with their pants down on the app period and length of opening...depending on the SAFER app count might have all in Peer Review because of the low total.

  14. #64
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rayville, Louisiana, USA
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Ive talked to alot of people here in Louisiana and they did not apply. When I asked why they wouldnt apply it boiled down to they were fed up with the process and frustrated that departments with several million dollar budgets and large tax bases got funded last year and the small deparments that have budgets were passed over. Same thing for some of my friends in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Texas.

  15. #65
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    Ah yes, cover that in one of the first handful of slides in my workshops, Perception. Budget size has nothing to do with need. After all pretty sure those large tax base departments with million dollar budget might have something called a payroll that takes care of that money in a pretty quick fashion. Only reason my department has nice stuff is the fact that we have 500+ volunteers so we don't need to increase the paid side.

    Certainly not every well-written, well-designed application gets funded, but I've heard a lot of folks we've worked with complaining until they see the difference in how we argued versus how they argued. Sometimes those that complained the most had 1-2 sentences per section. And those that complained they couldn't get bunker gear and had compressors, rescue tools, and all sorts of other stuff in the app too. Not saying everyone is always going to hit the money, but I'll stand by the fact that this program spreads money around otherwise we wouldn't have gotten a $290k pumper for a department with 400 residents in 200 square miles of first due area in 2011.

    Can you ask for more if you cover more people? Sure, I can do certain things with the larger departments than I can with the smaller ones. But not wanting to take a few hours to put the application together over a little frustration? Sounds to me more like those that don't need the money right there.

  16. #66
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rayville, Louisiana, USA
    Posts
    70

    Default

    I'll stand by the fact that this program spreads money around otherwise we wouldn't have gotten a $290k pumper for a department with 400 residents in 200 square miles of first due area in 2011.

    Sounds like West Texas

    My philosiphy is if you dont apply you have no chance, so ive applied every year except for 2010 due to some health issues. Great program im just afraid its on its way out.

  17. #67
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    1,720

    Default

    Was Kansas actually, but hit West & Central Texas for similar in past years. Heck one year we worked half the funding that NE got, and lots of the regionals were for smaller areas. Of course like you said, don't apply don't get. SAFER is the one that needs to go back to the drawing board, welfare never works out. In some spots FD has become a target for layoffs since the powers that be think they can just get a SAFER for FFs so why lay off anyone else that can't get replaced. IMHO if they want things to actually get better, cut SAFER in half, limit the layoff/rehiring to once per department and the amount per award, and then put the other half into the station program. That will do more for the economy than SAFER will.

  18. #68
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Peer review still on for the 19th-24th of Aug?

  19. #69
    MembersZone Subscriber
    LVFD301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dist8229 View Post
    Ive talked to alot of people here in Louisiana and they did not apply. When I asked why they wouldnt apply it boiled down to they were fed up with the process and frustrated that departments with several million dollar budgets and large tax bases got funded last year and the small deparments that have budgets were passed over. Same thing for some of my friends in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Texas.

    Quite simply, if departments have not gotten AFG grants it is due to one of two things in 99% of the cases.

    1. They are not applying

    2. They are doing it wrong.

    I still see departments arguing that everyone else gets the grants but them, and it is unfair, yet they have never been to a seminar (Either free or paid) and have a "different" outlook of what the grants can do

  20. #70
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dist8229 View Post
    Ive talked to alot of people here in Louisiana and they did not apply. When I asked why they wouldnt apply it boiled down to they were fed up with the process and frustrated that departments with several million dollar budgets and large tax bases got funded last year and the small deparments that have budgets were passed over. Same thing for some of my friends in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Texas.
    OH PPPUUULLLEEEZZZE! Really! You know that is getting to be a really tired old response that is just absolutely not based in fact at all. I've been helping those small departments for years and they get funded just as many times as the big boys do. Let's see go ask Iberia Parrish about their Regional Comm Grant, how about the ladder truck for Natchidoches, what about Morgan City, Atlanta, Caddo FD, Eunice FD,Galvez-Lake FD or St Tammany just to name a few that I known I have assisted? I am sure Brian can name many more.

    But you know what? That's just fine by me. If they want to sit it out and pout about how unfair the system is to them then they are welcome to just pull up a chair and the group of them can have a great big ole pity party.

    While they are doing that, I'll be working with those departments that are tired of losing and want to invest a little time and effort to find out how to do it right and reap the benefits.
    Kurt Bradley
    Fire/EMS/EMA Grant Consultant
    " Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  21. #71
    MembersZone Subscriber
    WJVaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dickson TN
    Posts
    1,027

    Default

    look at it as they just increase my chances...

  22. #72
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,753

    Default

    The unfortunate thing, there will always be naysayers about the AFG and how their department is not funded for their application while their neighbors are awarded on a consistent basis. It is the same sob story year in year out. In reality, it is easier and less time consuming to find a solution to the problem than just complaining about their plight.

    How hard is it to seek out those departments and ask for some guidance? It isnít.

    How hard is it to follow the PG and stick to priority items? It isnít.

    How hard is it to submit a quality project? It isnít.

    How hard is it to find someone to review your work before submitting the application? It isnít.

    Every department in this country has the opportunity to be awarded an AFG grant. Those that do put in the time, effort and commitment to give their departmentís application the best possible chance. Stop griping and follow their lead.

  23. #73
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    441

    Default

    FV-03793 4:20 Eastern
    FO-07174 approx 4:58 Eastern

  24. #74
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rayville, Louisiana, USA
    Posts
    70

    Default

    I think I struck one of Kurts nerves. LOL but seriously I dont like hearing that people arent applying, because that doesnt show a need. If we dont show the need then its going to be alot easier for Washington to take the pogram away from us.

  25. #75
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dist8229 View Post
    I think I struck one of Kurts nerves. LOL but seriously I dont like hearing that people arent applying, because that doesnt show a need. If we dont show the need then its going to be alot easier for Washington to take the pogram away from us.
    Yep, like rubbing salt in an open wound. Nothing perosnal here, just a real pet peeve of mine. I just hate to listen to the whiners and those who feel as though they are entitled.
    Kurt Bradley
    Fire/EMS/EMA Grant Consultant
    " Never Trade Skill for Luck"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Safer Submission
    By Attack6 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-19-2012, 07:45 PM
  2. Online Submission
    By Cottenboy007 in forum Computers, the 'Net & Us
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-21-2011, 02:06 PM
  3. 2009 FP&S submission
    By hinesfire in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-27-2009, 11:08 AM
  4. FP & S Grant Submission numbers
    By capt4nocfa in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 03-09-2009, 10:38 PM
  5. Application Submission Reminder
    By SLY4420 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 03:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register