Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 41112131415 LastLast
Results 261 to 280 of 284
Like Tree75Likes

Thread: Union Thuggery in NJ

  1. #261
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Yup. Wrong.

    It's really not something that has any impact on my life so I didn't spend any time researching it when I was told that was the case.
    Thus again PROVING that none of the facts you post can be trusted as valid because you don't check them.

    Thanks for once again proving you lie, fabricate, bs, and spin everything to try and make yourself look good. Too bad you can't just tell the truth or actually supply facts that you can substantiate.

    Nice work making yourself even more irrelevant.
    scfire86 likes this.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate


  2. #262
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    Thanks for admitting you make statements when you are ignorant of the facts. We've known that for some time. Especially when it relates to anything fire related.
    Yup. Ignorant.

    I guess I have more important things to worry abou than the civil service status and the pay of department 6 hours away.

    The information that I had received - not sought - while involved in a conversation with 3 or 4 other people was wrong.

    Do I look concerned?
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  3. #263
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    Thus again PROVING that none of the facts you post can be trusted as valid because you don't check them.

    Thanks for once again proving you lie, fabricate, bs, and spin everything to try and make yourself look good. Too bad you can't just tell the truth or actually supply facts that you can substantiate.

    Nice work making yourself even more irrelevant.
    That's right. I didn't fact check the civil service status of a department 6 hours south that has zero impact on my life.

    Makes me feel good though that we seem to be making more $$$$ for doing less runs and likely having better working conditions, and we don't even have to pay union dues.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  4. #264
    Forum Member FWDbuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pee-Ayy!
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    The information that I had received - not sought - while involved in a conversation with 3 or 4 other people was wrong.

    Do I look concerned?
    about as concerned as you would if you came across a burning vehicle with a child trapped inside.

    Dayum.....you fell right into that one.
    "Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."

  5. #265
    Forum Member snowball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Just North of South Central
    Posts
    2,740

    Default

    Originally posted by LAFE
    I have been anti-union from the get go. And I have been anti-some departments that seemingly have held their cities safety hostage for unreasonable benefits, such as one very large northern city, where unions tend to run the joint, where their members get holiday pay whether they work or not and get something called "recall pay" though they are very, very rarely ever recalled.

    I am for firefighters being paid fairly. I am not for benefits that the general public would consider unreasonable, and often with good reason.
    You get paid for holidays and you stay home, whats the difference? When I go in on Christmas eve and day this year, my pay stays the same. In lieu of that, I and most unions are given "Holiday Hours" that we can burn at our liesure. The pay for me stays the same, the guy covering me, unless he is on relief on that shift, will get OT.

    As far as your baseless comment about "recall pay", that sounds like a total fabrication for effect on your part. You only get recall pay when you are recalled for whatever reason. No city in their right mind is going to bump a fireman's pay on a chance they might be recalled.

    So if we are to believe your theory, when they recall a few guys, do they get "double recall pay"? And what about the ones that don't get recalled? Do they just get "regular recall pay" for not being recalled? Name the department and I will look up their MOU, either that or you are welcome to prove me wrong.

    You really need to educate yourself before spouting off. Your'e already branded as a mutt, now you want to lower yourself to lying mutt?
    IAFF

  6. #266
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Jack ..

    I believe you are wrong.

    According to the LA Office of the Examiner, New Orleans does not have a Civil Service Board, meaning the department is not civil service.

    Here is the link and the actual list in their website: http://ose.louisiana.gov/jd_select1.asp

    Again it appears the information I had was correct. They are not civil service due to the pre-Katrina population.

    Prove me wrong.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 12-02-2012 at 04:45 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  7. #267
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FWDbuff View Post
    about as concerned as you would if you came across a burning vehicle with a child trapped inside.

    Dayum.....you fell right into that one.

    Personal choices.

    Funny thing is given the same scenario today, even after all the crap, I still would make the same choice.

    So keep bringing it up. I have no issues with it.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  8. #268
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Jack ..

    I believe you are wrong.

    According to the LA Office of the Examiner, New Orleans does not have a Civil Service Board, meaning the department is not civil service.

    Here is the link and the actual list in their website: http://ose.louisiana.gov/jd_select1.asp

    Again it appears the information I had was correct. They are not civil service due to the pre-Katrina population.

    Prove me wrong.
    Here you go.......

    http://www.nola.com/politics/index.s...planned_i.html

    Civil service revamp planned in New Orleans
    Published: Thursday, September 13, 2012, 11:00 PM
    Bruce Eggler, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune By Bruce Eggler, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune

    "Almost from the day he took office in 2010, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu has talked about his desire to change what he saw as an outdated and inefficient civil service system that made it hard for the city to hire, promote and retain top-quality employees. So far, Landrieu has done little to turn that desire into action, but it appears that is about to change. A recent memo circulated among top officials in Landrieu's administration outlined a plan to present sweeping changes in the city's personnel management system to the city Civil Service Commission next month, with the goal of getting them adopted by November and implemented by the start of 2013."


    It took me less than 5 minutes to find this.
    snowball likes this.

  9. #269
    Forum Member snowball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Just North of South Central
    Posts
    2,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireMedic049 View Post


    It took me less than 5 minutes to find this.
    I was just going to put this up when you ninja'd me...haha!
    IAFF

  10. #270
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireMedic049 View Post
    Here you go.......

    http://www.nola.com/politics/index.s...planned_i.html

    Civil service revamp planned in New Orleans
    Published: Thursday, September 13, 2012, 11:00 PM
    Bruce Eggler, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune By Bruce Eggler, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune

    "Almost from the day he took office in 2010, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu has talked about his desire to change what he saw as an outdated and inefficient civil service system that made it hard for the city to hire, promote and retain top-quality employees. So far, Landrieu has done little to turn that desire into action, but it appears that is about to change. A recent memo circulated among top officials in Landrieu's administration outlined a plan to present sweeping changes in the city's personnel management system to the city Civil Service Commission next month, with the goal of getting them adopted by November and implemented by the start of 2013."


    It took me less than 5 minutes to find this.
    It is the CITY's Civil Service Commission.

    Per state law cities over 400,000, which No was pre-Katrina, was not eligable to to be a part of the state civil service system, which is supported by the fact that they are not on the STATE Office of the Examiners, who handles the state's system, list.

    It is in fact possible the city had it's own civil service system since it was not eligible, due to it's population, for the state civil service system.

    In light of the info on the State Office of the Examiner's webpage, we both may in fact be correct.

    In fact, here is the RS Statue from LA law that defines who is eligable for the state civil service system:

    § 2471. Applicability

    This Part applies to any municipality which operates a regularly
    paid fire and police department and which has a population of not
    less than thirteen thousand nor more than two hundred fifty
    thousand
    according to the latest regular federal census for which the official figures have been made public.

    Under that RS Statue, New Orleans would be ineligible due to population'

    They have the right to set up a city system, which may mirror state civil service laws, but would not fall into the same system as any other department in the state, unless they serve less than 13,000.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 12-02-2012 at 06:04 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  11. #271
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    It may be the CITY's Civil Service Commission.

    Per state law cities over 400,000, which No was pre-Katrina, was not eligable to to be a part of the state civil service system, which is supported by the fact that they are not on the STATE Office of the Examiners, who handles the state's system, list.

    It is in fact possible the city had it's own civil service system since it was not eligible, due to it's population, for the state civil service system.

    In light of the info on the State Office of the Examiner's webpage, we both may in fact be correct.

    In fact, here is the RS Statue from LA law that defines who is eligable for the state civil service system:

    § 2471. Applicability

    This Part applies to any municipality which operates a regularly
    paid fire and police department and which has a population of not
    less than thirteen thousand nor more than two hundred fifty
    thousand
    according to the latest regular federal census for which the official figures have been made public.

    Under that RS Statue, New Orleans would be ineligible due to population'

    They have the right to set up a city system, which may mirror state civil service laws, but would not fall into the same system as any other department in the state, unless they serve less than 13,000.
    And no matter how you try to cover your azz now you did originally post the information with no research to prove whether you were right or wrong. Just like a ton of other times when you spouted unsubstantiated statistics and so called facts.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  12. #272
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    It may be the CITY's Civil Service Commission.

    Per state law cities over 400,000, which No was pre-Katrina, was not eligable to to be a part of the state civil service system, which is supported by the fact that they are not on the STATE Office of the Examiners, who handles the state's system, list.

    It is in fact possible the city had it's own civil service system since it was not eligible, due to it's population, for the state civil service system.

    In light of the info on the State Office of the Examiner's webpage, we both may in fact be correct.

    In fact, here is the RS Statue from LA law that defines who is eligable for the state civil service system:

    § 2471. Applicability

    This Part applies to any municipality which operates a regularly
    paid fire and police department and which has a population of not
    less than thirteen thousand nor more than two hundred fifty
    thousand
    according to the latest regular federal census for which the official figures have been made public.

    Under that RS Statue, New Orleans would be ineligible due to population'

    They have the right to set up a city system, which may mirror state civil service laws, but would not fall into the same system as any other department in the state, unless they serve less than 13,000.
    Nice try, but you stated the following in Post #211:

    "I do know that New Orleans is not civil service due to the fact that thier population is over the maximum threshold, or at least was pre-Katrina. They are now under the threshold, but nobody has made an issue of the fact that they now should be civil service. I believe Baton Rouge is."

    You may have been attempting to allude to participation in the "State Civil Service System", but you clearly stated that New Orleans was not "civil service". Civil Service is Civil Service regardless of who is administering the program. So while you may be correct that New Orleans is not participating in the State Civil Service System, you were clearly WRONG that New Orleans isn't Civil Service. Therefore, on the matter of whether or not New Orleans is Civil Service, we were not both correct and YOU were the one that was WRONG.

  13. #273
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    And no matter how you try to cover your azz now you did originally post the information with no research to prove whether you were right or wrong. Just like a ton of other times when you spouted unsubstantiated statistics and so called facts.
    Again, it really wasn't important enough for me to fact check it. Actually still has, zero bearing on my life, especially since thee system they appear to be in applies to the city only, and may have some very different rules than the state system..

    The fact is the folks that I was having the conversation with were in a position to know as both of their departments are in the process of being being forced into civil service status, and had done a tremendous amount of research on civil service. So yes, I took their information as the truth, and lookeeeee lookeeeeee it turned out that it was in fact the case.

    And no, we are not on the list as we are still in the process. We are taking every moment that we can to go civil service as we know it will have consequences on the volunteer/career relationship in our organization.

    And just out of curiosity, give me an example of some those other "unsubstantiated" statistics.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 12-02-2012 at 06:12 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  14. #274
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireMedic049 View Post
    Nice try, but you stated the following in Post #211:

    "I do know that New Orleans is not civil service due to the fact that thier population is over the maximum threshold, or at least was pre-Katrina. They are now under the threshold, but nobody has made an issue of the fact that they now should be civil service. I believe Baton Rouge is."

    You may have been attempting to allude to participation in the "State Civil Service System", but you clearly stated that New Orleans was not "civil service". Civil Service is Civil Service regardless of who is administering the program. So while you may be correct that New Orleans is not participating in the State Civil Service System, you were clearly WRONG that New Orleans isn't Civil Service. Therefore, on the matter of whether or not New Orleans is Civil Service, we were not both correct and YOU were the one that was WRONG.
    New Orleans lost significant population post-Katrina. baton Rouge, and to a lesser extent, as well as Houston gained much of that population, so yes, there was a question as to why NO was not forced into the state system when it's population dropped below the maximum post-Katrina.

    Again, did I follow it with a great deal of interest? No, as it has zero affect on my life, and have I have no interest in labor relations, especially when they are 6 hours south of me, but I heard the matter discussed when i was with those that had more interest in the subject. Yup, I was wrong they are civil service, but possibly not under the same rules to which we will, once we fully adopt civil service, along with every other civil service department in the state is subject to.

    We are dealing with the state civil service system in my current situation, and that is the only system in which I have any interest, and frankly, the only system pertinent to the discussion regarding the need for a union in my department.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 12-02-2012 at 06:20 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  15. #275
    Forum Member scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Yup. Ignorant.
    Agreed. No big deal, except for the fact this is not an isolated instance.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I guess I have more important things to worry abou than the civil service status and the pay of department 6 hours away.
    Ha ha ha. Funny. Keep thinking anyone is going to buy that.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    The information that I had received - not sought - while involved in a conversation with 3 or 4 other people was wrong.
    I have no doubt you believe much of what you "hear" regardless of its validity.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Do I look concerned?
    Not relevant.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  16. #276
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    The fact is the folks that I was having the conversation with were in a position to know as both of their departments are in the process of being being forced into civil service status, and had done a tremendous amount of research on civil service. So yes, I took their information as the truth, and lookeeeee lookeeeeee it turned out that it was in fact the case.
    Their information that New Orleans was not participating in the State Civil Service System may be true, but that doesn't change the fact that you made a statement that was not representative of their findings.

    As I already pointed out, your statement was that New Orleans was NOT Civil Service. You didn't qualify the statement in terms of State vs City Civil Service. Therefore, you incorrectly used their information in your statement and your statement was not correct.

  17. #277
    Forum Member FWDbuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Pee-Ayy!
    Posts
    7,396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Personal choices.

    Funny thing is given the same scenario today, even after all the crap, I still would make the same choice.

    So keep bringing it up. I have no issues with it.
    Which just proves two things:
    1. You always have been, and always will be a gutless, spineless yellow pu$$y coward
    2. You never have been, and never will be a firefighter.
    DeputyChiefGonzo and RyanK63 like this.
    "Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."

  18. #278
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    New Orleans lost significant population post-Katrina. baton Rouge, and to a lesser extent, as well as Houston gained much of that population, so yes, there was a question as to why NO was not forced into the state system when it's population dropped below the maximum post-Katrina.
    Not relevant to the discussion.

    Again, did I follow it with a great deal of interest? No, as it has zero affect on my life, and have I have no interest in labor relations, especially when they are 6 hours south of me, but I heard the matter discussed when i was with those that had more interest in the subject. Yup, I was wrong they are civil service, but possibly not under the same rules to which we will, once we fully adopt civil service, along with every other civil service department in the state is subject to.
    Again, not really relevant as the discussion was never about whether or not they were in the same system as everybody else, but only whether they were in fact civil service.

    We are dealing with the state civil service system in my current situation, and that is the only system in which I have any interest, and frankly, the only system pertinent to the discussion regarding the need for a union in my department.
    And has no relevance to the discussion about New Orleans' being civil service.

  19. #279
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireMedic049 View Post
    Not relevant to the discussion.

    Again, not really relevant as the discussion was never about whether or not they were in the same system as everybody else, but only whether they were in fact civil service.

    And has no relevance to the discussion about New Orleans' being civil service.
    I have already admitted that I was incorrect.

    However, the fact that they are not part of the state system does have relevance when we are discussing the state system's and the union's impact on wages and benefits in every other department in the state that is mandated to be civil service.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  20. #280
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FWDbuff View Post
    Which just proves two things:
    1. You always have been, and always will be a gutless, spineless yellow pu$$y coward
    2. You never have been, and never will be a firefighter.
    1. Yup

    2. Nope

    But hey, think what you wish. It won't affect any decision that I make the rest of my career.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sutphen...union/non-union built???
    By FIREMECH1 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-06-2010, 08:58 AM
  2. How does your Union do it?
    By QbenOliver in forum Career/Paid Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 12:45 AM
  3. Union Help
    By mopanglow in forum Federal & Military Firehouse Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 02:07 PM
  4. who can be in the union?
    By HeavyRescueTech in forum Career/Paid Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2003, 11:50 AM
  5. Using non union help to build a union firehall
    By firefighthero in forum Meet and Greet
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-06-2002, 09:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts