Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By FFFRED

Thread: Are you illegally using CPAT?

  1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    933

    Default Are you illegally using CPAT?

    I have been talking this over with some of my friends that are in the fire service in different departments and can't come up with an answer. SO before I go to the source I thought maybe someone here could chime in. Here is the issue.....and its a couple parts

    1.)Many fire departments use CPAT as a condition of employment. Many Job Listings have things such as EMT or CPAT as a prerequisite. From what I gather, a department will ask for a "current" CPAT card to be considered for hiring. Many of these departments do not issue the test but rather rely on local fire academies, tech schools, or community colleges to conduct tests periodically.

    2.) Most if not all tech schools, colleges, or fire academies only have Limited CPAT Licenses.

    Is the CPAT that many of these departments use ( that do not carry an IAFF CPAT license ) under copy right infringement? Are departments and above listed schools illegally issuing a true CPAT exam? Can these types of schools just hold random or periodic CPAT tests to issue cards to whoever passes?

    Here is what is on the IAFF Web Site for CPAT Licensure..I have highlighted and underlined some key items

    Under the current policy, authorization to use the CPAT under a full license will only be granted to fire departments and other employers that will be fully administering the CPAT Program and hiring fire fighter employees. Limiting the granting of licenses to only those entities that actually administer the program has enabled us to better ensure that the CPAT is only being administered in strict compliance with the licensing agreement. Third party testing organizations (limited to federal, state or provincial agencies; state/provincial fire academies; colleges/universities that conduct pre-employment testing; or pre-employment testing organizations) that only administer the physical testing portion of the CPAT may apply for a Limited License. Such Limited Licenses allow such third party testing organizations to use the CPAT for purposes of testing the physical capability of fire fighter candidates. However, this license is granted only upon the express conditions that the licensee may only administer the CPAT for a fire department that already possesses a complete and valid license from the IAFF. Limited licensees shall not administer the CPAT to any person without first obtaining a written agreement with the fire department to which the person is applying. The provisions of this agreement are outlined below.

    These Limited License organizations then operate under the license of the jurisdiction that is responsible for administering the overall CPAT Program. In addition, a fire department that uses another fire departmentís resources and facilities to test candidates must apply for a license of their own. The licensing policy ensures that the CPAT Program used by the licensee fully covers every aspect of the CPAT, including recruiting and mentoring programs, providing recruits with fitness guidance to help prepare them for the CPAT and setting up and administering the test.

    Any use of the CPAT without a license or any misuse of the CPAT program is a violation of the IAFF copyright on this program.
    What do you think??


  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Here, There, Everywhere
    Posts
    4,191

    Default

    This is the first cogent thread I've seen in these forums in months and none of you guys who can offer all sorts of high minded discourse on the best light package for your 87 toyota pick-up can't even offer some perspective from the many departments who it would appear violate the terms of the CPAT licencing trademark and patent?

    This is why I don't bother checking in here much anymore.

    FTM-PTB
    ATFDFF likes this.

  3. #3
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,662

    Default

    And maybe FFFRED if you would have come in and offered more information instead of acting like a little male appendage that would have been more helpful.

    I didn't comment on this because I don't have enough information. I wanted to go back and talk to my Union President and ask him about this. My career FD uses the cpat, as do the majority in this area and frankly I have no idea whether they are using it under permission or not.

    So thanks for adding nothing to the topic. Have a nice day.
    ďThe person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and live.Ē Leo F. Buscaglia

    This place gets weirder and weirder every day...

  4. #4
    MembersZone Subscriber tree68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Jefferson County, NY USA
    Posts
    2,210

    Default Cpat?

    The people who have the answers are at the management level.

    Most rank-and-file firefighters just do what they're told. If they have to have CPAT, they get it from whatever source is available that their agency will accept.

    The bigger question here is how many knew that CPAT was a copyrighted, licensed package with the restrictions listed?

    I'd guess not many.

    In fact, it's entirely possible that there are folks administering "CPAT" with no license whatsoever. They've got the guidelines and whatever other materials are needed, having acquired same through someone willing to share, and run the program on their own, possibly never realizing that it is a licensed item.
    Last edited by tree68; 03-04-2013 at 07:49 PM. Reason: additional comments
    Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.

    Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,370

    Default

    If one part of the official cpat is changed is it still cpat

    But still used as candidate physical ability test, in the hiring process


    Is cpat a trademark or only copyright ??

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Here, There, Everywhere
    Posts
    4,191

    Default

    Because of where I'm at I have no possible way of offering any information to expand on the topic. Ours is a world unto itself. We administer the CPAT internally and all the proper licences are maintained to the best of my knowledge.

    Yet after seeing 160+ views I was startled to not see at least one question or comment offering some insight to what I would say could be and should be of great importance to many FDs out there (not to mention locals or the IAFF itself). I offered my statement as subtle commentary as to the lack of serious discussions as of late in my view that's all.

    While the scenario presented by the brother above certainly is well worth investigation....there should be greater concern over the apparent world of difference being illustrated between the historical physical abilities of probies entering the FDNY academy and these socially engineered, gerrymandered classes of slackers...

    In regards to the CPAT....well for all of those out there who think the IAFF has your back by creating that joke of an exam (whose stated purpose was to enable more women to pass among other things)...take a look at what we have slogging through our academy right now. Fatter FDNY recruits failing

    Who would have guessed creating an exam built explicitly to de-emphasize strength, agility & stamina and just so happens to coincide with a push to boost "diversity" at all costs would result in a bunch of persons who can't even begin to measure up to the lowered minimal standards that have now become accepted... surprise surprise surprise!

    FTM-PTB

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Here, There, Everywhere
    Posts
    4,191

    Default

    tree68 fair analysis.

    I'm not sure what the demographic break down of the internals are for who frequents FH.com but I'll bet while management (staff chiefs and such) aren't well represented I'd wager to bet there are more than a few Union members and a fair representation of officers of said locals who probably should take more than a passing interest on this issue the brother has stumbled upon.

    Not directed towards your comment specifically but I think your statement in a general sense highlights my earlier observation that oddly the firehouse Kitchen lawyers who are so quick as to opine on every manner of litigation risk regarding helmets, turnouts, poles, responses, blue lights, techniques, tool mounting...etc. strangely have found their limits in Copyright and patent law!

    FTM-PTB

  8. #8
    MembersZone Subscriber tree68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Jefferson County, NY USA
    Posts
    2,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fire49 View Post
    Is cpat a trademark or only copyright ??
    Copyright. License is $5K per year.
    Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.

    Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,383

    Default

    We do not use CPAT at my combo department as the physical portion of the hiring process for career personel.

    We use an in-house agility test which includes a ladder raise, stair climb w/ load, hose drag, dummy drag, tool carry and block chop while in full PPE and SCBA. The event is timed, not pass/fail and the time will play a role in the selection process.

    My VFD also uses a similiar course for new volunteers.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    301

    Default

    As a Chief Officer for a combination department in charge of the recruitment and hiring program for our department, we use CPAT for our full time applicants. We participate in a regional hiring process program administered by the local technical college who has a limited license. We, as a department hold a full CPAT license under the condition that our physical agility test used for part-time/POC members does not replicate the CPAT program and or its name. The last I checked, we are the only combo department in the state to hold a CPAT license issued by the IAFF.

    I think one critical component missing in CPAT is an aerial ladder climb, which I have in our other physical agility test program for part time/POC members. It is amazing just how many candidates out there are terrified of getting off the ground!
    Last edited by Frosty42; 03-05-2013 at 04:28 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Need Help with cpat
    By KPanic in forum Testing & Fitness
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 11:21 AM
  2. Flag of Mexico Flown Illegally Over Reno Business
    By RoughRider in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 10:26 PM
  3. Need your help with the CPAT
    By rleslie65 in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-20-2006, 08:54 PM
  4. Cpat
    By CLEARVIEW82 in forum Testing & Fitness
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 02:03 PM
  5. Cpat Course In Bc
    By aaronb in forum Testing & Fitness
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2005, 04:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts