View Poll Results: Is it worth agressive interior attack on known vacant buildings?

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, it is worth the risk

    20 55.56%
  • No, it is not worth the risk

    16 44.44%
Like Tree136Likes

Thread: Risk/Reward Interior attack vacant buildings presentation

  1. #341
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Certainly not expecting to be able to work a military crash with one days training. I know it's hard to believe but we already have a response plan in place with Barksdale for them to come out and deal with the aircraft.
    A plan is not acting. You've made it clear you have no intention of doing anything that remotely resembles firefighting. The plan you claim that exists is nothing more than paper. Might as well be a comic book (appropriately since you are a comic claiming to be a firefighter) for all the good it will do if an actual incident occurs.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Took the class just to get a very, very basic understanding of aircraft firefighting operations as well as additional basic knowledge on the aircraft themselves. We already have have had some basic Aircraft Operations for Structural Firefighters classroom programs, but I wanted just a little bit of hands-on, and the command staff at my VFD agreed that it would be useful.
    Why would they approve a class for someone who never intends to act? Obviously Bossier Parish is filled with those who exemplify the adage of "one being born every minute."

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    AS I have stated earlier, both of my departments have the possibility of dealing with Blackhawks coming into Camp Minden as well asr med helos, and both departments have responded in the past to crashes and emergency landings on highways involving general aviation aircraft. So yes, the class makes sense for both of my agencies.
    Hopefully they have people who will look to act instead of you who has made it clear you have no intention of doing anything that even remotely involves firefighting.
    Last edited by scfire86; 04-09-2013 at 05:12 PM.
    SPFDRum and FyredUp like this.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  2. #342
    Forum Member
    RyanK63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Fleetville, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    240

    Default

    I disappear for a few months and LA is still ranting on? If you were this relentless in fighting fire you might actually be a good firefighter.

    Anyway, if there is a chance there is a surviving victim(s) inside, I'm going to work. I'd rather get inside, make an attempt at an attack and search, and have to back out than sit outside and let it burn. We are firefighters, keep the chicken****s at the station.
    Last edited by RyanK63; 04-09-2013 at 01:04 PM.
    FyredUp likes this.
    "If it was easy, someone else would of done it already." - Lt. Ray McCormack FDNY

    - Firefighter 1 / HAZMAT Ops / EMT-B

  3. #343
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Certainly not expecting to be able to work a military crash with one days training. I know it's hard to believe but we already have a response plan in place with Barksdale for them to come out and deal with the aircraft.

    Why do you need training in military aircraft emergencies when you once again admit you will do nothing to intervene?


    Took the class just to get a very, very basic understanding of aircraft firefighting operations as well as additional basic knowledge on the aircraft themselves. We already have have had some basic Aircraft Operations for Structural Firefighters classroom programs, but I wanted just a little bit of hands-on, and the command staff at my VFD agreed that it would be useful.

    WHY? Why did you waste time and your volly FD's money, which supposedly they have very little in the first place, on training you freely admit you will never utilize? Seems beyond ridiculous to me.


    AS I have stated earlier, both of my departments have the possibility of dealing with Blackhawks coming into Camp Minden as well asr med helos, and both departments have responded in the past to crashes and emergency landings on highways involving general aviation aircraft. So yes, the class makes sense for both of my agencies.

    Maybe for civilian aircraft, but you said earlier military aircraft emergencies would involve the airbase coming out to handle it.


    And Fryed, the instructors agreed that the basic search and rescue principles practiced in the train evolutions would also be applicable in large bus operations.

    Sorry, not buying it. The construction of a train car, the hazards in a train car are FAR different from a bus. For example, try taking a window out of a train car in the same manner you would a bus and see how badly you fail.

    The only similarity, and it is a stretch is the seating of passengers.
    IF you would actually do something maybe this would be worthwhile. but it seems to me your history of excuse making would preclude you from even getting close to an aircraft incident.
    scfire86 and RyanK63 like this.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  4. #344
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,007

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    IF you would actually do something maybe this would be worthwhile. but it seems to me your history of excuse making would preclude you from even getting close to an aircraft incident.
    I think snowball had it figured out -nothing but padding his resume- worthless paper
    ?

  5. #345
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    A plan is not acting. You've made it clear you have no intention of doing anything that remotely resembles firefighting. The plan you claim that exists is nothing more than paper. Might as well be comic book (appropriately since you are a comic claiming to be a firefighter) for all the good it will do if an actual incident occurs.

    Actually, the plan has been practiced. We would likely perform struxctural suppression and rescue if it came down in a neighborhood and the base crews would arrive with at least 2 ARFF vehicles and work the aircrtaft. If it was possible to rescue the aircrews within the limited ARFF training some of our career and volunteer members possess, we would.

    Again, where I have stated that I would likely not perform aggressive fire suppression operations except in some specific situations such as abandoned buildings, confirmed truss buildings, older mobile homes,with more than 2 rooms of involvement and some other situations where resources, training and exoperience did not match the fire?


    Why would they approve a class for someone who never intends to act? Obviously Bossier Parish is filled with those who exemplify the adage of "one being born every minute."

    Again, this training was through my VFD in another parish, not my combo department. Obviously my volunteer Chief feels that I would act in circumstances where actions where consistant with maintaining member safety, and found it worthwhile to send me to that class.


    Hopefully they have people who will look to act instead of you who has made it clear you have no intention of doing anything that even remotely involves firefighting.
    See above. Obviously my command staffs do not feel that way.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  6. #346
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Actually, the plan has been practiced. We would likely perform struxctural suppression and rescue if it came down in a neighborhood and the base crews would arrive with at least 2 ARFF vehicles and work the aircrtaft. If it was possible to rescue the aircrews within the limited ARFF training some of our career and volunteer members possess, we would.
    Practice isn't doing. We practiced combat maneuvers during my brief stint in the Army. The veterans that had actually been in combat stated it was nothing like the real deal. For one thing nobody died. Secondly, given the limited resources and training you refuse to do because they are not fires you commonly fight I will light candles hoping no airplanes have an impact incident in your jurisdiction. Assuming they survive the crash, they are pretty much toast if they hit in Bossier Parish.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Again, where I have stated that I would likely not perform aggressive fire suppression operations except in some specific situations such as abandoned buildings, confirmed truss buildings, older mobile homes,with more than 2 rooms of involvement and some other situations where resources, training and exoperience did not match the fire?
    Again, those aircrews are pretty much toast. You were just being obtuse in stating as such. Since you have no experience fighting an ARFF fire, those poor airman are goners.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Again, this training was through my VFD in another parish, not my combo department. Obviously my volunteer Chief feels that I would act in circumstances where actions where consistant with maintaining member safety, and found it worthwhile to send me to that class.
    See above. Obviously my command staffs do not feel that way.
    They obviously don't know you like we do.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  7. #347
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,589

    Default

    Why do you need training in military aircraft emergencies when you once again admit you will do nothing to intervene?

    And exactly where did I state that?

    True, there are many situations involving aircraft, especially on my VFD, who sent me to the class, where aggressive intervention would not be consistant with member life safety. However, part of the reson they sent me to the class was to better understand aircraft emergencies, and define our limitations and identify mutual aid resource needs at those types of incidents, and be able to deliver training on our response protocols.



    WHY? Why did you waste time and your volly FD's money, which supposedly they have very little in the first place, on training you freely admit you will never utilize? Seems beyond ridiculous to me.

    Because they felt that the class was worthwhile for the above reasons. Would we intervene in a situation where a small GA aircraft went down? Do we have the resources? Maybe, but they wanted somebody with a little more operational understanding of aircraft emergencies than what LSU offered for structural personnel.

    We could very easily have a general avaiation aircraft go down in the district as we border a community with a general avaition facility.



    Maybe for civilian aircraft, but you said earlier military aircraft emergencies would involve the airbase coming out to handle it.

    However, we could very easily have a B-52, cargo aircraft or large frame command/control aircraft go down in residental area. Unless there is an immediatte need for rescue we would handle the structural suppression, rescue and EMS issues and the base would handle to aircraft/fuel fire issues, and likely rescue.



    Sorry, not buying it. The construction of a train car, the hazards in a train car are FAR different from a bus. For example, try taking a window out of a train car in the same manner you would a bus and see how badly you fail.

    The only similarity, and it is a stretch is the seating of passengers.

    Never said that it was identical, but the basic priniples and basic techniques of movement around the space apply.

    Again, my VFD found value in that portion of the class as well.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  8. #348
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    Practice isn't doing. We practiced combat maneuvers during my brief stint in the Army. The veterans that had actually been in combat stated it was nothing like the real deal. For one thing nobody died. Secondly, given the limited resources and training you refuse to do because they are not fires you commonly fight I will light candles hoping no airplanes have an impact incident in your jurisdiction. Assuming they survive the crash, they are pretty much toast if they hit in Bossier Parish.





    Nope.

    So what do suggest we do? Crash a plane in a residental neighboorhood and then set a couple of homes on fire? True, we have not actually worked the scenario but it has been tabletopped.

    I will repeat ... My philopsphy on fire operations are not those of my department as a whole. I am not aggressive and beleive that aggressive operations is warrented only in situations with a HIGH probability of changing the outcome. That is not the philospohy of most of our officers and they are far more aggressive than I consider reasonable. In fact, we have several members with ARFF training through thier career gigs and a couple with Air Force experience and certifications.

    That being said we have no ARFF or high flow foam capability, so likely, as stated above, our operations would likely be confined to structural suppression, unless those with aircraft training and experience indicated that we could operate in the vicinity of the aircraft.


    The resources on my VFD are far less, as well as the levels of training and experience, and yes, that is a completly different scenario.





    Again, those aircrews are pretty much toast. You were just being obtuse in stating as such. Since you have no experience fighting an ARFF fire, those poor airman are goners.





    Likely, if there was significant fire, yes they would be as we do lack high flow foam abilities and we are not ARFF trained across the board as it is a low priority for both of my departments. No disagreement there.





    They obviously don't know you like we do.



    True. They know me better through my actions on the job. Imagine that.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  9. #349
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Why do you need training in military aircraft emergencies when you once again admit you will do nothing to intervene?

    And exactly where did I state that?

    True, there are many situations involving aircraft, especially on my VFD, who sent me to the class, where aggressive intervention would not be consistant with member life safety. However, part of the reson they sent me to the class was to better understand aircraft emergencies, and define our limitations and identify mutual aid resource needs at those types of incidents, and be able to deliver training on our response protocols.


    You said the airbase would handle military aircraft.

    Let me tell you what LA, from everything you have said about your personnel, response time, and equipment, there will be nothing you are going to do to positively affect the outcome of an aircraft incident involving fire. It is that brutally simple.


    WHY? Why did you waste time and your volly FD's money, which supposedly they have very little in the first place, on training you freely admit you will never utilize? Seems beyond ridiculous to me.

    Because they felt that the class was worthwhile for the above reasons. Would we intervene in a situation where a small GA aircraft went down? Do we have the resources? Maybe, but they wanted somebody with a little more operational understanding of aircraft emergencies than what LSU offered for structural personnel.

    We could very easily have a general avaiation aircraft go down in the district as we border a community with a general avaition facility.


    And again, without repeating what I said above, you will not do anything to positively affect the outcome of an incident involving an aircraft on fire, other than to stand around and spray water on the smoldering remains of the affected structures.


    Maybe for civilian aircraft, but you said earlier military aircraft emergencies would involve the airbase coming out to handle it.

    However, we could very easily have a B-52, cargo aircraft or large frame command/control aircraft go down in residental area. Unless there is an immediatte need for rescue we would handle the structural suppression, rescue and EMS issues and the base would handle to aircraft/fuel fire issues, and likely rescue.


    So are you trying to justify learning about aircraft fires by saying you will have to put out burning buildings hit by an airplane, but not the airplanes themselves because the airbase crash crews will do that? Again, why did you need specialized training for that?

    Sorry, not buying it. The construction of a train car, the hazards in a train car are FAR different from a bus. For example, try taking a window out of a train car in the same manner you would a bus and see how badly you fail.

    The only similarity, and it is a stretch is the seating of passengers.

    Never said that it was identical, but the basic priniples and basic techniques of movement around the space apply.

    Again, my VFD found value in that portion of the class as well.


    I am sure they did. Although I keep hearing a little voice in my head that says you said "Why teach people about things they won't ever see or use. And still you went to a class on train cars to learn about bus rescue. I am sure YOU see the logic in that.
    Seriously, it has gotten to the point where your excuses, your ramblings, and your justifications, are nothing more than ludicrous and funny.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  10. #350
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,589

    Default

    You said the airbase would handle military aircraft.

    I said, referring to my combo department, crews from the airbase would respond as part of a pre-arranged plan and would likely handle the aircraft unless there is some immediate need for us to do so prior to their arrival, such as attempting to control the aircraft fire itself, or attempt if it goes down in the neighborhood, or perform a rescue if we have enough of our members with fire department or military training on-scene to lead the operation.

    If there were none of those issues, yes, in all likelihood, we would leave the aircraft itself to the crews from the base and we would handle the civilian side of the incident.

    The simple fact is I was not sent by my combo department, which is the one with the far greater military aircraft exposure. I was sent by my VFD, whose exposure is more towards the general aviation side associated with the nearby general aviation airport. Depending on the size of the aircraft and the complexity of the incident it may manageable. That is why my department decided to send me to this class.

    The military would not respond to assist my volunteer department, who sent me to this class, in all likelihood, unless it was a downed military aircraft. If it was civilian, we (my VFD's area) would likely have to handle the incident without the crews from the air base. Either way, it would be at a minimum, a 35-40 minute response from Barksdale.

    Any more questions as to why I was sent, I suggest you contact my Chief as he was the one that made the call.




    And again, without repeating what I said above, you will not do anything to positively affect the outcome of an incident involving an aircraft on fire, other than to stand around and spray water on the smoldering remains of the affected structures.

    Fully agree that it may be that situation, as neither department has any large flow foam capabilities, and my VFD has no ARFF training, except for one Air Force ARFF certified reservist.

    Could we intervene if the fire was limited? Perhaps.

    Bottom line is you have little knowledge of what personal actions i would take or what department-level actions I would order or recommend in these situations.

    Again, if you have specific questions as to why he authorized me to send me to this class, I suggest you contact my volunteer Chief.



    Maybe for civilian aircraft, but you said earlier military aircraft emergencies would involve the airbase coming out to handle it.

    As I have stated, the airbase would probably send limited resources to a civilian aircraft incident in my combo's area, but would send a full response for a military incident. As I stated earlier, we would likely not get assistance from the airbase in my volunteer department's area, which is in part, why they sent me.

    The Chief understands that we have limited resources and capabilities, but wanted to send an officer to get additional training, so if an aircraft incident occurs, he has an officer with training beyond the LSU Aircraft Awareness to class to make an assessment and possibly lead or command an operational response.



    So are you trying to justify learning about aircraft fires by saying you will have to put out burning buildings hit by an airplane, but not the airplanes themselves because the airbase crash crews will do that? Again, why did you need specialized training for that?

    Again, my volunteer Chief felt that he wanted me at the class.

    .

    I am sure they did. Although I keep hearing a little voice in my head that says you said "Why teach people about things they won't ever see or use. And still you went to a class on train cars to learn about bus rescue. I am sure YOU see the logic in that.

    Which was authorized by the Chief of the department that paid for the class. He saw value in the class.

    We are far more likely to be involved in a response to a downed aircraft or a bus crash, from which some basic principles from this class can be applied, than we are in many other incidents discussed in FFI/FFII.


    Seriously, it has gotten to the point where your excuses, your ramblings, and your justifications, are nothing more than ludicrous and funny.

    Any questions as to why I was at this class should probably be directed to my volunteer Chief, who authorized the department to send me.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 04-09-2013 at 10:22 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  11. #351
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Likely, if there was significant fire, yes they would be as we do lack high flow foam abilities and we are not ARFF trained across the board as it is a low priority for both of my departments. No disagreement there.
    Thanks. There was no purpose in sending you to this class at taxpayer expense.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    True. They know me better through my actions on the job. Imagine that.
    That helps reinforce my opinion of your entire department. That they consider you the best of the bunch says a lot.
    FyredUp likes this.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  12. #352
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post


    I said, referring to my combo department, crews from the airbase would respond as part of a pre-arranged plan and would likely handle the aircraft unless there is some immediate need for us to do so prior to their arrival, such as attempting to control the aircraft fire itself, or attempt if it goes down in the neighborhood, or perform a rescue if we have enough of our members with fire department or military training on-scene to lead the operation.

    If there were none of those issues, yes, in all likelihood, we would leave the aircraft itself to the crews from the base and we would handle the civilian side of the incident.

    The simple fact is I was not sent by my combo department, which is the one with the far greater military aircraft exposure. I was sent by my VFD, whose exposure is more towards the general aviation side associated with the nearby general aviation airport. Depending on the size of the aircraft and the complexity of the incident it may manageable. That is why my department decided to send me to this class.

    The military would not respond to assist my volunteer department, who sent me to this class, in all likelihood, unless it was a downed military aircraft. If it was civilian, we (my VFD's area) would likely have to handle the incident without the crews from the air base. Either way, it would be at a minimum, a 35-40 minute response from Barksdale.

    I guarantee you if a military aircraft fell out of the sky in your volly FD's area the military base would respond. They own the aricraft and they will be there.

    Any more questions as to why I was sent, I suggest you contact my Chief as he was the one that made the call.

    LA contacting your chief and messing with your livlihood, no matter how much I disagree with your rantings, simply isn't my style. So you can stop the call my chief BS right now.



    Fully agree that it may be that situation, as neither department has any large flow foam capabilities, and my VFD has no ARFF training, except for one Air Force ARFF certified reservist.

    Then why waste time and money at a class when you know you have no ability to actually have a positive impact on a crash?

    Could we intervene if the fire was limited? Perhaps.

    If one of those larger military aircraft crash shortly after take-off it will be anything but a limited fire.

    Bottom line is you have little knowledge of what personal actions i would take or what department-level actions I would order or recommend in these situations.

    Untrue...you have made it brutally clear what your actions will be in any fire situation.

    Again, if you have specific questions as to why he authorized me to send me to this class, I suggest you contact my volunteer Chief.


    Not my style, nicely played whine though...


    As I have stated, the airbase would probably send limited resources to a civilian aircraft incident in my combo's area, but would send a full response for a military incident. As I stated earlier, we would likely not get assistance from the airbase in my volunteer department's area, which is in part, why they sent me.

    Wrong, the closest air force fire department will respond. I thought you had this all planned out regarding military aircraft?

    The Chief understands that we have limited resources and capabilities, but wanted to send an officer to get additional training, so if an aircraft incident occurs, he has an officer with training beyond the LSU Aircraft Awareness to class to make an assessment and possibly lead or command an operational response.


    Why? So you could stand there and tell him what you can't do?


    Again, my volunteer Chief felt that he wanted me at the class.

    Of course.

    Which was authorized by the Chief of the department that paid for the class. He saw value in the class.

    We are far more likely to be involved in a response to a downed aircraft or a bus crash, from which some basic principles from this class can be applied, than we are in many other incidents discussed in FFI/FFII.


    Really? How many major aircraft incidents have you been too? Esoecilly involving large frame military aircraft...

    Any questions as to why I was at this class should probably be directed to my volunteer Chief, who authorized the department to send me.
    This ask your chief thing is even funnier than your usual drivel...
    scfire86 likes this.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  13. #353
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    This ask your chief thing is even funnier than your usual drivel...
    Which is saying a lot since his usual drivel is usually pretty good.
    FyredUp likes this.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  14. #354
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    Which is saying a lot since his usual drivel is usually pretty good.
    Too true...
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  15. #355
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    This ask your chief thing is even funnier than your usual drivel...
    I'll make this very clear.

    1. My combo department has a high exposure for crashes involving fixed wing military aircraft as we are on the departure and approach routes for the air base. My department also has a high exposure to military rotary aircraft at the National Guard facility we cover. They have no ARFF response as we are the fire department for the facility. We have a much more limited exposure to incidents involving civilian aircraft.

    Ya with me so far?

    2. My combo department has a plan with Barksdale, which has been rehearsed, which involves the firefighting crews and ARFF vehicles responding from the base for any downed military aircraft with a full response and in the event of a civilian aircraft, a partial response.

    3. My combo department has several members that either have significant ARFF training from thier career gig or Air Force ARFF training who would be in a position to lead operations on the aircraft if the situation dictated immediate operations on the aircraft itself. If there is no immediate need for operations on the aircraft itself, our priority would be firefighting and rescue operations on any structures or civilians that may be involved or threatened, and the military and their ARFF vehicles would handle the aircraft sector of the incident.

    4. My combo department did not send me to this class.

    Have I confused you yet?

    5. My volunteer department has a much more limited exposure to crashes involving military aircraft with the exception of the rotary aircraft who often fly over my VFD's district at low levels on approach to the National Guard facility. In fact, the facility is actually surrounded by my VFD's response area and the helipad is actually less than 100' from the facility's perimeter, meaning that if it went down while landing, there is a good chance it would be my VFD, not my combo department, that would be responding..

    That being said, as I have stated multiple times, my VFD has a much higher exposure to smaller general aviation aircraft crashes than my combo department, as we are close to a GA airport in the neighboring fire district. The airport has no ARFF response.

    In addition, we routinely cover air med helo takeoffs and landings.

    6. It was my volunteer department that sent me to this class. When I requested this class, the Chief's intent was to gain some general knowledge on crash operations at the officer level for structural members and apparatus, primarily for operations involving general aviation aircraft. He approved me taking the class.

    I fully understand, and have stated, that the military would be coming if one of their aircraft went down in my VFD's district. The problem there is simply that the response time would likely be at least 35-40 minutes, which would likely require that at a minimum, we understand some basics about military aircraft fires and crashes so that we can operate safely on the edge of the incident and protect exposures. We fully understand that we would likely never have the resources, training or experience levels required to directly intervene on the (military) aircraft itself.

    7. As a department, depending on response, including AMA with a 5-man crew and a engine capable of producing Class A foam from multiple discharges (similar to the engine we likely will be purchasing later this year) we may have the capability to intervene in some general aviation crash situations. Again, I was sent to gather information on exactly how we could intervene with our resources and gather some information on basic response and operational procedures through hands-on training.

    8. I'll repeat .. It was my VFD, not my combo department that paid for me to attend this class. The Chief felt that it was important knowledge for the department. Certainly it could be used at my combo gig if an aircraft, military or civilian, went down, but as a rule, my combo gig does send members to ARFF training beyond basic awareness-level classes.

    Are we ever going to see an air crash in my VFD district? Maybe. Maybe not. But there is that possibility and the person who makes the ultimate decision on who we send to what type of training decided that it was worth the money. It's really that simple.

    Your comments on the fires I will and will not fight keep getting funnier and funnier as you know very little about me.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 04-10-2013 at 03:14 AM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  16. #356
    Forum Member
    FiremanLyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Are we ever going to see an air crash in my VFD district? Maybe. Maybe not. But there is that possibility and the person who makes the ultimate decision on who we send to what type of training decided that it was worth the money. It's really that simple.
    Hmm, willing to bet the odds of having a victim inside an "abandoned" structure would be greater.
    FyredUp and RyanK63 like this.
    ~Drew
    Firefighter/EMT/Technical Rescue
    USAR TF Rescue Specialist

  17. #357
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I'll make this very clear.

    1. My combo department has a high exposure for crashes involving fixed wing military aircraft as we are on the departure and approach routes for the air base. My department also has a high exposure to military rotary aircraft at the National Guard facility we cover. They have no ARFF response as we are the fire department for the facility. We have a much more limited exposure to incidents involving civilian aircraft.

    EVER had a crash involving a military aircraft in your Combo FD's area?

    Further if your combo FD didn't send you to this class this point of your defense of the class is moot.


    Ya with me so far?

    2. My combo department has a plan with Barksdale, which has been rehearsed, which involves the firefighting crews and ARFF vehicles responding from the base for any downed military aircraft with a full response and in the event of a civilian aircraft, a partial response.

    Irrelevant since you have made it clear your combo FD didn't send you to this class.

    3. My combo department has several members that either have significant ARFF training from thier career gig or Air Force ARFF training who would be in a position to lead operations on the aircraft if the situation dictated immediate operations on the aircraft itself. If there is no immediate need for operations on the aircraft itself, our priority would be firefighting and rescue operations on any structures or civilians that may be involved or threatened, and the military and their ARFF vehicles would handle the aircraft sector of the incident.

    Irrelevant since you have made it clear your combo FD didn't send you to this class.

    4. My combo department did not send me to this class.

    We know and it blows everything you said above this out of the water since it is all irrelevant.

    Have I confused you yet?

    No, but you seem confused since all you have talked abou is the combo FD that DIDN'T send you to this class.

    5. My volunteer department has a much more limited exposure to crashes involving military aircraft with the exception of the rotary aircraft who often fly over my VFD's district at low levels on approach to the National Guard facility. In fact, the facility is actually surrounded by my VFD's response area and the helipad is actually less than 100' from the facility's perimeter, meaning that if it went down while landing, there is a good chance it would be my VFD, not my combo department, that would be responding..

    EVER had a crash involving a helicopter in your volly FD's area?

    That being said, as I have stated multiple times, my VFD has a much higher exposure to smaller general aviation aircraft crashes than my combo department, as we are close to a GA airport in the neighboring fire district. The airport has no ARFF response.

    EVER had any type of aircraft crash in your volly FD's area?

    In addition, we routinely cover air med helo takeoffs and landings.

    Whoop de freaking do!! We did several of those last year ourselves.

    6. It was my volunteer department that sent me to this class. When I requested this class, the Chief's intent was to gain some general knowledge on crash operations at the officer level for structural members and apparatus, primarily for operations involving general aviation aircraft. He approved me taking the class.

    To what end? You admit freely you have no large foam application capability, no ARFF trained members and no willingness to change either one.

    I fully understand, and have stated, that the military would be coming if one of their aircraft went down in my VFD's district. The problem there is simply that the response time would likely be at least 35-40 minutes, which would likely require that at a minimum, we understand some basics about military aircraft fires and crashes so that we can operate safely on the edge of the incident and protect exposures. We fully understand that we would likely never have the resources, training or experience levels required to directly intervene on the (military) aircraft itself.

    I think tht may be the first truthful statement out of you on this entire topic.

    7. As a department, depending on response, including AMA with a 5-man crew and a engine capable of producing Class A foam from multiple discharges (similar to the engine we likely will be purchasing later this year) we may have the capability to intervene in some general aviation crash situations. Again, I was sent to gather information on exactly how we could intervene with our resources and gather some information on basic response and operational procedures through hands-on training.

    You do know that Class A foam is NOT designed for flammable liquids don't you? That's why it is called CLASS A foam.

    So what did you learn besides more justification for inaction?


    8. I'll repeat .. It was my VFD, not my combo department that paid for me to attend this class. The Chief felt that it was important knowledge for the department. Certainly it could be used at my combo gig if an aircraft, military or civilian, went down, but as a rule, my combo gig does send members to ARFF training beyond basic awareness-level classes.

    We know it was your volly FD, you are the one that keeps mentioning your combo FD.

    Are we ever going to see an air crash in my VFD district? Maybe. Maybe not. But there is that possibility and the person who makes the ultimate decision on who we send to what type of training decided that it was worth the money. It's really that simple.

    You see LA here is where your jusitification for this class becomes pathetically funny. You can justify going to a class to learn about aircraft crashes when you have never had one, but can't justify doing any kind of search on an abandoned building for victims because you have never seen one. I am sure you will come up with some more nonsense to justify your position, but out here we cal that hypocrisy.

    Your comments on the fires I will and will not fight keep getting funnier and funnier as you know very little about me.
    Oh we know you very well. You have stated more reasons for not entering a building on fire than ones to enter. Up to an including right off possibly viable victims, including your own family. You have talked about structural instabiity and the extent of the fire, and THEN even went so far as to say the type of structure would prevent you from entering, not the size of the fire itself but the construction method of the structure would prevent you from entering. That's the problem with broad stroke tactics, there is no wiggle room, there is no chance for adapting tactics. The rest of us here have stated emphatically that we would do a size-up, a risk vs benefit analysis and if the building conditions and fire size allowed we would enter and search for victims. You implied that was reckless and stupid, and you were called a coward. The truth is somewhere in the middle but your rigidity doesn't allow for gray areas.
    RyanK63 likes this.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  18. #358
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    Oh we know you very well. You have stated more reasons for not entering a building on fire than ones to enter. Up to an including right off possibly viable victims, including your own family. You have talked about structural instabiity and the extent of the fire, and THEN even went so far as to say the type of structure would prevent you from entering, not the size of the fire itself but the construction method of the structure would prevent you from entering. That's the problem with broad stroke tactics, there is no wiggle room, there is no chance for adapting tactics. The rest of us here have stated emphatically that we would do a size-up, a risk vs benefit analysis and if the building conditions and fire size allowed we would enter and search for victims. You implied that was reckless and stupid, and you were called a coward. The truth is somewhere in the middle but your rigidity doesn't allow for gray areas.
    Aside from the masterful way you dissect his statements and contradictions via parsing, this summation really does hold his head under water.

    He's stated he won't enter a structure to search for potential victims yet we're supposed to believe he was sent to this class for what, I don't know. Given his adamant mindset of not firefighting his VFD could have spent the money on something more worthwhile. Perhaps a special deal with a local bakery to have French pastry delivered during their meetings, or a new lightbar for the Gremlin.
    FyredUp likes this.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  19. #359
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    Aside from the masterful way you dissect his statements and contradictions via parsing, this summation really does hold his head under water.

    He's stated he won't enter a structure to search for potential victims yet we're supposed to believe he was sent to this class for what, I don't know. Given his adamant mindset of not firefighting his VFD could have spent the money on something more worthwhile. Perhaps a special deal with a local bakery to have French pastry delivered during their meetings, or a new lightbar for the Gremlin.
    Thanks for the kind words.

    I have to admit I laughed right out loud at this comment:

    Perhaps a special deal with a local bakery to have French pastry delivered during their meetings, or a new lightbar for the Gremlin.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  20. #360
    Forum Member
    conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Well, if we have decided to enter and do a search and the search comes up negative, what should we do then? I read about firefighters dying in and on abandoned buildings, but I never hear if they were still conducting a search or not. If we did the search and are sure no one is inside should we continue interior attack or move to the outside and protect exposures, letting the involved abandoned building burn down?
    I only ask because we have established if conditions warrant, most of us are going to do a search. OH, I am also glad I got my avatar working, even though my bunker gear pictured is subcontracted through the Chicago Tent and Awning Company.
    Last edited by conrad427; 04-10-2013 at 01:17 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. interior attack
    By whitefishfire in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-28-2009, 01:55 PM
  2. Is the risk worth the reward??
    By Rivwarrior in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-30-2005, 05:59 AM
  3. first interior attack
    By smfd232 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2002, 02:43 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-13-2002, 01:09 PM
  5. interior attack communications
    By mtperry in forum Fireground Tactics
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-02-2002, 03:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register