Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience

View Poll Results: Is it worth agressive interior attack on known vacant buildings?

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, it is worth the risk

    20 55.56%
  • No, it is not worth the risk

    16 44.44%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 121920212223 LastLast
Results 421 to 440 of 453
Like Tree136Likes

Thread: Risk/Reward Interior attack vacant buildings presentation

  1. #421
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SPFDRum View Post
    ^^^^^^All I see above is one excuse after another.....
    ..... Whatever.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.


  2. #422
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    ..... Whatever.


    "Whatever?" What are you some petulant little teen aged girl?
    Last edited by FyredUp; 04-19-2013 at 04:23 AM.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  3. #423
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    "Whatever?" What are you some petulant little teen aged girl?
    Yes, "Whatever".

    The simple fact is that I will not commit my personnel into a hostile enviroment on the "possibility" that the victims or property may be viable. The crews are my priority. For me to commit them into a hostile enviroment there must be a reasonable "probability" that I have viable victims and/or property to save.

    And yes, viability is very much dependant on the training skill and experience of the crew, as well as the amount of manpower available. What may be "viable" in your community may not be in mine, even if we are talking about the same number of responders.

    If that's not in the highest traditions of the fire service, or doesen't meet the performance standards of the some of the posters here .... Whatever.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  4. #424
    Forum Member scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I would love for every volunteer member to know that while operating his wages would be covered if he was injured, and hat their famalies would be protected.

    Would that change how I employed them and what risks I exposed them to? Likely no, as they still, even with enhanced wage coverage, are THE priority on the fireground and they need to be treated as such.
    One of the many reasons why you and your department are jokes and an insult to the fire service.


    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Insults are generally the work of those unable to discuss. You continue to not disappoint me.
    It's never been my goal to impress you. You might consider my remarks insults. Everyone else whose ever been a real firefighter considers them accurate.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    As I stated in the previous post, you never seem to disappoint me.
    See above response.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Funny thing is you have no idea how I act on the fireground when therre is are VIABLE lives to be saved.
    All we have to go on is what you have written on these boards. So we do indeed know how you act unless you've been lying. Which then becomes a whole other issue.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Yes, "Whatever".

    The simple fact is that I will not commit my personnel into a hostile enviroment on the "possibility" that the victims or property may be viable. The crews are my priority. For me to commit them into a hostile enviroment there must be a reasonable "probability" that I have viable victims and/or property to save.

    And yes, viability is very much dependant on the training skill and experience of the crew, as well as the amount of manpower available. What may be "viable" in your community may not be in mine, even if we are talking about the same number of responders.

    If that's not in the highest traditions of the fire service, or doesen't meet the performance standards of the some of the posters here .... Whatever.
    You continue to delineate the difference between your joke FD staffed with joke firefighters and a real FD staffed with real firefighters. We looked for ways to do our job, you look for ways to avoid it. We did interior attack numerous times and we all went home. Most of us retired after decades of that mindset. The ones that haven't retired are still working and getting there. Given your parameters there would be numerous civilians dead or severely injured that we actually saved. Individuals you've stated are not your concern since you didn't cause the circumstances of their distress.
    Last edited by scfire86; 04-19-2013 at 10:19 AM.
    Jasper 45 likes this.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  5. #425
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    One of the many reasons why you and your department are jokes and an insult to the fire service.

    I never said that going home uninjured was thier priority, but when they are under my supervision, it is MY priority.

    [COLOR="#FF0000"]

    It's never been my goal to impress you. You might consider my remarks insults. Everyone else whose ever been a real firefighter considers them accurate.

    Ya....... Right.



    All we have to go on is what you have written on these boards. So we do indeed know how you act unless you've been lying. Which then becomes a whole other issue.

    [COLOR="#FF0000"]And where have I said that I would not take risks for viable victims, assuming the training, experience and resources were available to support that risk, except in the specific cases of trusss construction with possible fire in ther overhead space, or a well-involved older mobile home?[/COLOR]


    You continue to delineate the difference between your joke FD staffed with joke firefighters and a real FD staffed with real firefighters. We looked for ways to do our job, you look for ways to avoid it. We did interior attack numerous times and we all went home. Most of us retired after decades of that mindset. The ones that haven't retired are still working and getting there. Given your parameters there would be numerous civilians dead or severely injured that we actually saved. Individuals you've stated are not your concern since you didn't cause the circumstances of their distress.
    I look for ways to do the job while at the same time assuring that my members will return home after EVERY call or shift. if you want to call that avaoilding the job, I guess I can't change that.

    Funny thing is that I have also made entry into burning structures many times and I never suffered more than a strain.That being said the fires of today are much more hostile, and also far less likely to yield viable victims on arrival, than they were even 10 years ago, so you have to adjust your mindset and realize that those fires of the past have little relevance when making decisions about the fires of the present. It is the only way that you are going to assure the famalies of your members that they will in fact return home after every call or shift.

    The fact is that there is significant differnce between the abilities of my combo FD and my volunteer department. Those abilities are based on access to better training, more experience through far more fires (especially in the case of those that work fulltime for the 2 nieghboring cities) and better resources through far better funding. I have to look at each through thier own capabilities, and there are simply things that my combo department does every day that my VFD will likely never be able to do.

    For me to have the same expectations of my VFD as I do of my combo department would not only be foolish, but it would also be irresponsble and dangerous. In addition, for me to have the same expectations of either department, compared to either of the neighboring full-time departments, would also be foolish and dangerous.

    I never said that I didn't care about folks still inside, but it is my responsbility as a supervisor to care about my crew far more, and my decsions are based around that.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 04-19-2013 at 11:19 AM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  6. #426
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Yes, "Whatever".

    All I can do here is laugh at you, and if you were here I would laugh in your face. Once again I am glad we don't have your kind in my area. Your ramblings about how we are dangerous, and wreckless, and suicidal we all are, no you haven't said those words but your implications have been clearly understood by the majority here, have become just like Charlie Brown's teacher...Muwah wah wah wah, Muwah wah wah wah. Mindless repeated dronings of someone who believes that the lives of victims are not your concern if you might get a boo boo trying to save them.
    The simple fact is that I will not commit my personnel into a hostile enviroment on the "possibility" that the victims or property may be viable. The crews are my priority. For me to commit them into a hostile enviroment there must be a reasonable "probability" that I have viable victims and/or property to save.

    And yes, viability is very much dependant on the training skill and experience of the crew, as well as the amount of manpower available. What may be "viable" in your community may not be in mine, even if we are talking about the same number of responders.

    You don't put any concern into the viability of the victims. You have repeated over and over it is about YOUR firefighters. Why is it all across the country VES is damn near a standard procedure but you won't teach it? Why is it all across the country firefighters understand that the job involve risks, yes we try to minimize them, but due to the inherent nature of the job and if you actually do the job, it is impossible to eliminate them all.

    How about you spend a little less time on here during your "Work Day" and you spend more time learning the craft of firefighting so you can train your people how to do VES, and do proper size-ups to determine viability of interior search and fire attack. It seems all you peruse is the uber safety, new wave, excuse for not entering websites that are a blight on the fire service. Too many book smart, no field experience, people trying to make a name for themselves.


    If that's not in the highest traditions of the fire service, or doesen't meet the performance standards of the some of the posters here .... Whatever.

    Let me type this really slow so maybe you can get it this time. NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE here gives a Tinker's DAMN what you and you merry band of vollies and combo department people do in your little half acre of Louisiana. It is when you try to infect the minds of the newbies that come on here with your bovine recyclable waste material that we will battle you, and as much as you wish to paint yourself as the new wave of the fire service your inaction plan will never be the way the majority do this job. NO, that doesn't mean we mindlessly run into places we shouldn't, but it for damn sure means we will go into places you cower from and will make saves of people you callously and heartlessly "Don't lose a minute's sleep over" writing off.
    You say insults are the mark of someone with nothing meaningful left to say...I say "Whatever" is the sign of someone that knows they have lost but aren't smart enough to surrender and admit it.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  7. #427
    Forum Member scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    never said that going home uninjured was thier priority, but when they are under my supervision, it is MY priority.
    It was mine as well. And we managed to do interior attack numerous times with my crew going home uninjured.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Ya....... Right
    No really.....it's never been my goal to impress you.....ever.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    And where have I said that I would not take risks for viable victims, assuming the training, experience and resources were available to support that risk, except in the specific cases of trusss construction with possible fire in ther overhead space, or a well-involved older mobile home?
    And myself and my crew engaged in attacking fires in all of those scenarios and we went home....uninjured. Many times we found no victims. But we did the interior attack with the assumption that we might find someone who needed saving. We considered that doing something you don't. OUR JOB!!

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I look for ways to do the job while at the same time assuring that my members will return home after EVERY call or shift. if you want to call that avaoilding the job, I guess I can't change that.
    So did I.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Funny thing is that I have also made entry into burning structures many times and I never suffered more than a strain.That being said the fires of today are much more hostile, and also far less likely to yield viable victims on arrival, than they were even 10 years ago, so you have to adjust your mindset and realize that those fires of the past have little relevance when making decisions about the fires of the present. It is the only way that you are going to assure the famalies of your members that they will in fact return home after every call or shift.
    I did interior attacks on modern structures right up until the time I retired. My crews went home at the end of the shift. We weren't afraid of modern construction and we made decisions accordingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    The fact is that there is significant differnce between the abilities of my combo FD and my volunteer department. Those abilities are based on access to better training, more experience through far more fires (especially in the case of those that work fulltime for the 2 nieghboring cities) and better resources through far better funding. I have to look at each through thier own capabilities, and there are simply things that my combo department does every day that my VFD will likely never be able to do.
    Which is why your VFD is a joke.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    For me to have the same expectations of my VFD as I do of my combo department would not only be foolish, but it would also be irresponsble and dangerous. In addition, for me to have the same expectations of either department, compared to either of the neighboring full-time departments, would also be foolish and dangerous.
    See above response.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    I never said that I didn't care about folks still inside, but it is my responsbility as a supervisor to care about my crew far more, and my decsions are based around that.
    As was mine. And I based my decisions accordingly and my crews all went home.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  8. #428
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    536

    Default

    I like to read the blogs of firefighters. I have read some well respected chiefs and other officers who are trying to constantly answer the question that we are trying to answer here. I find a lot of the old veterans tend to err on the side of safety going as far as saying that we should never go into a "vacant building". While a lot of the jumpseat riders are more of the opinion that we should make sure of occupancy no matter what and why the hell not put the fire out from the inside if conditions permit. Not having a lot of experience in the fire service puts me at a disadvantage when it comes to tactics, however hindsight is a bit#@ when it comes to LODD's at a vacant or abandoned structure. I react poorly when I hear about them. I usually think "what the hell were they doing in there". Now that I read LODD reports, I usually find that the firefighters were not acting recklessly at all. Everything lined up and things went bad. I was of the opinion that we should never enter an abandoned building, but now realize that how can we be sure if we do not enter. I think now that 360 size up training and experience is probably what I lack the most. We can stay pretty safe if we never go inside, but I am not sure that is the right thing to do. I signed up to do the JOB. Sorry if I am rambling. Heck, people get killed in my day job of farming all the time, we don't stop farming because it is too dangerous, we just try to do things correctly and as safely as POSSIBLE.

  9. #429
    Forum Member EastKyFF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    3,032

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by conrad427 View Post
    I like to read the blogs of firefighters.
    Me like cookies.
    conrad427 likes this.
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.Ē
    --General James Mattis, USMC


  10. #430
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,527

    Default

    All I can do here is laugh at you, and if you were here I would laugh in your face. Once again I am glad we don't have your kind in my area. Your ramblings about how we are dangerous, and wreckless, and suicidal we all are, no you haven't said those words but your implications have been clearly understood by the majority here, have become just like Charlie Brown's teacher...Muwah wah wah wah, Muwah wah wah wah. Mindless repeated dronings of someone who believes that the lives of victims are not your if you might get a boo boo trying to save them.

    Give me a reason to take a risk, and yes, in some cases, risk injury to my crew, and I will. The only valid reason is viable life, and in some cases, viable property, though those circumstances would be VERY, VERY few and far between in either my combo or volunteer fire districts.

    The bottom line is that in the rural enviroment, most folks that die in fires are dead long before the department arrives. That's the simple reality. There is simply no point, in most cases, of going interior for rescue operations unless there is a strong reason to make entry. People die in fires. people especially die in fires in the rural enviroment. The vast majority of the time, firefighters cannot change that, but we can get hurt or killed trying to change that on a hope, not a realistic assessment.



    You don't put any concern into the viability of the victims. You have repeated over and over it is about YOUR firefighters.

    And in the end it is about MY firefighters. Does that mean I'm not concerned about the victims? no. But in the end my actions are based on what is best for one group of folks ... The people who I have been tasked to supervise, may that be just my crew, a sector or division, or the entire scene as the IC. Nobody else. If that makes me cold, callous, uncaring or ay other word you may want to toss my way about the victims, so be it.


    Why is it all across the country VES is damn near a standard procedure but you won't teach it?

    Really? When I brought up the topic of VES a few years ago, nobody in this area, including the career departments or the state instructors at the LSU facility just a few miles away from us, knew anything about it. In fact, not only have I conducted training on VES twice in my own combo department, but I have also done a class on it for another department. The fact is the command staff at my combo gig has decided not to adopt it as a standard technique, but has instead chosen to maintain through-the-door searhes as our standard procedure. Yes, it's a tool in the box, but not the standard tool.

    As far as my VFD, both the training officer and the Deputy Chief agree that the majority of our members simply do not have the training or experience to safely use VES, so it has been decided by the three of us not to teach it.

    Since we are on the topic of training ..... I have urged the members at my VFD to seek more outside training .... And they have. I hvae worked towards implementing new training standards ... Which have been implemented. And I have implemented much more physical and hands-on training, as well as introduced several new operational concepts and procedures, including the transistional attack and vehicle stabilzation operations.

    So, you were saying?


    Why is it all across the country firefighters understand that the job involve risks, yes we try to minimize them, but due to the inherent nature of the job and if you actually do the job, it is impossible to eliminate them all.

    Never said we could eliminate all, but through smart operations, including yes, not performing some operations that traditionally we have considered "part of the job", we can greatly reduce the exposure. We will always disagree on this. My job is simple ... To bring the members back unhurt. Everything else, short of injuries that may occur during realistic rescue operations within the skills, experience levels and training of the members, is secondary to that.

    How about you spend a little less time on here during your "Work Day" and you spend more time learning the craft of firefighting so you can train your people how to do VES, and do proper size-ups to determine viability of interior search and fire attack.

    Again, I do. My combo department, honestly, is already very well trained, generally highly experienced and (unfortunatly) operates in a manner that is consistant with the level of aggressiveness that you would likely consider acceptable. And yes, I am involved with training there on a daily basis as a part of my "workday".

    It's my VFD that is my primary area of concern, and I work with them as a volunteer.

    As far as my craft, I consider myself a skilled firefighter. That has absolutly nothing to do with making choices reagrding go/no-go decsion making. There are simply places that we do not need to be no matter how skilled we are.



    It seems all you peruse is the uber safety, new wave, excuse for not entering websites that are a blight on the fire service. Too many book smart, no field experience, people trying to make a name for themselves.

    Funny ... In addition to looking at the "standard websites" like Firehouse and Fire Engineering I also look quite often at websites like Fire Warrior and even McCormack's Urban Firefighter and yes, I find some articles of value at those places as well.Much of of it is either simply not applicable based on the resources and training time avaialble to my personnel, but I look anyway.



    Let me type this really slow so maybe you can get it this time. NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE here gives a Tinker's DAMN what you and you merry band of vollies and combo department people do in your little half acre of Louisiana. It is when you try to infect the minds of the newbies that come on here with your bovine recyclable waste material that we will battle you, and as much as you wish to paint yourself as the new wave of the fire service your inaction plan will never be the way the majority do this job.

    And I will continue to post so that the newbies see that there is an alternative to your vision of what a firefighter should be and where he/she should operate.


    NO, that doesn't mean we mindlessly run into places we shouldn't, but it for damn sure means we will go into places you cower from and will make saves of people you callously and heartlessly "Don't lose a minute's sleep over" writing off.

    And if that makes you feel better at night, so be it. Again, as long as I walk out with my crew intact and uninjured.. It has been a successful day.

    You say insults are the mark of someone with nothing meaningful left to say...I say "Whatever" is the sign of someone that knows they have lost but aren't smart enough to surrender and admit it.

    After awhile, it justs get tiring.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 04-19-2013 at 01:21 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  11. #431
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EastKyFF View Post
    Me like cookies.
    Me too. And ice cream.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  12. #432
    Forum Member scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    Give me a reason to take a risk, and yes, in some cases, risk injury to my crew, and I will. The only valid reason is viable life, and in some cases, viable property, though those circumstances would be VERY, VERY few and far between in either my combo or volunteer fire districts.
    The reason is because it is your JOB!.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    The bottom line is that in the rural enviroment, most folks that die in fires are dead long before the department arrives. That's the simple reality. There is simply no point, in most cases, of going interior for rescue operations unless there is a strong reason to make entry. People die in fires. people especially die in fires in the rural enviroment. The vast majority of the time, firefighters cannot change that, but we can get hurt or killed trying to change that on a hope, not a realistic assessment.
    The bottom line is that folks like you who claim to be firefighters are an embarrassment to the fire service.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  13. #433
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaFireEducator View Post
    All I can do here is laugh at you, and if you were here I would laugh in your face. Once again I am glad we don't have your kind in my area. Your ramblings about how we are dangerous, and wreckless, and suicidal we all are, no you haven't said those words but your implications have been clearly understood by the majority here, have become just like Charlie Brown's teacher...Muwah wah wah wah, Muwah wah wah wah. Mindless repeated dronings of someone who believes that the lives of victims are not your if you might get a boo boo trying to save them.

    Give me a reason to take a risk, and yes, in some cases, risk injury to my crew, and I will. The only valid reason is viable life, and in some cases, viable property, though those circumstances would be VERY, VERY few and far between in either my combo or volunteer fire districts.

    You have said plainly, and quite clearly, that mere building construction would prevent you entering a building on fire. Not extent of the fire, not building condition, BUT BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. WHY? If the fire is confined to the compartment, or you may prefer room, the structure is not threatened and normal firefighting techniques can and should be used. In other words, go inside and put out the damn fire. You talk about how you go in, yet all you do is make more and more excuses and arguments why not to.

    The bottom line is that in the rural enviroment, most folks that die in fires are dead long before the department arrives. That's the simple reality. There is simply no point, in most cases, of going interior for rescue operations unless there is a strong reason to make entry. People die in fires. people especially die in fires in the rural enviroment. The vast majority of the time, firefighters cannot change that, but we can get hurt or killed trying to change that on a hope, not a realistic assessment.


    Maybe where you live. Departments around here have more saves than have deaths in fires. Must be a cultural thing.

    You don't put any concern into the viability of the victims. You have repeated over and over it is about YOUR firefighters.

    And in the end it is about MY firefighters. Does that mean I'm not concerned about the victims? no. But in the end my actions are based on what is best for one group of folks ... The people who I have been tasked to supervise, may that be just my crew, a sector or division, or the entire scene as the IC. Nobody else. If that makes me cold, callous, uncaring or ay other word you may want to toss my way about the victims, so be it.


    The fact is you come off as a cold, callous, uncaring Son of a Bitch. If you don't mean it the way you say it then come up with a better way of saying it because right now I would rather have a Troop of Brownies coming to my house fire before any firefighters led by you. At least Brownies are taught about Duty, Service and Honor.

    Why is it all across the country VES is damn near a standard procedure but you won't teach it?


    Really? When I brought up the topic of VES a few years ago, nobody in this area, including the career departments or the state instructors at the LSU facility just a few miles away from us, knew anything about it. In fact, not only have I conducted training on VES twice in my own combo department, but I have also done a class on it for another department. The fact is the command staff at my combo gig has decided not to adopt it as a standard technique, but has instead chosen to maintain through-the-door searhes as our standard procedure. Yes, it's a tool in the box, but not the standard tool.

    It is surely not my fault that it seems that great portions of the State of Lousiana, or at least the parts you come in contact with, are about 20 years out of touch with the rest of the fire service when it comes to VES. Whether knowing about it and rejecting it, or actually practicing it.

    Further your comment about through the door searches shows clearly YOU don't understand when and where VES would be used. Because it does not replace normal search procedures, it is for a rapid search in areas of high probability of victims being located when time is of the essence.


    As far as my VFD, both the training officer and the Deputy Chief agree that the majority of our members simply do not have the training or experience to safely use VES, so it has been decided by the three of us not to teach it.

    So let me see if I have this right...When your firefighters don't have the training or the experience to do something instead of training them to do it and giving them experience on the training grounds you simply dismiss the idea all together. Now I understand why you don't want your volly FD going interior, because they don't have the training or experience you dismiss that practice instead of training to do it. IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR NOW!

    Since we are on the topic of training ..... I have urged the members at my VFD to seek more outside training .... And they have. I hvae worked towards implementing new training standards ... Which have been implemented. And I have implemented much more physical and hands-on training, as well as introduced several new operational concepts and procedures, including the transistional attack and vehicle stabilzation operations.

    Yet VES is beyond them. Interesting.

    So, you were saying?

    I was saying it is fun watching you constantly contradict yourself in your maze of BS.


    Why is it all across the country firefighters understand that the job involve risks, yes we try to minimize them, but due to the inherent nature of the job and if you actually do the job, it is impossible to eliminate them all.

    Never said we could eliminate all, but through smart operations, including yes, not performing some operations that traditionally we have considered "part of the job", we can greatly reduce the exposure. We will always disagree on this. My job is simple ... To bring the members back unhurt. Everything else, short of injuries that may occur during realistic rescue operations within the skills, experience levels and training of the members, is secondary to that.

    My job is simpler, serve the public by saving lives and protecting property in as safe a manner as I can. Understanding that the job has inherent risks and that the only way to be 100% safe is to quit firefighting and take up a safer passtime like reading in a soft cushy overstuffed chair, equipped with a seatbelt and air bags.

    How about you spend a little less time on here during your "Work Day" and you spend more time learning the craft of firefighting so you can train your people how to do VES, and do proper size-ups to determine viability of interior search and fire attack.

    Again, I do. My combo department, honestly, is already very well trained, generally highly experienced and (unfortunatly) operates in a manner that is consistant with the level of aggressiveness that you would likely consider acceptable. And yes, I am involved with training there on a daily basis as a part of my "workday".

    Yet there are days when you are supposedly at work when you are on here for hours during the work day. Seems like your job doesn't really require all that much work if you can afford to do that.

    It's my VFD that is my primary area of concern, and I work with them as a volunteer.

    No kidding, you make new excuses for them everyday.

    As far as my craft, I consider myself a skilled firefighter. That has absolutly nothing to do with making choices reagrding go/no-go decsion making. There are simply places that we do not need to be no matter how skilled we are.

    You can consider yourself whatever you want. Wishing you are something doesn't make it true.



    It seems all you peruse is the uber safety, new wave, excuse for not entering websites that are a blight on the fire service. Too many book smart, no field experience, people trying to make a name for themselves.


    Funny ... In addition to looking at the "standard websites" like Firehouse and Fire Engineering I also look quite often at websites like Fire Warrior and even McCormack's Urban Firefighter and yes, I find some articles of value at those places as well.Much of of it is either simply not applicable based on the resources and training time avaialble to my personnel, but I look anyway.


    I'm sure you do. Again more excuses not to train.

    Let me type this really slow so maybe you can get it this time. NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE here gives a Tinker's DAMN what you and you merry band of vollies and combo department people do in your little half acre of Louisiana. It is when you try to infect the minds of the newbies that come on here with your bovine recyclable waste material that we will battle you, and as much as you wish to paint yourself as the new wave of the fire service your inaction plan will never be the way the majority do this job.

    And I will continue to post so that the newbies see that there is an alternative to your vision of what a firefighter should be and where he/she should operate.

    When anyone that comes here sees the overwhelming number that disagree with your blather it becomes obvious how valid you are.

    NO, that doesn't mean we mindlessly run into places we shouldn't, but it for damn sure means we will go into places you cower from and will make saves of people you callously and heartlessly "Don't lose a minute's sleep over" writing off.

    And if that makes you feel better at night, so be it. Again, as long as I walk out with my crew intact and uninjured.. It has been a successful day.

    I do feel better knowing that I look for reasons to do the job rather than one's not to.

    You say insults are the mark of someone with nothing meaningful left to say...I say "Whatever" is the sign of someone that knows they have lost but aren't smart enough to surrender and admit it.

    After awhile, it justs get tiring.

    Then stop. You are the narcissist that needs the attention.
    Have a nice day!
    scfire86 likes this.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  14. #434
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    536

    Default

    I fight the same kind of mentality all the time. The mentality of "we rarely see the problem so why train for the problem?". I recently suggested training on getting a firefighter or a victim out of a second story window and was met with "why, we have not seen that in years?" REALLY? I was flabbergasted. I would think a VFD in the south should get trained up unless the community is fine with the fact that no entry will be made because they are not trained well enough. We may not cost as much as a paid dept. but we have as much responsibility to be worth the money, however small the amount.

  15. #435
    Frank-Gifford
    Firehouse.com Guest

    Default

    Similar resonance.
    Last edited by Matty_Bev; 11-21-2013 at 05:22 PM.

  16. #436
    Forum Member Squad1LT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Back to your question and poll as to is it worth an aggressive interior attack on a known vacant. I always tell my guys when we respond to a vacant and also commercial/industrial fires is to slow down. Be more careful and aware then when in an occupied SFD. You should always be aware, but I always remind my guys enroute to on of these fires to be more careful etc... and if there is anything i dont like I am pulling the plug sooner in a vacant then I would in a sound building or an occupied SFD.

  17. #437
    Forum Member ToDaRoof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matty_Bev View Post
    Hmm a lot of very edgy replies to this. I'm only applying to departments but I would never be so antagonizing to a question like this if I was a seasoned pro. Can't anyone just answer the guy's question using their own brain? I mean, you COULD just give the guy all the scenarios you encounter doing this job, eh? Instead of slamming him and his question for being vague (i.e. stupid). So he didn't include ALL the variables . . . can't ANY of you provide them? He asked a question. It's called an open-ended question. The answers should include information he didn't consider when asking the question. I always thought Firefighters were supposed to be very helpful people but, reading through a lot of these replies, I am encountering the same old macho, antagonistic, internet-tough-guy posturing as I find on any website - forum. Maybe I should go to law school like my ma wants. Very disappointed. And let the slamming me commence . . . Actually read through and found some answers that were very informative and helpful and the least aggressive and antagonistic. So that's good. But, there still is a lot of bickering and stupid name-calling. I've said what I've said and now I'm not coming back to this site. Why bother if you can't ask a simple question and get 100% help from people who are supposed to be 100% helpful. Cheers.
    Bye! Have fun in law school; a career full of... aggressiveness, antagonizing, bickering, and name-calling.

  18. #438
    Frank-Gifford
    Firehouse.com Guest

    Default

    Good Question.
    Last edited by Matty_Bev; 11-25-2013 at 02:38 PM.

  19. #439
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matty_Bev View Post
    How did you pass the written? I said maybe I should go to law school. Didn't say I was going. Super answer though! Bravo and bye bye.
    I thought you were leaving nd never coming back to this site? You have the integrity to be a lawyer.
    Crazy, but that's how it goes
    Millions of people living as foes
    Maybe it's not too late
    To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

  20. #440
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matty_Bev View Post
    How did you pass the written? I said maybe I should go to law school. Didn't say I was going. Super answer though! Bravo and bye bye.
    You're still here?
    Let me be the first to say how PROFOUNDLY sorry I am that you might have been offended by the content of an OPEN internet forum.
    Let me assure you that should you ever decide to become a firefighter you will NEVER have to learn to deal with people that have different personalities or differences of opinions. EVER.

    Good luck. You are going to need it.
    Last edited by conrad427; 10-09-2013 at 10:52 AM.
    The fire service is about service to our fellow man.
    There is a trust that must not be broken and we are the keepers of that trust.
    Captain Dave LeBlanc

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. interior attack
    By whitefishfire in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-28-2009, 01:55 PM
  2. Is the risk worth the reward??
    By Rivwarrior in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-30-2005, 05:59 AM
  3. first interior attack
    By smfd232 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2002, 02:43 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-13-2002, 01:09 PM
  5. interior attack communications
    By mtperry in forum Fireground Tactics
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-02-2002, 03:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts