Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 60
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Helping the Detroit Fire Department.

  1. #21
    Forum Member GTRider245's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Augusta,GA
    Posts
    3,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    You are entirely missing the point.
    The point is by no fault of their own, DFD firefighters respond to more fire than all of the departments in this thread combined with worn out gear, broken or missing tools and less than proper staffing. You buy a shirt, they get a saw. Or boots. Or whatever.

    As usual the same crowd caused the discussion to veer off track with political BS that has nothing to do with the point of the thread.
    Career Firefighter
    Volunteer Captain

    -Professional in Either Role-

    Quote Originally Posted by Rescue101 View Post
    I don't mind fire rolling over my head. I just don't like it rolling UNDER my a**.


  2. #22
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,882

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTRider245 View Post
    The point is by no fault of their own, DFD firefighters respond to more fire than all of the departments in this thread combined with worn out gear, broken or missing tools and less than proper staffing. You buy a shirt, they get a saw. Or boots. Or whatever.

    As usual the same crowd caused the discussion to veer off track with political BS that has nothing to do with the point of the thread.
    In my opinion the "political bs" is an important part of this thread. Its not like Detroit was hit by a one time tsunami and that is why they are in the straits that they are in. A large part of the problem is the corrupt government. I fully understand that the guys in the trenches are the ones suffering, but myself personally , I hate to see federal government go to prop up a "banana republic" -And GT just for the record, the first fundraiser the organization had was a patch quilt, I sent the FIRST patch in to them, and guess what ? I have also purchased a shirt.
    ?

  3. #23
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    611

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slackjawedyokel View Post
    In my opinion the "political bs" is an important part of this thread. Its not like Detroit was hit by a one time tsunami and that is why they are in the straits that they are in. A large part of the problem is the corrupt government. I fully understand that the guys in the trenches are the ones suffering, but myself personally , I hate to see federal government go to prop up a "banana republic" -And GT just for the record, the first fundraiser the organization had was a patch quilt, I sent the FIRST patch in to them, and guess what ? I have also purchased a shirt.
    So let's get right down to it. If it was your call would they get the money or not? I'm not asking if you LIKE them getting the money. Forget about the REASONS they need the money. (I'm assuming we all agree they do need it) But, plain and simple, SHOULD they get the money?

    Anyone else care to answer?

  4. #24
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by captnjak View Post
    So let's get right down to it. If it was your call would they get the money or not? I'm not asking if you LIKE them getting the money. Forget about the REASONS they need the money. (I'm assuming we all agree they do need it) But, plain and simple, SHOULD they get the money?

    Anyone else care to answer?
    I'll answer the question. Although I already did a few posts back. If the money they got is a SAFER Grant, and they filled out the application properly, made it past computer scoring, made it past peer review, and were deemed a valid grant request, then YES, they should get the money. That is the same process anyone else applying for that same grant would have to do.

    The down side is in 5 years, at the end of the SAFER Grant funding, they will most likely lay off the same number they hired because unless some radical change occurs there the city's money problems will not end.
    “The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and live.” Leo F. Buscaglia

    This place gets weirder and weirder every day...

  5. #25
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,882

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by captnjak View Post
    So let's get right down to it. If it was your call would they get the money or not? I'm not asking if you LIKE them getting the money. Forget about the REASONS they need the money. (I'm assuming we all agree they do need it) But, plain and simple, SHOULD they get the money?

    Anyone else care to answer?
    If you are talking about the safer grant --- if they are judged on a level playing field, they should have just as good a chance as any other department. Do I agree with how the safer and the fire grant operate --no, but I feel like most federal programs benefit either under achievers and or agencies/people that know how to play the system.
    ?

  6. #26
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snowball View Post
    CDF or CalFire as they like to call themselves now, has several different matrix's in place for whatever you can afford. If all you can spring for is an unstaffed tender in a pole barn, then they are more than happy to plaster their logo on the side of it. The plus to that is they have resources that will respond to incidents. CDF claims to be the largest fire department in the US, when in reality, they are just a series of really small departments staffed by state employees. They are like assisted living for struggling towns, not really too concerned with making a huge profit, but they'll take every spare penny you have. Just spreading their empire like the Romans did. If a community receives more service than they pay for, the excess is slung around the neck of the already over taxed Californian.

    I had to edit this:
    No disrespect to the CalFire brothers, they are a stellar group of firefighters dedicated to providing excellent care to the citizens they serve.
    I think this is actually a fair comment.

    Calfire got into the contract business under the idea they had a fire department for half the year. So in some rural areas the idea was proposed to let the local area pick up the tab in the winter. This was kind of a win for both sides, the local got a full time staff at 50% cost, and the state got a little extra money.

    Things changed at some point and the state got into the contract fire business big time. The Riverside County Fire Department is a Calfire Operation and accounts for more than half of their paid personnel.

    What started as a practical idea has kind of turned into an empire.

  7. #27
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by captnjak View Post
    So let's get right down to it. If it was your call would they get the money or not? I'm not asking if you LIKE them getting the money. Forget about the REASONS they need the money. (I'm assuming we all agree they do need it) But, plain and simple, SHOULD they get the money?

    Anyone else care to answer?
    Sure. I'll say No. If the city of Detroit has run itself into the red, giving them a grant is wasting it. They obviously have no financial plan to keep the city afloat. With years of debt building, I can't see any possible way they followed grant procedures and were still able to win one. Isn't part of the grant (at least it used to be) being able to pay a growing percentage each year?
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  8. #28
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Here and there View Post
    I think this is actually a fair comment.

    Calfire got into the contract business under the idea they had a fire department for half the year. So in some rural areas the idea was proposed to let the local area pick up the tab in the winter. This was kind of a win for both sides, the local got a full time staff at 50% cost, and the state got a little extra money.

    Things changed at some point and the state got into the contract fire business big time. The Riverside County Fire Department is a Calfire Operation and accounts for more than half of their paid personnel.

    What started as a practical idea has kind of turned into an empire.
    Thanks to you and SnowBall for the replies. I have always kind of wondered how the system worked. Seems like parts of the system are pretty practical.
    Is the current system cost effective? Or is it spending more than it takes in taxes and contract fees?
    The fire service is about service to our fellow man.
    There is a trust that must not be broken and we are the keepers of that trust.
    Captain Dave LeBlanc

  9. #29
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    526

    Default

    I guess I don't see an alternative to giving Detroit the money. No one is willing to make a compromise so we go broke. Sure the people voted in the fools that have worked hard to break the city for years, but we have gone pages and pages about searching vacant buildings for a possible vagrant or crackhead. The people of Detroit should be searched for even if they voted for idiots. What other option is there?
    The fire service is about service to our fellow man.
    There is a trust that must not be broken and we are the keepers of that trust.
    Captain Dave LeBlanc

  10. #30
    Forum Member snowball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Just North of South Central
    Posts
    2,731

    Default

    I say let them have the grant. And like Fyred stated, only if they complete the application process. Grants are use specific and the money will be guaranteed to go to the FD and has to be accounted for. Those guys love their city and through all the pay cuts, layoffs, budget cuts, crappy gear, dilapidated houses, and rigs that couldn't pull a sick whore off a toilet, they go to work and try their hardest to protect the citizenry. If that means that Cowpieville has to wait a year for their third new rig to sit idle until the harvest parade, so be it. If it means that my department has to wait another year for new SCBA's, then screw them!


    No, just kidding, so be it.
    IAFF

  11. #31
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snowball View Post
    I say let them have the grant. And like Fyred stated, only if they complete the application process. Grants are use specific and the money will be guaranteed to go to the FD and has to be accounted for. Those guys love their city and through all the pay cuts, layoffs, budget cuts, crappy gear, dilapidated houses, and rigs that couldn't pull a sick whore off a toilet, they go to work and try their hardest to protect the citizenry. If that means that Cowpieville has to wait a year for their third new rig to sit idle until the harvest parade, so be it. If it means that my department has to wait another year for new SCBA's, then screw them!


    No, just kidding, so be it.
    Seriously I can't believe you posted this absolute bunch of bovine recyclable waste material.

    If that means that Cowpieville has to wait a year for their third new rig to sit idle until the harvest parade, so be it.
    So your image of the rural volunteer fire service is we all have bright new rigs sitting in our stations and have no need for the grants. Seriously? When my #1 POC FD got our grant for a new engine in 2005 it was the first NEW piece of fire apparatus we had bought since 1926. Everything in between was someone else's cast off used piece of iron. Heck, we went years where the rigs were older than the majority of members on the department.
    “The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and live.” Leo F. Buscaglia

    This place gets weirder and weirder every day...

  12. #32
    the 4-1-4 Jasper 45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ...A great place, on a Great Lake
    Posts
    2,783

    Default

    Don, believe me when I say this, I'm not attacking volunteers or your department. There are a lot of inequities when grants are handed out. I was just in a volunteer/paid-call department close by me and, all of their turnout gear was grant funded. It's a fairly well funded, larger community with a decent tax base that probably could have bought their own turnout gear, rather than use the grant.
    What's my point, here? We (as a Nation) "waste" a lot of tax money on tasks or items that don't work the way a program was intended. Homeland security is a great example, I'm not sure if that is UASI, but it's geared towards USAR/collapse. Just look at the amount of grant money the state of Wisconsin wasted. Money that was sent here to create USAR capabilities and was squandered away. Sure, the state developed a pretty cool training site at Volk Field, with a ton of potential, that most firefighters in this state will never see. As a state, we have no response capability from those tens of millions of dollars spent.
    A comparison would be the state of Illinois. As dysfunctional and broke as that state is, in the same amount of time, they developed a system that should be modeled around the nation.

    At least with the SAFER grant for Detroit, there will be a tangible result from the money spent. I'm not saying there is no tangible benefit from a grant that puts a new rig in an engine house in which a department couldn't afford it, because there is. Somehow, we have to differentiate where the waste occurs and hold accountable the grant money that gets wasted.
    The thing is, is that no one ever thinks they are the one wasting money. Some third party will have to make that determination.

    And, I really don't buy or like the argument that the people get the government they vote for. They don't always. There is a lot more to it than that. There are always voters who vote differently, or opposed to those causing the dysfunction, etc...there are also those that are stuck for financial reasons, emotional reasons (it's their home) or some other reason that is unique to them. It's kind of like the argument given that says; if you don't like your working conditions, quit; go find a new job. Like it is ever just that simple.

    We're not talking about changing a political climate here, we're talking about grants that benefit our own. Maybe if we policed ourselves a bit better, we wouldn't have to have the argument about which grant is more important, or beneficial. Believe me, I include my part of the world in this; the job I work for has a full time grant writer.

    i don't really know or have answers. I'm on vacation with nothing better to do this morning!

  13. #33
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    611

    Default

    Thanks for the replies.

    The sad part is I believe if we were to cut out the fraud, corruption and mis-management at all levels of government, along with billions in overseas aid that is never appreciated or reciprocated, we'd have plenty of money to fund critical services all over the country.

  14. #34
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,651

    Default

    I am not saying Detroit hasn't proven a need for this grant, but too many times fire departments see grants going to fund things like exercise equipment, video conferencing training systems, and other things like that which are not basic necessities while other departments with true need for apparatus, turn out gear and scba can't get past the computer grading part of the process. Sometimes it just boils down to who can afford to hire the better grant writer and who has to struggle along on their on trying to write a grant. I have written 6 AFG grant proposals for my #1 POC FD. I have been successful twice, once in 2003 for scba, and once in 2005 for an engine. With the old system it was a daunting task, under the new application process, in my opinion, they just made it harder for people like me trying to help out their small rural fire department. You see not everyone can afford to have a grant writer on staff or even to hire a grant writer to write their grant. Sometimes it comes down to the chief or a firefighter sitting at the keyboard for hours doing their best to try and write a grant.
    “The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and live.” Leo F. Buscaglia

    This place gets weirder and weirder every day...

  15. #35
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,446

    Default Allow me to clarify

    I am glad that the Federal grant was awarded and will benefit the fire department and in turn the community despite the debacle they have allowed themselves to get in to.

    My point is that their is no "free" money. Now to some extent, all federal taxpayers are subsidizing the City of Detroit.

    What I will not do is buy a t-shirt, send my personal money beyond tax dollars, or send free equipment to benefit the City of Detroit. That would just give the local politicians another reason to NOT spend local money on police and fire protection and my money will end up funding some more stupid **** that got them into this situation in the first place.
    Last edited by MemphisE34a; 12-03-2013 at 09:59 AM.
    Robert Kramer
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  16. #36
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,882

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MemphisE34a View Post
    I am glad that the Federal grant was awarded and will benefit the fire department and in turn the community despite the debacle they have allowed themselves to get in to.

    My point is that their is no "free" money. Now to some extent, all federal taxpayers are subsidizing the City of Detroit.

    What I will not do is buy a t-shirt, send my personal money beyond tax dollars, or send free equipment to benefit the City of Detroit. That would just give the local politicians another reason to NOT spend local money on police and fire protection and my money will end up funding some more stupid **** that got them into this situation in the first place.
    I bought a tee shirt hoping that these small "gifts" will fall under the politicians' radar and they wont cut their funding. but I agree with you about the politicians completely. Most look at grant money as a way to fund "day to day" operations as opposed to using that money to move forward. The biggest problem I have with the safer grant is the way the rules have been changed , you can lay off personnel in the hopes of getting a grant to help offset costs of rehiring. And in "cowpie" land some departments will run unsafe apparatus in the hopes of getting a fire grant.
    ?

  17. #37
    Forum Member conrad427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Just south of Canada
    Posts
    526

    Default

    I said earlier that I would rather the money be spent in the US rather than in a foreign country. The money is going to be spent regardless.

    When we build something for nothing in a foreign country it is wasteful. When people die in a bridge collapse in THIS country on a federal hiway it is criminal.
    The fire service is about service to our fellow man.
    There is a trust that must not be broken and we are the keepers of that trust.
    Captain Dave LeBlanc

  18. #38
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bones42 View Post
    Sure. I'll say No. If the city of Detroit has run itself into the red, giving them a grant is wasting it. They obviously have no financial plan to keep the city afloat. With years of debt building, I can't see any possible way they followed grant procedures and were still able to win one. Isn't part of the grant (at least it used to be) being able to pay a growing percentage each year?
    The new formula is that the feds pay the full bill for a shorter period of time, which I believe is 3 years compared to the previous 5 year tiered system.

    The simple fact is this is nothing but a revolving door where in most cases this urban departments reapply for a new grant when the current ones runs out and the feds pick up the bill for another 3 years.

    This system was redesigned plain and simple to reward the union by providing a platform to keep union jobs and the democrat politicians to keep them happy.

    Call that political BS if you want but SAFER was designed to help small departments transition from volunteer personnel to limited full time staff or very limited full time combo departments to a few more paid staff. The program was not designed to keep fulltime members on large urban departments who had to lay folks off. The program has been derailed and is now supplementing large all career department's staffing levels.

    There is no way that the feds should be supporting a local service to the extent that they are under the current arrangement.
    Last edited by LaFireEducator; 12-03-2013 at 01:30 PM.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  19. #39
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
    Posts
    10,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    I am not saying Detroit hasn't proven a need for this grant, but too many times fire departments see grants going to fund things like exercise equipment, video conferencing training systems, and other things like that which are not basic necessities while other departments with true need for apparatus, turn out gear and scba can't get past the computer grading part of the process. Sometimes it just boils down to who can afford to hire the better grant writer and who has to struggle along on their on trying to write a grant. I have written 6 AFG grant proposals for my #1 POC FD. I have been successful twice, once in 2003 for scba, and once in 2005 for an engine. With the old system it was a daunting task, under the new application process, in my opinion, they just made it harder for people like me trying to help out their small rural fire department. You see not everyone can afford to have a grant writer on staff or even to hire a grant writer to write their grant. Sometimes it comes down to the chief or a firefighter sitting at the keyboard for hours doing their best to try and write a grant.
    And I fully agree that if the program continues, the scope of the program should be narrowed to very specific direct firefighting and training areas.

    Apparatus should be very, very basic Plain Jane (which would be more than adequate for a rural department with a true need for a new truck) with a the department having the option to toss in their own money for anything beyond that. And departments with their newest truck over 15 or 20 years should move to the front of the line.

    The simple fact it he system does not work. The proof lies in the fact that my combo department, with a $1.3M budget and most of the front line SCBA primarily compliant received a grant three years ago to replace 32 SCBA while my VFD with a budget of 140K and very few compliant SCBA did not.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  20. #40
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    Not sure why guys are comparing trucks and equipment with a SAFER grant. 2 completely separate areas and grants that have zero to do with each other.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Detroit Fire Department
    By orlando_Watkins in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-29-2013, 07:34 PM
  2. An ode to the Detroit Fire Department
    By DeputyChiefGonzo in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-09-2012, 05:49 PM
  3. detroit fire department?!?!?!?!?
    By Fire_Fighter_Tom in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-28-2011, 07:42 PM
  4. Detroit Fire Department
    By detroitfire1552 in forum Hiring & Employment Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-13-2009, 10:42 AM
  5. Detroit Fire Department
    By ChiefOne2004 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2002, 10:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts