1. #1
    Forum Member
    Skojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    rural upstate NY
    Posts
    75

    Default Your thoughts on FLIR K40 or K50

    Anyone willing to share their experiences with either the FLIR K40 or K50? Looking for the good, the bad, and the ugly. Thanks in advance.

    Skojo

  2. #2
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Have no experience with either. Keep in mind, repairs will need to be shipped back to Europe I belief for any issues.

  3. #3
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10

    Default NFPA Compliance

    I too am interested in any experience, especially with the FLIR K-50. The company has a lot of experience outside of the fire service. This is their attempt to gain market share. The official line is that the K-40 and K-50 are designed to NFPA specifications. But no independent testing lab has tested for compliance. A FLIR marketing person indicated that they hope to start testing in 2014. This seems to be a weak response by someone who hopes to sell their products to the fire service. The issue is quite simple, purchase 4 K-50's, one for each of our first response engines, or purchase only 2 of another manufacturer for the same price.

  4. #4
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    43

    Default

    We have had a Flir K-50 in service for probably 4 months now, and we have been very happy with it so far. The actual image it provides is top notch, and comparable to any other imager we tested, and superior to many. The lanyard system for carrying the TIC is not the best or the worst in the world, and the truck charger is a little on the large side, and not the most robust. Overall when comparing image quality, ergonomics, and battery life, we could not justify the additional cost of any of the competitors over this camera. We were able to purchase quite a bit of other equipment we needed with the $4000 we saved by going with the Flir. So far I could recommend this camera to anyone considering it.

  5. #5
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    39

    Default

    We're in mid Indiana. On the IL state line. We have been using a Cairns Viper since they came out several years ago. We demo'd Scott, MSA and Argus. At the last minute I emailed FLIR to request a demo for the K40. A WS Darley Rep called me 5 minutes later and arranged a demo for us yesterday evening at 6:00pm.

    FLIR is a trusted name in this industry. Police night vision helicopters use the FLIR cameras on the nose...right? They used to make the internals for the MSA camera until they announced their own entry into the market. They make their own unit. The warranty is 2 years total and 10 on the internal components. Nobody beats that. The standard features beat everyone elses. You get 5 view modes, it's a nice size/weight and batteries are inexpensive to replace. The other models we demo'd only had one view mode. 4 hours run time each battery. Properly sized large screen. Truck charger station is an extra $750. But so is everyone elses. Also any software upgrades are free from FLIR.

    For a price of $3940 versus everyone elses $6000+ it was a no brainer. Darley says they sell them 4 to 1 over their MSA and Argus models. We could find no faults with the unit. It will do anything we would expect and more. Sure beats our old Viper.

    When you make your own units in house...the low price becomes understandable. They don't make bunker gear and fire helmets. Nor do they make SCBA. They make imagers for military and police. And now fire service. So the price advantage isn't because it's not a good device.
    Last edited by 2Chief; 04-04-2014 at 01:45 PM.

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2

    Default

    So my department just got the flir k50. I have yet to use it on a fire just yet but right out of the box I'm skeptical. I tested it side by side of our old msa evolution 5200. Shine them both on a person, the flir k50 is showing people to be 82-84 degrees, where the old MSA is showing people at 96-98 degrees. So which is more accurate? Yes I'm sure the skin temp is 82-84 and it is showing on the skin. But body temp is obviously going to be closer to 98 degrees. Shine it in a cup of water of cold water, flir shows 30 degrees, MSA shows 55 degrees? No ice in the water and it wasn't a block of ice so I'm guessing it was much closer to 55 degrees. Why the difference? I don't know.

    So why does this make a difference, especially when you are looking for a hot fire? I've used it to find people in car wrecks that were ejected in a brushy area down a hills on a dark night. On a warm summer night it could very well be 82 degrees and if that is what a person shows up as, they could hide very well. But it is pretty unlikely it will be 98 degrees out in the dark most anywhere. It also makes me question it's ability to penetrate. If it can't even show a persons accurate body temp because it only shows what their skin temp, is it only going to show the temp on the surface of dry wall and not the hidden fire under the drywall? Also I don't even understand the cup of water. It makes me thinks it's just less accurate. Most of the time I use a thermal image camera accuracy is very very important. A few degrees of accuracy can make a difference between what I think looks like a suspicious heat signature and not...............Jury is still out on it, but my initial impression is not good so far.

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northeast Coast
    Posts
    3,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Chief View Post

    FLIR is a trusted name in this industry. Police night vision helicopters use the FLIR cameras on the nose...right?
    Are you sure they are the same company? FLIR is the acronym for Forward Looking Infrared, not necessarily the company that is selling the product? I don't know, just wondering if this isn't a Xerox type of thing.

    As for the temperature readings being off? I'd question at what temperature was the pyrometer "set". Nearly every measuring meter has a sweet spot, and as you go above or below that the deviation increases. So if MSA calibrates their pyrometer at room temps, such as 100 F, then measuring closer to that will be more accurate. And if FLIR or another sets the pyrometer at a greater temperature where they anticipate the TIC to be used, say 500 F it's likely less accurate when measuring at standard room temps?

    The above being said, I've never handled the FLIR units and am just starting our search for a replacement camera for our older ISG. So I certainly will be interested to look one over along with the others on the market.

  8. #8
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northeast Coast
    Posts
    3,891

    Default

    So just a day later I had the chance to look over the FLIR K40(?) The higher resolution one. I did check look at the temp readout and found skin temps at 82F but other items in the room were right at anticipate room temp, thus I suspect skin temp is not typically the standard 98.6F without contact to transfer the heat?

    The pros: price is the biggest, but the picture trigger as a standard feature (no camera options, just two models and a truck charger option). The multiple modes allowed decent quality imaging, and there is stateside service. In our area the TICs go to Nashua, NH. There are color and non-color modes, hi gain lock and low gain lock to assist with anticipated temps in the area you're looking (hi-gain for search, low gain for fire, maybe vice versa?). Batteries are just $150 each if they need to be replaced. The package comes with two, a standard charger, the TIC and some lanyards all in a Pelican style case.

    The cons: It's not cooled internally, so the camera will shut down if the internals get up to 185F? We couldn't get a read on how quick that could occur at the safe floor level. I'd like to stick it in the oven until it warned of shut down, just to gauge the time at say, 350 F? No thermal throttle or whatever ISG calls the similar feature (hot spot tracker?), but that's about the only feature missing from a comparable camera at twice to the price.

    On interesting item we had never seen or heard of was the TIC for IPhone 5. Apparently they're tossing one in with every camera. One of our firefighters downloaded the app (1-2 minutes) and was able to use the TIC on her Iphone. Not a great for interior work, but maybe as an outside size-up tool? It worked and allows photos and video along with multiple colorization options. Pretty impressive if not a tad on the gimmicky side. But again, it did function as a TIC.

    We can buy two for the price of one of other camera we were considering without a loss of screen size, certainly making us look to demo and prove it works or not.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Flir K50 TIC
    By LFPDLT in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-14-2013, 01:12 PM
  2. flir parts
    By Hope FD in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-18-2012, 02:12 AM
  3. Scott and FLIR
    By IRalltheway in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-18-2001, 06:42 PM
  4. Fire Flir SOG
    By kbadler in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-14-2000, 09:11 AM
  5. FIRE FLIR
    By CHRIS FOLLETT in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-12-1999, 04:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register