Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Forum Member EMT6126's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Byrdstown TN>
    Posts
    176

    Default Legislation Introduced Clarifying Volunteers not Subject to Employer Mandate

    December 11, 2013
    Legislation Introduced Clarifying Volunteers not Subject to Employer Mandate

    On December 10, legislation was introduced in the House by Representative Lou Barletta (R-PA) and the Senate by Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) clarifying that ‘qualified emergency services volunteers’ will not be counted as employees under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). If enacted, the Protecting Volunteer Firefighters and Emergency Responders Act (H.R. 3685/S. 1798) would make clear that fire and EMS agencies will not be required to offer volunteer personnel health insurance, even if they receive other nominal benefits.

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers volunteers who receive nominal benefits to be common law employees of the agencies that they serve. The PPACA requires large employers to provide full-time employees with health insurance coverage. Because it falls to the IRS to enforce the PPACA mandate that employers provide health insurance, many fire and EMS departments could end up facing penalties starting in 2015 if they do not offer health insurance benefits to their volunteers.

    In September, the NVFC sent the IRS a letter requesting clarification in the final implementing regulations for the PPACA that volunteers will not be treated as employees under the law. Since then, Representatives Peter King (R-NY), Patrick Meehan (R-PA), Rob Wittman (R-VA), Chris Collins (R-NY), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Lou Barletta (R-PA), and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) have followed up with similar formal letters to the IRS asking for clarification on behalf of the volunteer emergency services. As of now the IRS has not indicated how it will proceed, which prompted the introduction of H.R. 3685 and S. 1798.

    “It is critically important that fire and EMS agencies not be forced to offer health insurance to volunteer personnel,” said NVFC Chairman Philip C. Stittleburg. “Agencies don’t have the resources to provide health benefits to their volunteers and individual volunteers have no expectation of receiving such benefits from the agencies they serve. I’d like to thank all of the bill sponsors from both parties for coming together and introducing this legislation.”

    Co-sponsors of S. 1798 include Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV), Patrick Toomey (R-PA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Angus King (I-ME), and Mark Begich (D-AK). H.R. 3685 is co-sponsored by Representatives Patrick Meehan (R-PA), Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Jon Runyan (R-NJ), Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Scott Perry (R-PA), Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Leonard Lance (R-NJ), David P. Joyce (R-OH), Mike Simpson (R-ID), Jim Renacci (R-OH), Jim Gerlach (R-PA), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Michael Grimm (R-NY), Austin Scott (R-GA), Rodney Davis (R-IL), Richard Hanna (R-NY), David McKinley (R-WV), Jackie Walorski (R-IN), Stephen Fincher (R-TN), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Bill Shuster (R-PA), Cory Gardner (R-CO), Joe Pitts (R-NY), Chris Collins (R-NY), Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Walter Jones (R-NC), Andy Barr (R-KY), Kristi Noem (R-SD), Candice S. Miller (R-MI), Tom Marino (R-PA), John Shimkus (R-IL), Keith Rothfus (R-PA), Todd Young (R-IN), and Lynn Jenkins (R-KS).

    The NVFC issued an Action Alert on December 11, asking our members to contact their Representative and Senators to ask them to support H.R. 3685 and S. 1798 using our Capwiz system.

    NVFC Chairman Stittleburg will appear on Fox News tonight (December 11) shortly after 7pm to discuss the issue.
    I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.


  2. #2
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,872

    Default

    someone forgot to read the small print of the original bill

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    88

    Default

    If the volunteer firefighters are not going to be considered employees will the municipalities still be responsible for covering the workman’s compensation insurance? If they are not responsible for that coverage with that change in classification, then you will still have a problem.

  4. #4
    Forum Member SFD_E73_RET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    KC area
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fire49 View Post
    someone forgot to read the small print of the original bill
    Yeah like Congress

  5. #5
    Let's talk fire trucks! BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peak85 View Post
    If the volunteer firefighters are not going to be considered employees will the municipalities still be responsible for covering the workman’s compensation insurance? If they are not responsible for that coverage with that change in classification, then you will still have a problem.
    Good question. It's too bad that Virginia doesn't require the municipality to require WC for volunteers.
    Career Fire Captain
    Volunteer Chief Officer


    Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is Your FD Prepared for the Narrowbanding Mandate?
    By FHEditor in forum Technology & the Emergency Services
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 09:19 AM
  2. Legislation Reauthorizing FIRE Act Introduced
    By onebugle in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 09:58 PM
  3. Clarifying about WSMR
    By EASTCOASTFIRE in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-12-2005, 09:06 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-23-2005, 04:25 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-30-2004, 12:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts