01-15-2001, 02:02 PM #1RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
Regionalize Vollies and Then Some
Monmouth County, NJ is developing too rapidly for the volunteer emergency services to keep up with the staffing, training and response times required for adequate public protection. Some volly houses should be consolidated and staffed with volly duty crews, while other should be decommishioned and districts placed under career primary care. I have my opinions of which, but first I want to see if there is any interest in educated volly and career dialogue.
01-15-2001, 02:36 PM #2FFTrainerFirehouse.com Guest
Wow, you're looking for an "educated" volly / career discussion and you come in with things like:
"Some volly houses should be consolidated and staffed with volly duty crews, while other should be decommishioned and districts placed under career primary care"
Just my opinion, but I don't think you're choosing the best route to start off this type of conversation. You're looking at ****ing off a lot of people with that type of approach.
Now to answer the question, consolidation definitely has it's merits, but everything has it's goods and bads. We need to weigh out those goods and bads for each area and determine the best plan of action -- the same way we fight fires. With the exception of 'putting the wet stuff on the red stuff' we don't fight all fires the same so maybe we should consider not blanketing a county with "Mass Consolidation" plan that might be great for one part of the county but suck for another.
There are places it may work. In my area for example, there is a neighboring town that has to come through ours to get to a small sliver of theirs even though it is literaly less than a mile from our station. Some of these logistical problems may be relieved with regionalization and also some of the absurd redundancy in apparatus may be relieved.
Response time is a whole nother issue that has, in previous posts, caused some controversy so I a going to chicken out and stay away from it. The only one thing I will say is it is better to know that it may take 3 minutes longer for someone to get there, but they are definitely coming vs. a dept going to 2nd or 3rd request for manpower and still having trouble getting out the door.
Just my thoughts. Hope they make a little sense.....
01-15-2001, 03:44 PM #3George Wendt, CFIFirehouse.com Guest
Radfire. the only thing I don't agree with you on is that this is a Monmouth County thing. This is a New Jersey problem. Morris County is as blatant an example of the mismanagement of the fire service as any place I have seen.
Regionaizing vol depts. is far more than a response time issue. There are many, many management issues that can be dealt with through the regionalization concept.
I own a home in Morris County. I pay at least $7000.00 in property taxes per year ( I wonder why people can't afford to volunteer anymore). My town has a surplus of fire apparatus that is mind -boggling. As a fire fighter, it is painful to know that the department could have spent their money more efficiently to gain resources they still don't have. As a tax payer, it infuriates me that my tax dollars are thrown out the window unnecessarily. The apparatus purchasing guidleines in Morris County are: Buy something bigger than the next town and buy the latest technology, whether we have researched and tested it or not.
What problems can be solved. First of all, manpower. What good is a first alarm assignment that is limited to one town, when all they are ever going to get during the day is 4 guys? If this first alarm assignment was strategically planned, and included apparatus from the closest stations, the response time and manpower available would improve. I was a volly for a short time in a town where we were directed by the Chief to call all the apparatus from our town before we went to mutual aid. Well, one of the districts was 13 miles away and the mutual aid was 1/2 mile from the fire. Tell me this direction makes sense. Yet nonsense like this happens every day. Remember, the person with the fire does not care what color the fire trucks are or what name is on the side of them.
Another problem that would be solved is purchasing. Purchasing equipment in bulk, for several departments will save money and will result in standardization.
Procedures would be standardized. That way, every department would be singing off the same sheet of music.
Communications would be centralized and standardized. Every unit would have the same frequencies and would be able to communicate with every other unit. Also, the dispatching centers would necessarily be placed under the FD instead of the PD where it is now.
This is just a start. There are two ways for this to happen. Be a visionary and work on this problem now, or wait until it is too late and be dragged kicking and screaming into the merger. One way is good. One way is bad. You pick.
01-15-2001, 10:39 PM #4Halligan84Firehouse.com Guest
I'll chime in from South Jersey on this. How do you guys see the individual towns giving up on home rule and going with regionalized or shared service? I know North Hudson did it, but still hear of a number of problems (real or not). I agree things have to change, one thing that always suprised me about north jersey was how the town borders seemed to be concrete barriers. Our automatic aid is much more liberal down here, countywide dispatch which has been in place about 30 years has helped that tremendously.
01-16-2001, 04:31 PM #5George Wendt, CFIFirehouse.com Guest
Halligan, you are right. NJ is the home rule capital of the world. South Jersey has got better mutual aid plans and organizational plans than anywhere in North Jersey, especially Burlington, Camden and Ocean. I can tell you that the big difference is that those counties have strong, organized County Fire Marshal's and County Fire Coordinators. Any attempt in Morris County to utilize a County Fire anything is met with disdain.
This movement will not start in the fire department's themselves. It will start when the public and the governing bodies get sick and tired and hearing about 2-3 calls to turn out an ambulance or an engine and paying $400,000 for a custom pumper when a commercial pumper for half the price will do the same job.
01-16-2001, 09:53 PM #6RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
There are good points already coming up and stated with good intent.
Regarding the fact that I may **** some people off.......I can't help but ask the questions that need asking. I already have made enemies in the volls because question the need for an $850,000 100' tower ladder with a reward facing camera for backing up and gold leafing and chrome out the wazzoo when the tallest structure is two stories. I was told that it was because the membership was getting too old and could ride the bucket up. I'm not kidding!
Another example was when I asked a former member why he switched to a neighboring towns engine comany. He answered that when he wanted to have more active drills with line stretching, ladder raising or for the cademy to teach learn something in house that the elder membership put an end to it. He had finally had enough so he went somewhere else.
Other towns are experiences response time growth due to the older members running newer members into the ground. Other times it's just apathy due to no "work" that diminishes younger response.
Mutual aid seemed to be to me to be driven by politics. Whoever the chief liked during the year of his term the company goes with, then next year new chief, new mutual aid outfit. It doesn't matter that we may need this piece or that piece, but who they wanted to invite to their fire.
I feel that there should be a county-wide emergency services master plan. The county has a master plan for road upgrades and population growths. Why can't there be one for progessive regional consolidation of emergency services?
I feel we need the liberal mutual-aid and established county-wide dispatch that Halligan stated. It's what I feel is the keystone of a good management system....communication and cooperation.
We also need an accountable and managed system of purchasing, recruitment, retention and training. Accountable to the taxpayers...our customers...providing the most for the cost as George stated.
Keep the discussion strong, because the problem isn't just Monmouth, but the whole state and the answers are coming out right here. I only chose Monmouth, because it's where I am.
01-17-2001, 03:56 PM #7FFTrainerFirehouse.com Guest
You know as I think about it some more, this is really a statewide problem. I, like George, have my ties to Morris County and I have to say we are horrible with the "Mines better than yours" "I can top that" attitude.
We have people buying towers to replace straight sticks only to find out the tower doesn't fit in certain neighborhoods so now they have purchased a new stick as well. We have people asking for aerials in towns that are maybe 2 - 3 square miles even though all 4 towns that border them already have at least 1 aerial if not more. There is absolutely no shared services in any aspect of the fire service.
I came back to NJ from Virginia where they use the county system for many stations. It is proof that a system does work if it is planned properly by people who have a clue. It can't be planned solely by Politicians or solely by the Fire Service. If you can form a committee that is made up to find a nice balance between FD, Govt. and Citizen, and you come in with an open mind, I think we could make it work.
There are things that would definitely be good for us. George makes an excellent point about purchasing equipment. As most anyone knows, when you buy in bulk, you generally save. If we could form county wide organizations that could leverage their size for things such as gear, radios, pagers, etc. I think we could be a lot better off. Not to mention the money we could probably make by selling some off some of the redundant equipment.
01-17-2001, 05:32 PM #8TCFireFirehouse.com Guest
I'll take a chance and stick my 2 cents in from Western New York. I think the previous comments have almost all hit the nail right on the head, it's not just a Jersey problem. I belong to a small volunteer dept that is finding attracting/retaining members to be increasingly difficult. I think just about everyone in my county is pretty much in the same boat.
The points made regarding pricey apparatus purchased just to 'keep up with the Joneses', exotic equipment when it's available from your neighboring mutual aid company(s), new turnout gear every year with maybe 6 structure fires, are absolutely right on. We're our own worst enemy.
My company has downsized from 5 trucks down to 3, not only for budgetary reasons, but how can you justify the expense, onboard equipment, fuel, insurance, etc involved in having a hall full of expensive equipment that you can't consistently staff with proper crews? The average age of our active membership is 42!
I'm certain that County-wide or regional departments are coming whether we like it or not. The volunteer service is finding it increasingly difficult to provide consistent manpower to meet the growing demands of many urban or suburban areas. The additional training, certification, and specialization requirements don't make the task any easier (I'm all for training/getting smarter by the way).
We cheer (usually) our local governments when they talk consolidation of services, economies of scale, etc. The Fire Service will not be far behind. There will be a lot of screaming and hollering along the way, but I think the handwriting is already on the wall. I Love being a Volunteer Firefighter (15 yrs) and I would hate to see my own Company become part of a larger, consolidated dept, but unless things change, consolidation and probably combination paid/volunteer companies will be in the future for a town near me!
01-17-2001, 06:21 PM #9RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
Can anyone tell me how much it might cost a town to bond itself for an apparatus? Is it like a mortgage or a car loan? The cost must accumulate expontentially.
01-18-2001, 01:33 PM #10Kyle WickmanFirehouse.com Guest
All of you guys have it right. There has even been studies that some counties in NJ have 1/3 the population and 1/10 of the size of NYC. Yet there is twice as many apparatus. North Hudson has merged into one, but they have a lot of problems. Only because politition where just looking at the money saving aspects and not the saftey of the firefighters and the general population. There are some towns that should merge. FFTRAINER, I think I know where you work. I work in the town next door. I think that the 3 M's should merge. Well at least share services. I think it could be done with hireing a few for people.
MY OPINONS NOT MY DEPARTMENTS
[This message has been edited by Kyle Wickman (edited 01-18-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Kyle Wickman (edited 01-18-2001).]
01-18-2001, 05:08 PM #11RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
I'm looking into Morris County as well as others, before I say anything in reference to possible progress. In regards to Monmouth County, there is approximately 115 companies here with approximately enough equipment to protect New York's five boroughs 1 1/2 times. I have to find the apparatus handbook of the county to verify this, so I may be a little off.
I know of one town, a single mile square, with eight companies. Some of these outfits have thirteen to sixteen pieces of equipment including one with a hovercraft supposedly. I feel it's a bit extravagant, but that, as well as this whole message is only my opinion.
01-18-2001, 06:40 PM #12ENGINE18-3Firehouse.com Guest
Hello from Camden County! To me regionalization only seems like common sense. We would be stronger and better. Yes Camden County has some of the best mutual aid plans in the state but even there the politics of companies feuding can compromise the firefighters safety and the publics as well. But with regionalization hopefully that will end those situations. With regionalization we would be able to stand up to people the politicians better and be able to help ourselves out better because if we aren't the initiators of this then it will be forced down upon us and we wont like that.
The statements above are my own opinions
FF Greg Grudzinski
Oaklyn Fire Dept.
01-26-2001, 11:04 AM #13tkrzmFirehouse.com Guest
I know a firefighter who actual put together a mock county fire department for monmouth, also with ems and fire prevention. It was a combo dept career controlled (all chief's are career), but the vollie lt's and capt's had the same power as the career officers. It was broken down into 5 Divisions with 30 career companies and 30 volunteer throughout monmouth county. As you can see most stations as we know would be gone. It made alot of sense, but we all know the vol fire service won't do it unless a law mandates it!!! These two complete seperate visions of the fire service is why we don't get funding or are respected by the politicians. Career needs and Volunteer needs are in the same ball park, playing the same game, but are on different teams. Unless this service unites and presses all our issues like the cops do, law enforcement and fema will get 90% of all $$$ and we will continue to get crap. Even ems has there act together better than us!
01-26-2001, 01:43 PM #14D.SCHWERFirehouse.com Guest
John you and I know first hand about consolidation. The meeting we had was not very productive if you supported consolidation. It really comes down to one thing, volunteers do not want to give up anything.
I bet if you research it that you would find that #1 there are not that many volunteers that ACTUALLY pay taxes because they are young enough to be living home and #2 they rent so they do not see the tax first hand.
I believe some where down the line we will consolidate to a degree. I think therw will need to be a process in that direction and it could not or should not happen overnight.
John I agree, our mutual aid works well and contributes to better ISO ratings. However there are still personalities and ego to deal with on the fireground. Combined drills should be continued if not for anything else down here for scheduling and cost purposes at CCFA.
I think (it may be too progresive for these parts that mutual aid districts should meet jointly an "association/co-op" if you will to discuss fire operations, training, volume purchases of equipment and building supplies, insurance and utilities.
Do what I did, I got elected fire commissioner and I try to have a say in the way my taxes are spent. I probably pay the most property/fire/school taxes out of the entire board and volunteer fire company.
The views and opinions expressed herin are my personal views and opinions and not those of any organization, department I may belong to or represent
01-26-2001, 11:30 PM #15SmokeyBearFirehouse.com Guest
It is clear that the begining argument came from a paid Firefighter who is anti-volunteer. I bet you began as a volunteer before you became career. Most of us did too. I still volunteer in my hometown and am proud to do it. How soon we forget where we came from huh? Did you ever stop and think that you are lucky you have your job? In Monmouth County especially. You are the only fully paid fire dept in the county, (with the exception of Military Bases) if I am not mistaken. True, Asbury may at one time have needed a fully paid department when the town was booming. Let's not kid ourselves here,
you respond to just as many calls as all the
volunteer departments do. And in some cases, even less. Most of the calls for service now in Asbury are EMS calls. Which probably warrants a full time EMS, but not fire.
Every other town can effectively fight fires on a full time basis with volunteers, why can't Asbury? All I'm saying is, don't throw stones! Be glad you are gainfully employed.
Leave the vollies alone. I can recall more than once that they helped you out.
01-28-2001, 03:04 PM #16George Wendt, CFIFirehouse.com Guest
D. Schwer, Me getting elected to a governmental post is not the answer (besides, my employment prohibits me from holding an elected position). I do have a say in my how my tax dollars are spent, I vote. And when the time comes to vote on that issue, believe me, I'll be out front leading the charge.
01-28-2001, 05:12 PM #17GreenCapFirehouse.com Guest
As a Member of the Asbury Park, NJ Fire Department I feel I must respond to your post in the Firehouse.com forms.
*SmokyBear- It is clear that the beginning argument came from a paid Firefighter who is anti-volunteer. I bet you began as a volunteer before you became career. Most of us did too.
How can you come to that conclusion unless you know him personally? I do, and I can assure you that he is in no way anti-volunteer, pro career-professional maybe, but not anti-volunteer.
*SmokyBear- I still volunteer in my hometown and am proud to do it.
I commend you for being such a civic-minded individual. The Asbury Park Firefighters are also very civic-minded. They can be seen volunteering in many aspects of community service such as coaching youth sports, mentoring disadvantaged youth, performing fund raisers for local, state, and national charities or constructing homes for the local habitat for humanity.
*SmokyBear- Did you ever stop and think that you are lucky you have your job?
Although we consider ourselves fortunate and honored to be entrusted with such an office, luck plays a very small part in how one attains the position of a Firefighter in the City of Asbury Park. You must first persevere through an exceptionally competitive testing process. Than you are subjected to a comprehensive back ground, physical, and psychological investigation to determine whether or not you are fit mentally, physically, and morally enough for the high standards of the APFD. After this you may or may not have earned the right to be called a “Probationary Firefighter”.
*Smoky Bear- you are the only fully paid fire dept in the county, (with the exception of Military Bases) if I am not mistaken.
You are not mistaken; prior to my employment here I was employed as a Firefighter at one of those Military Bases. So I am familiar with their operation but I don’t understand your point?
*SmokyBear- True, Asbury may at one time have needed a fully paid department when the town was booming.
When Asbury Park was “booming” it’s fire department had 56 career professional firefighters and an untold number of volunteer professional firefighters staffing 6 fire stations throughout the city. The career firefighters began staffing a “rescue squad” ambulance in 1930. Over the last 35 to 40 years Asbury Park, like most urban areas in New Jersey, has been in a social and economic decline. A large factor in this was a large-scale riot in the summer of 1970 that left a major retail district in smoldering ruins. As a result, the career staff has been cut by about 30% to a maximum of 40 people. Although we rarely have 40, we usually hover around 36. For reasons of which I am not aware, the volunteer force no longer exists. 4 of the 6 fire stations have been razed and another has been turned over to the board of education for offices and storage. It should be noted that the future of Asbury Park and its fire department looks bright. The real-estate market is seeing unprecedented activity, major renovations can be seen all over town, and the beachfront is poised to begin a $700,000,000 redevelopment project with recommendations for an additional fire station in the redevelopment zone.
*SmokyBear- Let's not kid ourselves here, you respond to just as many calls as all the
volunteer departments do. And in some cases, even less.
I don’t think that RadFire or myself are trying to kid anyone. I don’t have any cold hard facts about the number of responses by the various combination, or volunteer organizations in the area and I would rather not comment on speculation.
*SmokyBear- Most of the calls for service now in Asbury are EMS calls. Which probably warrants a full time EMS, but not fire.
Although the name is “Asbury Park Fire Department” our mission encompasses all areas of public safety except law enforcement. Aside from our numerous non-emergency functions, we consistently respond to approximately 5,700 emergency incidents annually. Like most career fire departments in the United States the bulk of our emergency responses (about 73%) are for medical emergencies. All fire department members are certified to the EMT-B level. The remainder of our emergency responses about (27%) includes but is not limited to fire suppression, extrication, hazardous materials mitigation, under water rescue and recovery, etc. Aside from responding to emergencies, the APFD is responsible for all fire prevention inspections and investigations, public fire safety education (each year we educate more than 3,000 city school children), crime scene support for the police department, public service, etc.
*SmokyBear- Every other town can effectively fight fires on a full time basis with volunteers, why can't Asbury? All I'm saying is, don't throw stones! Be glad you are gainfully employed.
It’s only my opinion but I have to disagree here. Many districts are adding career personal, expanding the number of existing personal, or considering doing so. All you have to do is talk to people around the county or listen to the scanner and you may see that there are not enough dedicated volunteers to handle the expectation of service at a recognized minimum standard level.
In closing I would like to say that I do not believe RadFire was attempting to slander the volunteer fire service in Monmouth County. I think he was just trying to have some good discussions on how to make it better. If you are interested in this concept you should check some of the combination county fire departments in the state of Maryland. I believe that from the state level to the local level Maryland is leaps and bounds ahead of New Jersey as far as the fire service is concerned.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. You can even come by the station and get a first hand look at our operation if you like.
Kevin Keddy – Captain
Asbury Park Fire Department
01-28-2001, 05:28 PM #18tkrzmFirehouse.com Guest
Smokeybear, You sure are smoking something good. Just listen to Monmouth County Dispatch and tell me how many departments provide not good but just fair fire service protection. You are as one sided has the creator of this discussion. The fire service is a huge coverup period, career and volunteer. When you read the paper you always read firefighters were on the scene in minuets. Many deaths occur because it takes 10 min to get on the scene. You don't hear about this. We all know this is Bull*****. If the newspapers every reported the real facts, 21-22 year old chiefs who have never pumped an engine commanding incidents, or career members not willing to learn a new tactic the people we protect would be discusted. How about the 60% quota for those volunteer companies that are buiser than Asbury Park. Are all the members making 500 runs and drills a year. NOT ONE AND YOU KNOW IT. Keep it up and if the truth ever comes out it will cut both ways. And by the way, in Long Branch the career force has kept that volunteer dept floating for the past 15-20 years!!! Many other combination departments are becoming a reality. Forget where you came from?? On most issues I wish I could because its a Joke! This does not mean that there are not dedicated members both career and volunteer that provide service the right way!!!
01-29-2001, 02:10 PM #19ffnbsFirehouse.com Guest
I'll give my .02 from Michigan.
It's the same here, the problem here(and maybe it's not our whole problem) is that the State Police run the state fire marshals office. In my opinion, and I'll admit it's not a fully educated one in respect to the issue, is that if the state had the fire service in full control of records,training etc. we could possibly set up regional fire training schools that are much better equipped than anything that I went through. We know that the fire service is unique, not too many occupations have people fully paid and then other people completely vollunteering their time doing the exact same thing. Something needs to be done but sometimes I wonder if anybody can agree on anything in this business. I think it's going to come down to state laws to change anything and that won't happen anytime soon.
01-29-2001, 02:33 PM #20RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
Well, there are some interesting posts. I feel Smokey, that the answers to your accusations have been sufficiently supplied by the other posts. So I won't waste time responding.
I wonder where the response times come from with the volunteers. How can anyone say they were on scene in 5 minutes? Then you look at the facts about who was on scene. Not an engine or a truck, but a chief. One chief with no pump, ladders or hoses and only him with his ICS board, so he can manage the incident. No fire guys, but one chief with no indians.
Who puts fires out? Who vents roofs? Not a chief, but firefighters. Oh that's right he has to give a size-up. Why can't the officer do their own size-up as he/she arrives with the first engine/truck? I've heard of apparatus not leaving the building, but the chief is on scene with his rig. Once there were fireguys waiting for a driver, but the only driver was an officer and he went to the scene to be in charge, instead of getting to the firehouse to get the appartus and the people to put the fire out. A neighboring town put the fire out responding as mutual aid.
Basically, I'm saying that there is a lack of uniformity in training. Some officers are all books. Others are action oriented and little book knowledge. Even so, when the situation occurs the priorities must be placed correctly. Glory of being in charge or getting the job done efficiently, which is more important.
Then there is the question of why each volly chief needs a new Tahoe or Expedition to drive around in. Why isn't it a stripped down '80's Bronco with a plow kit? Utilitarian aren't I. Some towns have three different chiefs, each with there own chief's car. New cars. Are these purchased by the department or bonded for by the municipality?
Combine the departments, a career department oversees the qualification processes and officers are promoted through testing and experience on the job. Chiefs should remain paid.
01-29-2001, 02:33 PM #21FFTrainerFirehouse.com Guest
Smokeybear, you might want to consider relaxing a little bit. Don't take everything quite so personally and feel so threatened.
I didn't like the word choice of the initial post, and I commented on it in my first reply on this subject. However, my feelings of dislike were not with thinking it was an attack on volunteers, but simply with the wording and tone. Yes I know that the 'replaced with career' statement was used, but in some cases that may be true.... if you regionalized and one of those regions happens to have the call volume that warrants it, then go ahead add a career staff so you can guarantee that the first engine is rolling immediately on every job. Now maybe not all regions all will, but for those that do, maybe a career subsidation is necessary, even if only during the daytime hours like some places already do. If you still feel threatened, think about the fact that you cannot do away with the volunteer sector of the fire service, you can subsidize it nicely with a few career stations strategically scattered about, but you will not replace it -- at least I don't think so.
Now what I think a piece of the arguement was in this topic....
There are many towns in NJ (and it looks like other states) that need to make a visit with reality. The amount of dollars spent on redundant apparatus, chrome, diamond plate, and "mine is bigger and better than yours" equipment is absolutely absurd and I think that is part of the argument. It is not a 'do away with volunteers' post, I think it is more of a join forces, pool your resources than anything else.
Reality will set in here sometime and consolidation, regionalization (whatever you want to call it) will probably be jammed down our throats because there are so many people in the fire service that live by the "we've always done it this way" attitude that we will never initiate change, we will always make it look like the politicians are screwing us and we will turn and try to get some sympathy from the public when in reality it is their tax dollars we are throwing away.
OK, I hear the creaking and cracking of my soap box giving way, so I'm going to get down now, but one final thought. We need to take a little bit of the time we spend arguing against every change and focus it on the good (and maybe the bad) that the change could have rather than just saying "IT SUCKS, I HATE THE THOUGHT, I'M NOT DOING IT AND THAT'S THAT!" Take the time to examine things a little bit. We process a hundred different thoughts and scenarios enroute to a job, why can't we do it for the pro's and con's of a possible change?
[This message has been edited by FFTrainer (edited 01-29-2001).]
01-29-2001, 02:48 PM #22dr infernoFirehouse.com Guest
Smokey Bear: I hope you understand that the problem with staffing levels in todays career departments are at a critical low due to the mentality of the local politicians and thinking like yours. If you are a career man do you not believe that you are at serious risk when your companies are running at minimum levels? Do you not think that the job you have is worth fighting for? I think that you should reconsider saying that a career departments calls could be handled by a volunteer company. That is the amunition needed by local bean counters to reduce the level of service provided by these professional firefighters even further and possibly put yourself out of job. (which may be o.k. with you but I worked damn hard to achieve my position as a career man and I'll fight every day to ensure my position and even create new ones to fill the vacancies created by cheap skate administrators and fellow brothers who think like yourself) As for the career/volunteer issue I think you are wrong here it's not a matter of forgeting where you came from it's a matter of where you are going!!!
01-29-2001, 03:51 PM #23RADFIREFirehouse.com Guest
In my initial post I simply threw the opinion out of volunteer consolidation, and that some houses be decommissioned for career primary care. Primary care. I didn't say do away with volunteers, however to make the service more efficient through common sense revisions (i.e. duty crews, practical purchasing,etc.). For starting the topic I felt that answering the question which I was presenting wouldn't make any sense. I wanted others to tell me and others their answers. It wasn't until I was career that I realized the inefficiencies with the volly system. While volunteering I had a little idea of some problems, but now I see more. From the discussion many feel likewise. I just don't know if the progression will take place sooner or later. Like someone said in a post, the politicians have to be forced to address the issue. We'll see.
[This message has been edited by RADFIRE (edited 01-29-2001).]
01-29-2001, 09:33 PM #24Kyle WickmanFirehouse.com Guest
There has been a lot good posts here. I think a major problem here is that towns, and departments think they are going to lose out in the long run. Just thank how much better thinks would be run. I know in my county there are 3 no make that 4 career department on top of each other. While each one does a great job, think about how great things would be as one. I not saying become one big department, but share. We have a department that runs through our town to get to part of there area. I know that Morris Twp runs through Morristown to get to part of there area. I think we can honestly do do this together. Just everyone thinks they will lose out in the end. Thats why this will never happen.
01-30-2001, 12:37 PM #25FFE3BFDFirehouse.com Guest
"This will never happen" is a strong statement. Do you think that some people in the North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue ever used that statement?
With politicans seeing the dollar signs of state grant money and the reduction of cost in their annual budgets, they will be more then happy to jump on the "Regionalization" band wagon.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)