Thread: Firefighters Dismissed
02-02-2001, 08:46 AM #26mike021Firehouse.com Guest
The only way I could see they feel they partown the equipment is either they buy it with firehouse money from their ambulance and they run their ambulance and make the money or as a tax payer who payed for the truck. I know in my dept. some say sometimes we partly own this suff, we get the ambulance out and make the money to buy it. just a thought
02-02-2001, 03:13 PM #27George Wendt, CFIFirehouse.com Guest
Wow, not only are you guys jealous of authority, selfish and dishonest, you're dilusional, too!
I am a LEO in NJ. In NJ, the definition of property of another states, in part: "includes property in which any person other than the actor has an interest which the actor is not privileged to infringe, regardless of the fact that the actor also has an interest in the property..." So if PA's law reads anything like NJ's, you're lucky you haven't been charged.
You OWN a piece of the apparstus? Are you for real? That is absolutely one of the most selfish statements I have heard come out of a FF mouth.
I will stick by my statement; the dept. is better off without you five.
02-02-2001, 10:25 PM #28fc80chiefFirehouse.com Guest
I don't want to seem like I am piling on here. I just got to ask you a couple of questions first.
What would have happened if your actions would have resulted in a direct injury or a catastropic loss to an innocent bystander to the situation or one of your own fellow firefighters?
If you were denied permission to take the rig, then would the insurance carrier have covered you if you were involved in an accident either to the funeral or from the funeral.
If either of those scenarios had taken place guess whose butt you just put in a sling along with your own. Thats right - THE CHIEF.
I am not trying to harp the point that you were wrong. You have already as much admitted that.
What I am trying to point out here is that the chief has every right and responsibility to do what he did - to deny you permission and when you blew that off - to exact disciplinary actions.
I am torn on whether expulsion is a suitable punishment or not. On one hand insubordination is a very serious action, it can totally undermine a chief or other officer and their effectiveness to do their job, that is why the military deals (or at least used to) with it severely. On the other hand the Vol. fire service everywhere is desparately understaffed. I have to be honest though, I do lean toward agreeing with your chief.
Being a chief of a vol. outfit myself I can't help but wonder if there is a whole lot more to this story that we aren't being told. Other vollys out there can associate themselves to firehouse politics, I am sure that you have all seen or heard these before "I don't like these people so I am going to turn them down" or "the chief is a jerk, so lets blow him off"
Either way though, whether the chief was being fair and equal or not the Sugar Grove 5, by your own admission (remember you said that you were wrong) should have never taken that rig.
Nothing personal to the 5 from Sugar Grove, you just got yourselves in a real wringer, and that is something we all have done from time to time.
[This message has been edited by fc80chief (edited 02-02-2001).]
02-02-2001, 10:41 PM #29Chief79Firehouse.com Guest
Let's see if I have this figured out yet! An Assistant Chief and 4 other fire department personnel get together and vote to disobey a direct order from the Chief of the department. They know they will be punished but they figure satisfying their own personal wishes will be worth the punishment. Am I right so far? If so then seeing as how these five were correct in assuming they would be punished, why are they complaining now. They all agreed it would be worth the punishment. Ooops what happened? Danged if the Chief didn't forget to ask these five what punishment they wanted him to dole out. How dare him not ask what punishment they wanted. I wish I was over this Chief so I could hear their gripe. Wouldn't take me long to put these five in their place.
02-02-2001, 11:25 PM #30FFTrainerFirehouse.com Guest
This is getting a little beaten up here so I will ask the one question I asked in the other post regarding this subject and have yet to get an answer on and it goes like this.
This never happened, your still a member and a couple years down the road you are no longer Asst. Chief rather you are now Chief. It is approx. 10 days into your term and you are faced with a difficult decision. You toss and turn for a night keeping your wife and kids by being preoccupied with what the right thing to do is. You finally come to a conclusion and you issue your directive. In turn, 5 members - including your ASST. CHIEF - make a little side vote and blatantly disobey your order. What do you feel?? Do you feel disappointed? Let Down? Betrayed? Angry? Come on now, you were a highly qualified Asst. Chief who took it upon himself to make a decision to go against your superior and take a truck, so make another decision now and let us all know how you would feel being in the chief's shoes.
While we wait, I'll tell you I would have been livid!! I would have suspended you if I was in a good mood, but I believe I may have removed you also. It would have been very difficult to decide, but what does keeping you get me? An Asst. Chief that does not support me? No thanks! I'd rather bump someone else up that I can depend on to stand by me through all the thick and thin that the fire service presents us with daily.
Oh and if you are not one of those depts. that owns your vehicles, then your municipality owns them and the power has been given to the chief to care for them and insure their proper use. If you are saying no one person owns it more than the other, then we might as well let Hank that hangs out on the corner of Main St take her for a spin when he feels like it and not charge him for it, because well he's a resident and owns part of it. Boy I sure hope I own the motor or something important on my town's apparatus for what I pay in taxes!!!
02-03-2001, 09:39 PM #3114Rescue1Firehouse.com Guest
"you will see how I have explained there is no such thing as a front line truck in SGVFD"
How long were you in th efire service not to understand this concept???
"Also who could be charged with stealing a vehicle that doesn't belong to any one individual ?"
Now on to this gem, unauthorized taking of public property is a felony. The vehicle in question belongs the taxpayer, if your one of them fine but it does not give you the right to randomly take it as you please. Come on be real this makes you sound real ignorant, and that's not a defense.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)