What have y'all heard about Pierce independent front suspension? Anybody got it? Pierce says it's the best thing since sliced bread. I'm not sold that the $7,000 price is worth it.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 49
-
06-09-2003, 12:41 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- East Coast
- Posts
- 12
Pierce independent front suspension
-
06-09-2003, 02:04 PM #2FH Mag/.com Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Cypress, TX
- Posts
- 7,288
We've got it coming on both our new engine and new heavy rescue due at the end of next month. The larger braking components will make it safer since trucks going 60mph will stop in 60' less distance. Since that makes the difference between stopping and plowing down 6 cars, we thought it was worth the extra dough even if we never need it. The ride is unbelievably smooth. I rode in a mutual aid company's Enforcer with the TAK4 and it was a better ride than my Z71 pickup. Less jarring of the cab and truck as a whole will put less strain on components and make the life of the truck longer, at least the way we looked at it. And with the roads around Houston being far from smooth, we'll really be putting it to the test. But if you can, get out and hitch a ride with someone that has it and see for yourself. That's the only way to be convinced for sure.
BrianBrian P. Vickers
www.vickersconsultingservices.com
Emergency Services Consulting
Westlake VFD - Houston, TX
Proud Member IACOJ - Redneck Division
-
06-09-2003, 11:37 PM #3MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 121
MY DEPARTMENT HAS THE TAK-4 SYSTEM IN OUR 2002 DASH 105' AERIAL. I LOVE THE RIDE, NO MORE BOUNCING AROUND IN THE CAB ON THE NICE SMOOTH NEW ENGLAND ROADS
Last edited by UFDFF15; 06-10-2003 at 12:07 AM.
-
06-10-2003, 03:13 PM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Paramus, New Jersey, U.S.A.
- Posts
- 12
We just got the TAK-4 on our 2002 Lance and the ride is fantastic. Worth every penny we spent on it. With regards to braking, I can only go by what Pierce says without testing it out ourselves, but I noticed the driver doesn't bounce around as much as he use to in our old engine. We still have our 84 Hahn and when we hit the same potholes with both engines, there is a difference. If you can afford it, I would purchase it both for the safety and comfort.
-
06-11-2003, 12:17 PM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- In the great state of MI
- Posts
- 48
We received our 2003 Pierce Lance with the Tak-4 IFS. The ride is unbelievable!! If you get a chance to ride in one please do. Call a Pierce rep and see if there is one in your area. Call that dept. and ask them. Not only is your stopping distance improved, but your brakes last longer. I checked with a service tech. about the IFS and he has had no problems yet. If you were to see the suspension, you would understand! Heavy-duty. The steering is very sensitive. It's worth the money!! And if you order a truck now (before Sept.) with the Tak-4 IFS you will receive the new roll-over protection system FREE! Go to their web site. www.piercemfg.com Good Luck.
-
06-11-2003, 11:32 PM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- Houston area
- Posts
- 106
One word: UNREAL! My vol. dept just bought 6 pumpers and a heavy rescue, all Enforcers with TAK-4. You really can't explain the difference and give it justice: you have to drive one. Handling is great, I'll have to defer to the engineers on braking distances; saying "it stops really good" is about as technical as I can put it. http://www.kleinfiredept.com to see our new ones. You won't regret the extra cash...
These are my opinions and not those of the organizations for which I work and/or volunteer.
-
06-12-2003, 11:30 PM #7Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 232
Truck Guy sounds like a rep.
berger 3447, saw your truck in Austin, very nice.
How did you swing the stereo system?
BC79, bet you can't wait.
-
06-12-2003, 11:49 PM #8FH Mag/.com Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Cypress, TX
- Posts
- 7,288
Got that right. I'm worse than a kid at Xmas. Although it's delayed for a bit on the rescue. Pierce is taking it to IAFC in Dallas because they like the design. Plus it was paid for by the grant, so a little marketing effort on two fronts. Can't complain too much about it, it's good exposure. Plus the department has made it by without it for 30+ years, so 3 weeks won't matter too much. Reminds me, I'll have to take off that weekend and go see it at the show. I'll need more pictures.
-
06-13-2003, 01:44 PM #9MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- Indiana
- Posts
- 56
What about turning radius? Is Pierce promoting a sharper turning radii (greater cramp angle)?
I just saw a protype IFS on a semi, they were claiming a sharper turning radii (55 degree cramp angle) and a smoother ride. This semi also had super single tires on the tractor and the trailer (as opposed to standard dual wheels) Super single are popular in Europe.
-
06-13-2003, 01:49 PM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Paramus, New Jersey, U.S.A.
- Posts
- 12
According to the literature on the TAK-4, they are saying that the cramp angle is 45 degrees.
-
06-13-2003, 09:05 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- In the great state of MI
- Posts
- 48
NO!! ctxffman Not a Pierce rep. Just a firefighter that was working on specs. for a new pumper for two and a half years. This was going to be our first new pumper in ten years and I was fairly new to the dept. This was the first pumper I have ever spec'd and had built. Working with Pierce was excellant. Or I just had a good rep.! But you just can't say enough about that suspension. Just drive it!!!
-
06-13-2003, 09:44 PM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 232
If you been working on specs for 2.5 yrs, you may be qualified to go to work for Pierce. I hope you the truck works out for you and the dept.
As for the TAK-4, I have driven one and it is nice. I wish our new Quantum had it.
-
06-15-2003, 12:48 AM #13Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- Houston area
- Posts
- 106
ctxffman: Justification on the stereo was mainly that we'd end up installing our own on each of the trucks anyway, and to pay a little more to have it done at the factory would keep all of them to the same standard, and we wouldn't have to worry about our guys running wire and rewiring a brand new truck. Plus it makes for a real clean look...
These are my opinions and not those of the organizations for which I work and/or volunteer.
-
07-08-2003, 12:27 AM #14Forum Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Posts
- 35
We got our new Midmount Tower with the TAK4 and I have only 2 words:
GET IT
It is SOOOO worth the cost. No BS, it makes all the difference. We have a 1997 Lance pumper that we thought road smooth as silk...well, the Tower rides even better. If you've ever rode in the front of a charter bus (think Greyhound) it's kinda like that. That's the only thing I can compare it to.
As far as turning radius, huge difference. Our truck is 47 feet long but makes tighter turns than our 32 foot pumper. Go figure.
Braking is up too. This truck weighs 80,000 lbs and stops pretty darn quick.
That's my 2 cents worth...
-
03-30-2005, 03:00 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 30
steering problems
Have any of you had any steering problems with the IFS? We are having terrible problems and have been told by pierce engineer that it is the nature of independent front suspensions. It is especially poor on the return steering.We are at the point that we may have it replaced.
-
03-30-2005, 03:13 PM #16FH Mag/.com Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Cypress, TX
- Posts
- 7,288
None here, and considering the Texas State Animal is the pothole, we've beaten on it pretty good with no problems in 18 months.
-
03-30-2005, 07:22 PM #17
We have a 2002 Enforcer rescue pumper with TAK-4. It has just under 29k miles on it and no problems yet. Unbelivable smooth ride.
But the thing I like the best is it stops on a dime! I dont recall what Pierce claims on the website about the improved stopping distance (65%?), but belive it. Ive had to get on it hard a couple times.
For the improved braking ability alone its well worth the 7k.Fire Marshal/Safety Officer
IAAI-NFPA-IAFC/VCOS-Retired IAFF
"No his mind is not for rent, to any god or government"
RUSH-Tom Sawyer
Success is when skill meets opportunity
Failure is when fantasy meets reality
-
03-30-2005, 07:49 PM #18Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 30
We have a 2004 Enforcer Rescue with the Tak-4. The problem we are experiencing is a lack of power steering on the return. All of our equipment is Pierce but this is the first with this suspension. When we enquired to Pierce and had them look at it they said it was because this vehicle has the IFS Tak-4 and the steering will be different. Is your steering different from any of your other apparatus? We are at the point where we believe it is too dangerous to have the comfort of the ride. By your responses I really question that it is US getting use to a new suspension system. Many of us believe that there is something wrong. What we need is someone from a department that has this setup drive our vehicle.
-
03-30-2005, 07:50 PM #19Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Upstate NY
- Posts
- 44
From my understanding, the IFS has nothing to do with the decreased stopping distance. It is because the brakes are upgraded when the suspension is added. The brakes can be upgraded w/out the suspension for a few hundred dollars.
-
03-31-2005, 11:03 AM #20Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Easton,Pa
- Posts
- 363
viking73 where are you located? Did you contact your dealer? They should be able to tell.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



