Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Sr. Information Officer NJFFSA16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    25 NW of the GW
    Posts
    8,434

    Post The Rand Report-First Responders

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Police officers, firefighters, health care
    workers and others who would be the first to respond to a terroris atttack say they need better protection, according to a study
    released Wednesday.
    The 174-page report by the Rand Corp., a California-based think
    tank, said responders don't know how well their clothing would
    protect them, or how well their current equipment would function.
    They said that they often cannot talk to one another because radios
    work on different frequencies.
    "Men and women who choose to risk their lives to save the lives
    of others are telling us they need better protection, better safety
    training equipment and better coordination to do their jobs," said
    Tom LaTourrette, lead author of the study, which is based on
    interviews with 190 people in 60 communities.
    The responders said they would likeighter-weight equipment and
    protective clothing, handsfree radios, better training and new
    tools to detect the hazards they face. One problem is that they
    have few choices when it comes to personal protection no matter
    what the hazard "because protection options are very limited to
    begin with," the report said.
    Homeland Security Department spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the
    department was receptive to improvements. "Every day, states and
    cities are buying new protective and communications equipment," he
    said.
    In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, first responders are
    very concerned about the dangers and casualties that could result
    from another terrorist attack.
    "Terrorism is on everybody's mind," said D.J. Peterson, the
    project leader. "Protecting themselves against terrorist incidents
    is their greatest priority. In the past, the big terrorist threat
    might have been a pipe bomb at a school. Now we're talking about
    entire buildings coming down. The scale has changed."
    Congressional Democrats have tried to add millions of dollars
    for first responders and other security priorities to spending
    bills for the new Homeland Security Department, but the majority
    Republicans have defeated those efforts, saying that the department
    gets enough money. House and Senate Republicans this summer
    rejected Democratic efforts to reduce tax cuts for millionaires and
    use the money for homeland security.
    Peterson said more money may not be the only answer. For
    example, he said, small towns may be able to pool their orders for
    emergency equipment, thus getting a better price than they
    currently get for buying small amounts separately.
    ----
    On the Net:
    Rand report: http://www.rand.org
    Proudly serving as the IACOJ Minister of Information & Propoganda!
    Be Safe! Lookouts-Awareness-Communications-Escape Routes-Safety Zones

    *Gathering Crust Since 1968*
    On the web at www.section2wildfire.com


  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber mcaldwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Panorama, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    3,022

    Default

    It's an endless arguement. We all say we need more, but no one ever says they have "enough"?

    Keep the studies coming because we can use all the help we can get, but at the end of the day, we are always going to have to be friggin' magicians with our budgets and equipment.
    Never argue with an Idiot. They drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!

    IACOJ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts