LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHello, my name is Randy. I am our Rescue Lt. for our vol. squad in Va. We have a set of Hurst 150 cutters. With today's vehicles, the 150's are not doing the job. I have permission to purchase another set of cutters. Can anyone tell me the advantages and disadvantages of the Hurst Extractor and Extractor II? According to the specs., they look to be almost identical. Please reply.
Thanks
Randy
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Extractor or extractor II
-
11-29-2003, 11:11 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 2
Extractor or extractor II
-
12-09-2003, 04:36 PM #2MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 1
Extractor or extractor II
Randy,
I have tried both the tools and my personal preference is the
X-Tractor. With the blade design it seems to be a much better cutting and for those who are replacing the old JL-150, it compares the best to it with better results.
-
12-10-2003, 09:36 AM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Pt. Beach, NJ
- Posts
- 10,253
I thought the X-Tractor and X-Tractor II both had the same blade style? I know the X-Tractor S has the straight blade design while the others had the curved blade design. We purchased the S style about a year ago as we had an O cutter already. What difference in blade design is there in the X-Tractor and X-Tractor II?
"This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
