1. #1
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    24

    Default Lot more trouble for City of Bridgeport Fire dept over hiring test

    Firefighting felons?

    2 on Bridgeport hiring list

    By AARON LEO aleo@ctpost.com

    BRIDGEPORT — Two convicted felons are on the Fire Department's hiring list, sparking criticism from a firefighter group and several firefighter candidates.

    But the Civil Service Commission, which allowed the men to be listed, could reconsider this move at a special meeting July 27 because new information about the two candidates recently surfaced, said John C. Colligan, the city's recently retired civil service director.

    Colligan would not identify the two felons, but said he opposed their addition to the hiring list. The notice for the 2002 firefighter entrance exam had stated no one with felony convictions would be appointed.

    Barring felons has been a city Civil Service standard since 1936, but is not required by an ordinance or the city charter, Colligan said. However, felons cannot be police officers because state law prohibits convicted felons from carrying guns, he said.




    OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
    7/16/2004
    - 2 kids safe after carjacking
    - Weapon used in New Haven shootings found
    - Embracing the Polka Dot's past
    - Cops: Man used Net to lure boy into sex tryst
    - Shore Line East to test onboard security plans
    - New bids sought for Tomlinson project
    - Mayor's pay expected to top $85,000
    - Sex-assault victim sues Derby school district
    - 'Stonewalk' peace marchers to pass through region
    - Man charged in incident at Milford mall
    - Fairfield may reconsider Jennings Beach for pool site
    - Bridgeport artist apartments near completion
    - Milford's 'snowbirds' riled by car tax bills
    - Police seek accomplice in robbery
    - Smoking blamed for Milford house fire
    - Officer back on duty despite assault cases
    - Contractor held after Easton scam for removing mold




    The firefighter issue arose when nine people, including the two felons, appealed to the Civil Service Commission after Colligan refused to place them on the list.

    The commission overrode him at its June 8 meeting, voting to place the felons on the hiring list out of sympathy, Colligan said.

    The city has not yet hired any new firefighters from the list, which expires two years after the date of the first hire.

    Richard Albrecht, lawyer for the Bridgeport Firefighters for Merit Employment, is also asking the commission to reconsider its decision. The BFME's stated goal is to ensure Civil Service rules are followed in hiring and promotion.

    In a June 22 appeal filed with the Civil Service Office, Albrecht said the firefighter candidates with felonies are untrustworthy and not qualified for the job.

    "Trust between firefighters is an integral and necessary part of the job," he said.

    They also cannot be trusted to protect personal property in buildings, and the job requires they sometimes must enter while the owners are not there, he contended.

    "Although the Civil Service Commission may feel compassion for certain individuals, or feel that they want to give them a chance, such laudable motives should not be involved in appointments to agencies in the public safety sector," the BFME appeal states.

    Albrecht said he also filed a request June 10 for the candidates' identities to be revealed under the Freedom of Information Act. The City Attorney's office is considering it, Colligan said.

    John Bolton and 18 other white firefighter candidates are also protesting the decision.

    Bolton complained to the City Council about the issue at its meeting Tuesday.

    The 19 have already filed two federal lawsuits against numerous city officials and panels alleging violations of their civil rights by reverse discrimination.

    Lawyer Norman Pattis represents them in both suits, which name a total of about 130 defendants.

    The plaintiffs seek millions of dollars in damages and want the list of more than 600 candidates thrown out.

    They contend a prejudicial oral exam prevented them from ranking higher in the 2002 entrance testing process, among other allegations.

    Aaron Leo, who covers regional issues, can be reached at 330-6222.

  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Big Rock, IL
    Posts
    38

    Default

    The whole way of hiring is messed up anyway.

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Syracuse , NY
    Posts
    138

    Default

    There is no such thng as "reverse discrimination".

    Discrimination is discrimination.If you choose to hire anyone based on race,you disciminate against all other races.

    It should be illegal.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register