Again, as I have stated, I do not know the laws for other states, but in my state a law cannot be change post arrest so that suspects can receive a harsher sentence. If you we arrested for a misdemeanor crime12-1-2009 and the law took affect 1-1-2010 making it a felony you would be charge with the law as it was in effect when the crime was committed. Unless I have misinterpreted the statue.
If I had someone with a DWI I would not hire them anyways. Most insurance will preclude someone with a DWI from driving a commercial vehicle. Like I said I find drunkards of poor character. If you need to drink so bad you cannot wait till you are in a safe place, then no I would not hire you.
I have own 14 businesses since 1978 and sold 11 of them for a profit. I have three left and the only one that even came close to flopping is my limo company. That was do to 9-11-2001. I have never committed a felony and see no reason to cut slack to someone who "Takes the easy way out". If you victimize once you will do it again.
We all make choices, good or bad. If you make a poor choice then you live with the results. You commit a felony you forfeit the opportunity to be FF\EMS\LE.
Closed Thread
Results 81 to 100 of 320
-
02-09-2010, 06:01 PM #81MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
-
02-09-2010, 08:23 PM #82Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
HEY, Jakesdad and all the rest check out the bold!!!
Again, it would depend on the circumstances and a case by case basis.
Some of these might be explainable:
18.2-102 LAR-2412-F6 Unauthorized use of animal, auto, boat worth $200 or more
18.2-108 LAR-2808-F9 Receive stolen goods-$200 or more
18.2-172 FRD-2521-F5 Uttering
18.2-181 FRD-2624-F6 Bad checks, $200 or more
18.2-181.1 FRD-2699-F6 Bad checks, two or more w/in 90 days, >=$200
18.2-200.1 FRD-2805-F9 Fail to perform construction in return for advances, > $200
Many times it is easier and cheaper to just admit you are guilty. There may be extenuating circumstances.
-
02-09-2010, 08:26 PM #83Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
Exactly!!! The laws change. So what was a felony 5 years ago is no longer and some new felonies get added. I'm not talking about murder, rape, robbery, etc. I'm talking about the lesser and sometimes explainable or justifiable crimes. Like the teens who are sexting, and the 17 year old having sex with his 1 year old girlfriend. Felonies, but these are bad felonies and bad convictions. There is no reason to exempt these people from employment.
-
02-09-2010, 09:59 PM #84
I "checked out the bold"...
That's RAPE. Are you that stupid not to recognize it?18.2-67.1(A,1) RAP-1133-F9 Forcible sodomy, victim under age 13
18.2-67.1(A,2) RAP-1132-F9 Forcible sodomy, by force, threat, etc, victim age 13+"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
-
02-09-2010, 10:15 PM #85MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
In Jonnee's post, two back you did. You have no problem with forcible sodomy, otherwise commonly known as rape.
Still felonies. Application stamped DENIED! Please move to the next window for the ditch digger applications. NEXT INLINE!!!
-
02-10-2010, 12:12 AM #86Jason Knecht
Assistant Chief
Altoona Fire Rescue
Altoona, WI
IACOJ - Director of Cheese and Whine
http://www.cheddarvision.tv/
EAT CHEESE OR DIE!!
-
02-10-2010, 05:31 AM #87MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jul 1999
- Location
- Flanders, NJ
- Posts
- 13,537
-
02-10-2010, 06:57 AM #88
He'll blame it on dyslexia again...
"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
-
02-10-2010, 02:08 PM #89Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
Actually , if you go back a few posts Jakesdad made they claim that Sodomy laws were off the book. Yet here they are.
How about this one Teens facing felonies for 'sexting'
an excerpt
So in NY, this alone would eliminate 70% of the population....Saratoga County District Attorney James Murphy says the sexting law might be too harsh when it comes to children sending images of themselves.
According to a national survey, 70 percent of teens have been involved in sexting. If they're caught in New York, even if they send pictures of themselves, they are treated as child pornographers.
The latest case involves an 18-yea- old man and a 15-year-old girl who met through a youth group at the Abundant Life Church in Milton.
Police say the young man, Andrew Priest of Ballston Spa, sent images of his private parts to the girl.
"A man who is clearly old enough to know better is taking a picture of his erect penis and sending it to a 15-year-old girl. That's a crime. That's a Class D felony," Murphy said.
Police say the man asked the girl to send pictures of herself in return and she did. Now she's also charged with a felony -- promoting obscene sexual performance by a child. ...
-
02-10-2010, 02:09 PM #90Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
02-10-2010, 06:03 PM #91MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
If you look at the Supreme Court ruling in "Lawrence v. Texas, you would find that they struck down consensual sex sodomy laws. Although they are on the books they are unenforceable. If you still have questions I would suggest you trying arguing with the Supreme Court.
So say, too bad. Their parents should have taught them better. That is the penalty for being young and stupid. They are probably drunkards too. Do not pass go, go straight to jail and do not collect a civil service application.
-
02-10-2010, 08:57 PM #92Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
I just find it humorous how some can use Sodomy when it is convenient to do so.
Perhaps if you are the Brady Bunch or live in the Little House on the Prairie. In the real world it doesn't work that way.So say, too bad. Their parents should have taught them better. That is the penalty for being young and stupid. They are probably drunkards too. Do not pass go, go straight to jail and do not collect a civil service application.
We will obviously have to agree to disagree here. I can accept that not all felonies should be a reason for being disqualified. Felons can and do get Security Clearances and deal with issues of National security where hundreds, thousand, and millions of lives are at stake. There is no reason they cannot also function as fire fighters, EMTs, and LEOs.Last edited by ScareCrow57; 02-10-2010 at 09:00 PM.
-
02-10-2010, 09:24 PM #93
I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
02-10-2010, 10:32 PM #94MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
I was thinking the same thing about you, since you started the thread in this direction. To my knowledge no one, in this thread, but you feels sodomy is still a crime.
Sure it does. It works like that every wheres. I know of no department that hires felonies, or keeps them when arrested after they are hired. As it should be.
I prefer to think of it as I have much higher standards than you do. I do not disagree with you as much as I know you are outright wrong. That is not an opinion, but solid fact.
-
02-11-2010, 05:40 PM #95Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
-
02-11-2010, 05:44 PM #96Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
Here ya go:::
Sure it does. It works like that every wheres. I know of no department that hires felonies, or keeps them when arrested after they are hired. As it should be.I prefer to think of it as I have much higher standards than you do. I do not disagree with you as much as I know you are outright wrong. That is not an opinion, but solid fact.
I would be willing to bet that your own department wouldn't fire a person with a DWI felony, they would rehab them instead. The Unions are big on that one sunshine.
-
02-11-2010, 06:16 PM #97
I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.
"The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."
"When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."
-
02-11-2010, 07:09 PM #98
Well... Scarecrows have been known to send people and forum threads in the wrong direction...
"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
-
02-11-2010, 07:50 PM #99MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,168
-
02-11-2010, 08:33 PM #100Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 8,677
You do know that in NYS a person that is not at least 17 years and one day cannot consent? Other states have similar laws, in some it is 12 or 13. Some foreign countries have different laws altogether. So a felony is not always a felony everywhere you go. It is not uncommon for kids as young as 11 or 12 years old to engage in sexual experimentation. So when a 17 year old and a 16 year old "play around" the 17 year old gets a felony. You can preach abstinence all you want. Kids will be kids. And honestly, at the age I didn't even know or care what the laws were.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




