1. #1
    dazed and confused
    Resq14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,993

    Default CAD - who uses what

    What CAD software do you currently use?

    Likes/Dislikes?

    Do you have experience using other software, and if so, how do they compare? Which did you prefer?

    What do you feel are important features that aren't necessarily found in all software packages?
    God Bless America!Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
    Google Is Your Friend™Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
    Click this to search FH Forums!

  2. #2
    Forum Member
    firenresq77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    5,213

    Default

    At my FT gig, dispatching for County EMS, we use Litton/PRC Public Sector Inc. CAD....... It's OK...... We just got the newer version of it a few years ago, after having the old old version that just had a keyboard and monitor, no PCs........ Everything was in the keyboard and Monitor. They are looking to get a new CAD, but I believe they are looking for something with the integrated mapping and AVLs........

    The Comm Center for my FD uses Emergitech CAD. I can't say a whole lot about it since I've never used it, but I don't believe they are using it to it's fullest capabilities, probably because they don't know what all it can and cannot do.

    I like the Litton, because when you enter a comment into a mask, it will automatically time-stamp it. Anytime you do anything with an incident, it is time-stamped........ The Emergitech doesn't do that all the time. I guess there a couple area where a comment can be added and 1 time-stamps it, but the other doesn't. When dispatch sends us a fax of our times from Emergitech, we don't have times that they add the comments (under control, water on fire, etc).

    The Litton has to have everything typed in (enroute, on scene, etc) using abbreviations. It would be nice to have buttons to click......

  3. #3
    Rabble rouser
    Kobersteen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Fairfax County (VA) Fire & Rescue Dept.
    Posts
    529

    Default

    We are still working the bugs out of Alteris.

    Don't get me started on that...
    Member IACOJ - Building crust and full of lust...

    "It's okay to to scared, just don't be chicken." - Clark

  4. #4
    dazed and confused
    Resq14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,993

    Default

    My PT job (which is also my FD's center) is replacing an ancient Unix-flavored terminal database with IMC software. What I like about it: very fast queries, very easy to understand once you get the hang of it, integrated DMV/NCIC functions. Cons: It just can't handle FD dispatching, police case information, no graphical user interface... it's just out-lived its useful life.

    The software from IMC is a definite improvement. Much more secure data entry and storage, time stamping, quite flexible, somewhat customizable. I'm curious if anyone else is using it on here. I've attended a couple training sessions on it, and have begun using it at work... and I often find myself wondering "why did they do it this way" and "why can't I do _______." We no longer have integrated DMV/NCIC... will be running Linxx2010 for that. This just translates into extra steps on traffic stops, though I believe there might be plans in the works for linking IMC CAD with other terminal software for such queries and entries. AVL and mapping seem to be a little further down the road. Regardless, it is an improvement.

    My old FT job used HTE CAD. Loved command line entry, managing units through the command line, the high level of customization available, etc. Cons: wasn't true graphical user interface... was just an advanced terminal screen using IBM AS/400. Case management for police was decent, but not as efficient as newer packages. DMV/NCIC was not supported at the time... Linxx2010 used for that.

    My FT job uses Crisnet netRMS. Police case files are managed using a "file folder" analogy for storing documents. Unfortunately, the RMS portion is weak and lacks many functions as far as backfilling screens, etc. As far as "CAD" goes... it's a mess. It's basically just a blank screen with some labeled areas that you have to complete one at a time for every single call. It does not support FD dispatching, run cards, any type of advanced features, DMV/NCIC, backfilling fields from mastername/vehicle/location files. The dispatching portion is very poor and lacks needed features. We use Linxx2010 for DMV/NCIC here as well.

    I often feel as though communication personnel don't have enough input into the software design process. CAD needs to be very flexible, EASY to understand and use, straightforward, and customizable.
    God Bless America!Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
    Google Is Your Friend™Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
    Click this to search FH Forums!

  5. #5
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Our E911 dispatch center uses Southern Softwares CAD4.25. Its a fairly new system, so theres not really many complaints from it. They did have FoxPro. It really wasnt that good. It may have been few years ago but its not now.

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    MrJim911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    225

    Default

    We currently use HTE CAD IV. It's an old non-windows based system runing off a AS400. It's easy to use but it's OLD. HTE does offer CAD V now that is windows based, but I've heard it's not all that great.

    When we make the move into our new building next year we are getting Motorola's Printrack Gold Elite with all the bells and whistles. We are also getting their Vesta phone system and radio equipment.

    When we put the bid out we were looking at New Word and VisionAir and another I can't remember. Printrack looked better then any of them.

    My agency put one Supervisor and one Telecommunicator on each committee. (CAD committee)(Phone/Radio committee) I was on the phone/radio committee. I love the Vesta phone system and their radio set up. And I've heard great things about the CAD.

    We are also getting the Watson consoles with hydraulics....(drool). Our current airplane cockpit set up with knobs, dials and buttons will be replaced with five 19 inch touchscreen monitors. SWEET!

  7. #7
    dazed and confused
    Resq14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,993

    Default

    FoxPro... still using that as a read-only database for FD run cards at my FT job. It's hardly ideal, but better than notebooks and papers.
    God Bless America!Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
    Google Is Your Friend™Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
    Click this to search FH Forums!

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    firenresq77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    5,213

    Default

    Originally posted by MrJim911

    We are also getting the Watson consoles with hydraulics....(drool). Our current airplane cockpit set up with knobs, dials and buttons will be replaced with five 19 inch touchscreen monitors. SWEET!
    We have Electralift tables. The company that makes them is out of business. We have 1 that has been broken since August.....

    We also have 19" touch screen monitors for our radios, but it's the Centracoms, I believe....... They work pretty good......

  9. #9
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    17

    Default

    We use Intergraph Public Safety CAD. I think its good and the biggest problem is that the agency( my PD agency) is not keeping up with the vendor software or the hardware. Its to the point now that we are so behind, that the vendor doesn't really service the software too much anymore. Its out-dated and they say about 4 versions behind. I think the agency is looking at a new system so they can go out and pick it apart and make it not work. Also, we only use about 10 % of the software capibility. Thats the State for ya I guess.

  10. #10
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dublin Ohio
    Posts
    3

    Default

    We use HTE's CAD400 and we love the functionality and the reliability. It is not pretty, but it is very functional and user defineable. It is AS400, but has a GUI interface if desired and will now run on a NavaLine HTML front end to have a windows like functionality.

    Jay
    Dublin Ohio
    Last edited by jsomerville; 12-15-2004 at 01:07 PM.

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ramseycl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Next to the big ditch
    Posts
    489

    Default

    WeE are using PSSI CAD, it is ok but we seem to be having more and more problems. The system just can't keep up, but I think part of it is our computer. I think we have been using it for about 3 years, before that we had an old doss based CRIS/CAD system.

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Eliot, Maine
    Posts
    11

    Default CAD-IMC

    Resq14

    We have been running IMC since 1999 here in the City of Portsmoyhth, NH. We have combined center here for Police/Fire/EMS. It seems to work ok for us. Before we got IMC we used HTE AS/400. I loved that system, especially the command line. It was great. I know that my boss is always in contact with other dept's that use IMC to try and make the fire side of dispatching more easier.

    We also moved into a new section of our pd. All of the bells a whisles. Watson Furniture with the hydrolic lift/air/heat and ligthing. Along with 3 19in computer screens to run cad and also a 19in touch screen radio screen for our Motorola Elite Centra Comm. And can u belive it they actually gave us a windows. They don't open (cause they do not want us to jump out) but at least we can see what the weather is out for people that call from MASS that want to go to Water Country. Sorry had to say that!

  13. #13
    Dispatch Dweller
    Jay911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    On the way to the station. Really. It's 12 kilometers away and there's traffic.
    Posts
    339

    Default

    We switched from Logisys' FirstCall to Intergraph Public Safety's I/CAD last year. A lot of my co-workers and colleagues have gripes, and I have to agree on some aspects, but I tend to like the new system a lot better than the old one. A lot of the 'problems' are things that are simply done differently - perhaps more convoluted or taking longer than with the old system.
    --jay.

  14. #14
    dazed and confused
    Resq14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,993

    Default Re: CAD-IMC

    Originally posted by EliotO3
    And can u belive it they actually gave us a windows. They don't open (cause they do not want us to jump out) but at least we can see what the weather is out for people that call from MASS that want to go to Water Country. Sorry had to say that!
    LOL

    Yeah I loved HTE on the AS/400... it just worked, and it worked well.

    I hadn't heard about the html front-ends... cool. But now with the full GUI version available, that's probably the way to go if you're in the market.
    God Bless America!Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
    Google Is Your Friend™Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
    Click this to search FH Forums!

  15. #15
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    La Crosse, WI
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Happy New Year!

    Sorry I've missed out on this discussion, and hope I can still contribute.

    We have a combined Police/Fire/EMS civilian center using Vision Aire CAD. We've had it for about 5 years and have suffered through quite a number of problems, but it works quite well now (we're still after them for some things, though). We've just started Tear & Go (or Rip & Run) at our FT Fire Stations, and they like that.

    As far as dispatch use goes, we have command line and DMV/NCIC interface, and there are a number of items that can be added to specific locations, e.g. medical info; responders; vacation checks; sprinkler alarms; hazardous materials; etc. One very nice feature is that our E911 information dumps into a New Call Screen directly, so we only need to enter the nature of call and basic information.

    Our RMS is also Vision Air, and our FD is finally looking at getting Vision Air's Fire software.

    We've had the hydraulic work stations since 99, and they are excellent. We're adding "status lights" that will show when a dispatcher is on the radio (red light) or phone (blue light). We're going to need to upgrade our radio & phone equipment in the next couple of years - using Motorola Centracom Gold (no touch screen, though).

    We did get a new logging recorder system from Voice Print International that enables us to e-mail recordings to District Attorneys, law enforcement or other requesters instead of having to make cassette tapes. This system will also (when everything is finalized) capture ANI/ALI information and radio IDs. We can add comments or colored flags to any call (comments while phone calls are in progress) and can even send calls to phones - so we can let an officer listen to a complainant's phone call while en route to the call.
    Joe O'Keefe

  16. #16
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2

    Default CAD System

    In Melbourne, Australia we use Intergraph I/Dispatcher - fully integrated between police, fire, ambulance and non-urgent ambulance. this system is connected to a pabx system for alert tones and voice-announcing the staff stations, and to the statewide paging system for volunteer brigades. it also uses AVL (polling) and can give verbal directions from one point to another. it accepts LAT/LONG entries to locate an event, and makes use of CommonPlace names - to give either an enhanced or reduced response to a particular premise.
    i/dispatcher, like any CAD, has its problems.. it likes to have its terminals rebooted every couple of days, however ive found it generally very thorough and fast (runs on a microwave-linked multi-site windows nt platform) for the work it handles; we have nearly 150 terminals on the network.
    EVERY event is saved and cannot be deleted, EVERY keystroke is recorded, EVERY appliance movement / status is logged and timestamped
    The system is a full GUI - spread over 3x21" flat monitors (including centracom gold for radio channels), keyboard and two mice, and features statewide digital mapping along with the color street directory overlay in most areas.
    Our organisation utilises about 50-60% of the systems full capabilities.

  17. #17
    dazed and confused
    Resq14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,993

    Thumbs up

    Very impressive!
    God Bless America!Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
    Google Is Your Friend™Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
    Click this to search FH Forums!

  18. #18
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    4

    Default

    For fire dispatching we are currently using a Microsoft Access database for running assignments backed up with paper run cards. Incident logging is done by hand in a notebook with forms that we designed in Microsoft Excel. Dispatchers are responsible for inputing run data into SunPRO RMS for fire reporting. For police dispatching we are using a locally designed UNIX based software that isn't much more than a computerized punch card with an attached RMS system.

    I would be interested to get feed back from anyone who is using/has used Orbacom Genesis I CAD. It looks like that will be replacing what we have in the not too distant future.

    Thanks

  19. #19
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2

    Default

    We use orbacom for our CAD, not sure what version. It provides run card info for police fire and ems, and also resourse management. The system also provided us with digital mapping for phase ii wireless. It has a lot of nice features to it (timers, for disptatch response) but they are CPU hogs and have turned them off at the moment. While I believe the system works pretty good, you will get others in my center that disagree. The other side is the support, our center has had to enter into litigation with the software vendor to correct bugs and to complete the delivery of the package as spec'ed over 3 years ago.

    Jim 33
    Lancaster County-Wide Communications

  20. #20
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lebanon County, Pa
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Our County does not have a CAD system! We still use the old "Box" card system.
    VF - 142 "Ghostriders" last stand in 95'
    You will be missed "Dakota"
    "In squad we trust"
    "Got air will travel"
    In truck we squad!
    I will take my squad over your engine any day of the week

  21. #21
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Newport News, Va
    Posts
    13

    Default

    In our dispatch center we use a QED cad system. Works well, when it wants to. We got the system about a year ago as the first agency that runs multiple towns with a single town system. So that means that most of the programing has to be re-written. That just makes more problems in its own. New software means something else crashes. Auto faxing, cant get run plans. Its not a bad system to have-- very easy to learn and very little brain power to use. But for working in a county dispatch center it needed to come in as 100% working, not the 75-80%

    Have fun stay safe

  22. #22
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2

    Default

    My agency uses Printrack. We are more have more knowledge on the police side of things. My biggest problem with it is that there are too many steps to do a task that should take one simple steps. We are also networked and bought the system with several other metro area agencies, so we all have the same type codes and they're not personalized to each department.

  23. #23
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8

    Thumbs up Fire/Rescue CAD system From IMC

    IMC (Grafton, Massachusetts) has recently upgraded their CAD system to make swapping personnel on apparatus much easier. In cities where apparatus assignments are per shift it really shines. But in smaller communities where personnel floats depending on the type/location of call it took a few keystrokes to get people moved around. That's been fixed and the system flies. What's really cool is that all of the CAD information automatically backfills into the NFIRS report with minimal typing. Apparatus, personnel, times, duties, and stations will automatically backfill. The CAD system offers instant access to all data related to the incident address including hazmat, hydrants, structure type, fire plan, water connection points, utility shutoff, cross streets, last inspection findings, and more. The CAD system does run cards out to 10 alarms with moveups and station coverage. IMC is tough to beat!

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Chicago Suburban area. Comm center for 6 towns. We use Spillman products including Summit and Mobile. Summit is the base program for records management (RMS) and CAD. Mobile is used in the squad cars and also at the center for mobile messaging which is very convenient.

    I've been using Spillman for 3 years now. Previous experience with CISCO public safety CAD. (Not cisco the networking product company).

    Spillman is a very well thought out RMS program but CAD was added as an afterthought and they still haven't caught up. Fast typers do well with it because you can do anything from the command line. Long-winded commands and numerous verifications slow down entries and become cumbersome.

    Overall, 4 out of 5. Spillman's newest release is starting fresh building on their powerful database with an all new GUI and functionality.

  25. #25
    Forum Member
    FIREMAN36054139's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    MILLBROOK, ALABAMA
    Posts
    7

    Thumbs up

    For Autauga County E-911 we use Spillman Summit 4.5 & I have ejoyed it alot, once you figure out the short cuts its a blast
    CHRIS DEYERLE
    FIRE FIGHTER / COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER
    MILLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT / AUTAUGA E-911
    MILLBROOK, ALABAMA / PRATTVILLE, ALABAMA

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register