Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Sr. Information Officer NJFFSA16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    25 NW of the GW
    Posts
    8,434

    Post Jackson Discrimination Case

    JACKSON, Miss. (AP) - The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has
    upheld a lower court decision that the city of Jackson
    discriminated against a veteran white firefighter in his attempts
    to advance in rank.
    David Campbell, in a lawsuit filed in August, 2000, alleged the
    city and various employees, because of his race, delayed his
    promotion to captain and later his opportunities to train as a
    district chief.
    A federal jury ruled in Campbell's favor, awarding him $60,000
    in lost wages and $20,000 for emotional distress. The city appealed
    but the 5th Circuit said Monday the evidence supported the jury's
    verdict.
    Campbell, who joined the Jackson Fire Department in 1984,
    claimed that while his own advancement was stalled, black employees
    who were less qualified received promotions.
    Tony Davis, a former district chief, testified during the lower
    court trial that he was told by Fire Chief Raymond McNulty to take
    Campbell's name off a December 1998 list of those seeking
    promotions because he's white.
    McNulty, who is black, had testified that race played no role in
    any decisions on Campbell's training and promotions.
    According to the court record, Campbell presented evidence
    during the trial showing that he scored second highest among the
    candidates for promotion to captain and that he was promoted after
    four lower-scoring employees had been promoted, which guaranteed
    their higher seniority.
    "This group included a black promotee who as the city concedes
    would not have been promoted at all but for the two month delay,"
    the court said.
    Campbell also said he was purposefully denied more opportunities
    to train by working out of rank as acting district chief when a
    deputy district chief "invented and applied a new rule" that
    prevented him from signing up for the list to train for six months
    after he first became a captain.
    He said when he finally became eligible for the training, the
    rotation list was deliberately manipulated to deny him the
    opportunity.

    (Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
    Proudly serving as the IACOJ Minister of Information & Propoganda!
    Be Safe! Lookouts-Awareness-Communications-Escape Routes-Safety Zones

    *Gathering Crust Since 1968*
    On the web at www.section2wildfire.com


  2. #2
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Default

    Good for him.
    RK
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    84

    Default

    it was about time. he had to wade through mountains of paperwork, red tape, and listen to various other types of harassment to get it done and he still hasn't seen a dime. the case is again being appealed.

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Sounds much like the affirmative action lawsuit the Birmingham Firefighters fought back in the late 80's and early 90's. Good on him. It is about time someone stands up. A firefighter or police officer's color should not make any difference in the world. If you are not qualified, you are not qualified and that's that.
    Jason P. Brush, EMT-T
    US Navy Police Investigator

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts