Town in NJ, ems/rescue department, took FD off alerting procedures for MVA's unless confirmed entrapment, overturned or fluids leaking awhile back. The Squad has jurisdiction on MVAs. They cover a good stretch of route 78. Below are some of the responses i got from the assistant chief for proposed highway response sogs. I researched alot on highway safety through respondersafety.com. In short, they included a single engine for response to mva's that didn't meet the above criteria to assist in traffic control, buffer zone, lifting, and possibly a line if extrication was found and then for the above criteria, either a ladder or pumper/tanker for traffic and 2 engines. All of these obviously included bls/als when needed/and the rescue.
Here are some of the responses I recieved:
"I think you make more of a target for careless drivers to slam into a fire truck whose sole purpose is a LARGE TRAFFIC CONE, at the rate of speed the vehicles move on r78, nothing is gonna prevent a vehicle from plowing into us! It just exaserbates the situation and now you have a 25 ton fire truck crashing into to as well as the careless vehicles on our highways. I believe the SP usually control the traffic with flares and cones hundreds of yards away and usually shut down the slow lane."
"As far as FD response to minor MVA's for no other reason then as a TRAFFIC CONE is ludacris."
"The impact of uneccessary FD personnel responding puts more people at risk then just limiting a BLS response. You now have 10 more personnel vehicles responding to the incident SPEEDING to the scene, FD Station, etc."
imho as for safety, our's comes first, if we were injured we can't help anyone else. Not calling the FD because we're worried about their response to the building or scene is not in the best interest of our safety. Get them enroute and if they're not needed, send them home. Now, there is an issue with the departments not following sops but it seems that the officers of this org have just about given up trying to change that.
This is also a department (or chief for that matter), that feels it necessary to blind every driver on the road with an insane number of leds/strobes when on scene. Apparently they know better than all the experts that have researched these topics.
I'm open for comments/suggestions, I'm always willing to learn.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 60
02-28-2005, 12:18 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Morgantown, WV
FD taken off most MVA's - ur thoughts?
02-28-2005, 12:40 PM #2I'm open for comments/suggestions"This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
02-28-2005, 12:56 PM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Illinois-where pertnear is close enough!
I believe in erring on the side of response times. Dispatch fire, police and EMS at once. If any or all are not needed, then call them off. Finding out that you need them AFTER you get there is too late.
The motoring public don't want any of us there, because they would have to slow down to a safe speed and we all know that they haven't got time for that.
Remember Bradley Golden (9/25/01)
RIP HOF Robert J. Compton(ENG6511)
02-28-2005, 01:02 PM #4
Unless we are really tied-up, an engine with extrication equipment responds on all MVA's. Since the ambulance is a FIRE DEPARTMENT ambulance, we have none of the silly ****ing matches that seem to arise when too many cooks are in the kitchen.IAFF-IACOJ PROUD
02-28-2005, 01:21 PM #5
His reasons are total BS, that's for sure. On a highway with cars cruising along at 70+, not having a 25 ton truck there for protection is asking for death and destruction. A Dodge Neon is not going ot push a 25 ton truck several hundred feet into the scene.
On regular surface streets, it is not needed unless there is a situation calling for it (extrication, fluids, fire, etc). The police handle non-injury accidents on their own all day long.Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.
02-28-2005, 01:58 PM #6
Like Mikey, EMS is part of the FD so if the bus goes the rescue and engine goes too. If I'm working the scene, I want the big red traffic cone.
We DO NOT go to all MVAs. We're dispatched to confirmed injuries or accidents where the caller is unsure. Otherwise, we don't respond unless specifically requested by the PD to assist with cleanup and/or traffic. If that happens, we respond cold because there's no reason to get in a hurry.
02-28-2005, 02:12 PM #7
An engine goes to all medical runs here. I guess the truck and rescue could go too if it was a last resort thing.
No matter what they are getting a BRT at the scene.Originally Posted by ThNozzleMan
I A C O J
Honorary Disclaimer: While I am a manufacturer representative, I am not here to sell my product. Any advice or knowledge shared is for informational purposes only. I do not use Firehouse.Com for promotional purposes.
02-28-2005, 02:15 PM #8
In my opinion and I am sorry if I come off strong-
In my first fire science class, the instructor once told
me- "The fire department is the #1 leader when it comes to
I believed him in 1989 and I believe him now. The FD should
be on the initial dispatch for all reported traffic collisons
(aka T/Cs). The FD should be in charge of all fire and EMS
This happened in Mesquite, Nevada. One day the City Manager
said "Enough!" Fire and rescue are now combined and thats it.
Done deal. The Fire Chief and Ambulance Chief were both so
angry that they up and quit. Good, now the operation runs
Keep the FD on the traffic collisons responses.
02-28-2005, 02:23 PM #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Bossier Parrish, Louisiana
Not really sure which way to go on this as I have been to so many MVAs where the fire department was dispatched automatically and not needed once they arrive. Looking at it from a firefighter safety standpoint, one could argue that unless you have a fairly high rate of injuries/extracations the risk of the engine and POVs (in a vollie/combo situation) being envolved in an accident while responding outweighs the need for a rapid response time in those few situations you are actually needed. The other question is do you really want to tie up an engine or heavy simply to act as a traffic cone for EMS and LE, especially if you have limited resources ?
Guess I'll go with keep the FD in quarters, especially if vollie, until they are actually needed. But, not knowing the local situation ... guess that opinion ain't worth very much ...
Just my thoughts.
02-28-2005, 02:59 PM #10
We run reported injuries, all extrications, and they automatically send us to all 'cars over a hill' or 'rollovers', simply due to the increased likelihood of entrapment or injuries.
If PD beats us there and informs us we're not needed, we shut the lights off and head home. If they need us, we're there to provide additional trained medical personnel, any landing zones required, and to minimize hazards."Captain 1 to control, retone this as a structure and notify the fire chief...."
Safety is no accident.
02-28-2005, 03:14 PM #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- North Carolina
We respond to all EMS/MVA/etc. runs. Emergency traffic or non-emergency. If we start out emergency and are cut back to routine traffic by EMS.. it is the officers choice whether we continue in or not. I can't tell you how many times we've been dispatched to an MVA/pin-in and it has ended up being complete BS.. then on the other hand, I also can't tell you how many time I've run an MVA that ended up being a pretty good pin job. I'd say it's better to be safe than sorry, put a fire apparatus on all EMS/MVA/non-fire calls. If you don't need them.. no harm done, but if you need them NOW and they are still at the station.. well that could be a bad thing. That's just what I've experienced.
02-28-2005, 03:21 PM #12If you don't need them.. no harm done,"This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
02-28-2005, 03:50 PM #13
When I say "every MVA", I am talking PI accidents and of course non-injury fuel spills /hazardous conditions. The engine gets returned as soon as it is determined they are not needed. I would think in rural America, the F.D would play an even more important role at crashes. Scene lighting, manpower etc. Sorry Bones, but the argument that it would cause "too many" calls is a bit weak. Why dosent the Fire Department do extrication? If your town runs 300 PI accidents, then there is a serious driving problem in your neighborhood.IAFF-IACOJ PROUD
02-28-2005, 03:52 PM #14
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- North Carolina
If your vollie department gets calls that members can't "turnout" for.. then it might be time to consider getting a part-time paid person or two to run calls during the day, when the vollies are at work. That's just my opinion.. I know things are run differently with vollie departments that only run.. maybe 1 call a day. I'm talking about career departments, or other paid/part-time departments that have the personnel to run the calls. Heck, if it is a strain to run EMS/MVA calls.. then do ya'll only run Fire? Well, that'd probably make sense.. especially if you won't beat EMS to the scene.
02-28-2005, 04:04 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jun 2000
- 911 N. Sycamore St. Yep, that's really our address.
I think I wouldn't care, except that I would tell my friends and families to make sure when they call in their own crash, to make sure they say, "I think extrication will be needed."
It's kinda like the BLS neighbors we have. We've told them repeatedly, feel free to call us anytime for an ALS intercept; yet they routinely call a private from 15 miles away. Do I care? No, I do not. That is their privelige. While I'd like to have the call volume and get our rural medics some more run time, it's not worth getting bunched up in my panties over it. Same applies here. You want us, call us. Otherwise, whatever. Don't come crying to me when your people get mashed up when some dumb*****ed drunk plows into your "minor PI" crash scene some late afternoon, wishing like hell you'd had that 40 ton traffic cone.Omnis Cedo Domus
02-28-2005, 05:12 PM #16
A little background: EMS and Fire/Extrication are different agencies. EMS used to do both patient care and extrication however in these days of reduced staffing they have to focus strictly on patient care and we took over rescue/extrication a several years ago.
Our dispatch protocal is that the FD is sent to any accident that meets ALS criteria(rollover, head on, obviously confirmed pin, caller says its "bad" and so on) We remain in quarters for all of the 'minor mva, party to be checked out' etc.
That being said, it seems to run in cycles and with the majority of our incidents on Interstate Highway I think it coincides with personnel rotations within our State Police. We will go several months of going to every petty incident that there aren't even injuries at let alone entrapment or fluids but then you will go several months of driving on the highway and saying 'oh look another chunk out of the guardrail that wasn't there yesterday' or hearing EMS going and we don't so I guess it all evens out.
I believe the SP usually control the traffic with flares and cones hundreds of yards away and usually shut down the slow lane."
The worst part is that they(State Police) have jurisdiction over MVAs on the interstate so they could technically send us packing. It has never come to that, but there have been ****ing matches.
My personal opinion is if you want to call us, go ahead we will come out and do our job. If you don't, I'll stay in my warm bed or my air conditioning and read about it in the newspaper tomorrow.
Bottomline is if you are called, do your job professionally and remember.... everyone goes home!
02-28-2005, 05:27 PM #17
Mikey, extrication is handled by my EMS agency, been that way for past 20 years. Might change in the next few, but for now, it's theirs. They will roll 4 EMTS on an ambulance and another 4-6 on their "rescue" truck for the extrication and any scene lighting needs. They respond now to about 300 MVA's in their coverage area where no FD is requested. I'd say better than 95% of them are people who first called their lawyers, then called for help.
FTMPTB15, that would be correct, we do not provide BLS. Separate agency in town handles BLS along with Dive Team and extrication.
Gentlemen, please note, on better than 3/4 of the MVA's that EMS rolls on, they are cancelled and/or any treatment is refused. It plays heavily on their resources also as during our summer season, 3 or 4 calls at 1 time is fairly common. Having to respond to MVA's needlessly can take away care from others. Currently, FD responds to about 250 calls per year, EMS responds to over 1500. I do not have any numbers on how many MVA's the PD respond to that no FD or EMS is called at all, but I know they happen.
I also know that if/when the FD takes over extrication, our call volume will be increased and we will have to account and plan for that."This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
02-28-2005, 05:36 PM #18
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- North Carolina
Well considering ya'll don't provide any BLS.. it would make sense to only roll the FD on MVA/pin-in/major trauma/etc.
Just to clarify one thing.. we roll on most ALL MVA's that EMS rolls on.. there is the occassional one that is PD response only, in which they get on scene and request EMS non-emergency to check out the patients. Those we don't go on. Basically, if someone calls into dispatch and says everyone is out of the cars and it is only property damage... then PD is the only people that respond... and they'll usually go non-emergency.
02-28-2005, 06:17 PM #19
In my city, the fire department provides BLS first-response service as well as extrication. BLS/ALS transport is handled by a third-party, regional ambulance authority. So, if the ambulance rolls... so does the fire department. This should include all accidents except those where the caller is confirming no injuries.
Our only problem is that we're dispatched by the police department. 97% of the time, everything works out fine. But just this month, we had an injury accident that was reported as an accident with unknown injuries. We were not dispatched because PD wanted to send a patrol unit first to see if there were injuries.
02-28-2005, 06:29 PM #20
I think it's great that your firefighters are allowed to leave work for calls. And you're correct, leaving work for a call should be done within reason. But then again, I think that should be up to the individual firefighter/employee. Do they drop everything for every pull station at the elementary school caffeteria, for example? It's the same concept.
I wish local businessed would let our firefighters answer calls in the daytime. Our township recently passed an ordinance stating all volunteers who work for the township must be allowed to respond to fire calls while working. We got a kick out of it when our paid chief posted the memo for our paid firefighters...."Captain 1 to control, retone this as a structure and notify the fire chief...."
Safety is no accident.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)