Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 14 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 273
  1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber arhaney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wren, MS Until the forum gremlins pay a visit!
    Posts
    1,448

    Thumbs down No more using of 10 codes, by order of the feds?

    I just heard on our local news that all Fire, EMS and LEO's are supposed to stop using 10 codes, or face the loss of funding! Have I been in a coma, or under a rock? Someone please enlighten me!
    Chief
    Wren Volunteer Fire Department
    IACOJ
    Southern Division

    http://www.wrenfiredepartment.4t.com/

    In Memory of:
    FireFighter/Pilot James Archer
    1946-2005
    "Rest in peace James, you now have the ultimate set of wings on you."

    Thanks, LeuitEFDems


  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    953

    Default

    10-74


    ....................


  3. #3
    Forum Member LeuitEFDems's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Egremont, The Bizerkshires, MA
    Posts
    1,294

    Default

    That's news to me....How will they enforce this anyway? Are the feds gonna listen to every freq in the country?
    The comments made by me are my opinions only, not of the Fire and EMS services I am affiliated with.

    I have lost my mind..has anyone seen it? it's not worth much..but it's mine

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Richfield, NC
    Posts
    618

    Default

    I got a question that runs along this same topic I guess for dispatching medical calls does anyone elses dispatch give the response and have the problem a different code?
    ex: medic unit and station # Delta 33 (which might be Delta response for a traumatic injury which has the code number of 33)
    Our county is going to switch to this for no apparent reason and the way they are doing it now isn't a problem.

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    KENTUCKY
    Posts
    410

    Default

    one of those efforts of standardization: your 10-74 makes no sense to me. I'll just 10-7.

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber arhaney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wren, MS Until the forum gremlins pay a visit!
    Posts
    1,448

    Default

    I kinda understand the need for standards, but the way they explained it was that we would have to use plain ole english.......(Or southern drawl )!
    Chief
    Wren Volunteer Fire Department
    IACOJ
    Southern Division

    http://www.wrenfiredepartment.4t.com/

    In Memory of:
    FireFighter/Pilot James Archer
    1946-2005
    "Rest in peace James, you now have the ultimate set of wings on you."

    Thanks, LeuitEFDems

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber arhaney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wren, MS Until the forum gremlins pay a visit!
    Posts
    1,448

    Default A little more info...........

    From http://www.wtva.com/


    may have been interesting to listen to on the police shows, but all those coded messages between dispatchers and patrolmen are about to disappear.
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency has ordered police, fire and other emergency responders to phase out the codes infavor of plain speaking English.
    Departments who fail to comply will face major funding losses from the federal government.
    The changes must be in effect by October of next year.
    Chief
    Wren Volunteer Fire Department
    IACOJ
    Southern Division

    http://www.wrenfiredepartment.4t.com/

    In Memory of:
    FireFighter/Pilot James Archer
    1946-2005
    "Rest in peace James, you now have the ultimate set of wings on you."

    Thanks, LeuitEFDems

  8. #8
    Forum Member SafetyPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Makes sense to me. Everyone's always complaining about not being able to talk to each other...but even if the technology's there, if you use different terminology, its just as bad. That was one of the major reasons behind the advent of ICS...to get everyone talking the same language.

    I can understand keeping some of them for "sensitive" communications...like for us calling to request a PD Code 4 (which means to have them come secure the scene). But beyond that, I'm all in favor of plain language communications.
    Chris Gaylord
    Emergency Planner / Fire Captain, UC Santa Cruz FD

  9. #9
    Forum Member RLFD14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    562

    Default

    It's also nice to use a 10-code to advise you have a DOA or a suicide victim or other sensitive things. Even though the scanner hounds have got it figured out, it doesn't sound quite so harsh as saying "we got a dead body here, cancel the ambulance".

    But I also preach the advantages of speaking plain English. Tough to enforce, but I guess the time of the 10-code has passed... as said scanner hounds and the Internet and simply hearing various codes of all kinds used in context have taken away any masking of your comments and their intent.
    You only have to be stupid once to be dead permanently
    - - - - - -
    I A C O J

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber jaybird210's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    911 N. Sycamore St. Yep, that's really our address.
    Posts
    2,604

    Default

    I'm not that up on NIMS yet; is the elimination of 10-codes a component?
    Omnis Cedo Domus

    www.hinckleyfd.org

  11. #11
    Forum Member JackTee09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SC & NJ
    Posts
    630

    Default

    There are other changes coming as well. Thats just part of now being one happy FEMA family.
    Jacktee

    IACOJ

    "Insert quotation here."

  12. #12
    Forum Member TCFire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Lockport, New York
    Posts
    417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RLFD14
    It's also nice to use a 10-code to advise you have a DOA or a suicide victim or other sensitive things. Even though the scanner hounds have got it figured out, it doesn't sound quite so harsh as saying "we got a dead body here, cancel the ambulance".

    But I also preach the advantages of speaking plain English. Tough to enforce, but I guess the time of the 10-code has passed... as said scanner hounds and the Internet and simply hearing various codes of all kinds used in context have taken away any masking of your comments and their intent.
    Absolutely agree. The only 10 codes that we encourage our members to use are those concerning a suicide or a fatality. Other than those, just "speaka da English". Listening to the FDNY radio is enough to make your head spin!
    In Arduis Fidelis
    Faithful in Adversity

  13. #13
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Gaskin, FL
    Posts
    46

    Default

    NIMS (IS-700) if you applied for a grant last 2 yrs you said your were "nims compliant" nims says to use pain talk.

    but I dont think they can make you, only cut off money if you dont

  14. #14
    Early Adopter cozmosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,921

    Cool I don't think we have to worry about the radio cops

    Quote Originally Posted by fireflymedic
    but I dont think they can make you, only cut off money if you dont
    Somehow, I don't think the Feds will be monitoring every fire frequency to make sure folks use the correct verbage. Besides, even clear text can be confusing. Ask for a rescue company around here and you'll get a truck with tools and firefighters. Ask for it elsewhere and you might get an ambulance.

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    584

    Default

    More overthinking. If everyone knows your ten codes...what difference does it make. At least with a ten codes everyone who NEEDS to know what you said will know...no room for interpritation, mispronouncing etc....we use them and have no problems. I couldnt imagine everyone trying to speak plain English on everything, or enter a sentence for the incident disposition on the MDT or the dispatcher. If learning Ten codes is to tough, then.......well nuff said.

  16. #16
    Forum Member JackTee09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SC & NJ
    Posts
    630

    Default

    They don't have to monitor any frequencies. There are more than enough people willing to make a headline by saying "The Desktop Fire Company not in Compliance" - thus they have ears everywhere.
    Jacktee

    IACOJ

    "Insert quotation here."

  17. #17
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    ICS 100, at least in my area, states that all communications should be in "plain text" to alleviate any differences in codes. ICS 200 reinforces that also. ICS 700 also reinforces that. It's really nothing new, just not something a lot of people follow.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  18. #18
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LFD2203
    one of those efforts of standardization: your 10-74 makes no sense to me. I'll just 10-7.
    heheh..

  19. #19
    Forum Member tbonetrexler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Magnolia, Delaware US
    Posts
    527

    Wink

    I believe delaware was already headed to plain speech anyway. at least the chiefs were on the ball on THIS one JK




    Hey k3twpfire


    do u really need to supplement your committed personell and equipment (10-74)??
    Last edited by tbonetrexler; 08-23-2005 at 09:53 AM.

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Berks County, PA
    Posts
    629

    Default

    Among other things, NIMS provides for standardization of communications terminology and procedures using a plain english system for transmission of messages and standardization of apparatus and equipment designations using a plain english/resource typing system. So, eventually, we'll all know exactly what we're getting when we request "two type-1 engines" or "three type-2 tenders" or whatever else we need.

    Besides, there's no possible rational argument for the patchwork pseudo-system of communications procedures and terminology we have in this country. Everyone runs around doing their own thing and saying, "if they want to work with us, they can do it our way." That's a load of crap, and I don't mind telling you. While I don't necessarily see the need for everything included in the NIMS initiatives, standardized communication procedures and terminology are definitely things the emergency services need, no matter how much the emergency services think they don't.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. HOUSTON walked away from this contract
    By Firewalker1 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 12:34 AM
  2. A rare serious issue from me.........
    By StayBack500FT in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-09-2004, 02:44 AM
  3. New York State Reporting Codes
    By SFDny15 in forum New York
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-04-2002, 12:43 PM
  4. Fire Codes
    By dhavenshome in forum Meet and Greet
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2002, 12:39 AM
  5. A Resolution worth sharing
    By karolin in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-21-2002, 02:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts