I see lots of pictures of FF wearing their bunker pants while working in flood waters. Flooding has not been a problem for us (we live on a mountain), but why do they wear these heavy pants?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 21
Thread: Bunker Pants in Flood waters?
-
08-31-2005, 08:28 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Arizona
- Posts
- 481
Bunker Pants in Flood waters?
-
08-31-2005, 08:36 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 36
I would assume they havent had anybody sink in them yet. the only benifit is the added protection they offer from debris. Other than that they are a good way to get hurt in deeper water.
-
08-31-2005, 08:41 PM #3
I see this a lot we well, especially with all of the news about the hurricane. There is a lot of it going on. I think dfdems is right, protection from the debris.
"You don't know what a real family is until you spend a day at the firehouse"
Visit my "fire stories blog" here.
-
08-31-2005, 09:05 PM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Putnam County NY
- Posts
- 29
Obviously the flood waters were not over the rescurers heads so wearing bunkers while walking on the ground make sence
-
08-31-2005, 11:07 PM #5
"Don't fear the water... fear what's lurking in the water."
I would *definetly* want to wear my bunker pants/boots if there are snakes, etc. swimming around with me.
You do not sink with turnout gear. You lose mobility. In moving water, your ability to maneuver is severely restricted and then the gear becomes hazardous.
If you have not conducted in-water drills in turnout gear to feel what it is like, I highly recommend dedicating a set of old, cleaner gear (wash it several times) for pool play. You will see how buoyant gear is before it becomes waterlogged. You will also see how you can trap air in gear, boots, and helmet. If you have an old SCBA around, you can see what it would be like if you were to accidentally fall in while on air. It's surprisingly buoyant.
Obviously, have people standing by when you do this drill without a PFD. Otherwise, always wear PFD's around water.Last edited by Resq14; 08-31-2005 at 11:11 PM.
God Bless America! • Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
Google Is Your Friend™ • Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
Click this to search FH Forums!
-
08-31-2005, 11:15 PM #6
Most departments are not going to have nearly enough swiftwater, or flatwater gear like PFD's and dry suits for an operations like this, so the turnouts may provide some degree of protection from unseen debris. Infection from a laceration would be almost certain, and difficult to treat in that environment.
Definitely a bad idea in any area where you may encounter a current or drop off though. Treading water in turnouts would be exhausting.
I think it is important to note that we can't second guess these guys. They are dealing with their 9/11 scale incident right now, in that they are completely outside their normal capabilities, and desperately working to save what lives they still can.Never argue with an Idiot. They drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
IACOJ
-
09-01-2005, 05:40 AM #7
Yep I agree the gear is for protection same as the other gentleman have said.
" We are not extraordinary people , we are people caught in extraordinary situations. " Chapter 1 IFSTA Manual
-
09-01-2005, 09:37 AM #8
Originally Posted by mcaldwell
Everyone seems scared to say that the aftermath of this hurricane is equally bad or worse than 9/11. Why?? The events transpiring now are obviously much more devestating than 9/11. The reason that 9/11 happened is the only thing worse. New York lost a handful of large buildings and they evacuated lower Manahttan.
Today, CITIES are destroyed. CITIES are being evacuated. When it is all done with the death toll will be much higher as a result of this storm, I am sure. People still there are without food, water, and gasoline. Sound like 9/11?? No, that didn't happen.
I am not trying to minimize the tragic events of 9/11, but if everyone is honest about it, this is worse.
Edit - sorry for this having absolutely nithing to do with the topic. I would not wear turnouts in water over my boots.Robert Kramer
cell #901-494-9437
Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.
"Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.
Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.
-
09-01-2005, 11:38 AM #9
They probly dont have the option but we wear our wildland Advace pants (no liner of course) in such situations. Gives the abrasion/cut protection but doest absorb 20 pounds of water.
I cringe when I see guys working in bunkers and such in swiftwater rescues...
-Brotherhood: I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
-Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of you life is to serve as a warning to others.
-Adversity: That which does not kill me postpones the inevitable.
-Despair: Its always darkest before it goes Pitch Black.
-
09-01-2005, 11:45 AM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- Boston Ma
- Posts
- 156
I was one of you who used to think you would sink to the bottom, boy was I wrong. You will not sink, sure it will be harder to walk around but you dont have to worry about sinking. If I was to wear my bunker pants I would make sure the bottoms are tied off around my boot, dont want anything swimming up my pant leg!!
-
09-01-2005, 11:51 AM #11MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Springfield, Missouri
- Posts
- 176
My department has done some drills where we rescued some people from rivers and such and we had bunker pants and boots on but we also had PFDs on as well. It doesn't look like there is too much swiftwater there. Unless you are by one of their levees most of it is stagnant water. And from the majority of pictures I have seen, its only waist high or so where these people are walking. Like others have said, you lose mobility in bunkers but I think it would be ok, especially if that was all you had for protection. If that is the case, well, wear them.
Firefighter/EMT-B
IACOJ
-
09-01-2005, 12:14 PM #12
If I were faced with the situation, I too would be wearing my bunker pants for protection
The "water" is a concoction of water, hazardous materials, biohazards and debris. You cant see what's under 1 inch of it, let alone waist high or deeper.
God bless the Brothers and Sisters in the Gulf area.. the problems they are facing are Mount Everests in comparison to the anthills we are dealing with."The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
-
09-01-2005, 12:25 PM #13Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Memphis Tn,USA-now
- Posts
- 5,437
Last year,we went to Gilbertsville Ky and heard a lecture from a FDNY water rescue LT who told us and showed us pictures of a FF in full turnout gear floating in a pool for thirty minutes,no pain,no strain.
Now,in a current,you'd be concerned but in that situation,you'd be turning the call over to the swiftwater troops.
I used to work on the river out of Memphis-Wepfer and Economy Boat Store for reference,MemphisE34-and we wore Type V work vests which provide 17 pounds of flotation.Since a 180 lb man in water weighs about 12 or 13 lbs due to the body's natural flotation,this is considered an adequate margin.
Deckhands were required to wear them at all times on the boats while the pilots rarely wore them.Something about the license enabling them to walk on the water.
I never subscribed to that thought and when I moved here to Kentucky,I refused to wear a blue float jacket issued by the company I worked for as a pilot,instead wanting as much visibility as possible so I stuck with my blaze orange Mustang type float jacket from Stearns.
There's enough risk just walking the tow like falling overboard and getting crushed between barges,or run over by the tow,sucked into the wheels that I wanted as much flotation as I could get.Not gonna say I seen it all on the river,the bad stuff that can happen but I seen enough and lost friends in that line of work.
DO NOT TAKE CHANCES on the river.
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse
Last edited by doughesson; 09-01-2005 at 12:28 PM.
-
09-01-2005, 07:56 PM #14MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 326
343 firemen have not been killed during this disaster. You know, our brothers.
Originally Posted by MemphisE34a
But you make some good points.
-
09-02-2005, 03:41 AM #15
Okay, im starting the pool; how long until George W. declares war on mother nature?I am not trying to minimize the tragic events of 9/11, but if everyone is honest about it, this is worse.
A problem with flood waters is that you tend to loose all your utilities. Such as water, power and the most dangerous of all: sewage. Burst sewage pipes infect the flood waters, thats why so many people are ironically without any water to drink. A firefighter wading along cuts his leg on a piece of structural iron from a collapsed building. He doesnt take too much notice of it because there are many more people worse off then him. He walks into another pool of water which happens to be contaminated. A piece of excrement floats past and brushed against the cut in his leg.
I bet he will be feeling really stupid for not wearing those bunker pants in a couple of days time when the infection gets real bad and there is not enough aid for him to be treated.
"There are only two things that i know are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And im not so sure about the former."
For all the life of me, i cant see a firefighter going to hell. At least not for very long. We would end up putting out all the fires and annoying the devil too much.
-
09-02-2005, 10:13 AM #16
Originally Posted by erics99
Absolutely Eric. My point is that by saying this total situation is worse than 9/11 should not mean that you are taking anythign away from that day. Our 343 brothers are not forgotten by me or anyone else in the fire service, I am sure.
I just don't think it is wrong to say that this situation is worse in terms of a total event.Robert Kramer
cell #901-494-9437
Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.
"Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.
Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.
-
09-02-2005, 11:20 AM #17
Apples and oranges.Both horrendous tragedies. No need to compare them.
IAFF-IACOJ PROUD
-
09-02-2005, 02:21 PM #18
The 343 will never be forgotten by any of us. However, just because a large number of brothers were killed doesn't automatically make a disaster worse. It makes it worse for us... but the world is bigger than just us firefighters.
Originally Posted by erics99
As Memphis said, you have entire cities that practically don't exist anymore. In New Orleans, you have a city of 500,000 shut down. In the end, I think there will be more dead along the coast than there were in NYC.
-
09-02-2005, 08:34 PM #19
See above.
Originally Posted by MIKEYLIKESIT
God Bless America! • Remember all have given some, but some have given all.
Google Is Your Friend™ • Helpful forum tip - a "must see" if you're new here
Click this to search FH Forums!
-
09-02-2005, 09:01 PM #20
lets get this back on track ...........see above ....above ...............
IACOJ both divisions and PROUD OF IT !
Pardon me sir.. .....but I believe we are all over here !
ATTENTION ALL SHOPPERS: Will the dead horse please report to the forums.(thanks Motown)
RAY WAS HERE 08/28/05
LETHA' FOREVA' ! 010607
I'm sorry, I haven't been paying much attention for the last 3 hours.....what were we discussing?
"but I guarentee you I will FF your arse off" from>
http://www.firehouse.com/forums/show...60#post1137060post 115
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Anyone not use their suspenders on thier bunker pants?
By HeavyRescueTech in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 23Last Post: 04-11-2005, 03:45 PM -
Bunker pants for sale
By 911brad in forum Fire Explorer & Jr. FirefightingReplies: 0Last Post: 09-08-2004, 07:31 PM -
Integrated harness in bunker pants
By halign1075 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 01-08-2003, 11:47 AM -
Bunker pants and driving
By BillyMott in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 37Last Post: 12-12-2002, 07:13 PM -
SFFD bunker? pants?
By logan in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 29Last Post: 04-28-2002, 08:49 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



